Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, 75:103 | Cite as

Soil aggregation may be a relevant indicator of nutrient cation availability

  • Léa Bedel
  • Arnaud LegoutEmail author
  • Anne Poszwa
  • Gregory van der Heijden
  • Mélanie Court
  • Noémie Goutal-Pousse
  • Emmanuelle Montarges-Pelletier
  • Jacques Ranger
Research Paper

Abstract

Key message

Aggregation was studied in two acidic forest soils (NE France) to investigate the potential link between available Ca and Mg content and soil aggregate size distribution and properties. Clay content influenced the aggregation status while clay mineralogy influenced aggregate stability and dynamics. Aggregation status and reactivity of soil components contributed to the difference of exchangeable Ca and Mg content in topsoil between the two sites.

Context

Though nutrient fluxes are important to define forest soil chemical fertility, the quantification of nutrient reservoirs in the soils and their availability to tree uptake is essential. A thorough understanding of nutrient availability requires an investigation of nutrient location and distribution in the soil solid phase.

Aims

The general aim was to investigate the potential link between available Ca and Mg content and soil aggregate size distribution and their properties (chemical, physical, mineralogical).

Methods

Soil aggregates were separated according to three size classes (200–2000 μm; 50–200 μm; < 50 μm) in two forest soils of the Lorraine plateau (France), both classified as Luvisols ruptic. The physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties were measured for each aggregate class.

Results

We showed that the relative abundance of an intermediate aggregate class [200–50 μm] was relevant to explain the difference of exchangeable Ca and Mg between sites. These aggregates were the poorest in organic and reactive mineral components and were unstable, which may mitigate the retention of Ca and Mg by ion-exchange.

Conclusion

This study highlights the role of aggregation and reactivity of soil components as relevant determinants of cation availability to tree uptake in soils.

Keywords

Chemical fertility Calcium Magnesium Forest soil Aggregation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the ANR DST, the Région Lorraine, the Lhoist Group, the European Union via FEDER, the ONF, the LTSER France Zone Atelier Bassin Moselle and the Ministry of Research (through the EC2O and OteLo programs) for funding. These sites belong to the SOERE F-ORE-T which is supported annually by Ecofor, Allenvi, and the French national research infrastructure ANAEE-F. Léa Bedel PhD thesis was granted by INRA and Région Lorraine. The UR BEF is supported by a grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program (ANR-11-LABX-0002-01, Lab of Excellence ARBRE).

Author contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, data acquisition and analysis: Léa Bedel, Anne Poszwa, Arnaud Legout, Jacques Ranger

Mineralogy: Emmanuelle Montarges-Pelletier, Mélanie Court

Writing—original draft: Léa Bedel, Arnaud Legout, Anne Poszwa, Jacques Ranger

Writing—review and editing: all co-authors

Project administration, supervision, funding acquisition: Jacques Ranger, Anne Poszwa, Arnaud Legout

Funding information

ANR DST

Région Lorraine

Lhoist Group

European Union (via FEDER)

ONF

LTSER France Zone Atelier Bassin Moselle

French Ministry of Research (through the EC2O and OteLo programs)

Ecofor

Allenvi

ANAEE-F

INRA

ANR-11-LABX-0002-01, Lab of Excellence ARBRE

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13595_2018_782_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (935 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 934 kb)
13595_2018_782_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (643 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 643 kb)
13595_2018_782_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (688 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 687 kb)
13595_2018_782_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (653 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 653 kb)
13595_2018_782_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (517 kb)
ESM 5 (PDF 516 kb)
13595_2018_782_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (332 kb)
ESM 6 (PDF 332 kb)

References

  1. Adesodun J, Adeyemi E, Oyegoke C (2007) Distribution of nutrient elements within water-stable aggregates of two tropical agro-ecological soils under different land uses. Soil Tillage Res 92:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreux F, Bruckert S, Correa A, Souchier B (1980) Sur une méthode de fractionnement physique et chimique des agrégats des sols : origines possibles de la matière organique des fractions obtenues. C R Acad Sci 381–384Google Scholar
  3. Baize D, Girard MC (2008) Référentiel pédologique - Association française pour l'étude du sol (AFES). ISBN: 978–2–7592-0186-0. Edition QuaeGoogle Scholar
  4. Balesdent J (1996) The significance of organic separates to carbon dynamics and its modelling in some cultivated soils. Eur J Soil Sci 47:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balesdent J, Petraud JP, Feller C (1991) Effets des ultrasons sur la distribution granulométrique des matières organiques des sols. Science du Sol (1984) 29:95–106Google Scholar
  6. Balesdent J, Besnard E, Arrouays D, Chenu C (1998) The dynamics of carbon in particle-size fractions of soil in a forest-cultivation sequence. Plant Soil 201:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balesdent J, Chenu C, Balabane M (2000) Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage. Soil Tillage Res 53:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bedel L, Poszwa A, van der Heijden G, Legout A, Aquilina L, Ranger J (2016) Unexpected calcium sources in deep soil layers in low-fertility forest soils identified by strontium isotopes (Lorraine plateau, eastern France). Geoderma 264:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berthelin J, Munier-Lamy C, Portal JM, Toutain F (1999) Physico-chemical characterization, reactivity and biodegradability of soil natural organic matter. In: Baveye P, Block J-C, Goncharuk V (eds) Bioavailability of organic xenobiotics in the environment. NATO ASI series. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 251–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billings S (2006) Soil organic matter dynamics and land use change at a grassland/forest ecotone. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2934–2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bottinelli N, Capowiez Y, Ranger J (2014) Slow recovery of earthworm populations after heavy traffic in two forest soils in northern France. Appl Soil Ecol 73:130–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Britzke D, da Silva L, Moterle D, dos Santos Rheinheimer D, Bortoluzzi E (2012) A study of potassium dynamics and mineralogy in soils from subtropical Brazilian lowlands. J Soils Sediments 12:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Capowiez Y, Boizard H, Bottinelli N, Ranger J (2015) Capacity of earthworms to restructure compacted soils, Workshop Regeneration of Compacted Forest Soils, Osnabrück, (Germany). 29 Octobre 2015Google Scholar
  15. Carignan J, Hild P, Mevelle G, Morel J, Yeghicheyan D (2001) Routine analyses of trace elements in geological samples using flow injection and low pressure online liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS: a study of geochemical reference materials BR, DR-N, UB-N, AN-G and GH. Geostand Newslett 25:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen BT (1992) Physical fractionation of soil and organic matter in primary particle size and density separates, advances in soil science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–90Google Scholar
  17. Ciesielski H, Sterckeman T, Santerne M, Willery JP (1997) Determination of cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in soils by means of cobalt hexamine trichloride. Effects of experimental conditions, 17. EDP Sciences, Les UlisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark G, Sale T, Tang C (2010) Organic amendments initiate the formation and stabilization of macroaggregates in a high clay sodic soil. Aust J Soil Res 47:770–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernández-Ugalde O, Barré P, Hubert F, Virto I, Girardin C, Ferrage E, Caner L, Chenu C (2013) Clay mineralogy differs qualitatively in aggregate-size classes: clay-mineral-based evidence for aggregate hierarchy in temperate soils. Eur J Soil Sci 64:410–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Girard MC, Walter C, Rémy J-C, Berthelin J, Morel J-L (2011) Sols et environement. EAN13: 9782100549009. DunodGoogle Scholar
  21. Goutal N, Lamy F, Ranger J, Boivin P (2016) Structural damage and recovery determined by the colloidal constituents in two forest soils compacted by heavy traffic. Eur J Soil Sci 67:160–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene-Kelly R (1953) Identification of Montmorillonoïds in clays. J Soil Sci 4:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hathaway J (1958) Clay Miner:15(8)Google Scholar
  24. Haynes R, Naidu R (1998) Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Ogdahl M, Zytkowiak R, Hale C, Karolewski P (2006) Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology 87:2288–2297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffmann U, Klemen E (1950) Loss of exchangeability of lithium ions in bentonite on heating. Z Anorg Allg Chem 262:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horn R (1990) Aggregate characterization as compared to soil bulk properties. Soil Tillage Res 17:265–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeanroy E (1983) Diagnostic des formes du fer dans les pédogénèses tempérées. Université Nancy, Nancy 168p + annexes ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiménez JJ, Lorenz K, Lal R (2011) Organic carbon and nitrogen in soil particle-size aggregates under dry tropical forests from Guanacaste, Costa Rica—implications for within-site soil organic carbon stabilization. CATENA 86:178–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jolivet C, Arrouays D, Leveque J, Andreux F, Chenu C (2003) Organic carbon dynamics in soil particle-size separates of sandy Spodosols when forest is cleared for maize cropping. Eur J Soil Sci 54:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Julien JL, Charlet L, Dambrine E, Delvaux B, Dufey J, Fardeau JC, Le Cadre E, Tessier D (2007) L’acidification des sols. chap 23. In: Girard MC, Walter C, Rémy JC, Berthelin J, Morel JL (eds) Sols et Environnement. Dunod Ed, Paris, pp 516–537Google Scholar
  32. Kessler J, Chambraud A (1986) La météo de la France. JC Lattès, Paris 312ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhn NJ, Armstrong EK, Ling AC, Connolly KL, Heckrath G (2012) Interrill erosion of carbon and phosphorus from conventionally and organically farmed Devon silt soils. CATENA 91:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kunze GW, Dixon JB (1986) Pretreatment for mineralogical analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 1—Physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, p 91–100Google Scholar
  35. Legout A, Hansson K, Van Der Heijden G, Laclau J-P, Augusto L, Ranger J (2014) Chemical fertility of forest soils: basic concepts. Revue Forestière Française LXVI:413–424Google Scholar
  36. Leguédois S, Le Bissonnais Y (2004) Size fractions resulting from an aggregate stability test, Interrill detachment and transport. Earth Surf Process Landf 29:1117–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehra OP, Jackson ML (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clay Clay Miner 7:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moni C, Rumpel C, Virto I, Chabbi A, Chenu C (2010) Relative importance of sorption versus aggregation for organic matter storage in subsoil horizons of two contrasting soils. Eur J Soil Sci 61:958–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moni C, Derrien D, Hatton PJ, Zeller B, Kleber M (2012) Density fractions versus size separates: does physical fractionation isolate functional soil compartments? Biogeosciences 9:5181–5197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oades JM (1984) Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management. Plant Soil 76(1–3):319–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oades J, Waters A (1991) Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Aust J Soil Res 29:815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piccolo A, Pietramellara G, Mbagwu JSC (1997) Use of humic substances as soil conditioners to increase aggregate stability. Geoderma 75:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qin S, Hu C, He X, Dong W, Cui J, Wang Y (2010) Soil organic carbon, nutrients and relevant enzyme activities in particle-size fractions under conservational versus traditional agricultural management. Appl Soil Ecol 45:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reichert JM, Norton LD, Favaretto N, Huang C-h, Blume E (2009) Settling velocity, aggregate stability, and interrill erodibility of soils varying in clay mineralogy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1369–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robert M, Tessier D (1974) Méthode de préparation des argiles des sols pour des études minéralogiques. Annales Agronomiques 25:859–882Google Scholar
  46. Robin V, Tertre E, Beaufort D, Regnault O, Sardini P, Descostes M (2015) Ion exchange reactions of major inorganic cations (H+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+) on beidellite: experimental results and new thermodynamic database. Toward a better prediction of contaminant mobility in natural environments. Appl Geochem 59:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, Kleber M, Kogel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Manning DAC, Nannipieri P, Rasse DP, Weiner S, Trumbore SE (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singer A (1994) Clay mineralogy as affecting dispersivity and crust formation in Aridisols, Transactions of the 15th World Congress of Soil Science. Acapulco, Mexico, pp 37–46Google Scholar
  49. Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stemmer M, Gerzabek MH, Kandeler E (1998) Organic matter and enzyme activity in particle-size fractions of soils obtained after low-energy sonication. Soil Biol Biochem 30:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stern R, Ben-Hur M, Shainberg I (1991) Clay mineralogy effect on rain infiltration, seal formation and soil losses. Soil Sci 152(6):455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tamura (1958) Identification of clays minerals from acid soils. J Soil Sci 9:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Flessa H, Guggenberger G, Matzner E, Marschner B (2007) SOM fractionation methods: relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2183–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. WRB., I.W.G (2014) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World soil resources reports no. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  55. Zelazny L, Jardine P (1989) Surface reactions of aqueous aluminum species. In: Sposito G (ed) The environmental chemistry of aluminum. Lewis Publishers, New-York, p 147–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inra, BEFNancyFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LIECUniversité de LorraineNancyFrance
  3. 3.ONF, Département RDIVillers-lès-NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations