Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, 75:93 | Cite as

Xylogenesis of compression and opposite wood in mountain pine at a Mediterranean treeline

  • Caterina Palombo
  • Patrick FontiEmail author
  • Bruno Lasserre
  • Paolo Cherubini
  • Marco Marchetti
  • Roberto Tognetti
Research Paper

Abstract

Key message

Comparisons between compression and opposite wood formation in prostrating Pinus mugo indicate that the secondary meristem can produce more tracheids with thicker walls by also increasing the number of contemporaneously differentiating cells, rather than only increasing the duration or the rate of cell formation.

Context

Although cambium tissues within a stem experience the same climatic conditions, the resulting wood structure and properties can strongly differ. Assessing how meristem differently regulates wood formation to achieve different anatomical properties can help understanding the mechanisms of response and their plasticity.

Aims

We monitored the formation of compression (CW) and opposite (OW) wood within the same stems to understand whether achieved differences in wood structure are caused by modifications in the process of cell formation.

Methods

We collected weekly microcores of compression and opposite wood from the curved stem of ten treeline prostrating mountain pines (Pinus mugo Turra ssp. mugo) at the Majella massif in Central Italy.

Results

Results indicate that cambium formed approximately 1.5 times more cells in CW than OW, despite that CW cell differentiation only extended 2 weeks longer and the residence time of CW cells in the wall-thickening phase was only 20% longer. Differences in their formation were thus mainly related to both the rates and the width of the enlarging and wall-thickening zones (i.e., the number of cells simultaneously under differentiation) and less to duration of cell formation.

Conclusion

We conclude that to achieve such a different wood structures, the efficiency of the secondary meristem, in addition of altered rate of cell division and differentiation, can also modify the width of the developing zones. Thus, deciphering what rules this width is important to link environmental conditions with productivity.

Keywords

Mediterranean mountains Pinus mugo Turra subsp. mugo Xylogenesis Cell differentiation Intra-annual dynamics Majella massif 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Majella National Park and Ufficio Territoriale per la Biodiversità di Pescara (Carabinieri Forestali) for permission to access the sites and to core the trees. We are grateful to Luciano Schiazza, Giuseppe D’Ascanio, Gianni Blasioli, Roberto Lezzi (Caramanico Terme) for their support in fieldwork, and to Prof. Stefania Scippa and Dr. Dalila Trupiano for providing laboratory equipment, and Dr. Holger Gärtner and Prof. Fritz Schweingruber for valuable suggestions and fruitful discussion.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation SNF (projects CLIMWOOD-160077 and LOTFOR-150205).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13595_2018_773_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25.6 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 26202 kb)

References

  1. Aloni R, Zimmermann MH (1983) The control of vessel size and density along the plant axis-a new hypothesis. Differentiation 24:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anfodillo T, Deslauriers A, Menardi R, Tedoldi L, Petit G, Rossi S (2012) Widening of xylem conduits in a conifer tree depends on the longer time of cell expansion downwards along the stem. J Exp Bot 63:837–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cailleret M, Jansen S, Robert EMR, Desoto L, Aakala T, Antos JA, Beikircher B, Bigler C, Bugmann H, Caccianiga M, Čada V, Camarero JJ, Cherubini P, Cochard H, Coyea MR, Čufar K, Das AJ, Davi H, Delzon S, Dorman M, Gea-Izquierdo G, Gillner S, Haavik LJ, Hartmann H, Hereş A-M, Hultine KR, Janda P, Kane JM, Kharuk VI, Kitzberger T, Klein T, Kramer K, Lens F, Levanic T, Linares Calderon JC, Lloret F, Lobo-Do-Vale R, Lombardi F, López Rodríguez R, Mäkinen H, Mayr S, Mészáros I, Metsaranta JM, Minunno F, Oberhuber W, Papadopoulos A, Peltoniemi M, Petritan AM, Rohner B, Sangüesa-Barreda G, Sarris D, Smith JM, Stan AB, Sterck F, Stojanović DB, Suarez ML, Svoboda M, Tognetti R, Torres-Ruiz JM, Trotsiuk V, Villalba R, Vodde F, Westwood AR, Wyckoff PH, Zafirov N, Martínez-Vilalta J (2017) A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality. Glob Chang Biol 23:1675–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castagneri D, Fonti P, von Arx G, Carrer M (2017) How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from long-term intra-ring anatomy in Picea abies. Ann Bot 19:1011–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cocozza C, Palombo C, Tognetti R, La Porta N, Anichini M, Giovannelli A, Emiliani G (2016) Monitoring intra-annual dynamics of wood formation with microcores and dendrometers in Picea abies at two different altitudes. Tree Physiol 36:832–846.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Côté WA, Day AC, Timell TE (1968) Studies on compression wood VII. Distribution of lignin in normal and compression wood of tamarack Larix laricina (Du Roi, K. Koch). Wood Sci Technol 2:13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuny HE, Rathgeber CBK, Lebourgeois F, Fortin M, Fournier M (2012) Life strategies in intra-annual dynamics of wood formation: example of three conifer species in a temperate forest in north-East France. Tree Physiol 32:612–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuny HE, Rathgeber CBK, Kiessé TS, Hartmann FP, Barbeito I, Fournier M (2013) Generalized additive models reveal the intrinsic complexity of wood formation dynamics. J Exp Bot 64:1983–1994.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert057 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuny HE, Rathgeber CBK, Frank D, Fonti P, Fournier M (2014) Kinetics of tracheid development explain conifer tree-ring structure. New Phytol 203:1231–1241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12871 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Deslauriers A, Fonti P, Rossi S, Rathgeber CBK, Gričar J (2017) Ecophysiology and plasticity of wood and phloem formation. In: Amoroso M, Daniels L, Bäker P, Camarero J (eds) Dendroecology. Springer Ecological Series, 231Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson LA (2001) Lignification and lignin topochemistry - an ultrastructural view. Phytochemistry 57:859–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donaldson LA, Singh AP, Yoshinaga A, Takabe K (1999) Lignin distribution in mild compression wood of Pinus radiata D. Don. Can J Bot 77:41–50Google Scholar
  13. Donaldson LA, Grace JC, Downes G (2004) Within tree variation in anatomical properties of compression wood in radiata pine. IAWA J 25:253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Du S, Yamamoto F (2007) An overview of the biology of reaction wood formation. J Integr Plant Biol 49:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eilmann B, Zweifel R, Buchmann N, Fonti P, Rigling A (2009) Drought-induced adaptation of the xylem in Scots pine and pubescent oak. Tree Physiol 29:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fonti P, Jansen S (2012) Xylem plasticity in response to climate. New Phytol 195:734–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fonti P, Von Arx G, García-González I, Eilmann B, Sass-Klaassen U, Gärtner H, Eckstein D (2010) Studying global change through investigation of the plastic responses of xylem anatomy in tree rings. New Phytol 185:42–53.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03030.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonti P, Heller O, Cherubini P, Rigling A, Arend M (2013) Wood anatomical responses of oak saplings exposed to air warming and soil drought. Plant Biol 15:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankenstein C, Eckstein D, Schmitt U (2005) The onset of cambium activity – a matter of agreement? Dendrochronologia 23:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galle A, Esper J, Feller U, Ribas-Carbo M, Fonti P (2010) Responses of wood anatomy and carbon isotope composition of Quercus pubescens saplings subjected to two consecutive years of summer drought. Ann For Sci 67:809–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardiner B, Macdonald E (2005) Compression wood in conifers – the characterization of its formation and its relevance to timber quality, in European Union – Framework Programme FP5 – Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources, QLRT-2000-00177, pp 376Google Scholar
  22. Gričar J, Čufar K (2008) Seasonal dynamics of phloem and xylem formation in silver fir and Norway spruce as affected by drought. Russ J Plant Physiol 55:538–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gričar J, Zupančič M, Čufar K, Koch G, Schmitt U, Oven P (2006) Effect of local heating and cooling on cambial activity and cell differentiation in the stem of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Ann Bot 97:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gričar J, Zupančič M, Čufar K, Oven P (2007) Regular cambial activity and xylem and phloem formation in locally heated and cooled stem portions of Norway spruce. Wood Sci Technol 41:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groover A (2016) Gravitropisms and reaction woods of forest trees – evolution, functions and mechanisms. New Phytol 211:790–802.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13968 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinrich I, Gärtner H (2008) Variations in tension wood of two broad-leaved tree species in response to different mechanical treatments: implications for dendrochronology and mass movement studies. Int J Plant Sci 169:928–936.  https://doi.org/10.1086/589695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Körner C (2006) Significance of temperature in plant life. In: Morison JIL, Morecroft MD (eds) Plant growth and climate change. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, pp 48–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lehner G, Lütz C (2003) Photosynthetic functions of cembran pines and dwarf pines during winter at timberline as regulated by different temperatures, snow cover and light. J Plant Physiol 160:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lempereur M, Martin-StPaul NK, Damesin C, Joffre R, Ourcival JM, Rocheteau A, Rambal S (2015) Growth duration is a better predictor of stem increment than carbon supply in a Mediterranean oak forest: implications for assessing forest productivity under climate change. New Phytol 207:579–590.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13400 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Moser L, Fonti P, Buentgen U, Franzen J, Esper J, Luterbacher J, Frank D (2010) Timing and duration of European larch growing season along altitudinal gradients in the Swiss Alps. Tree Physiol 30:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nanayakkara B, Manley-Harris M, Suckling ID, Donaldson LA (2005) Chemical characterisation of compression wood in Pinus radiata. In: 13th International symposium on wood and pulping chemistry. Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  32. Nanayakkara B, Manley-Harris M, Suckling ID, Donaldson LA (2009) A quantitative chemical indicator of compression wood severity. Holzforschung 63:431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piermattei A, Crivellaro A, Carrer M, Urbinati C (2015) The “blue ring”: anatomy and formation hypothesis of a new tree-ring anomaly in conifers. Trees 29:613–620.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1107-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prislan P, Schmitt U, Koch G, Gričar J, Čufar K (2011) Seasonal ultrastructural changes in the cambial zone of beech (Fagus sylvatica) grown at two different altitudes. IAWA J 32:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pya N, Wood SN (2015) Shape constrained additive models. Stat Comput 25:543.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9448-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  37. Rathgeber CBK (2012) Cambial activity and wood formation: data manipulation, visualisation and analysis using R. R package version 1.4–1Google Scholar
  38. Rathgeber C, Cuny H, Fonti P (2016) Biological basis of wood formation: a crash course. Front Plant Sci 7:734.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.0073 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossi S, Anfodillo T, Menardi R (2006a) Trephor: a new tool for sampling microcores from tree stems. IAWA J 27:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T (2006b) Assessment of cambial activity and xylogenesis by microsampling tree species: an example at the alpine timberline. IAWA J 27:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T, Carrer M (2008a) Age-dependent xylogenesis in timberline conifers. New Phytol 177:199–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Gričar J, Seo JW, Rathgeber CBK, Anfodillo T, Morin H, Levanic T, Oven P, Jalkanen R (2008b) Critical temperatures for xylogenesis in conifers of cold climates. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:696–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossi S, Morin H, Tremblay MJ (2010) Growth and productivity of black spruce (Picea mariana) belonging to the first cohort in stands within and north of the commercial forest in Quebec, Canada. Ann For Sci 67:807.  https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rossi S, Morin H, Deslauriers A (2012) Causes and correlations in cambium phenology: towards an integrated framework of xylogenesis. J Exp Bot 63:2117–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rossi S, Anfodillo T, Čufar K, Cuny HE, Deslauriers A, Fonti P, Frank D, Gričar J, Gruber A, Huang J, Jyske T, Kašpar J, King G, Krause C, Liang E, Mäkinen H, Morin H, Nöjd P, Oberhuber W, Prislan P, Rathgeber CB, Saracino A, Swidrak I, Treml V (2016) Pattern of xylem phenology in conifers of cold ecosystems at the Northern Hemisphere. Glob Chang Biol 22:3804–3813.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13317 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schweingruber FH (2006) Wood structure and environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh AP, Donaldson LA (1999) Ultrastructure of tracheid cell walls in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) mild compression wood. Can J Bot 77:32–40Google Scholar
  48. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, eds MHL (2007) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climate change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 996Google Scholar
  49. Timell TE (1973) Ultrastructure of the dormant and active cambial zones and the dormant phloem associated with formation of normal and compression woods in Picea abies (L.) Karst. Technical publication n.96. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Siracuse, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Timell TE (1986a) The structure of compression wood. In Compression Wood in Gymnosperms, vol 1. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Timell TE (1986b) Chemical properties of compression wood. In Compression Wood in Gymnosperms, vol 1. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Villalobos DP, Díaz-Moreno SM, Said E-SS, Cañas RA, Osuna D, Van Kerckhoven SHE, Bautista R, Claros MG, Cánovas FM, Cantón FR (2012) Reprogramming of gene expression during compression wood formation in pine: coordinated modulation of S-adenosylmethionine, lignin and lignan related genes. BMC Plant Biol 12:100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar
  54. Yamamoto H, Okuyama T, Yoshida M, Sugiyama K (1991) Generation process of growth stresses in cell walls. III. Growth stress in compression wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:94–100Google Scholar
  55. Yamashita S, Yoshida M, Takayama S, Okuyama T (2007) Stem-righting mechanism in gymnosperm trees deduced from limitations in compression wood development. Ann Bot 99:487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yumoto M, Ishida S, Fukazawa K (1983) Studies on the formation and structure of compression wood cells induced by artificial inclination in young trees of Picea glauca. IV. Gradation of the severity of compression wood tracheids. Research Bulletins of the College Experiment Forests Hokkaido University 40: 409Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Bioscienze e TerritorioUniversità degli Studi del MolisePescheItaly
  2. 2.Snow and Landscape ResearchWSL Swiss Federal Institute for ForestBirmensdorfSwitzerland
  3. 3.Dipartimento Agricoltura, Ambiente e AlimentiUniversità degli Studi del MoliseCampobassoItaly
  4. 4.The EFI Project Centre on Mountain Forests (MOUNTFOR), Edmund Mach FoundationSan Michele all’AdigeItaly

Personalised recommendations