Optimal management of larch (Larix olgensis A. Henry) plantations in Northeast China when timber production and carbon stock are considered

  • Wei Peng
  • Timo Pukkala
  • Xingji Jin
  • Fengri LiEmail author
Research Paper


Key message

The optimal management of larch (Larix olgensis) plantations in Northeast China consisted of 2 or 3 thinnings and a rotation length of 55–61 years when economic profitability, wood production, and carbon sequestration were simultaneously maximized. Wood production ranged from 5.4 to 11.7 m3 ha−1 a−1, depending on site quality.


L. olgensis is an important tree species in the northeast forest region of China, playing a significant role in the establishment of fast-growing and high-yielding plantation forests in China. However, the management of these plantations has not been optimized in previous studies.


The objective of the study was to find the optimal combinations of thinning times, thinning types, and rotation length for L. olgensis stands when both timber production and carbon stock are considered.


First, a growth and yield model was developed to simulate the dynamics of larch plantations. Then, the models were linked with the Hooke and Jeeves optimization algorithm to optimize forest management for two commonly used planting densities and three site qualities.


Two thinnings were found to be suitable for larch plantations when the stand density at 10 years was 2125 trees/ha (corresponding to a planting density of 2500 trees/ha) whereas three thinnings were recommended when the density at 10 years was 2800 trees/ha (planting density of 3300 trees/ha). When the stand density was 2800 trees/ha, the optimal rotation length was 61, 58, and 55 years for site indices (SI) 12, 16, and 20 m (dominant height at 30 years), respectively. The mean annual wood production was 5.4 m3 ha−1 for SI 12, 8.2 m3 ha−1 for SI 16, and 11.7 m3 ha−1 for SI 20. The results were nearly the same for the lower initial stand density. The better the site quality of the stand, the earlier the thinnings were conducted.


In multifunctional forestry, optimal rotation lengths of larch plantations were 10–20 years longer than advised in the current silvicultural recommendations for Northeast China.


Growth and yield model Net present value Multifunctional forestry Multi-objective optimization 



The authors warmly thank Dr. Lihu Dong for his help in developing the individual tree growth model. The authors also thank the teachers and students of the Department of Forest Management, Northeast Forestry University (NEFU), China, who provided and collected the data for this study.


The research was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFD0600402), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600511), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of the People’s Republic of China (2572017CA04).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13595_2018_739_MOESM1_ESM.rar (30 kb)
ESM 1 (RAR 29 kb)


  1. Avery TE, Burkhart HE (1994) Forest measurements, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (1993) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken 639 p. ISBN 0-471-55793-5Google Scholar
  3. Brodie JD, Adams DM, Kao C (1978) Analysis of economic impacts on thinning and rotation for Douglas-fir, using dynamic programming. For Sci 24:513–522Google Scholar
  4. Chen DS (2010) The optimal management mode of large and medium diameter timber in larch plantation. Ph.D thesis, Northeast Forestry University. in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  5. Clutter JL, Forston JC, Piennar LV, Brister GH, Bailey RL (1983) Timber management—a quantitative approach. Wiley, New York, p 333Google Scholar
  6. de Miguel S, Mehtätalo L, Shater Z, Kraid B, Pukkala T (2012) Evaluating marginal and conditional predictions of taper models in the absence of calibration data? Can J For Res 42:1383–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de-Miguel S, Pukkala T, Yesil A (2014) Integrating pine honeydew honey into forest management optimization. Eur J For Res 133(423):432Google Scholar
  8. Dong LH, Zhang LJ, Li FR (2016) Developing two additive biomass equations for three coniferous plantation species in Northeast China. Forests 7:136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elfving B, Kiviste A (1997) Construction of site index equations for Pinus sulvestris L. using permanent plots data in Sweden. For Ecol Manag 98:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haight RG, Monserud RA (1990) Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands. II. Effects of decision criteria. For Sci 36:125–144Google Scholar
  11. Haight RG, Brodie JD, Dahms WG (1985) A dynamic programming algorithm for optimization of lodgepole pine management. For Sci 31:321–330Google Scholar
  12. Heagerty PJ, Zheng Y (2005) Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics 61:92–105CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heiðarsson L, Pukkala T (2011) Taper functions for lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Siberian larch (Larix sibirica) in Iceland. Icel Agric Sci 24:3–11Google Scholar
  14. Hooke R, Jeeves TA (1961) “Direct search” solution of numerical and statistical problems. J Assoc Comput Mach 8:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyytiäinen K (2003) Integrating economics and ecology in stand-level timber production. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 908: 42p.+ ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O, Valsta L (2005) Optimum juvenile density, harvesting and stand structure in even-aged Scots pine stands. For Sci 51:120–133Google Scholar
  17. Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Li FR, Dong LH (2017) Optimal management of Korean pine plantations in multifunctional forestry. J For Res 28:1027–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ju WZ (2010) Age effects on stand biomass and carbon storage of Larix olgensis plantation: a case study in DongzheLengHe forest station of Yichun City. Master thesis, Beijing Forestry University. in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  19. Kozak A (2004) My last words on taper equations. For Chron 80:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lei XD, Yu L, Hong LX (2016) Climate-sensitive integrated stand growth model (CS-ISGM) of changbai larch (Larix olgensis ) plantations. For Ecol Manag 376:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Li CS, Li CC, Zhang YC (1994) Study on the rotation length of larch plantation. Sci For logging 4:1–6 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Li M, Li Y, Man DB, Deng BZ, Pan JZ, Yao JQ, Zhu YJ, Zou DD (1997) A computer system of the stand silviculture models of building wood for Larix olgensis plantation. J Northeast Forestry Univ 25:26–29 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Liski J, Pussinen A, Pingoud K, Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T (2001) Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration? Can J For Res 31:2004–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu W, Li FR (2010) Distance-independent individual-tree growth models of Larix olgensis plantation. J Northeast Forestry Univ 38:24–27 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Mehtätalo L, de-Miguel S, Gregoire TG (2015) Modelling height-diameter curves for prediction. Can J For Res 45:826–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miina J, Pukkala T, Hotanen JP, Salo K (2010) Optimizing the joint production of timber and bilberries. For Ecol Manag 259:2065–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitscherlich EA (1919) Vorschriften zur Anstellung von Feldversuchen in der landwirtschaftlichen Praxis. P. Parey, Berlin 32 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Muchiri MN, Pukkala T, Miina J (2002) Optimising the management of maize—Grevillea robusta fields in Kenya. Agrofor Syst 56:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Näslund M (1937) Skogsförsöksanstaltens gallringsförsök i tallskog (Forest research intitute’s thinning experiments in Scots pine forests). Meddelanden frstatens skogsförsöksanstalt Häfte 29 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  30. Niinimäki S, Tahvonen O, Mäkelä A, Linkosalo T (2013) On the economics of Norway spruce stands and carbon storage. Can J For Res 43:637–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olschewski R, Benítez PC (2010) Optimizing joint production of timber and carbon sequestration of afforestation projects. J For Econ 16:1–10Google Scholar
  32. Palahí M, Pukkala T (2003) Optimising the management of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in Spain based on individual-tree models. Ann For Sci 60:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palahí M, Pukkala T, Bonet JA, Calinas C, Fischer CR, Martinez de Aragon JR (2009) Effect of the inclusion of mushroom values on the optimal management of even-aged pine stands of Catalonia. For Sci 55:503–511Google Scholar
  34. Pasalodos-Tato M (2010) Optimising forest stand management in Galicia, north-western Spain. Dissertationes Forestales 102:1–52Google Scholar
  35. Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T (2007) Optimising the management of even-aged Pinus sylvestris L. stands in Galicia, north-western Spain. Ann For Sci 64:787–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Fernández Núñez E, Mosquera Losada MR (2009) Optimal management of Pinus radiata silvopastoral systems established on abandoned agricultural land in Galicia (north-western Spain). Silva Fenn 43:831–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Calama R, Cañellas I, Sánches-González M (2016) Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered. Eur J For Res 135:607–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pihlainen S, Tahvonen O, Niinimäki S (2014) The economics of timber and bioenergy production and carbon storage in Scots pine stands. Can J For Res 44:1091–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pingoud K, Pohjola J, Valsta L (2010) Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. Silva Fennica 44:155–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pohjola J, Valsta L (2007) Carbon credits and management of Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. Forest Policy Econ 9:789–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pukkala T (2009) Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fennica 43:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pukkala T (2011) Optimising forest management in Finland with carbon subsidies and taxes. Forest Policy Econ 13:425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pukkala T (2017) Optimal crosscutting: any effect on optimal stand management? Eur J For Res 136:583–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pukkala T, Miina J (1997) A method for stochastic multiobjective optimization of stand management. For Ecol Manag 98:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O, Salo K, Hotanen JP (2011) A multifunctional comparison of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in a boreal region. Can J For Res 41:851–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2014a) Stand management optimization—the role of simplifications. Forest Ecosystems 1:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2014b) Optimizing any-aged management of mixed boreal under residual basal area constraints. J For Res 25:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2015) Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments? Forest Ecosystems 2:2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roise JP (1984) A nonlinear programming approach to stand optimization. For Sci 32(32):735–748Google Scholar
  50. Roise JP (1986) An approach for optimizing residual diameter class distribution when thinning even-aged stands. For Sci 32:871–881Google Scholar
  51. Solberg B, Haight RG (1991) Analysis of optimal economic management regimes for Picea abies stands using a stage-structured optimal-control model. Scand J For Res 6:559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. State Forestry Administration (2014) The eighth forest resource survey report.
  53. Valsta LT (1990) A comparison of numerical methods for optimizing even aged stand management. Can J For Res 20(7):961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valsta L (1992) An optimization model for Norway spruce management based on individual-tree growth models. Acta For Fenn 232:20 pGoogle Scholar
  55. Vanclay JK (1994) Modelling forest growth and yield: applications to mixed tropical forests. CABI, Walingford 312 pp. ISBN 0-85198-913-6Google Scholar
  56. Vauhkonen J, Pukkala T (2016) Selecting trees to be harvested based on the relative value growth of the remaining trees. Eur J For Res 135:581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vettenranta J, Miina J (1999) Optimizing thinnings and rotation of Scots pine and Norway spruce mixtures. Silva Fenn 33:73–84Google Scholar
  58. Yasaka M, Oono Y, Nakagawa M, Fukuchi M, Akashi N, Seiwa K (2008) Prediction of the diameter growth of individual trees in the larch plantation. The Bor For Soci 56:55–57Google Scholar
  59. Yu B (2008) Artificial cultivation techniques of Larix olgensis. Heilongjiang Sci Tec Info 35:193 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  60. Zang H, Lei X, Zeng W (2016) Height-diameter equations for larch plantations in northern and northeastern China: a comparison of the mixed-effects, quantile regression and generalized additive models. Forestry 89:434–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhu Y, Dumroese RK, Pinto JR, Li GL, Liu Y (2013) Fall fertilization enhanced nitrogen storage and translocation in Larix olgensis seedlings. New For 44:849–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Management, School of ForestryNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations