Climate, tree masting and spatial behaviour in wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): insight from a long-term study
- 245 Downloads
Climate factors affect seed biomass production which in turn influences autumn wild boar spatial behaviour. Adaptive management strategies require an understanding of both masting and its influence on the behaviour of pulsed resource consumers like wild boar.
Pulsed resources ecosystem could be strongly affected by climate. Disantangling the role of climate on mast seeding allow to understand a seed consumer spatial behaviour to design proper wildlife and forest management strategies.
We investigated the relationship between mast seeding and climatic variables and we evaluated the influence of mast seeding on wild boar home range dynamics.
We analysed mast seeding as seed biomass production of three broadleaf tree species (Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus cerris L., Castanea sativa Mill.) in the northern Apennines. Next, we explored which climatic variables affected tree masting patterns and finally we tested the effect of both climate and seed biomass production on wild boar home range size.
Seed biomass production is partially regulated by climate; high precipitation in spring of the current year positively affects seed biomass production while summer precipitation of previous year has an opposite effect. Wild boar home range size is negatively correlated to seed biomass production, and the climate only partially contributes to determine wild boar spatial behaviour.
Climate factors influence mast seeding, and the negative correlation between wild boar home range and mast seeding should be taken into account for designing integrated, proactive hunting management.
KeywordsMasting Mast seeding Seed consumer Deciduous forests Hunting management Apennine forests
We thank all other participants of PRIN project who contributed in discussion and shared unpublished results giving important indication to improve first draft of this manuscript. We further acknowledge the Ufficio Territoriale per la Biodiversità for climate data supply and all students and field assistants for wild boar data collection. We thank John Gurnell for useful comments. Finally, we acknowledge the Editor and two anonymous Reviewers for their precious comments.
This work was partially supported by the Italian Minister of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2010-2011, 20108 TZKHC).
Compliance with ethical standards
Following the Italian law 157/92 on wildlife management, the authors acquired the permission of catching wild boars in 2002 and 2005 from the Regional Government of Tuscany.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest and research integrity and ethical standards are maintained.
- Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) Ungulate management in Europe in the XXI century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Barton K (2015) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1(15):1Google Scholar
- Bogdziewicz M, Szymkowiak J, Kasprzyk I, Grewling Ł, Borowski Z, Borycka K, Kantorowicz W, Myszkowska D, Piotrowicz K, Ziemianin M, Pesendorfer MB (2017) Masting in wind-pollinated trees: system-specific roles of weather and pollination dynamics in driving seed production. Ecology 98:2615–2625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.), Springer, VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Cannon CH, Curran LM, Marshall AJ, Leighton M (2007) Beyond mast-fruiting events: community asynchrony and individual dormancy dominate woody plant reproductive behavior across seven Bornean forest types. Curr Sci India 93:1558–1566Google Scholar
- Canu A, Scandura M, Merli E, Chirichella R, Bottero E, Chianucci F, Cutini A, Apollonio M (2015) Reproductive phenology and conception synchrony in a natural wild boar population. Hystrix Ital J Mammal 26:77–84Google Scholar
- Chianucci F, Mattioli L, Amorini E, Giannini T, Marcon A, Chirichella R, Apollonio M, Cutini A (2015) Early and long-term impacts of browsing by roe deer in oak coppiced woods along a gradient of population density. Ann Silvicultural Res 39:32–36Google Scholar
- Fournier-Chambrillon C, Maillard D, Fournier P (1995) Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) inhabiting the Montpellier garrigue. J Mt Ecol 3:174–179Google Scholar
- Genov P, Massei G (2004) The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys: Boletín informativo de la Sociedad Española para la conservación y estudio de los mamíferos 16:135–145Google Scholar
- Jezierski W, Myrcha A (1975) Food requirements of a wild boar population. Polish Ecol Stud 1:61–83Google Scholar
- Kelly D, Geldenhuis A, James A, Penelope Holland E, Plank MJ, Brockie RE, Cowan PE, Harper GA, Lee WG, Maitland MJ, Mark AF, Mills JA, Wilson PR, Byrom AE (2013) Of mast and mean: differential temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. Ecol Lett 16:90–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kenward R (1987) Wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Kon H, Noda T, Terazawa K, Koyama H, Yasaka M (2005) Proximate factors causing mast seeding in Fagus crenata: the effects of resource level and weather cues. Botany 83:1402–1409Google Scholar
- Magee L (1990) R2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. Am Stat 44:250–253Google Scholar
- McLeod AI (2011) Kendall: Kendall rank correlation and Mann-Kendall trend test. R package version 2.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Kendall
- Montserrat-Martí G, Camarero JJ, Palacio S, Pérez-Rontomé C, Milla R, Albuixech J, Maestro M (2009) Summer-drought constrains the phenology and growth of two coexisting Mediterranean oaks with contrasting leaf habit: implications for their persistence and reproduction. Trees 23:787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morellet N, Bonenfant C, Börger L, Ossi F, Cagnacci F, Heurich M, Kjellander P, Linnell JDC, Nicoloso S, Sustr P, Urbano F, Mysterud A (2013) Seasonality, weather and climate affect home range size in roe deer across a wide latitudinal gradient within Europe. J Anim Ecol 82:1326–1339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nussbaumer A, Waldner P, Etzold S, Gessler A, Benham S, Thomsen IM, Jørgensen BB, Timmermann V, Verstraeten A, Sioen G, Rautio P (2016) Patterns of mast fruiting of common beech, sessile and common oak, Norway spruce and Scots pine in Central and Northern Europe. For Ecol Manag 363:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team, 2015 _nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models_. R package version 3.1–121, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
- Piovesan G, Adams JM (2001) Masting behaviour in beech: linking reproduction and climatic variation. Can J Bot 79:1039–1047Google Scholar
- Pohlert T (2016) Trend: non-parametric trend tests and change-point detection. R package version 0.2.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trend
- Preatoni DG, Bisi F (2013) HRTools: commodity functions for home range calculation. R package version 1.0. http://home.prea.net/
- R Core Team 2015 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
- Reyer CP, Leuzinger S, Rammig A, Wolf A, Bartholomeus RP, Bonfante A, de Lorenzi F, Dury M, Gloning P, Jaoudé RA, Klein T, Kuster TM, Martins M, Niedrist G, Riccardi M, Wohlfahrt G, De Angelisi P, De Dato G, Francois L, Menzel A, Pereira M (2013) A plant's perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability. Glob Change Biol 19:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- UTB (2015) Ufficio Territoriale per la Biodiversità, Pieve S. Stefano, Province of Arezzo, official data: http://www.indicepa.gov.it/ricerca/n-dettagliouffici.php?prg_ou=37163
- White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. London Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar