Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 395–404 | Cite as

Thinning has a positive effect on growth dynamics and growth–climate relationships in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) trees of different crown classes

  • Jorge OlivarEmail author
  • Stella Bogino
  • Cyrille Rathgeber
  • Vivien Bonnesoeur
  • Felipe Bravo
Original Paper



Modification of stand density by thinning may buffer the response of tree growth and vigor to changes in climate by enhancing soil water availability.


We tested the impact of thinning intensity on cambial growth of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis L.) under semi-arid, Mediterranean conditions.


A multiple thinning experiment was established on an Aleppo pine plantation in Spain. We analysed the stem growth dynamics of two different crown classes under four different thinning intensities (15 %, 30 %, and 45 % removal of the basal area) for 2 years, based on biweekly band dendrometer recordings. Local relative extractable soil water was derived from the use of a water balance model Biljou© (available at and used as an explanatory variable.


Radial growth was mainly controlled by soil water availability during the growing season, and differed by crown class. The growth rates of dominant trees were significantly higher than the growth rates of suppressed trees. Removal of 30 % and 45 % of the initial basal area produced a growth release in both dominant and suppressed trees that did not occur under less intense thinning treatments.


Soil water availability was the main driver of radial growth during the growing season. Forest management confirmed its value for ameliorating the effects of water limitations on individual tree growth. These results may help managers understand how altering stand density will differentially affect diameter growth responses of Aleppo pine to short-term climatic fluctuations, promoting forests that are resilient to future climatic conditions.


Forest management Stand density Dendrometer Dominant Suppressed 



The authors wish to thank Cristina Prieto, Irene Ruano and Lucía Risio for their help on the installation of the dendrometers, Inforriego and the Spanish Meteorological Agency for providing the meteorological data, Cristóbal Ordoñez for his help on the field data collection, and Jorge Leporati for his help with data analysis.


Funding was provided by the Spanish Research National Projects AGL-2007-65795-C02-01 and AGL2011-29701-C02-02.


  1. Adams HD, Kolb TE (2004) Drought responses of conifers in ecotone forests of northern Arizona: tree ring growth and leaf d13C. Oecologia 140:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attolini MR, Calvani F, Galli M, Nanni T, Ruggiero L, Schaer E, Zuanni F (1990) The relationship between climatic variables and wood structure in Pinus halepensis Mill. Theor Appl Climatol 41:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouriaud O, Leban J-M, Bert D, Deleuze C (2005) Intraannual variations in climate influence growth and wood density of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 25:651–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnwath GC, Peterson DW, Nelson CR (2012) Effect of crown class and habitat type on climate–growth relationships of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir. For Ecol Manage 285:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camarero JJ, Olano JM, Parras A (2010) Plastic bimodal xylogenesis in conifers from continental Mediterranean climates. New Phytol 185:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherubini P, Gartner BL, Tognetti R, Bräker OU, Schoch W, Innes JL (2003) Identification, measurement and interpretation of tree rings in woody species from Mediterranean climates. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78:119–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotillas M, Sabaté S, Gràcia C, Espelta JM (2009) Growth response of mixed Mediterranean oak coppices to rainfall reduction: Could selective thinning have any influence on it? For Ecol Manage 258:1677–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dean TJ, Baldwin VCJR (1993) Using a density-management diagram to develop thinning schedules for loblolly pine plantations. Research Paper SO-275. USDA, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  9. De Luis M, Gričar J, Čufar K, Raventós J (2007) Seasonal dynamics of wood formation in Pinus halepensis from dry and semi-arid ecosystems in Spain. IAWA J 28:389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deslauriers A, Rossi S, Anfodillo T (2007) Dendrometer and intra-annual tree growth: What kind of information can be inferred? Dendrochronologia 25:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eilmann B, Zweifel R, Buchmann N, Fonti P, Rigling A (2009) Drought-induced adaptation of the xylem in Scots pine and pubescent oak. Tree Physiol 29:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gea-Izquierdo G, Martín-Benito D, Cherubini P, Cañellas I (2009) Climate-growth variability in Quercus ilex L. west Iberian open woodlands of different stand density. Ann For Sci 66:802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Granier A, Bréda N, Biron P, Viville S (1999) A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands. Ecol Model 116:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez E, Campelo F, Camarero JJ, Ribas M, Muntán E, Nabais C, Freitas H (2011) Climate controls act at different scales on the seasonal pattern of Quercus ilex L. stem radial increments in NE Spain. Trees 25:4637–4647. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keeland BD, Sharitz RR (1993) Accuracy of tree growth measurements using dendrometer bands. Can J Forest Res 23:2454–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kula E (1988) The economics of forestry: modern theory and practice. Timber Press, Portland, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lev-Yadun S (2000) Wood structure and the ecology of annual growth ring formation in Pinus halepensis and P. brutia. Ecology, biogeography and management of Pinus halepensis and P. brutia. In: Néeman, G, Trabaud L (eds) Forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 67–78Google Scholar
  19. Linares JC, Camarero JJ, Carreira JA (2009) Plastic responses of Abies pinsapo xylogenesis to drought and competition. Tree Physiol 29:1525–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liphschitz N, Lev-Yadun S, Rosen E, Waisel Y (1984) The annual rhythm of activity of the lateral meristems (cambium and phellogen) in Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinea L. IAWA Bull n.s. 5:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long JN (1985) A practical approach to density management. For Chron 61:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. López-Serrano FR, Landete-Castillejos T, Martínez-Millán J, del Cerro-Barja A (2000) LAI estimation of natural pine forest using a non-standard sampling technique. Agr Forest Meteorol 101:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martín-Benito D, del Río M, Heinrich H, Helle G, Cañellas I (2010) Response of climate–growth relationships and water use efficiency to thinning in a Pinus nigra afforestation. For Ecol Manage 259:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Misson L, Nicault A, Guiot J (2003) Effects of different thinning intensities on drought response in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). For Ecol Manage 183:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitrakos KA (1980) A theory for Mediterranean plant life. Acta Oecol 1:245–252Google Scholar
  26. Moreno G, Cubera E (2008) Impact of stand density on water status and leaf gas exchange in Quercus ilex. For Ecol Manage 254:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Néeman G, Trabaud L (2000) Ecology, biogeography and management of Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Backhuys, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  28. Olivar J, Bogino S, Spiecker H, Bravo F (2012) Climate impact on growth dynamic and intra-annual density fluctuations in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) trees of different crown classes. Dendrochronologia 30:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orwig DA, Abrams MD (1997) Variation in radial growth responses to drought among species, site, and canopy strata. Trees 11:474–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parry ML, Canziani OG, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Pasho E, Camarero JJ, Vicente-Serrano SM (2012) Climatic impacts and drought control of radial growth and seasonal wood formation in Pinus halepensis. Trees 26:1875–1886. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peet RK, Christensen NL (1987) Competition and tree death. Bioscience 37:586–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL. Scholar
  34. Rathgeber C, Misson L, Nicault A, Guiot J (2005) Bioclimatic model of tree radial growth: application to French Mediterranean Aleppo pine forests. Trees 19:162–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Specht RL (1981) Primary production in Mediterranean climate ecosystems regenerating after fire. In: Di Castri F, Goodall DW, Specht RL (eds) Mediterranean-type shrublands. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Lear DH, Kapeluck PR (1995) Above- and below-stump biomass and nutrient content of a mature loblolly pine plantation. Can J For Res 25:361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zweifel R, Item H, Häsler R (2001) Link between diurnal stem radius changes and tree water relations. Tree Physiol 21:869–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Olivar
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Stella Bogino
    • 2
  • Cyrille Rathgeber
    • 3
    • 4
  • Vivien Bonnesoeur
    • 3
    • 4
  • Felipe Bravo
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute Universidad de Valladolid & INIAPalenciaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias AgropecuariasUniversidad Nacional de San LuisVilla MercedesArgentina
  3. 3.Inra, UMR 1092 LERFoBChampenouxFrance
  4. 4.AgroParisTech, UMR 1092NancyFrance
  5. 5.Departamento de Producción Vegetal y Recursos ForestalesUniversidad de ValladolidPalenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations