Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 363–369 | Cite as

Cause–effect relationship among morphological adaptations, growth, and gas exchange response of pedunculate oak seedlings to waterlogging

  • Fabienne Tatin-FrouxEmail author
  • Nicolas Capelli
  • Julien Parelle
Original Paper

Abstract

Context

In response to waterlogging, pedunculate oak is known to develop adventitious roots and hypertrophied lenticels. However, to date, a link between these adaptations and the ability to maintain net CO2 assimilation rates and growth has not been demonstrated.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore the cause–effect relationship between the ability to form morphological adaptations (hypertrophied lenticels and adventitious roots) and the capacity to maintain high assimilation rate and growth.

Methods

The occurrence of morphological adaptations and the parameters of photosynthesis were monitored over 20 days of waterlogging in 5-week-old pedunculate oak seedlings presenting similar morphological development.

Results

Based on the development or not of morphological adaptations, the following three categories of responses were identified: development of hypertrophied lenticels and adventitious roots, development of hypertrophied lenticels alone, and the lack of development of adaptive structures. These categories, ranked in the order given, corresponded to decreasing levels of initial net CO2 assimilation rate growth and photosynthesis parameters observed during waterlogging.

Conclusion

We observed a two-way cause–effect relationship between the capacity to form adaptive structures and the assimilation rate. Indeed, the initial assimilation rate determined the occurrence of hypertrophied lenticels and growth during stress, and then the development of morphological adaptations enhanced the ability to maintain assimilation levels during the stress.

Keywords

Quercus robur Waterlogging Hypertrophied lenticels Adventitious root Photosynthesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their helpful comments.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Franche-Comté and the regional council of Franche-Comté.

References

  1. Calvo-Polanco M, Señorans J, Zwiazek JJ (2012) Role of adventitious roots in water relations of tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings exposed to flooding. BMC Plant Biol 12:99–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Copolovici L, Niinemets U (2010) Flooding induced emissions of volatile signaling compounds in three tree species with differing waterlogging tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 33:1582–1594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02166.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Oliveira V, Joly C (2010) Flooding tolerance of Calophyllum brasiliense Camb. (Clusiaceae): morphological, physiological and growth responses. Trees Struct Funct 24:185–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0392-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dittert K, Wotzel J, Sattelmacher B (2006) Responses of Alnus glutinosa to anaerobic conditions—mechanisms and rate of oxygen flux into the roots. Plant Biol 8:212–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-873041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyer E (1994) Compared sensitivity of seedlings from 3 woody species (Quercus robur L., Quercus rubra L., and Fagus sylvatica L.) to water-logging and associated root hypoxia: effects on water relations and photosynthesis. Ann For Sci 51:417–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19940407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du KB, Shen BX, Xu L, Tu BK (2008) Estimation of genetic variances in flood tolerance of poplar and selection of resistant F1 generations. Agrofor Syst 74:243–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9112-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferner E, Renneberg H, Kreuzwieser J (2012) Effect of flooding on C metabolism of flood-tolerant (Quercus robur) and non-tolerant (Fagus sylvatica) tree species. Tree Physiol 32:135–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Folzer H, Dat JF, Capelli N, Rieffel D, Badot PM (2006) Response of sessile oak seedlings (Quercus petraea) to flooding: an integrated study. Tree Physiol 26:759–766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.6.759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gravatt DA, Kirby CJ (1998) Patterns of photosynthesis and starch allocation in seedlings of four bottomland hardwood tree species subjected to flooding. Tree Physiol 18:411–417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.6.411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kozlowski TT (1997) Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol Monogr 1:1–29Google Scholar
  11. Kreuzwieser J, Papadopoulou E, Rennenberg H (2004) Interaction of flooding with carbon metabolism of forest trees. Plant Biol 6:299–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-817882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Larson D, Davies FS, Schaffer B (1991) Floodwater temperature and stem lenticel hypertrophy in Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae). Am J Bot 78:1397–1403. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2445278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lévy G, Lefèvre Y, Becker M, Frochot LH, Picard JF, Wagner PA (1999) Excess water: effects on growth of the oak tree. Rev For Fr 51:151–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/5427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mielke MS, De Almeida AAF, Gomes FP, Aguilar MAG, Mangabeira PAO (2003) Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Genipa americana seedlings to soil flooding. Environ Exp Bot 50:221–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0702-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parelle J, Brendel O, Bodenes C, Berveiller D, Dizengremel P, Jolivet Y, Dreyer E (2006) Differences in morphological and physiological responses to water-logging between two sympatric oak species (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl., Quercus robur L.). Ann For Sci 63:849–859. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parelle J, Brendel O, Jolivet Y, Dreyer E (2007) Intra and inter-specific diversity of the response to water-logging in two co-occuring white oak species (Quercus robur and Q. petraea). Tree Physiol 27:1027–1034. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.7.1027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parent C, Crèvecoeur M, Capelli N, Dat JF (2011) Contrasting and adaptive responses of two oak species to flooding stress: role of non-synbiotic haemoglobin. Plant Cell Environ 34:1113–1126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02309.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pezeshki SR, Pardue JH, DeLaune RD (1996) Leaf gas exchange and growth of flood-tolerant and flood-sensitive tree species under low soil redox conditions. Tree Physiol 16:453–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.4.453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (http://www.R-project.org)Google Scholar
  20. Schmull M, Thomas FM (2000) Morphological and physiological reactions of young deciduous trees (Quercus robur L., Q. petraea [Matt.] Liebl., Fagus sylvatica L.) to waterlogging. Plant Soil 225:227–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026516027096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sena Gomes AR, Kozlowski TT (1980) Growth responses and adaptations of Fraxinus pennsylvanica seedlings to flooding. Plant Physiol 66:267–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp. 66.2.267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimamura S, Yamamoto R, Nakamura T, Shimada S, Komatsu S (2010) Stem hypertrophic lenticels and secondary aerenchyma enable oxygen transport to roots of soybean in flooded soil. Ann Bot 106:277–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang ZC, Kozlowski TT (1984) Water relations, ethylene production, and morphological adaptation of Fraxinus pennsylvanica seedlings to flooding. Plant Soil 77:183–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wagner P, Dreyer E (1997) Interactive effects of waterlogging and irradiance on the photosynthetic performance of seedlings from three oak species displaying different sensitivities (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. rubra). Ann Sci For 54:409–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabienne Tatin-Froux
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicolas Capelli
    • 1
  • Julien Parelle
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR Chrono-Environnement UFC/CNRS 6249 USC INRAUniversité de Franche-ComtéBesançon cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations