First cropping system model based on expert-knowledge parameterization
- 264 Downloads
Models are promising tools to support the design of cropping systems toward sustainable agriculture. Process-based deterministic models are predominantly used, whereas most of them involve a limited range of crop techniques, and are unsuited to organic agriculture. Moreover, their parameterization and local adaptation require a large amount of experimental data. We thus designed a model simulating the yields of successive crops, taking into account the effects of most crop techniques embedded in a cropping system, and suited for both conventional and organic farming. This model was designed assuming that its parameterization, mostly based on expert-knowledge elicitation, could enlarge the range of environmental conditions and crop techniques considered. The PerSyst model involves three types of parameters based on expert knowledge: (i) reference yields reached in the most common cropping system conditions, (ii) yield change due to crop sequence variation, and (iii) yield change due to variation in crop management. These parameters are stochastic to report yield variability across climatic years. The model was parameterized through an original expert elicitation method—combining individual interviews and collective validation—on three case studies, including one in organic farming. Model accuracy was assessed for two long-term experiments. Parameters such as yield change due to crop sequence and to crop management were close among case studies, highlighting possibilities to compensate for a local lack of knowledge. Moreover, simulated yields in both experiments showed great consistency with observed yields, with average relative root-mean-square error of prediction of 15% for winter wheat and faba bean for example. For the first time, thanks to expert-knowledge parametrization, we built a cropping system model, considering all techniques, which could be easily tailored to a diversity of conditions, both in conventional and organic farming. Lastly, advantages and limits of the PerSyst model to assess innovative cropping systems were discussed.
KeywordsArable crops Yield Crop management plan Crop sequence Organic farming RMSEP
We would like to thank J.F. Garnier et M. Bouviala (ARVALIS-Institut du végétal) for implementing the assessment of the predictive capacity of the PerSyst model in Île-de-France, as well as all the experts who were surveyed to parameterize PerSyst in Bourgogne, Eure-et-Loir, and Île-de-France.
This study was funded by the Futurol project, POPSY (2008 STRA 012), DIM Astrea, the Île-de-France Region, and the Agence de l’Eau Seine-Normandie.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Agreste (2017) Données en ligne. https://stats.agriculture.gouv.fr/disar. Accessed 1 March 2017
- Bockstaller C, Girardin P (2008) Mode de calcul des indicateurs agri-environnementaux de la méthode INDIGO®Google Scholar
- Bohanec M, Rajkovic V (1990) DEX: an expert system shell for decision support. Sistemica 1:145–157Google Scholar
- Brisson N, Ruget F, Gate P, Lorgeou J, Nicollaud B, Tayot X, Plenet D, Jeuffroy MH, Bouthier A, Ripoche D, Mary B, Justes E (2002) STICS : un modèle générique pour simuler les cultures et leurs bilans hydrique et azoté. II. Evaluation par comparaison à la réalité expérimentale. Agronomie 22:69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Furian T, Ballot R, Guichard L, Huat J (2015) Possible ex-ante assessment of rice-vegetable systems performances when facing data scarcity: use of the PERSYST model in West Africa. In: FSD5 proceedings. Montpellier, pp 507–508Google Scholar
- Meynard JM, Justes E, Machet JM, Recous S (1997) Fertilisation azotée des cultures annuelles de plein champ. In: Annales colloques INRA 83. INRA, Reims (France), pp 183–199Google Scholar
- Millenium Ecosystem Assesment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Pahl H, Krüpl C, Funk T (2000) Grain legumes for European growers—LINK production survey analysis. Grain Legum:22–24Google Scholar
- Sadok W, Angevin F, Bergez J-E, Bockstaller C, Colomb B, Guichard L, Reau R, Dore T (2008) Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods—a review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schneider A, Huyghe C (2015) Les légumineuses pour des systèmes agricoles et alimentaires durables, QuaeGoogle Scholar
- Sebillotte M (1990) Le système de culture, un concept opératoire pour les agronomes. In: Les Systèmes De Culture, INRA. Paris, pp 165–196Google Scholar