Advertisement

Apidologie

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Effects of sublethal acetamiprid doses on the lifespan and memory-related characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers

  • Jingliang Shi
  • Chunhua Liao
  • Zilong Wang
  • Zhijiang Zeng
  • Xiaobo WuEmail author
Original article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Honey bees that leave the hive and collect nectar or pollen from pesticide-treated plants are susceptible to be poisoned. Acetamiprid is a new class of insecticide and a member of the neonicotinoids that has been widely applied in the field for pest control. However, effects of sublethal doses of acetamiprid on worker bees are not yet fully understood. In this study, we examined effects of sublethal doses of acetamiprid on lifespan and memory-related characteristics. Newly emerged worker bees from a single colony were randomly divided into four groups, and this experiment was repeated three times using three different colonies. Three doses (0.5, 1, and 2 μg/bee) of acetamiprid diluted by water were added on the thorax of worker bees while bees were exposed to pure water as a control (0 μg/bee). The lifespan of bees treated with acetamiprid at a concentration over 1 μg/bee was significantly reduced, while there was no significant difference between the 0.5 μg/bee group and 0 μg/bee group. All three doses of acetamiprid affected the memory-related characteristics of bees, reduced the success of proboscis extension response (PER), affected homing ability, and influenced expression levels of two learning- and memory-related genes compared with the control group. This research confirms that sublethal doses of acetamiprid affect the survival of honey bees.

Keywords

Apis mellifera Acetamiprid  Sublethal doses  Lifespan  Learning and memory 

Notes

Author contributions

XB Wu and ZJ Zeng conceived this research and designed experiments; ZL Wang and CH Liao participated in the design and interpretation of the data; XB Wu and JL Shi performed experiments and analysis; XB Wu and JL Shi wrote the paper and participated in the revisions of it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31760714), the Outstanding Young Talent Program of Jiangxi Province (No. 20162BCB23029), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20171BAB204012).

References

  1. Abdel–Kader, SAS, Abdel–Lateef, M.F., Abdelmonem, A.E. et al. (2017) Effect of sub-lethal concentrations of the insecticides imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiametoxam and deltamethrin on the foraging behavior of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Middle East J. Agric. Res. 6(2),323–329.Google Scholar
  2. Abrol, D.P. (2013) Safety of Bees in Relation to Pest Management. Asiatic Honeybee Apis cerana. Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Bicker, G. (2015) Histochemistry of classical neurotransmitters in antennal lobes and mushroom bodies of the honeybee. Microsc. Res. Tech. 45(3), 174–183.Google Scholar
  4. Böhme, F., Bischoff, G., Zebitz, C.P. et al. (2016) Chronic exposure of honeybees, Apis mellifera (hymenoptera: apidae), to a pesticide mixture in realistic field exposure rates. Apidologie, 48(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
  5. Breer, H. (1987) Neurochemical aspects of cholinergic synapses in insect brain. J. Biomech. 39(06): S647.Google Scholar
  6. Claudianos, C., Ranson, H., Johnson, R.M. et al. (2010) A deficit of detoxification enzymes: pesticide sensitivity and environmental response in the honeybee. Insect Mol. Biol. 15(5), 615–636.Google Scholar
  7. Cutler, G.C., Scott-Dupree, C.D. (2014) A field study examining the effects of exposure to neonicotinoid seed-treated corn on commercial bumble bee colonies. Ecotoxicology, 23(9), 1755–1763.Google Scholar
  8. Cutler, G.C., Scott-Dupree, C.D., Sultan, M. et al. (2014) A large-scale field study examining effects of exposure to clothianidin seed-treated canola on honey bee colony health, development, and overwintering success. PeerJ, 2, e652.Google Scholar
  9. Dacher, M., & Gauthier, M. (2008) Involvement of no-synthase and nicotinic receptors in learning in the honey bee. Physiol. Behav. 95(1), 200–207.Google Scholar
  10. Danbolt, N.C. (2001) Glutamate Uptake. Prog. Neurobiol. 65, 1–105.Google Scholar
  11. Desneux, N., Decourtye, A., Delpuech, J.M. (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52(1),81–106.Google Scholar
  12. Decourtye, A., Devillers, J., Cluzeau, S. et al. (2004) Effects of imidacloprid and deltamethrin on associative learning in honeybees under semi-field and laboratory conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 57(3): 410–419.Google Scholar
  13. Decourtye, A., Devillers, J., Genecque, E. et al. (2005) Comparative sublethal toxicity of nine pesticides on olfactory learning performances of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 48(2): 242–250.Google Scholar
  14. Decourtye, A., Pham-Delègue, M.H., Devillers, J. et al. (2002) The proboscis extension response: assessing the sub-lethal effects of pesticides on the honey bee. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 57(3): 410–419.Google Scholar
  15. Fairbrother, A., Purdy, J., Anderson, T. et al. (2014) Risks of neonicotinoid insecticides to honeybees.[J]. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33(4),719–731.Google Scholar
  16. Fiala, A., Müller, U., & Menzel, R. (1999) Reversible downregulation of protein kinase a during olfactory learning using antisense technique impairs long-term memory formation in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J. Neurosci. 19(22), 10125–10134.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, J., Müller, T., Spatz, A.K. et al. (2014) Neonicotinoids interfere with specific components of navigation in honeybees. PLoS ONE, 9(3): e91364.Google Scholar
  18. Frost, E.H., Shutler, D., & Hillier, N.K. (2011) Effects of cold immobilization and recovery period on honeybee learning, memory, and responsiveness to sucrose. J. Insect Physiol., 57(10), 1385–1390.Google Scholar
  19. Frost, E.H., Shutler, D., & Hillier, N.K. (2012) The proboscis extension reflex to evaluate learning and memory in honeybees (Apis mellifera): some caveats. Naturwissenschaften, 99(9), 677–686.Google Scholar
  20. Frost, E.H., Shutler, D., & Hillier, N.K. (2013) Effects of fluvalinate on honey bee learning, memory, responsiveness to sucrose, and survival. J. Exp. Biol. 216(15), 2931–2938.Google Scholar
  21. Girolami, V., Mazzon, L., Squartini, A. et al. (2009) Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops: a novel way of intoxication for bees. J. Econ. Entomol. 102(5),1808–1815.Google Scholar
  22. Greig-Smith, P.W., Thompson, H.M., Hardy, A.R. et al. (1995) Incidents of poisoning of honeybees (Apis mellifera) by agricultural pesticides in Great Britain 1981–1991. Crop Prot. 13(8), 567–581.Google Scholar
  23. Hassani, A.K.E., Dacher, M., Gary, V. et al. (2008) Effects of sublethal doses of acetamiprid and thiamethoxam on the behavior of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 54(4): 653–661.Google Scholar
  24. Hassani A.K.E., Dacher, M., Gauthier, M. et al. (2005) Effects of sublethal doses of fipronil on the behavior of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 82(1): 30–39.Google Scholar
  25. He, X.J., Tian, L.Q., Wu, X.B., et al. (2016) RFID monitoring indicates honeybees work harder before a rainy day. Insect. Sci. 3(1),157–159Google Scholar
  26. Hillier, N. K., Frost, E. H., & Shutler, D. (2013) Fate of dermally applied miticides fluvalinate and amitraz within honey bee (hymenoptera: apidae) bodies. J. Econ. Entomol. 106(2), 558–565.Google Scholar
  27. Huang, Q., Kryger, P., Conte, Y.L. et al. (2012) Survival and immune response of drones of a Nosemosis tolerant honey bee strain towards N. ceranae infections. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 109(3),297–302.Google Scholar
  28. Iwasa, T., Motoyama, N., Ambrose, J.T. et al. (2004) Mechanism for the differential toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Crop Prot. 23(5), 371–378.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, R.M., Ellis, M.D., Mullin, C.A. et al. (2010) Pesticides and honey bee toxicity - USA. Apidologie, 41(3), 312–331.Google Scholar
  30. Kessler, S.C., Tiedeken, E.J., Simcock, K.L. et al. (2015) Corrigendum: Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides. Nature, 521(7550), 74–76.Google Scholar
  31. Klein, A.M., Vaissière, B.E., Cane, J.H. et al. (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274(1608), 303–313.Google Scholar
  32. Kucharski, R., Mitri, C., Grau, Y. et al. (2007) Characterization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor in the honeybee (Apis mellifera): implications for memory formation. Invertebr. Neurosci. 7, 99–108.Google Scholar
  33. Lambin, M., Armengaud, C., Raymond, S. et al. (2001) Imidacloprid-induced facilitation of the proboscis extension reflex habituation in the honeybee. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 4,129–134.Google Scholar
  34. Letzkus, P., Ribi, W.A., Wood, J.T. et al. (2006) Lateralization of olfaction in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Curr. Biol. 16(14), 1471–1476.Google Scholar
  35. Liao, C.H., He, X.J., Wang, Z.L. et al. (2018) Short-term exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin negatively affects the survival and memory-related characteristics of worker bees Apis mellifera. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 75(1), 59–65.Google Scholar
  36. Liao, C.H., Wu, J., Wang, Z.L. et al. (2017) Effect of fenpropathrin on the viability and homing ability of worker bees Apis mellifera. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 20(4),1063–1066.Google Scholar
  37. Morris, R.G.M., Davis, S., Butcher, S.P. (1990) Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and nmda receptors: a role in information storage? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 329(1253), 187–204.Google Scholar
  38. Pohorecka, K., Skubida, P., Miszczak, A. et al. (2012) Residues of neonicotinoid insecticides in bee collected plant materials from oilseed rape crops and their effect on bee colonies. J. Apic. Sci. 56(2),115–134.Google Scholar
  39. Schneider, C.W., Tautz, J., Grünewald, B. et al. (2011) RFID tracking of sublethal effects of two neonicotinoid insecticides on the foraging behavior of Apis mellifera. PLoS ONE, 7(1), 967–975.Google Scholar
  40. Stanley, D.A., Russell, A.L., Morrison, S.J. et al. (2016) Investigating the impacts of field-realistic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide on bumblebee foraging, homing ability and colony growth. J. Appl. Ecol. 53(5), 1440–1449.Google Scholar
  41. Tan, K., Chen, W., Dong, S. et al. (2014) Imidacloprid alters foraging and decreases bee avoidance of predators. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102725.Google Scholar
  42. Thany, S.H., Bourdin, C.M., Graton, J. et al. (2015) Similar comparative low and high doses of deltamethrin and acetamiprid differently iImpair the retrieval of the proboscis extension reflex in the forager honeybee (Apis mellifera). Insects, 6(4),805–814.Google Scholar
  43. Thompson, H.M (2003) Behavioural Effects of pesticides in bees–their potential for Use in Risk assessment. Ecotoxicology, 12(1–4),317.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, H.M., Thorbahn, D., Oomen, P.A. et al. (2010) Review of honeybee pesticide poisoning incidents in Europe - evaluation of the hazard quotient approach for risk assessment. Julius. Kühn. Archiv. 7(423),103–108.Google Scholar
  45. Tomizawa, M., Casida, J.E. (2004) Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: mechanisms of selective action. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 45,247–268.Google Scholar
  46. Wang, Z.L., Wang, H., Qin, Q.H. et al. (2013) Gene expression analysis following olfactory learning in Apis mellifera. Mol. Biol. Rep. 40(2), 1631–1639.Google Scholar
  47. Wu, J.Y., Anelli, C.M., Sheppard, W.S. (2011) Sub-lethal effects of pesticide residues in brood comb on worker honey bee (Apis mellifera) development and longevity. PLoS ONE 6(2), e14720.Google Scholar
  48. Wu-Smart, J., & Spivak, M. (2016) Sub-lethal effects of dietary neonicotinoid insecticide exposure on honey bee queen fecundity and colony development. Sci. Rep. 6, 32108.Google Scholar
  49. Zachepilo, T.G., Il'Inykh, Y.F., Lopatina, N.G. et al. (2008) Comparative analysis of the locations of the NR1 and NR2 NMDA receptor subunits in honeybee (Apis mellifera) and fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster, Canton-S wild-type) cerebral ganglia. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 38(4), 369–372.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Honeybee Research InstituteJiangxi Agricultural UniversityNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations