Advertisement

Apidologie

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 131–150 | Cite as

Nosema ceranae disease of the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

  • Mike Goblirsch
Review article

Abstract

The presence of honey bees in our landscapes has long invoked images of vitality, diligence, and cooperation. Unfortunately, the current state of bee health paints a rather different picture. The survival of honey bees, as well as the livelihoods of those who benefit from their labor, is under threat from several detractors to bee health. Exposure to pesticides, poor forage, mite parasites, and pathogens has resulted in high annual death of colonies in the USA, Europe, and other parts of the world. Among the suspects thought to contribute to bee decline, the fungal pathogen, Nosema ceranae, is found at high prevalence in both healthy and declining colonies. Since N. ceranae is thought to be a recent parasite of Apis mellifera, much remains unknown about its pathology at the individual and colony levels, as well as how infection may interact and synergize with other stressors. A review of research conducted on N. ceranae infection is provided. Attention is given to observations on detection of infection, cytopathology, viability and infectivity of spores, and caste-specific effects to survival, development, physiology, and behavior. Research findings showing effects from interactions with pesticides and viruses are also provided. Comparisons are drawn between N. ceranae and what is known about a similar, long-recognized pathogen of A. mellifera, Nosema apis. When possible, suggestions for future research that could broaden understanding of N. ceranae and ultimately improve honey bee health are offered to link observations on individual bee pathology with pathology observed at the colony level.

Keywords

fungal pathogen Microsporidia nosemosis social behavior 

1 A new Nosema

In the aftermath of colony collapse disorder, surveillance efforts have recorded the presence of a “new Nosema” traditionally associated with the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana, in colonies of the European honey bee, Apis mellifera. The detection of this new Nosema sp., Nosema ceranae, as a natural infection of A. mellifera was first reported in Europe in 2006 (Higes et al. 2006). Since then, there have been regular reports on the incidence of N. ceranae in A. mellifera and other host species from many parts of the world, supporting a widespread distribution of this parasite (Klee et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2008). The widespread distribution of N. ceranae has caused reason for concern for managed populations of A. mellifera and potentially other novel bee hosts. Because A. mellifera is considered to be a recent host, it raises questions as to the effects this pathogen has on host physiology, behavior, and longevity at the individual, as well as colony, level. The goal of this review is to highlight research findings that have contributed to our understanding of disease caused by N. ceranae. Additionally, this review is meant to further the discussion concerning the impact N. ceranae has mainly on A. mellifera and how it compares to nosemosis, the disease traditionally associated with Nosema apis, a similar pathogen long recognized to cause infection in A. mellifera (Zander 1909; for an excellent review of nosemosis and N. apis, the reader is referred to Fries 1993).

N. ceranae likely originated with Apis cerana as its primary host (Fries et al. 1996; Botías et al. 2012). However, archived samples suggest that N. ceranae had an expanded geographic and host range decades before first detection as natural infections of A. mellifera in Spain (Higes et al. 2006) and the USA (Cox-Foster et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2007). Two studies examining preserved specimens of honey bees by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis place N. ceranae in the USA as early as 1975 (Traver and Fell 2015). Samples collected in Finland between 1986 and 2006 showed that samples from as early as 1998 were positive for N. ceranae (Paxton et al. 2007). Likewise, archived material revealed that samples from as early as 1993 from Italy (Ferroglio et al. 2013), 1994 from Canada (Currie et al. 2010), and 1995 from Mexico (Guerrero-Molina et al. 2016) were positive for N. ceranae. Moreover, one sample of A. mellifera from Uruguay collected prior to 1990 was positive for N. ceranae by PCR (Invernizzi et al. 2009). In addition, Africanized drones collected in Brazil in 1979 had presence of spores by microscopy and were positive for N. ceranae by PCR (Teixeira et al. 2013). Clark (1980) described a second microsporidian in bees from southeastern USA; however, it is unlikely to have been N. ceranae due to the presence of a single nucleus instead of the diplonucleus characteristic of spores in this species.

Although the timing of N. ceranae’s introduction as a pathogen of A. mellifera is uncertain, it may have coincided with the spread of the mite parasite, Varroa destructor. As the movement of A. mellifera colonies into and out of regions where A. cerana is endemic lead to the introduction of the V. destructor as a parasite of A. mellifera, the interactions of these bee species may also have permitted the simultaneous acquisition and spread of N. ceranae. One question that remains unanswered: if N. ceranae has been present in colonies of A. mellifera for several decades, why has it only recently been considered as a factor in the decline of A. mellifera and only in some regions?

2 Detection and diagnosis

The first step in understanding the effects of N. ceranae is the ability to detect and diagnose this pathogen. Diagnosis of Nosema spp. infection can be determined by viewing and counting spores with a hemocytometer under magnification (Cantwell 1970). Nosema spp. spores have a distinct size and ovoid morphology that sets them apart from other microbes in tissue homogenates prepared from honey bees. Coupled with sampling of specific cohorts, the method developed by Cantwell (1970) can provide information on the proportion infected against a specific parameter (e.g., proportion of infected foragers). Although visualizing Nosema spp. spores under a microscope is relatively straightforward, and some skilled technicians may be able to discern between spores of N. apis and N. ceranae by eye, positive identification to species is complicated by the fact that both species cause single or mixed infections in A. cerana and A. mellifera (Chen et al. 2009; Forsgren and Fries 2010; Milbrath et al. 2015). Evidence suggests that infections with N. ceranae are now more prevalent in some regions where N. apis had historically been the only species present (Klee et al. 2007; Martín-Hernández et al. 2012; Emsen et al. 2016); therefore, failure to diagnose a mixed infection is likely if the infection is skewed heavily toward one species. Mixed infections that are skewed in favor of a single species point to the need for a reliable detection method specific to the level of species. Progress has been made using fluorescent dyes incorporated with microscopic techniques. For example, the fluorescent brightener, calcofluor white, has been shown to bind to chitin in the cell wall of mature N. ceranae spores (Snow 2016). Since immature spores lack chitin, this method is useful for localization studies of mature spores within cells, but it cannot differentiate between species (Snow 2016). Other detection markers, such as labeled antibodies (Aronstein et al. 2013), are needed to discern species and life stages. Species-specific antibodies could be applied toward the development of field assays permitting rapid diagnosis.

Alternatively, PCR amplification of genes encoding ribosomal RNA (rRNA) that are highly conserved within a species but variable between species has the potential to increase specificity and sensitivity of detection and quantification (Chen et al. 2009; Carletto et al. 2013; but see Ptaszyńska et al. 2014 on loop-mediated isothermal amplification). One study compared the specificity and sensitivity of microscopy to real-time PCR and showed that the former failed to identify N. ceranae spores in 50% of samples that tested positive by PCR (Traver and Fell 2011a). This finding may demonstrate a disparity between species in the production of spores, where N. ceranae may not be as prolific as N. apis (Martín-Hernández et al. 2009; Mulholland et al. 2012). It could also point to the considerable variability observed in sequences of rRNA genes from isolates of N. ceranae (Sagastume et al. 2011). Heterogeneity among N. ceranae isolates could result in the failure of probes to amplify a specific target. Higes et al. (2013a) speculate as to the origin of the uncharacteristic heterogeneity observed for N. ceranae rRNA genes and suggest the need for alternative markers for taxonomic characterization. The availability of fully sequenced genomes for N. apis (Chen et al. 2013) and N. ceranae (Cornman et al. 2009) coupled with the sequencing of PCR products could help resolve issues in properly discerning species, as well as haplotypes within species (e.g., N. ceranae).

3 Acquisition of spores and tissue tropism

Vegetative forms and immature spores of N. apis and N. ceranae have only been observed in midgut epithelial cells (Higes et al. 2007; García-Palencia et al. 2010). However, N. apis and N. ceranae have been detected by PCR in hypopharyngeal glands, salivary glands, fat body, and Malpighian tubules, but not brain or muscle (Chen et al. 2009; Gisder et al. 2010; Copley and Jabaji 2012; Huang and Solter 2013). Outside the gut, environmental spores of N. apis and N. ceranae have been observed on the mouthparts of workers and in semen from drones, pointing to possible mechanisms of horizontal transmission via trophallaxis (Smith 2012; Huang and Solter 2013) and vertical transmission via sexual contact (Peng et al. 2015; Roberts et al. 2015), respectively. Although late larval and pupal mortality caused by N. apis was observed in the Cape honey bee (Buys 1972), additional evidence is lacking as to whether the egg, larva, or pupa are susceptible to infection under natural conditions. In contrast to some species of Nosema (Raina et al. 1995; Terry et al. 1997), there is no evidence of transovarial transmission from an infected queen to her eggs (Roberts et al. 2015). The lack of vertical transmission may result from tissue tropism restricting the pathogen to infection within midgut epithelial cells or from immune defenses in semen (Peng et al. 2016, see below).

N. apis spores have been observed in the hemolymph of larvae (Gilliam and Shimanuki 1967), and drone pupae have tested positive by PCR for N. ceranae (Traver and Fell 2011b). N. ceranae has also been detected by PCR in royal jelly (Cox-Foster et al. 2007). Positive detection of spores or DNA in royal jelly supports the likelihood that immatures are exposed through brood food. Although one study was unsuccessful at infecting larvae with N. apis (Hassanein 1953), a more recent study showed the presence of developing spores within the midgut of prepupae provisioned with N. ceranae spores as 3-day-old larvae (Eiri et al. 2015). Moreover, Eiri et al. (2015) showed that infection as a larva can have a negative effect on adult longevity. Surveillance for infection in immatures is not typically performed; however, studies conducted in the field where larvae are inspected could provide information on infection frequency and intensity.

4 Pathogen development and cytopathology

The interaction of an obligate intracellular pathogen and the host cell is an exchange where the pathogen exploits host cell machinery to obtain resources and the host deploys defense mechanisms (e.g., apoptosis) to limit infection and replication. This interaction can be observed through histological and molecular approaches. Although there may be differences in the timing of specific infection events, the fine morphology and trajectory of development has been described in detail and is similar between N. apis and N. ceranae (Gray et al. 1969; Youssef and Hammond 1971; Liu 1984, 1989; Fries 1988, 1989a, b; de Graaf et al. 1994; Fries et al. 1996; Higes et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2009). True to their genus, N. apis and N. ceranae are diplokaryotic throughout their life cycle. Spores gain access to the host cell and initiate proliferation by rapidly extruding a long tube that is attached anteriorly to the spore by an anchoring disc (Xu and Weiss 2005). The extruded polar filament of a germinated spore penetrates a host cell, providing a conduit for the transfer of the binucleate sporoplasm (Figure 1). Presporal development, or merogony, begins within hours after inoculation with the sporoplasm. Merogony proceeds through a variable number of nuclear and/or cytoplasmic divisions. Binary fission leads to the production of clusters or chains of meronts, which are often quadrinucleate (Gray et al. 1969; Fries et al. 1996; Higes et al. 2007). Meronts of N. apis and N. ceranae have a single thin plasma membrane that remains in direct contact with the host cytoplasm and is similar to the early developmental stages of a related genus, Vairimorpha (Cali et al. 2011). There is no evidence for formation of a parasitophorous vacuole as displayed by members of the genus Encephalitozoon (Youssef and Hammond 1971; Scanlon et al. 2004). Not all Microsporidia utilize a parasitophorous vacuole as part of their development. The function of this organelle is purported to be an exploitation strategy of the pathogen in that the meront repositions host mitochondria along the interface of the vacuole to increase the surface area for the import of host ATP (Hacker et al. 2014). The absence of the parasitophorous vacuole in Nosema spp. leads to the possibility that this genus uses other means of obtaining a continuous supply of ATP from the host, such as nucleotide transporters embedded in the plasma membrane of the parasite (Tsaousis et al. 2008). Numerous mitochondria and free ribosomes have been observed surrounding the plasmalemma of meronts of N. ceranae (Higes et al. 2007).
Figure 1.

Germinated spore with extruded polar filament and sporoplasm. Purified spores were air-dried on glass slides followed by activation of germination by incubation with 0.5 M NaCl/0.5 M NaHCO3 solution for 30 min at 37 °C. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Meronts of N. apis and N. ceranae transform into either the primary spore or mature, environmental spore between 48 and 96 h after infection (Fries 1988; de Graaf et al. 1994; Higes et al. 2007). The primary spore is produced through binary fission of the sporont to form two sporoblasts, each having a thin spore wall and short polar filament. The primary spore is capable of transmitting infection to adjacent cells through autoinfection (i.e., spontaneous germination) (Becnel and Andreadis 1999). The major differences in development and morphology between the primary spore and the mature spore are the thick spore wall and longer polar filament of the later. Ultimately, an infected cell becomes tightly packed with parasites, leading to the rupture and release of spores into the gut lumen. Mature spores can pass through the rectum in the feces, serving as an inoculum for other bees, or they can remain in the midgut to infect other cells.

Cells infected with Nosema spp. show extensive lysis or degeneration (Liu 1984; Higes et al. 2007; Dussaubat et al. 2012). Other indicators of cell injury include a loss of glycogen particles and detachment of ribosomes from the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) (Liu 1984). Loss of glycogen and loose aggregation of ribosomes may be a consequence of damage to mitochondria (Kumar et al. 2012). Utilization of glycogen reserves indicates that an infected cell has switched from a more efficient means of energy production (i.e., oxidative phosphorylation) to less efficient anaerobic glycolysis, possibly to compensate for competition/depletion of ATP by the amitochondriate Nosema spp. As ATP is depleted, it is unavailable to drive the flow of ions across membranes. Pump failure retains sodium within the cell and causes swelling of the RER and detachment of ribosomes, resulting in necrosis (Kumar et al. 2012). Host cells likewise can proceed through programmed death, or apoptosis.

Measuring the activity of specific enzymes or levels of substrates involved with cascades of cell death has been used to explore whether infected cells proceed through apoptosis or necrosis. TUNEL assay and immunohistochemistry for caspase-3 have been used to examine apoptosis in midgut cells infected with N. ceranae. In a healthy cell, caspase-3 is inactive; however, early in the process of apoptosis, the proenzyme is cleaved, and the residues dimerize to the active form. Fragmented or damaged DNA late in apoptosis provides the substrate for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase to catalyze the addition of dUTP. Higes et al. (2013b) concluded that N. ceranae inhibits apoptosis as caspase-3 and dUTP-labeled molecules were widely distributed in uninfected tissues, but had negligible presence in infected tissues. A subsequent study confirmed that N. ceranae inhibits apoptosis at specific stages during parasite development and may be dependent on the host species (Gregorc et al. 2016). These findings reinforce what may be the norm for Microsporidia (Scanlon et al. 1999), and alludes to a conserved strategy utilized by intracellular microorganisms (Nash et al. 1998). For N. ceranae, this strategy may involve virulence factors expressed early during infection that bind and limit the activity of proapoptotic proteins responsible for releasing toxic molecules from host mitochondria (Huang et al. 2016). Interestingly, bees tolerant to N. ceranae may be less sensitive to apoptosis induced by parasite manipulation (Kurze et al. 2016a). The ultimate outcome for an infected cell is likely death, but understanding the mechanism is important for determining the degree by which it is mediated by the host to limit the spread of infection or whether the pathogen has some control over host metabolic processes.

5 Viability and infectivity

Bees become infected with Nosema spp. by ingesting spores. Sources of spores in the environment include comb and water that has been contaminated with feces. Spores of N. ceranae have been found in the corbicular pollen of foragers, and these spores can cause infection (Higes et al. 2008). This finding suggests that floral resources can become contaminated with feces from an infected bee or transferred from the body of a foraging worker. The presence of spores on flowers points to these shared resources as a significant source of pathogen dispersal. Graystock et al. (2015) demonstrate this by showing that uninfected host and nonhost bees can vector pathogens (e.g., N. apis and N. ceranae) from contaminated flowers to flowers not previously visited. Spores acquired from flowers during foraging may become mixed with pollen during grooming and are likely deposited in comb cells upon returning to the hive. Workers performing comb cleaning are more likely to become infected than queens and drones that do not perform these behaviors (Fries 1993). As bees emerge from pupation, they may also become infected as they chew through contaminated wax (Malone and Gatehouse 1998). The potential for exposure to spores in the hive increases when inclement weather prevents cleansing flights by infected bees (Moeller 1972; Retschnig et al. 2017).

Factors that affect viability can be determined by exposing spores to different storage conditions such as temperature, time, and reagents. The number of viable spores needed to cause infection in 50 and 100% of workers has been found to be comparable for both N. apis and N. ceranae and are in the range of 102 and 104 spores, respectively (Forsgren and Fries 2010). The viability of N. ceranae spores treated with brief exposure (1, 2, 4, or 6 h) to temperatures of 35 or 60 °C were assessed using SYTOX Green (Fenoy et al. 2009). Spores inspected immediately or 1 month after treatment showed comparable levels of staining to control spores held at 4 °C for 1 month in 1× PBS (≥ 92.0%). However, maintaining N. ceranae and N. apis spores at 4 °C in PBS for an extended period was not sufficient to sustain viability as levels declined by one third and three quarters after 6 and 12 months, respectively (Fenoy et al. 2009). More recently, the effect of cryopreservation (− 70 °C) on viability was assessed for N. ceranae (McGowan et al. 2016). Spores stored in water or 10% glycerol were comparable to freshly isolated spores; however, there was a significant reduction in infectivity for spores stored at − 70 °C (McGowan et al. 2016).

Although used less frequently, flow cytometry can provide an efficient and reproducible method for assessing viability (Peng et al. 2014). Spores that were freshly isolated, stored for 20 days at room temperature, or autoclaved were then segregated by light scattering filters to determine size and complexity. From these populations, the intensity of propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence was measured to differentiate viable spores from PI-positive (i.e., dead) spores (Sánchez Collado et al. 2014). Using this method, the percentage of dead spores was found to be < 15% for both N. apis and N. ceranae after 10 months at 4 °C or room temperature. Storage for 10 months at 33 °C for both species and − 20 °C for N. ceranae decreased viability by ≥ 50% in all cases. Reduction in viability was also correlated to decreased infectivity when treated spores were fed to uninfected bees (Sánchez Collado et al. 2014).

Spores may appear viable, but they may not be infectious. In other words, spores may not be competent to respond to stimuli in the gut and complete germination. Determining whether spores exposed to different conditions are infectious can be achieved by administering them to bees and measuring outcomes such as proportion infected and/or spore production. Malone et al. (2001) dried spores of N. apis on glass slides held at 33, 40, 45, and 49 °C for 3 or 5 days. Spores were then suspended in sucrose solution and fed to bees. Approximately half as many bees became infected from spores stored at 40, 45, and 49 °C compared to spores stored at 33 °C or spores stored at room temperature for 24 h, suggesting that temperature is one factor that influences germination (Malone et al. 2001).

Activation and completion of germination remains a poorly understood process. The large diversity of hosts and external environments where Microsporidia exist indicates that this process is host specific. Differences in germination have been demonstrated between N. apis and N. ceranae spores stored at low temperatures (4 °C). Freshly isolated spores dried on glass slides kept at 4 °C for 4 days showed that 80% of N. apis, compared to 10% of N. ceranae spores, germinated in the presence of 0.1 M sucrose in PBS (Gisder et al. 2010). Gisder et al. (2010) also noted that the extruded filament of many N. ceranae spores was relatively short, suggesting that the spores observed may have been the primary life stage and not the environmental form. It is likely that the primary spore requires different conditions to activate and complete germination compared to the environmental spore.

6 Comparative virulence

Evidence points to N. ceranae as being more prevalent and producing higher spore loads than N. apis (Paxton et al. 2007; Emsen et al. 2016); however, current trends in Europe suggest that infection with Nosema spp., in general, has become less prevalent in recent years (Laurent et al. 2016). Caged bees infected with N. apis, N. ceranae, or both species can be used to provide insight into differences in growth rate, infectivity, and transmission, as well as for comparing consequences to host physiology, such as immune response or survivorship. For example, infection of bees with 105 N. ceranae spores has been shown to produce 100% mortality 8 days after infection (Higes et al. 2007). Williams et al. (2014) compared spore loads and mortality between N. apis, N. ceranae, or mixed species and found that bees infected with N. ceranae had significantly increased mortality, but only increased spore load compared to bees infected with both species. Forsgren and Fries (2010) infected newly emerged bees with 10, 102, 103, and 104 spores of N. apis or N. ceranae, doses ≤ 10-fold lower than Higes et al. (2007), and noticed a slower rate of increase in N. ceranae spore number compared to N. apis. This difference was temporary, as spore load and proportion infected were equivalent between species 14 days after infection (Forsgren and Fries 2010). In addition, Forsgren and Fries (2010) examined within host competition from mixed infections using inocula of 1:9, 9:1, or equal ratios of species. The species with the lower inoculum produced a greater number of spores 14 days after infection, and it is hypothesized that this effect may have been due to negative frequency-dependent selection (Forsgren and Fries 2010). Negative frequency-dependent selection is a mechanism explaining how asexually reproducing organisms maintain genetic diversity within an essentially clonal population, ultimately leading to the development of unique haplotypes (Weeks and Hoffmann 2008). Multiple haplotypes have been detected in isolates of N. ceranae from individual bees and different geographic regions (Williams et al. 2008; Gómez-Moracho et al. 2014). Intraspecies variation within N. ceranae may explain why isolates from Spain are more virulent than isolates from other regions (Paxton et al. 2007); however, Dussaubat et al. (2013) found no genetic differences in isolates from Spain that demonstrate high virulence versus isolates from France that have low virulence. An alternative explanation for why N. ceranae does not have as pronounced of an effect on bees outside of Spain may pertain to host tolerance, as bees in Denmark, for example, have been under artificial selection against Nosema spp. for decades (Huang et al. 2012, 2014).

Attributing the severity of disease based on spore load can be misleading (Zheng et al. 2014). Bees that are infected but are otherwise asymptomatic can have either high or low spore loads (Meana et al. 2010). For example, a recent study suggests that challenge alone with N. ceranae can have negative effects on host fitness, such as learning rate in bumblebees, despite a lack of spore production (Piiroinen and Goulson 2016). If exposure to N. ceranae without subsequent infection is sufficient to induce a negative effect, then the impact to overall colony health may extend beyond infected individuals.

7 Effects on colony demography

7.1 Effects on queen health

N. ceranae can be transmitted horizontally from infected workers to the queen (Higes et al. 2009). It has been shown previously that queens infected with N. apis are more likely to be replaced through supersedure (Farrar 1947; Furgala 1962; Jay 1967). Alaux et al. (2011) looked at the profile of queen mandibular pheromone (QMP) as a proximate mechanism to explain above normal frequencies of supersedure due to infection. Findings showed that levels of the QMP compounds, 9-oxodec-2-enoic acid (9-ODA) and 9-hydroxy-2-enoic acid (9-HDA), were significantly greater, while methyl p-hydroxybenzoate (HOB), an antifungal, was significantly lower, in the heads of queens infected with N. ceranae (Alaux et al. 2011). Declining HOB may be one signal that prompts initiation of queen rearing. Further research is needed to determine whether concentrations of HOB produced from queens infected with N. ceranae under laboratory conditions are capable of altering worker behavior when administered in the hive. Interestingly, HOB is an antifungal commonly added to artificial diets used to rear insects (Cohen 2003). Although speculative, suppression of HOB production may facilitate Nosema spp. growth and transmission.

Infection can induce changes to other factors linked to queen reproductive health. Terminal oocytes of queens infected with N. apis show evidence of autolysis, and mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes, and yolk granules appear unevenly dispersed or in a state of deterioration (Liu 1992). While yolk material undergoes degeneration in the ovaries, levels of the yolk precursor protein, vitellogenin (Vg), increase in the hemolymph of infected queens. Eight days after inoculation, queens infected with N. ceranae were found to have nearly twice the amount of Vg as controls (Alaux et al. 2011). The reason Vg is elevated in the hemolymph is unclear. Vitellogenin is continuously synthesized in the fat body and secreted in the hemolymph of mature queens (Fluri et al. 1981), where it is routed to the ovaries for egg maturation (Hagedorn and Kunkel 1979). Elevated Vg levels in the hemolymph of infected queens may be a temporary condition due to deterioration of specific receptors on ovaries that facilitate uptake.

7.2 Effects on drone health

The contribution of drones in shaping colony health may be overlooked when identifying the impact of infectious diseases. However, the degree of genetic variation due to different patrilines allows variability in responses for a colony confronted with stressors such as pathogens. Drone pupae and adults are susceptible to natural infection with N. ceranae (Traver and Fell 2011b). While spore loads may not reach levels as seen in workers, evidence suggests that infection with N. ceranae has a greater negative effect on drone body mass and survival (Retschnig et al. 2014a). A decrease in survival has also been observed in drones experimentally infected with N. apis (Peng et al. 2015). These findings raise important questions about drone health. Do infected drones weigh less because workers recognize that they are infected and stop feeding them to reduce transmission? Is there an effect to the quality or quantity of sperm in infected drones? Although N. ceranae is restricted to tissues outside the genital tract, infection may contribute to changes in somatic processes that ultimately reduce fertilization and reproductive success.

Male social insects are thought to maintain high reproductive potential by investing in the production of abundant, high-quality sperm (den Boer et al. 2010). However, with this investment comes a trade-off: a reduction in the allocation of resources for nonreproductive processes such as the immune system (Baer et al. 2006). The susceptibility of honey bees to diseases and parasites puts the reproductive potential of drones, and the colony, at risk. However, evidence is emerging that drones have evolved mechanisms to protect sperm from the negative effects of infectious diseases, such as Nosema spp. Spores, or their detection by PCR, have been observed for both N. apis and N. ceranae in the ejaculates of drones (Peng et al. 2015; Roberts et al. 2015). Moreover, older drones infected with N. apis have decreased sperm viability (Peng et al. 2015). Inspection of seminal fluid has revealed the presence of protein and nonprotein factors that have high potency against N. apis spore viability. These factors act by inducing extracellular spore germination (Peng et al. 2016) and are associated with humoral immune response signaling and antimicrobial production (Grassl et al. 2017). Additional studies should confirm if the antimicrobial effects of seminal fluid are also effective against N. ceranae.

8 Effects on workers and disruption of the division of labor

The regulatory interaction between Vg and juvenile hormone (JH) provides one explanation for how honey bees express the sequence of behaviors homologous to the reproductive care exhibited by their solitary ancestors (Amdam et al. 2006). Experiments using RNAi or topical application of JH demonstrate how factors can interfere with the normal progression of worker ontogeny. For example, when Vg expression is suppressed via RNAi, JH titer spikes in nurse-aged bees, triggering premature foraging and a shortened lifespan (Guidugli et al. 2005; Amdam et al. 2007; Nelson et al. 2007; Marco Antonio et al. 2008). Application of JH produces similar effects when applied topically to nurse-aged bees (Robinson 1987; Robinson et al. 1989).

Physiological processes regulating host development are sensitive to parasites and pathogens (Hurd et al. 2001). For example, workers infected with Nosema spp. have elevated levels of JH (Fisher and Sanborn 1962; Liu 1989; Ares et al. 2012). In addition, Vg expression has been found to be depressed in infected nurse-aged workers (Antúnez et al. 2009; Goblirsch et al. 2013; Zheng et al. 2014; Garrido et al. 2016). Goblirsch et al. (2013) observed elevated Vg expression 16 days after infection with N. ceranae. Similar results were observed in infected queens (Alaux et al. 2011) and workers from colonies with low levels of infection (Antúnez et al. 2013). The pleiotropic role of Vg in the development of the queen and workers may provide insight in how its expression is affected by infection.

Alteration of Vg and JH levels due to infection would likely manifest as expression of age-inappropriate behaviors and other physiological changes. Hypopharyngeal glands of nurse-aged bees infected with N. apis are reduced in size and function (Wang and Moeller 1969; Liu 1990). Workers infected with Nosema spp. have shortened lifespans and spend more time outside the nest engaged in risky behaviors such as guarding, orientation flights, and foraging (Hassanein 1953; Wang and Moeller 1970; Higes et al. 2008; Woyciechowski and Moroń 2009; Alaux et al. 2010; Vidau et al. 2011; Aufauvre et al. 2012, 2014; Lecocq et al. 2016; Natsopoulou et al. 2016). The site of Nosema spp. infection, the midgut, may be the direct source of downstream effects on Vg and/or JH. Since nurses typically consume large amounts of pollen that becomes digested and used for brood food synthesis, it is possible that suppression of Vg in infected bees is the result of changes to nutritional and metabolic pathways (Holt et al. 2013; Vidau et al. 2014). A recent meta-analysis comparing transcriptome datasets from honey bees infected with multiple pathogens suggests that downregulation of Vg and others genes coding for carbohydrate metabolism and detoxification is a general response to infection and not specific to Nosema spp. (Doublet et al. 2017).

Evidence from studies on N. apis and N. ceranae show that infection can disrupt worker age polyethism, mainly by advancing the transition from nursing to foraging (Wang and Moeller 1970; Goblirsch et al. 2013). Premature foraging may be a consequence of energetic demands that N. ceranae imposes on workers at a young age (Mayack and Naug 2009). Energetic stress imposed by infection can affect homing ability (Wolf et al. 2014). For example, the success rate of bees returning to their colony is significantly reduced for infected workers (Kralj and Fuchs 2010; Wolf et al. 2014). Additionally, there is a negative correlation between spore load and orientation flight duration and distance (Wolf et al. 2016). Despite having intact spatial processing capability (Wolf et al. 2016), the impact that reduced duration and distance covered during orientation has on an infected forager’s output requires further study.

Workers infected with N. apis or N. ceranae have lower levels of trehalose, regardless of infection intensity (Mayack and Naug 2010; Kurze et al. 2016b). Low trehalose has been shown to reduce flying capability in bees infected with N. ceranae (Mayack and Naug 2010). Interestingly, flying capability can be restored if infected bees are given access to sucrose (Mayack and Naug 2010). The hypothesis that infected bees are “hungry” is supported by the finding that sucrose responsiveness is elevated in workers infected with N. ceranae and that these bees are less likely to share food with nestmates (Naug and Gibbs 2009). Ad libitum access to food may offset drains on carbohydrate and protein metabolism due to infection (Basualdo et al. 2014). In addition to energetic stress caused by parasitism, further research is needed to elucidate other mechanisms that may contribute to acceleration of behavioral maturation (Mayack et al. 2015).

The impact of Nosema spp. on development and physiology can be influenced by the age at which a bee becomes infected. One study looked at survival and parameters of immunity (e.g., prophenoloxidase and phenoloxidase) 12 days after workers of different ages were fed N. ceranae spores (Roberts and Hughes 2014). Although all age groups had the same duration of exposure, workers infected at an older age had higher spore loads yet were more likely to survive infection despite having a lower ability to mount an immune response (Roberts and Hughes 2014). This finding can be applied to explore infection dynamics at the colony level where older workers are more likely to be infected than younger workers (Jack et al. 2016).

Downstream effects from disruption of nutritional and metabolic pathways may also be evident by changes in pheromone production. Modulation of pheromone production has been shown in infected workers. Ethyl oleate (EO) is synthesized by older workers and has an inhibitory effect on behavioral development of younger workers. Older workers likely expose younger bees to EO during trophallaxis (Leoncini et al. 2004). Dussaubat et al. (2010) showed a positive correlation between spore load and EO production in infected bees. Because infection has been shown to cause workers to transition prematurely from nursing to foraging, elevated EO production may be an additional outcome of changes in underlying endocrine signaling that regulates pheromone synthesis.

N. ceranae affects individual bee lifespan directly through alteration of physiological and behavioral processes, but how can the pathological effects at the individual level lead to death of the colony? A honey bee colony has a complex structure where individuals perform age-specific tasks that maintain colony homeostasis. However, there is plasticity in the behavioral program of workers that allows them to respond to individual and colony stress. Workers can advance, delay, or revert to behaviors not typical for their age in response to colony need. For example, nurse-aged bees can advance development to become foragers in response to a depopulation event of older workers, or they can delay onset to foraging if the current field force is confined to the hive during bouts of poor weather (Huang and Robinson 1996; Schulz et al. 1998; Amdam and Omholt 2003). Infection with N. ceranae can be one factor that alters the social demographics of the colony. The change in the age distribution of the worker population may be a direct response to infection. Infected bees die from tissue failure (Higes et al. 2007), are unable to return to the hive due to energetic stress (Kralj and Fuchs 2010; Wolf et al. 2014), or exit the hive to limit transmission to uninfected workers (Rueppell et al. 2010). The loss of infected workers, if sustained over time, may trigger accelerated aging and precocious foraging in uninfected nurse-aged workers. Precocious foragers are less effective at foraging than normal-aged foragers, resulting in food insecurity for the colony. The culmination of these effects could ultimately lead to sudden colony death (Perry et al. 2015).

9 Interactions and bee health

Many factors thought to contribute negatively to bee health likely do not act alone but are additive or synergistic with other stressors. Pesticides are one factor in which extensive research has been initiated to better understand their effects. Foraging bees are exposed to pesticides from the external environment during collection of nectar and pollen. Additionally, the hive environment can become contaminated through acaricides used to control V. destructor. Residues of over 100 different pesticides and their metabolites have been detected on bees or in pollen, honey, wax, and equipment (Bogdanov 2006; Chauzat and Faucon 2007; Frazier et al. 2008; Chauzat et al. 2009; Mullin et al. 2010; Lambert et al. 2013; Pettis et al. 2013). The amount of any individual pesticide frequently detected in the hive may not be sufficient to cause acute toxicity, but combinations of pesticides and/or their metabolites may have cumulative effects that create synergisms with other stressors such as pathogens, mites, or poor nutrition (Sanchez-Bayo and Goka 2014). For example, bees exposed to high levels of pesticides have been shown to be more susceptible to N. ceranae infection, and this increased risk is hypothesized to result from the inability of exposed bees to mount an effective immune response (Pettis et al. 2013).

Neonicotinoids and phenylpyrazoles are recent classes of insecticides with low toxicity to mammals. For this reason, they are used intensively to control arthropod pests. Sublethal doses of neonicotinoids combined with entomopathogenic fungi have become part of an integrated approach that utilizes two modes of action to enhance control (Purwar and Sachan 2006). The presence of these neonicotinoids in the environment could affect nontarget species such as bees harboring natural infections of Nosema spp. The interaction of chronic exposure to the neonicotinoids, imidacloprid and thiacloprid, with N. ceranae has been shown to increase mortality (Alaux et al. 2010; Retschnig et al. 2014b; although see Garrido et al. 2016). These findings are similar to studies examining the interaction of the phenylpyrazole, fipronil, with N. ceranae (Vidau et al. 2011; Aufauvre et al. 2012; but see Aufauvre et al. 2014). Neonicotinoids target the nervous system; however, these pesticides have been shown to induce apoptosis in midgut cells of larvae (Gregorc and Bowen 2000). To understand mechanisms of premature cell death, in vitro systems comprised of honey bee cells could be useful to observe cell death from exposure to combinations of pesticides and Nosema spp.

In addition to effects on survivorship, the interaction of pesticides and Nosema spp. infection may change the dynamics of the host-parasite relationship, such as allowing exploitation of host resources for spore production. Infected bees were found to have elevated spore loads after exposure to either neonicotinoids or phenylpyrazoles (Vidau et al. 2011; Pettis et al. 2012). One explanation for higher spore loads may be that Nosema spp. is opportunistic and takes advantage of the antibiotic potential of pesticides to reduce populations of beneficial symbionts in the gut that serve as a defense against invasion from foreign pathogens (Yoder et al. 2013).

Nosema spp. infection and pesticide exposure are ubiquitous events for a honey bee colony; therefore, it is difficult to tease apart which event, infection, or exposure occurs first and alters processes allowing the subsequent event to exacerbate the pathology. N. ceranae has been shown to upregulate cytochrome P450 monooxygenase and glutathione-S-transferase, and downregulate catalase and glutathione peroxidase in the midgut (Aufauvre et al. 2014). These genes metabolize foreign substrates for detoxification or provide protection against oxidative damage by catalyzing hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen. Honey bees have half the P450 genes as some other insects (Claudianos et al. 2006). These findings provide clues as to the outcome when pesticides challenge the detoxification system of bees already overwhelmed from infection (Johnson et al. 2009). It could be that detoxification processes in the midgut become overwhelmed from exposure to pesticides, increasing susceptibility to infection.

10 Interaction with viruses

Honey bees are host to ≥ 18 viruses, most of which are nonenveloped, single-stranded, positive sense RNA viruses, or picornaviruses. Picornaviruses are highly prevalent and detrimental to bee health and productivity. Those viruses most frequently detected in beekeeping operations include black queen cell virus (BQCV), deformed wing virus (DWV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV), and sacbrood virus (SBV) (Chen and Siede 2007; Welch et al. 2009). Bailey et al. (1983) observed co-infections of BQCV and N. apis during a 3-year observation period and showed that BQCV and N. apis cycled in unison, with levels of both pathogens peaking in May or June. Seasonal cycling of common viruses and Nosema spp. was demonstrated more recently with microarrays and deep sequencing of the honey bee microbiome using samples taken from a large-scale migratory operation (Runckel et al. 2011). These findings suggest that levels of acute bee paralysis virus, BQCV, and SBV and N. ceranae peak in the summer and may act synergistically and contribute to colony failure.

The interaction of Nosema spp. and viruses has been reported for bees co-infected with N. ceranae and chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV) or DWV. One study showed that co-infection of bees with N. ceranae and CBPV resulted in increased replication of CBPV but not mortality (Toplak et al. 2013). Costa et al. (2011) found a significant negative correlation between N. ceranae spore load and DWV titer in midgut tissues of workers. Furthermore, a survey of 322 colonies in Hawaii showed that while ≥ 89% were infected with N. ceranae, there was no correlation between spore load and DWV titer (Martin et al. 2013). One possible explanation why there is no positive correlation between spore load and DWV titer may depend on specific demographics of sampled bees. Bees symptomatic for DWV have viral replication in tissues throughout the body, which include hemolymph, gut, legs, head, thorax, abdomen, and most notably, the wings (Boncristiani et al. 2009). Food-borne transmission is one mechanism by which DWV can establish infection (Chen et al. 2006a, b). However, asymptomatic bees do not show signs of replication in the gut or abdomen, prompting speculation that a compromise in the integrity of the gut is needed for DWV to enter circulation via hemolymph (Boncristiani et al. 2009). Deformed wing virus can infect immature stages, whereas current evidence shows that the adult is the only life stage that can be infected naturally with Nosema spp. Newly emerged bees symptomatic for DWV die shortly after emergence (Chen et al. 2005; Dainat et al. 2012). Even if these bees were inoculated with spores upon emergence, the time until death may not be sufficient for Nosema spp. to complete its development and produce a large number of spores. On the other hand, asymptomatic bees appear relatively healthy and have a lifespan that supports spore production. N. apis and N. ceranae need ≥ 10 days postinoculation to achieve fully developed infections (i.e. ~ 20 × 106 spores/species) (Forsgren and Fries 2010). If a sample consists mainly of asymptomatic bees, it is possible that these bees have high spore loads but low DWV titer.

11 Interspecies transmission

As mentioned above, flowers may become contaminated with bee pathogens through visitation by host and nonhost vectors (Graystock et al. 2015). Through the sharing of floral resources, it is also possible that a pathogen can gain access to novel hosts. Infection with N. ceranae in other species has been examined. One study used cage experiments to infect different honey bee species, including the dwarf honey bee, Apis florea, and the giant honey bee, Apis dorsata, with isolates of N. ceranae from Canada and Thailand. Both species were susceptible to infection with the Thai isolate but the Canadian isolate was only infective against A. dorsata (Chaimanee et al. 2013). This finding adds support to an Asian origin for N. ceranae but may also demonstrate strain virulence in that the isolate from Canada was capable of producing an infection in A. mellifera as well.

Infection with N. ceranae has also been found in several species of Bombus from China (Li et al. 2012), Argentina (Plischuk et al. 2009), and the UK (Graystock et al. 2013; Fürst et al. 2014), albeit at low to moderate prevalence. In contrast, Arbulo et al. (2015) sampled Bombus atratus and Bombus bellicosus in Uruguay and found that the prevalence of N. ceranae infection approached > 50% in most areas sampled. N. ceranae may be associated with decline in abundance and richness of Bombus; however, much remains unknown (e.g., infectivity and pathogenicity) about the impact this pathogen is having on populations of these bees.

The use of bees other than honey bees for commercial pollination has led to the development of artificial rearing techniques for some species. Several species of solitary bee from the family Megachilidae, as well as some bumblebees, can be reared in the laboratory (Bosch and Kemp 2002; Evans et al. 2007), making it possible to study the effects of transmission to novel hosts from infection on metrics of individual bee and social living (e.g., foraging efficiency, survivorship, and reproductive success) in a controlled environment. For example, one study inoculated workers of Bombus terrestris with 6.5 × 103 N. ceranae spores and observed nearly 100% infection, spore amplification, and reduction in longevity (Graystock et al. 2013). However, this represents a subset of the thousands of other bees where the effects from Nosema spp. can only be assessed using anecdotal evidence, such as prevalence of infection. It is a challenge for future research to develop methods leading to an increase in the number of species that can either be reared in the laboratory or assessed by minimally invasive techniques (Paxton et al. 1997).

12 Tolerance as opposed to treatment

Past management for Nosema spp. has involved the use of the antifungal agent, fumagillin, applied prophylactically in the fall and/or spring (Webster 1994). This regime was intended to coincide with seasonal peaks of N. apis. However, evidence suggests that fumagillin may not be effective against N. ceranae (Williams et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2013). Huang et al. (2013) demonstrated that N. ceranae was able to withstand higher concentrations of fumagillin relative to N. apis, as measured by rate of spore production. Moreover, infected workers treated with relatively low concentrations of fumagillin had higher spores loads of N. ceranae than infected workers not treated with fumagillin (Huang et al. 2013).

In addition to having negative effects on host physiology, fumagillin increases management costs, and residues may persist in the hive, posing risks to human health through honey consumption (Lopez et al. 2008; van den Heever et al. 2015). Therefore, there is a need for alternatives to hard chemicals for Nosema spp. management. For example, ensuring that a colony has access to stored pollen helps sustain high hemolymph protein levels and promotes tolerance for N. ceranae infection (Basualdo et al. 2014). Another example of how this may be achieved is through selection of tolerant stocks (Holt and Grozinger 2016), as has been reported for colonies in Denmark (Huang et al. 2012). Recent research has identified physiological and molecular factors associated with tolerance to N. ceranae. Traits linked to tolerance are a lack of energetic stress (Kurze et al. 2016b) and increased survival despite high spore loads (Huang et al. 2014; Roberts and Hughes 2014). Huang et al. (2012) compared the immune response of tolerant drones to those from unselected colonies and found that tolerant drones had more robust activation of Toll signaling, an immune pathway responsive to Gram-positive bacterial and fungal infection. Tolerant bees also have increased levels of thioredoxin peroxidase, which may protect gut cells from the accumulation of reactive oxygen species produced as an immune response or pathogen-induced elevation of host metabolism (Kurze et al. 2016a). Colony level selection by beekeepers in Denmark for tolerance to Nosema spp. has likely led to reduction in genetic variability of specific regions of the honey bee genome (Huang et al. 2014). Analysis of differences between the genome of individuals under selection with those from unselected colonies could be useful for identifying molecular targets for RNAi-based treatments that confer host resistance.

13 Conclusions

Beekeepers and researchers have long dealt with Nosema spp. disease in colonies. Past observations on how infestations with the old Nosema sp., N. apis, contribute to queen failure, atypical worker ontogeny, and colony decline serve as a reference for understanding the current challenges imposed by the new Nosema. Comparative studies using caged bees infected with N. ceranae, N. apis, or both species have shed light on differences in parasite development and load. In addition to identifying differences in parasite virulence, caged bee studies, coupled with next generation sequencing, provide a platform to elucidate mechanisms of host tolerance at the molecular level. Although the prevalence of N. ceranae and N. apis fluctuates independently, high levels of N. ceranae during summer months provide opportunities to examine how this parasite may form synergisms with other common stressors of the hive environment such as pesticides and viruses.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Katie Lee, Bridget Mendel Lee, and Marla Spivak, and two anonymous reviewers for providing critical feedback on this manuscript.

Author’s contribution

MG conceived and wrote the paper.

References

  1. Alaux, C., Brunet, J.L., Dussaubat, C., Mondet, F., Tchamitchan, S., Cousin, M., Brillard, J., Baldy, A., Belzunces, L.P., Le Conte, Y. (2010) Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees (Apis mellifera). Environ. Microbiol. 12:774–782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaux, C., Folschweiller, M., McDonnell, C., Beslay, D., Cousin, M., Dussaubat, C., Brunet, J.L., Le Conte, Y. (2011) Pathological effects of the microsporidium Nosema ceranae on honey bee queen physiology (Apis mellifera). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 106:380–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amdam, G.V., Omholt, S.W. (2003) The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: the double repressor hypothesis. J. Theor. Biol. 223:451–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amdam, G.V., Csondes, A., Fondrk, M.K., Page, R.E. Jr. (2006) Complex social behavior derived from maternal reproductive traits. Nature 439:76–78PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amdam, G.V., Nilsen, K.A., Norberg, K., Fondrk, M.K., Hartfelder, K. (2007) Variation in endocrine signaling underlies variation in social life history. Am. Nat. 170:37–46PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antúnez, K., Martín-Hernández, R., Prieto, L., Meana, A., Zunino, P., Higes, M. (2009) Immune suppression in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) following infection by Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia). Environ. Microbiol. 11:2284–2290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antúnez, K., Mendoza, Y., Santos, E., Invernizzi, C. (2013) Differential expression of vitellogenin in honey bees (Apis mellifera) with different degrees of Nosema ceranae infection. J. Apic. Res. 52:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arbulo, N., Antúnez, K., Salvarrey, S., Santos, E., Branchiccela, B., Martín-Hernández, R., Higes, M., Invernizzi, C. (2015) High prevalence and infection levels of Nosema ceranae in bumblebees Bombus atratus and Bombus bellicosus from Uruguay. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 130:165–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ares, A.M., Nozal, M.J., Bernal, J.L., Martín-Hernández, R., Higes, M., Bernal, J. (2012) Liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry to evaluate juvenile hormone III levels in bee hemolymph from Nosema spp. infected colonies. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed Life Sci. 899:146–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aronstein, K.A., Webster, T.C., Saldivar, E. (2013) A serological method for detection of Nosema ceranae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114:621–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Aufauvre, J., Biron, D.G., Vidau, C., Fontbonne, R., Roudel, M., Diogon, M., Viguès, B., Belzunces, L.P., Delbac, F., Blot, N. (2012) Parasite-insecticide interactions: a case study of Nosema ceranae and fipronil synergy on honeybee. Sci. Rep. 2:326PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aufauvre, J., Misme-Aucouturier, B., Viguès, B., Texier, C., Delbac, F., Blot, N. (2014) Transcriptome analyses of the honeybee response to Nosema ceranae and insecticides. PLoS One. 9:e91686PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baer, B., Armitage, S.A., Boomsma, J.J. (2006) Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature 441:872–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bailey, L., Ball, B.V., Perry, J.N. (1983) Association of viruses with two protozoal pathogens of the honey bee. Ann. Appl. Biol. 103:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Basualdo, M., Barragán, S., Antúnez, K. (2014) Bee bread increases honeybee haemolymph protein and promote better survival despite of causing higher Nosema ceranae abundance in honeybees. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6:396–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Becnel, J.J., Andreadis, T.G. (1999) “Microsporidia in Insects”. In: The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis. Ed. M. Wittner. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp 447–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bogdanov, S. (2006) Contamination of bee products. Apidologie 37:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boncristiani, H.F. Jr., Di Prisco, G., Pettis, J.S., Hamilton, M., Chen, Y.P. (2009) Molecular approaches to the analysis of deformed wing virus replication and pathogenesis in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Virol. J. 6:221PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bosch, J., Kemp, W.P. (2002) Developing and establishing bee species as crop pollinators: the example of Osmia spp. and fruit trees. Bull. Entomol. Res. 92:3–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Botías, C., Anderson, D.L., Meana, A., Garrido-Bailón, E., Martín-Hernández, R., Higes, M. (2012) Further evidence of an oriental origin for Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 110:108–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buys, B. (1972) Nosema in brood. S. Afr. Bee J. 44:2–4Google Scholar
  22. Cali, A., Neafie, R.C., Takorian, P.M. (2011) “Microsporidiosis”. In: Topics on the Pathology of Protozoan and Invasive Arthropod Diseases. Eds. W.M. Meyers, A. Firpo, D.J. Wear. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  23. Cantwell, G.E. (1970) Standard methods for counting Nosema spores. Am. Bee J. 110:222–223Google Scholar
  24. Carletto, J., Blanchard, P., Gauthier, A., Schurr, F., Chauzat, M.P., Ribière, M. (2013) Improving molecular discrimination of Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae. J. Invertebr.Pathol. 113:52–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chaimanee, V., Pettis, J.S., Chen, Y., Evans, J.D., Khongphinitbunjong, K., Chantawannakul, P. (2013) Susceptibility of four different honey bee species to Nosema ceranae. Vet. Parasitol. 193:260–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chauzat, M.P., Faucon, J.P. (2007) Pesticide residues in beeswax samples collected from honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.) in France. Pest Manag. Sci. 63:1100–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chauzat, M.P., Carpentier, P., Martel, A.C., Bougeard, S., Cougoule, N., Porta, P., Lachaize, J., Madec, F., Aubert, M., Faucon, J.P. (2009) Influence of pesticide residues on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony health in France. Environ. Entomol. 38:514–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen, Y.P., Siede, R. (2007) Honey bee viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 70:33–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen, Y.P., Higgins, J.A., Feldlaufer, M.F. (2005) Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of deformed wing virus infection in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:436–441PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chen, Y., Evans, J., Feldlaufer, M. (2006a) Horizontal and vertical transmission of viruses in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 92:152–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen, Y.P., Pettis, J.S., Collins, A., Feldlaufer, M.F. (2006b) Prevalence and transmission of honeybee viruses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:606–611PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen, Y., Evans, J.D., Smith, I.B., Pettis, J.S. (2008) Nosema ceranae is a long-present and wide spread microsporidian infection of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera) in the United States. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 97:186–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen, Y.P., Evans, J.D., Murphy, C., Gutell, R., Zuker, M., Gundensen-Rindal, D., Pettis, J.S. (2009) Morphological, molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Nosema ceranae, a microsporidian parasite isolated from the European honey bee Apis mellifera. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 56:142–147PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen, Y.P., Pettis, J.S., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Tallon, L.J., et al. (2013) Genome sequencing and comparative genomics of honey bee microsporidia, Nosema apis reveal novel insights into host-parasite interactions. BMC Genomics. 14:451PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Clark, T.B. (1980) A second microsporidian in the honeybee. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 35:290–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Claudianos, C., Ranson, H., Johnson, R.M., Biswas, S., Schuler, M.A., Berenbaum, M.R., Feyereisen, R., Oakeshott, J.G. (2006) A deficit of detoxification enzymes: pesticide sensitivity and environmental response in the honeybee. Insect Mol. Biol. 15:615–636PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cohen, A.C. (2003) “Insect Diets: Science and Technology”. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 324ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Copley, T.R., Jabaji, S.H. (2012) Honeybee glands as possible infection reservoirs of Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in naturally infected forager bees. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112:15–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cornman, R.S., Chen, Y.P., Schatz, M.C., Street, C., Zhao, Y., Desany, B., Egholm,M., Hutchison S, Pettis JS, Lipkin WI, Evans JD. (2009) Genomic analyses of the microsporidian Nosema ceranae, an emergent pathogen of honey bees. PLoS Pathog. 5:e100046Google Scholar
  40. Costa, C., Tanner, G., Lodesani, M., Maistrello, L., Neumann, P. (2011) Negative correlation between Nosema ceranae spore loads and deformed wing virus infection levels in adult honey bee workers. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 108:224–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Cox-Foster, D.L., Conlan, S., Holmes, E.C., Palacios, G., Evans, J.D., et al. (2007) A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science. 318:283–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Currie, R.W., Pernal, S.F., Guzman-Novoa, E. (2010) Honey bee colony losses in Canada. J. Apic. Res. 49:104–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dainat, B., Evans, J.D., Chen, Y.P., Gauthier, L., Neumann, P. (2012) Dead or alive: deformed wing virus and Varroa destructor reduce the life span of winter honeybees. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:981–987PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. de Graaf, D.C., Raes, H., Sabbe, G., de Rycke, P.H., Jacobs, F.J. (1994) Early development of Nosema apis (Microspora: Nosematidae) in the midgut epithelium of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 63:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. den Boer, S. P, Baer, B., Boomsma, J.J. (2010) Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science. 327:1506–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Doublet, V., Poeschl, Y., Gogol-Döring, A., Alaux, C., Annoscia, D., et al. (2017) Unity in defence: honeybee workers exhibit conserved molecular responses to diverse pathogens. BMC Genomics. 18:207PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dussaubat, C., Maisonnasse, A., Alaux, C., Tchamitchan, S., Brunet, J.L., Plettner, E., Belzunces, L.P., Le Conte, Y. (2010) Nosema spp. infection alters pheromone production in honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Chem. Ecol. 36:522–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dussaubat, C., Brunet, J.L., Higes, M., Colbourne, J.K., Lopez, J., et al. (2012) Gut pathology and responses to the microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the honey bee Apis mellifera. PLoS One. 7:e37017PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dussaubat, C., Sagastume, S., Gómez-Moracho, T., Botías, C., García-Palencia, P., Martín Hernández, R., Le Conte, Y., Higes, M. (2013) Comparative study of Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) isolates from two different geographic origins. Vet. Microbiol. 162:670–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Eiri, D.M., Suwannapong, G., Endler, M., Nieh, J.C. (2015) Nosema ceranae can infect honey bee larvae and reduces subsequent adult longevity. PLoS One. 10:e0126330PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Emsen, B., Guzman-Novoa, E., Hamiduzzaman, M.M., Eccles, L., Lacey, B., Ruiz-Pérez, R.A., Nasr, M. (2016) Higher prevalence and levels of Nosema ceranae than Nosema apis infections in Canadian honey bee colonies. Parasitol. Res. 115:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Evans, E., Burns, I., Spivak, M. (2007) “Befriending Bumble Bees: A Practical Guide to Raising Local Bumble Bees”. University of Minnesota Extension Service, Minneapolis, 65pp Google Scholar
  53. Farrar, C.L. (1947) Nosema losses in package bees as related to queen supersedure and honey yields. J. Econ. Entomol. 40:333–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fenoy, S., Rueda, C., Higes, M., Martín-Hernández, R., del Aguila, C. (2009) High-level resistance of Nosema ceranae, a parasite of the honeybee, to temperature and desiccation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6886–6889PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ferroglio, E., Zanet, S., Peraldo, N., Tachis, E., Trisciuoglio, A., Laurino, D., Porporato, M. (2013) Nosema ceranae has been infecting honey bees Apis mellifera in Italy since at least 1993. J. Apic. Res. 52:60–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fisher, F.M. Jr., Sanborn, R.C. (1962) Production of insect juvenile hormone by the microsporidian parasite Nosema. Natures 194:1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fluri, P., Sabatini, A.G., Vecchi, M.A., Wille, H. (1981) Blood juvenile hormone, protein and vitellogenin titres in laying and non-laying queen honeybees. J. Apic. Res. 20:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Forsgren, E., Fries, I. (2010) Comparative virulence of Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in individual European honey bees. Vet. Parasitol. 170:212–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Frazier, M., Mullin, C., Frazier, J., Ashcraft, S. (2008) What have pesticides got to do with it? Am. Bee J. 148:521–523Google Scholar
  60. Fries, I. (1988) Infectivity and multiplication of Nosema apis Z. in the ventriculus of the honey bee. Apidologie 19:319–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Fries, I. (1989a) The intracellular development of Nosema apis Z. Apidologie. 20:502–3Google Scholar
  62. Fries, I. (1989b) Observations on the development and transmission of Nosema apis Z. in the ventriculus of the honey bee. J. Apic. Res. 28:107–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Fries, I. (1993) Nosema apis—a parasite in the honey bee colony. Bee World. 74:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Fries, I., Feng, F., da Silva, A., Slemenda, S.B., Pieniazek, N.J. (1996) Nosema ceranae n. sp. (Microspora, Nosematidae), morphological and molecular characterization of a microsporidian parasite of the Asian honey bee Apis cerana (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Eur. J. Protistol. 32:356–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Furgala, B. (1962) The effect on intensity of Nosema inoculum on queens supersedure in the honey bee, Apis mellifera Linnaeus. J. Insect. Pathol. 4:429–432Google Scholar
  66. Fürst, M.A., McMahon, D.P., Osborne, J.L., Paxton, R.J., Brown, M.J. (2014) Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators. Nature. 506:364–366PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. García-Palencia, P., Martín-Hernández, R., González-Porto, A.-V., Marin, P., Meana, A., Higes, M. (2010) Natural infection by Nosema ceranae causes similar lesions as in experimentally infected caged-worker honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Apic. Res. 49:278–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Garrido, P.M., Porrini, M.P., Antúnez, K., Branchiccela, B., Martínez-Noël, G.M., Zunino, P., Salerno, G., Eguaras, M.J., Ieno, E. (2016) Sublethal effects of acaricides and Nosema ceranae infection on immune related gene expression in honeybees. Vet. Res. 47:51PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Gilliam, M., Shimanuki, H. (1967) In vitro phagocytosis of Nosema apis spores by honey bee hemocytes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 9:387–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gisder, S., Hedtke, K., Möckel, N., Frielitz, M.C., Linde, A., Genersch, E. (2010) Five-year cohort study of Nosema spp. in Germany: does climate shape virulence and assertiveness of Nosema ceranae? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:3032–3038PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Goblirsch, M., Huang, Z.Y., Spivak, M. (2013) Physiological and behavioral changes in honey bees (Apis mellifera) induced by Nosema ceranae infection. PLoS One. 8:e58165PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Gómez-Moracho, T., Maside, X., Martín-Hernández, R., Higes, M., Bartolomé, C. (2014) High levels of genetic diversity in Nosema ceranae within Apis mellifera colonies. Parasitology 141:475–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Grassl, J., Peng, Y., Baer-Imhoof, B., Welch, M., Millar, A.H., Baer, B. (2017) Infections with the sexually transmitted pathogen Nosema apis trigger an immune response in the seminal fluid of honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Proteome Res. 16:319–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Gray, F.H., Cali, A., Briggs, J.D. (1969) Intracellular stages in the life cycle of the microsporidian Nosema apis. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 14:391–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Graystock, P., Yates, K., Darvill, B., Goulson, D., Hughes, W.O. (2013) Emerging dangers: deadly effects of an emergent parasite in a new pollinator host. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 114:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Graystock, P., Goulson, D., Hughes, W.O. (2015). Parasites in bloom: flowers aid dispersal and transmission of pollinator parasites within and between bee species. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282 Google Scholar
  77. Gregorc, A., Bowen, I.D. (2000) Histochemical characterization of cell death in honeybee larvae midgut after treatment with Paenibacillus larvae, Amitraz and Oxytetracycline. Cell Biol. Int. 24:319–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Gregorc, A., Silva-Zacarin, E.C., Carvalho, S.M., Kramberger, D., Teixeira, E.W., Malaspina, O. (2016) Effects of Nosema ceranae and thiamethoxam in Apis mellifera: a comparative study in Africanized and Carniolan honey bees. Chemosphere 147:328–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Guerrero-Molina, C., Correa-Benítez, A., Hamiduzzaman, M.M., Guzman-Novoa, E. (2016) Nosema ceranae is an old resident of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies in Mexico, causing infection levels of one million spores per bee or higher during summer and fall. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 141:38–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Guidugli, K.R., Nascimento, A.M., Amdam, G.V., Barchuk, A.R., Omholt, S., Simões, Z.L.P., Hartfelder, K. (2005) Vitellogenin regulates hormonal dynamics in the worker caste of a eusocial insect. FEBS Lett. 579:4961–4965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hacker, C., Howell, M., Bhella, D., Lucocq, J. (2014) Strategies for maximizing ATP supply in the microsporidian Encephalitozoon cuniculi: direct binding of mitochondria to the parasitophorous vacuole and clustering of the mitochondrial porin VDAC. Cell. Microbiol. 16:565–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Hagedorn, H.H., Kunkel, J.G. (1979) Vitellogenin and vitellin in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24:475–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hassanein, M.H. (1953) The influence of infection with Nosema apis on the activities and longevity of the worker honeybee. Ann. Appl. Biol. 40:418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Higes, M., Martín, R., Meana, A. (2006) Nosema ceranae, a new microsporidian parasite in honeybees in Europe. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 92:93–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Higes, M., García-Palencia, P., Martín-Hernández, R., Meana, A. (2007) Experimental infection of Apis mellifera honeybees with Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 94:211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Higes, M., Martín-Hernández, R., Garrido-Bailón, E., García-Palencia, P., Meana, A. (2008) Detection of infective Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) spores in corbicular pollen of forager honeybees. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 97:76–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Higes, M., Martín-Hernández, R., García-Palencia, P., Marín, P., Meana, A. (2009) Horizontal transmission of Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) from worker honeybees to queens (Apis mellifera). Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1:495–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Higes, M., Juarranz, Á., Dias-Almeida, J., Lucena, S., Botías, C., Meana, A., García Palencia, P., Martín-Hernández, R. (2013a) Apoptosis in the pathogenesis of Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5:530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Higes, M., Meana, A., Bartolomé, C., Botías, C., Martín-Hernández, R. (2013b) Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia), a controversial 21st century honey bee pathogen. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5:17–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Holt, H.L., Grozinger, C.M. (2016) Approaches and challenges to managing Nosema (Microspora: Nosematidae) parasites in honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies. J. Econ. Entomol. 109:1487–1503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Holt, H.L., Aronstein, K.A., Grozinger, C.M. (2013) Chronic parasitization by Nosema microsporidia causes global expression changes in core nutritional, metabolic and behavioral pathways in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). BMC Genomics. 14:799PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Huang, Z.-Y., Robinson, G.E. (1996) Regulation of honey bee division of labor by colony age demography. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39:147–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Huang, W.F., Solter, L.F. (2013) Comparative development and tissue tropism of Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 113:35–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Huang, W.-F., Jiang, J.-H., Chen, Y.-W., Wang, C.-H. (2007) A Nosema ceranae isolate from the honeybee Apis mellifera. Apidologie 38:30–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Huang, Q., Kryger, P., Le Conte, Y., Moritz, R.F. (2012) Survival and immune response of drones of a Nosemosis tolerant honey bee strain towards N. ceranae infections. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 109:297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Huang, W.F., Solter, L.F., Yau, P.M., Imai, B.S. (2013) Nosema ceranae escapes fumagillin control in honey bees. PLoS. Pathog. 9:e1003185PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Huang, Q., Lattorff, H.M., Kryger, P., Le Conte, Y., Moritz, R.F. (2014) A selective sweep in a microsporidian parasite Nosema-tolerant honeybee population, Apis mellifera. Anim Genet. 45:267–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Huang, Q., Chen, Y.P., Wang, R.W., Cheng, S., Evans, J.D. (2016) Host-parasite interactions and purifying selection in a microsporidian parasite of honey bees. PLoS One. 11:e0147549PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Hurd, H., Warr, E., Polwart, A. (2001) A parasite that increases host lifespan. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268:1749–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Invernizzi, C., Abud, C., Tomasco, I.H., Harriet, J., Ramallo, G., Campá, J., Katz, H., Gardiol, G., Mendoza, Y. (2009) Presence of Nosema ceranae in honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Uruguay. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 101:150–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Jack, C.J., Lucas, H.M., Webster, T.C., Sagili, R.R. (2016) Colony level prevalence and intensity of Nosema ceranae in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). PLoS One. 11:e0163522PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Jay, S.C. (1967) The problem of infertile and Nosema-infected queens. Manitoba Entomol. 1:l4–17Google Scholar
  103. Johnson, R.M., Evans, J.D., Robinson, G.E., Berenbaum, M.R. (2009) Changes in transcript abundance relating to colony collapse disorder in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106:14790–14795PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Klee, J., Besana, A.M., Genersch, E., Gisder, S., Nanetti, A., et al. (2007) Widespread dispersal of the microsporidian Nosema ceranae, an emergent pathogen of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 96:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kralj, J., Fuchs, S. (2010) Nosema sp. influences flight behaviour of infected honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers. Apidologie. 41:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Kumar, V., Abbas, A.K., Aster, J.C. (2012) “Cell Injury, Cell Death, and Adaptations”. In: Robbins Basic Pathology. 9th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  107. Kurze, C., Dosselli, R., Grasslb, J., Le Conte, Y., Kryger, P., Baer, B., Moritz, R.F.A. (2016a) Differential proteomics reveals novel insights into Nosema–honey bee interactions. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 79:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Kurze, C., Mayack, C., Hirche, F., Stangl, G.I., Le Conte, Y., Kryger, P., Moritz, R.F. (2016b) Nosema spp. infections cause no energetic stress in tolerant honeybees. Parasitol Res. 115:2381–2388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Lambert, O., Piroux, M., Puyo, S., Thorin, C., L’Hostis, M., Wiest, L., Buleté, A., Delbac, F., Pouliquen, H. (2013) Widespread occurrence of chemical residues in beehive matrices from apiaries located in different landscapes of Western France. PLoS One. 8:e67007PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Laurent, M., Hendrikx, P., Ribiere-Chabert, M., Chauzat, M.-P. (2016) A pan-European epidemiological study on honeybee colony losses 2012–2014. Sophia Antipolis: European Union Reference Laboratory for honey bee health (EURL)Google Scholar
  111. Lecocq, A., Jensen, A.B., Kryger, P., Nieh, J.C. (2016) Parasite infection accelerates age polyethism in young honey bees. Sci Rep. 6:22042PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Leoncini, I., Le Conte, Y., Costagliola, G., Plettner, E., Toth, A.L., Wang, M., Huang, Z., Bécard, J.M., Crauser, D., Slessor, K.N., Robinson, G.E. (2004) Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101:17559–17564PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Li, J., Chen, W., Wu, J., Peng, W., An, J., Schmid-Hempel, P., Schmid-Hempel, R. (2012) Diversity of Nosema associated with bumblebees (Bombus spp.) from China. Int. J.Parasitol. 42:49–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Liu, T.P. (1984) Ultrastructure of the midgut of the worker honeybee Apis mellifera heavily infected with Nosema apis. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 44:282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Liu, T.P. (1989) Juvenile hormone III induced ultrastructural changes in the hypopharyngeal glands of honeybee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) without and with infection by Nosema apis Zander (Microsporidia: Nosematidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 18:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Liu, T.P. (1990) Ultrastructural analysis on the gland secretion in the extracellular ducts of the hypopharyngeal glands of the honeybee infected by Nosema apis. Tissue Cell. 22:533–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Liu, T.P. (1992) Oöcytes degeneration in the queen honey bee after infection by Nosema apis. Tissue Cell. 24:131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lopez, M.I., Pettis, J.S., Smith, I.B., Chu, P.S. (2008) Multiclass determination and confirmation of antibiotic residues in honey using LC–MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56:1553–1559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Malone, L.A., Gatehouse, H.S. (1998) Effects of Nosema apis infection on honey bee (Apis mellifera) digestive proteolytic enzyme activity. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 71:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Malone, L.A., Gatehouse, H.S., Tregidga, E.L. (2001) Effects of time, temperature, and honey on Nosema apis (Microsporidia: Nosematidae), a parasite of the honeybee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 77:258–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Marco Antonio, D.S., Guidugli-Lazzarini, K.R., do Nascimento, A.M., Simões, Z.L., Hartfelder, K. (2008) RNAi-mediated silencing of vitellogenin gene function turns honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers into extremely precocious foragers. Naturwissenschaften 95:953–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Martin, S.J., Hardy, J., Villalobos, E., Martín-Hernández, R., Nikaido, S., Higes, M. (2013) Do the honeybee pathogens Nosema ceranae and deformed wing virus act synergistically? Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5:506–510PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Martín-Hernández, R., Meana, A., García-Palencia, P., Marín, P., Botías, C., Garrido Bailón, E., Barrios, L., Higes, M. (2009) Effect of temperature on the biotic potential of honeybee microsporidia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:2554–2557PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Martín-Hernández, R., Botías, C., Bailón, E.G., Martínez-Salvador, A., Prieto, L., Meana, A., Higes, M. (2012) Microsporidia infecting Apis mellifera: coexistence or competition. Is Nosema ceranae replacing Nosema apis? Environ. Microbiol. 14:2127–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Mayack, C., Naug, D. (2009) Energetic stress in the honeybee Apis mellifera from Nosema ceranae infection. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 100:185–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Mayack, C., Naug, D. (2010) Parasitic infection leads to decline in hemolymph sugar levels in honeybee foragers. J. Insect Physiol. 56:1572–1575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Mayack, C., Natsopoulou, M.E., McMahon, D.P. (2015) Nosema ceranae alters a highly conserved hormonal stress pathway in honeybees. Insect Mol. Biol. 24:662–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. McGowan, J., De la Mora, A., Goodwin, P.H., Habash, M., Hamiduzzaman, M.M., Kelly, P.G., Guzman-Novoa, E. (2016) Viability and infectivity of fresh and cryopreserved Nosema ceranae spores. J. Microbiol. Methods. 131:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Meana, A., Martín-Hernández, R., Higes, M. (2010) The reliability of spore counts to diagnose Nosema ceranae infections in honey bees. J. Apic. Res. 49:212–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Milbrath, M.O., van Tran, T., Huang, W.F., Solter, L.F., Tarpy, D.R., Lawrence, F., Huang, Z.Y. (2015) Comparative virulence and competition between Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae in honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 125:9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Moeller, F.E. (1972) Effect of emerging bees and of winter flights on nosema disease in honey bee colonies. J. Apic. Res. 11:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Mulholland, G.E., Traver, B.E., Johnson, N.G., Fell, R.D. (2012) Individual variability of Nosema ceranae infections in Apis mellifera colonies. Insects 3:1143–1155PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Mullin, C.A., Frazier, M., Frazier, J.L., Ashcraft, S., Simonds, R., van Engelsdorp, D., Pettis, J.S. (2010) High levels of miticides and agrochemicals in North American apiaries: implications for honey bee health. PLoS One. 5:e9754PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Nash, P.B., Purner, M.B., Leon, R.P., Clarke, P., Duke, R.C., Curiel, T.J. (1998) Toxoplasma gondii infected cells are resistant to multiple inducers of apoptosis. J. Immunol. 160:1824–1830PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Natsopoulou, M.E., McMahon, D.P., Paxton, R.J. (2016) Parasites modulate within-colony activity and accelerate the temporal polyethism schedule of a social insect, the honey bee. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70:1019–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Naug, D., Gibbs, A. (2009) Behavioral changes mediated by hunger in honeybees infected with Nosema ceranae. Apidologie. 40:595–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Nelson, C.M., Ihle, K.E., Fondrk, M.K., Page, R.E., Amdam, G.V. (2007) The gene vitellogenin has multiple coordinating effects on social organization. PLoS Biol. 5:e62PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Paxton, R.J., Fries, I., Pieniazekc, N.J., Tengöd, J. (1997) High incidence of infection of an undescribed microsporidium (Microspora) in the communal bee Andrena scotica (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae). Apidologie. 28:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Paxton, R.J., Klee, J., Korpela, S., Fries, I. (2007) Nosema ceranae has infected Apis mellifera in Europe since at least 1998 and may be more virulent than Nosema apis. Apidologie 38:558–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Peng, Y., Lee-Pullen, T.F., Heel, K., Millar, A.H., Baer, B. (2014) Quantifying spore viability of the honey bee pathogen Nosema apis using flow cytometry. Cytometry A. 85:454–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Peng, Y., Baer-Imhoof, B., Millar, A.H., Baer, B. (2015) Consequences of Nosema apis infection for male honey bees and their fertility. Sci Rep. 5:10565PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Peng, Y., Grassl, J., Millar, A.H., Baer, B. (2016) Seminal fluid of honeybees contains multiple mechanisms to combat infections of the sexually transmitted pathogen Nosema apis. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283 Google Scholar
  143. Perry, C.J., Søvik, E., Myerscough, M.R., Barron, A.B. (2015) Rapid behavioral maturation accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112:3427–32PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Pettis, J.S., van Engelsdorp, D., Johnson, J., Dively, G. (2012) Pesticide exposure in honey bees results in increased levels of the gut pathogen Nosema. Natuurwet. 99:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Pettis, J.S., Lichtenberg, E.M., Andree, M., Stitzinger, J., Rose, R., van Engelsdorp, D. (2013) Crop pollination exposes honey bees to pesticides which alters their susceptibility to the gut pathogen Nosema ceranae. PLoS One. 8:e70182PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Piiroinen, S., Goulson, D. (2016) Chronic neonicotinoid pesticide exposure and parasite stress differentially affects learning in honeybees and bumblebees. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283 Google Scholar
  147. Plischuk, S., Martín-Hernández, R., Prieto, L., Lucía, M., Botías, C., Meana, A., Abrahamovich, A.H., Lange, C., Higes, M. (2009) South American native bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) infected by Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia), an emerging pathogen of honeybees (Apis mellifera). Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1:131–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Ptaszyńska, A.A., Borsuk, G., Woźniakowski, G., Gnat, S., Małek, W. (2014) Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for rapid detection and differentiation of Nosema apis and N. ceranae in honeybees. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 357:40–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Purwar, J.P., Sachan, G.C. (2006) Synergistic effect of entomogenous fungi on some insecticides against Bihar hairy caterpillar Spilarctia obliqua (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Microbiol. Res. 161:38–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Raina, S.K., Das, S., Rai, M.M., Khurad, A.M. (1995) Transovarial transmission of Nosema Locustae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) in the migratory locust Locusta migratoria migratorioides. Parasitol. Res. 81:38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Retschnig, G., Neumann, P., Williams, G.R. (2014a) Thiacloprid-Nosema ceranae interactions in honey bees: host survivorship but not parasite reproduction is dependent on pesticide dose. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 118:18–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Retschnig, G., Williams, G.R., Mehmann, M.M., Yañez, O., de Miranda, J.R., Neumann, P. (2014b) Sex specific differences in pathogen susceptibility in honey bees (Apis mellifera). PLoS One. 9:e85261PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Retschnig, G., Williams, G.R., Schneeberger, A., Neumann, P. (2017) Cold ambient temperature promotes Nosema spp. intensity in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Insects 8:20PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Roberts, K.E., Hughes, W.O. (2014) Immunosenescence and resistance to parasite infection in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 121:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Roberts, K.E., Evison, S.E., Baer, B., Hughes, W.O. (2015) The cost of promiscuity: sexual transmission of Nosema microsporidian parasites in polyandrous honey bees. Sci. Rep. 5:10982PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Robinson, G.E. (1987) Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 20:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Robinson, G.E., Page, R.E. Jr., Strambi, C., Strambi, A. (1989) Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies. Science. 246:109–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Rueppell, O., Hayworth, M.K., Ross, N.P. (2010) Altruistic self-removal of health-compromised honey bee workers from their hive. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1538–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Runckel, C., Flenniken, M.L., Engel, J.C., Ruby, J.G., Ganem, D., Andino, R., DeRisi, J.L. (2011) Temporal analysis of the honey bee microbiome reveals four novel viruses and seasonal prevalence of known viruses, Nosema, and Crithidia. PLoS One. 6:e20656PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Sagastume, S., del Aguila, C., Martín-Hernández, R., Higes, M., Henriques-Gil, N. (2011) Polymorphism and recombination for rDNA in the putatively asexual microsporidian Nosema ceranae, a pathogen of honeybees. Environ. Microbiol. 13:84–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Sánchez Collado, J.G., Higes, M., Barrio, L., Martín-Hernández, R. (2014) Flow cytometry analysis of Nosema species to assess spore viability and longevity. Parasitol Res. 113:1695–1701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Sanchez-Bayo, F., Goka, K. (2014) Pesticide residues and bees—a risk assessment. PLoS One. 9:e94482PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Scanlon, M., Leitch, G.J., Shaw, A.P., Moura, H., Visvesvara, G.S. (1999) Susceptibility to apoptosis is reduced in the Microsporidia-infected host cell. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46:34S–35SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Scanlon, M., Leitch, G.J., Visvesvara, G.S., Shaw, A.P. (2004) Relationship between the host cell mitochondria and the parasitophorous vacuole in cells infected with Encephalitozoon microsporidia. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 51:81–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Schulz, D.J., Huang, Z.-Y., Robinson, G.E. (1998) Effects of colony food shortage on behavioral development in honey bees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Smith, M.L. (2012) The honey bee parasite Nosema ceranae: transmissible via food exchange? PLoS One. 7:e43319PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Snow, J.W. (2016) A fluorescent method for visualization of Nosema infection in whole-mount honey bee tissues. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 135:10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Teixeira, E.W., Santos, L.G., Sattler, A., Message, D., Alves, M.L., Martins, M.F., Grassi Sella, M.L., Francoy, T.M. (2013) Nosema ceranae has been present in Brazil for more than three decades infecting Africanized honey bees. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 114:250–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Terry, R.S., Dunn, A.M., Smith, J.E. (1997) Cellular distribution of a feminizing microsporidian parasite: a strategy for transovarial transmission. Parasitology 115:157–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Toplak, I., Jamnikar Ciglenečki, U., Aronstein, K., Gregorc, A. (2013) Chronic bee paralysis virus and Nosema ceranae experimental co-infection of winter honey bee workers (Apis mellifera L.). Viruses 5:2282–2297PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Traver, B.E., Fell, R.D. (2011a) Prevalence and infection intensity of Nosema in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in Virginia. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 107:43–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Traver, B.E., Fell, R.D. (2011b) Nosema ceranae in drone honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 107:234–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Traver, B.E., Fell, R.D. (2015) A scientific note: survey for Nosema spp. in preserved Apis spp. Apidologie 46:194–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Tsaousis, A.D., Kunji, E.R., Goldberg, A.V., Lucocq, J.M., Hirt, R.P., Embley, T.M. (2008) A novel route for ATP acquisition by the remnant mitochondria of Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Nature 453:553–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. van den Heever, J.P., Thompson, T.S., Curtis, J.M., Pernal, S.F. (2015) Stability of dicyclohexylamine and fumagillin in honey. Food Chem. 179:152–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Vidau, C., Diogon, M., Aufauvre, J., Fontbonne, R., Viguès, B., Brunet, J.L., Texier, C., Biron, D.G., Blot, N., El Alaoui, H., Belzunces, L.P., Delbac, F. (2011) Exposure to sublethal doses of fipronil and thiacloprid highly increases mortality of honeybees previously infected by Nosema ceranae. PLoS One. 6:e21550PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Vidau, C., Panek, J., Texier, C., Biron, D.G., Belzunces, L.P., Le Gall, M., Broussard, C., Delbac, F., El Alaoui, H. (2014) Differential proteomic analysis of midguts from Nosema ceranae infected honeybees reveals manipulation of key host functions. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 121:89–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Wang, D.I., Moeller, F.E. (1969) Histological comparisons of the development of the hypopharyngeal glands in healthy and Nosema-infected worker honey bees. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 14:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Wang, D.I., Moeller, F.E. (1970) The division of labor and queen attendance behavior of Nosema infected worker honeybees. J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1540–1541Google Scholar
  180. Webster, T.C. (1994) Fumagillin affects Nosema apis and honey bees (Hymonoptera - Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 87:601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Weeks, A.R., Hoffmann, A.A. (2008) Frequency-dependent selection maintains clonal diversity in an asexual organism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105:17872–17877PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Welch, A., Drummond, F., Tewari, S., Averill, A., Burand, J.P. (2009) Presence and prevalence of viruses in local and migratory honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Massachusetts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7862–7865PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Williams, G.R., Shafer, A.B.A., Rogers, R.E.L., Shutler, D., Stewart, D.T. (2008) First detection of Nosema ceranae, a microsporidian parasite of European honey bees (Apis mellifera), in Canada and central USA. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 97:189–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Williams, G.R., Shutler, D., Little, C.M., Burgher-MacLellan, K.L., Rogers, R.E.L. (2011) The microsporidian Nosema ceranae, the antibiotic Fumagillin-B (R), and western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony strength. Apidologie. 42:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Williams, G.R., Shutler, D., Burgher-MacLellan, K.L., Rogers, R.E. (2014) Infra-population and community dynamics of the parasites Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae, and consequences for honey bee (Apis mellifera) hosts. PLoS One. 9:e99465PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Wolf, S., McMahon, D.P., Lim, K.S., Pull, C.D., Clark, S.J., Paxton, R.J., Osborne, J.L. (2014) So near and yet so far: harmonic radar reveals reduced homing ability of Nosema infected honeybees. PLoS One. 9:e103989PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Wolf, S., Nicholls, E., Reynolds, A.M., Wells, P., Lim, K.S., Paxton, R.J., Osborne, J.L. (2016) Optimal search patterns in honeybee orientation flights are robust against emerging infectious diseases. Sci. Rep. 6:32612PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Woyciechowski, M., Moroń, D. (2009) Life expectancy and onset of foraging in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Insectes Soc. 56:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Xu, Y., Weiss, L.M. (2005) The microsporidian polar tube: a highly specialized invasion organelle. Int. J. Parasitol. 35:941–53PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Yoder, J.A., Jajack, A.J., Rosselot, A.E., Smith, T.J., Yerke, M.C., Sammataro, D. (2013) Fungicide contamination reduces beneficial fungi in bee bread based on an area wide field study in honey bee, Apis mellifera, colonies. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 76:587–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Youssef, N.N., Hammond, D.M. (1971) The fine structure of the developmental stages of the microsporidian Nosema apis Zander. Tissue Cell. 3:283–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Zander, E. (1909) Tierische Parasiten als Krankenheitserreger bei der Biene. Münchener Bienenztg. 31:196–204Google Scholar
  193. Zheng, H.Q., Lin, Z.G., Huang, S.K., Sohr, A., Wu, L., Chen, Y.P. (2014) Spore loads may not be used alone as a direct indicator of the severity of Nosema ceranae infection in honey bees Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 107:2037–2044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations