Analysis of the changes in medium moisture content according to a crop irrigation strategy and the medium properties for precise moisture content control in rock wool

  • Young Bae Choi
  • Jong Hwa ShinEmail author
Research Report


The substrate moisture content affects crop absorption, microorganisms, oxygen concentration, water stress, and the ultimate evaporation amount. The moisture content in the rhizosphere can be controlled by the amount of water, the frequency of water supply, the time of water supply, and the rate of water supply provided to the crops. The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical properties of a rock wool medium and to investigate the water movement characteristics of the medium according to different watering conditions. To measure the moisture content of the substrate and the drainage amount, load cells were used as weight sensors, and the total irrigation capacity was 99 and 198 mL/min, respectively. The moisture content at each irrigation starting point was set from 30 to 80% of the substrate moisture content at each 5%. The relationship of the starting point of drainage, the 30% drainage rate, the point of the first saturation according to the two different irrigation rates, and the point of moisture content at the start of irrigation showed a sigmoidal relationship. When reviewing the irrigation to the first saturation point, the substrate moisture content got higher as the moisture content at the irrigation start increased. Also, it was shown that the higher the irrigation rate, the higher the saturated moisture content seen in the substrate. The high irrigation rate is useful for the saturation of the substrate, but a large amount of water was needed to adjust the drainage rate. For this reason, we analyzed the irrigation rate under various cultivation conditions.


Irrigation control Moisture content Rock wool Substrate 



This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024862) and Research Grant of Andong National University.


  1. Ahn TI, Son JE (2011) Changes in ion balance and individual ionic contributions to EC reading at different renewal intervals of nutrient solution under EC-based nutrient control in closedloop soilless culture for sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum L. ‘Fiesta’). Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 29:29–35Google Scholar
  2. Akinbile CO, Yusoff MS (2011) Growth, yield and water use pattern of chilli pepper under différent irrigation scheduling and management. Asian J Agric Res 5:154–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allaire S, Caron J, Ménard C, Dorais M (2004) Growing media varying in particle size and shape for greenhouse tomato. Acta Hortic 644:307–311. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blok C (1999) Air/water management in rockwool slabs. Acta Hortic 481:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bussell WT, McKennie S (2004) Rockwool in horticulture, and its importance and sustainable use in New Zealand. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 32:29–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corwin DL, Rhoades JD, Šimůnek J (2007) Leaching requirement for soil salinity control: steady-state versus transient models. Agric Water Manag 90:165–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Da Sailva FF, Wallach R, Chen Y (1995) Hydraulic properties of rockwool slabs used as substrates in horticulture. Acta Hortic 401:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Rijck G, Schrevens E (1998) Distribution of nutrients and water in rockwool slabs. Sci Hortic (Amst) 72:277–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denmead OT, Shaw RH (1960) The effects of soil moisture stress at different stages of growth on the development and yield of corn. Agron J 52:272–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denmead OT, Shaw RH (1962) Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture content and meteorological conditions 1. Agron J 54:385–390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gahoonia TS, Raza S, Nielsen NE (1994) Phosphorus depletion in the rhizosphere as influenced by soil moisture. Plant Soil 159:213–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hellemans B (2006) Environmental control and Paprika growing technique. Substratus Res. Center, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Islam S (2008) Evaluating performance of ecologically sound substrates under different temperature regimes. Int J Agric Biol 10:297–300Google Scholar
  14. Islam S, Khan S, Ito T, Maruo T, Shinohara Y (2002) Characterization of the physico-chemical properties of environmentally friendly organic substrates in relation to rockwool. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77:143–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kapur B, Çeliktopuz E, Sarıdaş MA, Kargı SP (2018) Irrigation regimes and bio-stimulant application effects on yield and morpho-physiological responses of strawberry. Hortic Sci Technol 36:313–325Google Scholar
  16. Kim HM, No KO, Hwang SJ (2016) Use of pellet or cube-type phenolic foam as an artificial medium for production of tomato plug seedlings. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 34:414–423Google Scholar
  17. Olle M, Ngouajio M, Siomos A (2012) Vegetable quality and productivity as influenced by growing medium: a review. Agriculture 99:399–408Google Scholar
  18. Park HJ, Park JH, Park KS, Ahn TI, Son JE (2018) Nondestructive measurement of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) Internal electrical conductivity and its relation to environmental factors. Hortic Sci Technol 36:691–701Google Scholar
  19. Schon MK, Peggy Compton M (1997) Comparison of cucumbers grown in rockwool or perlite at two leaching fractions. Horttechnology 7:30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schröder FG, Lieth JH (2002) Irrigation control in hydroponics. In: Savvas D, Passam H (eds) Hydroponic production of vegetables and ornamentals. Embryo Publications, Athens, pp 263–298Google Scholar
  21. Schwarz M (1995) Soilless culture management. Advanced series in agricultural sciences, vol 42. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Shin JH, Park JS, Son JE (2014) Estimating the actual transpiration rate with compensated levels of accumulated radiation for the efficient irrigation of soilless cultures of paprika plants. Agric Water Manag 135:9–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smittle DA, Dickens WL, Stansell JR (1994) Irrigation regimes affect yield and water use by bell pepper. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:936–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tadesse T, Nichols MA, Fisher KJ (1999) Nutrient conductivity effects on sweet pepper 2. Blossomend rot and fruit mineral status. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 27:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tüzel IH, Tüzel Y, Gül A, Altunlu H, Eltez RZ (2001) Effect of different irrigation schedules, substrates and substrate volumes on fruit quality and yield of greenhouse. Acta Hortic 548:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu G, Choi DG, Bae JH, Guak SH (2006) Effects of substrate EC and water content on the incidence of brown fruit stem and blossom end rot in glasshouse sweet pepper. J Bio-Environ Control 15:167–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture and BreedingAndong National UniversityAndongKorea

Personalised recommendations