Advertisement

Human Cell

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Proliferation of poorly differentiated endometrial cancer cells through autocrine activation of FGF receptor and HES1 expression

  • Michihiro MoriEmail author
  • Toshinori Mori
  • Aina Yamamoto
  • Shoji Takagi
  • Masatsugu Ueda
Research Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Patients with poorly differentiated endometrial cancer show poor prognosis, and effective molecular target-based therapies are needed. Endometrial cancer cells proliferate depending on the activation of HES1 (hairy and enhancer of split-1), which is induced by several pathways, such as the Notch and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathways. In addition, aberrant, ligand-free activation of the FGFR signaling pathway resulting from mutations in FGFR2 was also reported in endometrial cancer. However, a clinical trial showed that there was no difference in the effectiveness of FGFR inhibitors between patients with and without the FGFR2 mutation, suggesting a presence of another signaling pathway for the FGFR activation. Here, we investigated the signaling pathway regulating the expression of HES1 and proliferation of poorly and well-differentiated endometrial cancer cell lines Ishikawa and HEC-50B, respectively. Whereas Ishikawa cells proliferated and expressed HES1 in a Notch signaling-dependent manner, Notch signaling was not involved in HES1 and proliferation of HEC-50B cells. The FGFR inhibitor, NVP-BGJ398, decreased HES1 expression and proliferation of HEC-50B cells; however, HEC50B cells had no mutations in the FGFR2 gene. Instead, HEC-50B cells highly expressed ligands for FGFR2, suggesting that FGFR2 is activated by an autocrine manner, not by ligand-free activation. This autocrine pathway activated Akt downstream of FGFR for cell proliferation. Our findings suggest the usefulness of HES1 as a marker for the proliferation signaling and that FGFR inhibitor may be effective for poorly differentiated endometrial cancers that harbor wild-type FGFR.

Keywords

HES1 FGF/FGFR FGFR2 Endometrial cancer NVP-BGJ398 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Masayoshi Okada and Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Nogami Y, Banno K, Kisu I, et al. Current status of molecular-targeted drugs for endometrial cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1(5):799–804.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tatiana N, Carol A, Neenakshi S. Role of current and emerging biomarkers in resolving persistent clinical dilemmas. Am Soc Clin Pathol. 2016;145:8–21.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mariam M, Andrea M, Jamie N, et al. Risk-scoring models for individualized prediction of overall survival in low-grade and high-grade endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133:485–93.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joshua Z, Walter H. Controversies in the treatment of early stage endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/578490.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu ZH, Dai XM, Du B. Hes1: a key role in stemness, metastasis and multidrug resistance. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(3):353–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Du X, Cheng Z, Wang YH, et al. Role of Notch signaling pathway in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(27):9191–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abel EV, Kim EJ, Wu J, et al. The Notch pathway is important in maintaining the cancer stem cell population in pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sjölund J, Boström AK, Lindgren D, et al. The Notch and TGF-β signaling pathways contribute to the aggressiveness of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23057.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weng M, Tsao P, Tung C, et al. Hes1 increases the invasion ability of colorectal cancer cells via the STST3-MMP14 pathway. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144322.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ueo T, Imayoshi I, Kobayashi T, et al. The role of Hes genes in intestinal development, homeostasis and tumor formation. Dev Stem Cells. 2012;139:1071–82.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolós V, Grego-Bessa J, de la Pompa JL. Notch signaling in development and cancer. Endocr Rev. 2007;28(3):339–63.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jurcevic S, Klinga-Levan K, Olsson B, Ejeskär K. Verification of microRNA expression in human endometrial adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):261.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sasnauskienė A, Jonušienė V, Krikštaponienė A, et al. NOTCH1, NOTCH3, NOTCH4, and JAG2 protein levels in human endometrial cancer. Medicina (Kaunas). 2014;50(1):14–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Down-regulation of Notch-1 contributes to cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:483–93.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao F, Huang W, Zhang Y, et al. Hes1 promotes cell proliferation and migration by activating Bmi-1 and PTEN/Akt/GSK3β pathway in human colon cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(36):38667–80.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang M, Wu L, Wang L, et al. Down-regulation of Notch1 by gamma-secretase inhibition contributes to cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells A2780. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;393:144–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Götte M, Greve B, Kelsch R, et al. The adult stem cell marker Musashi-1 modulates endometrial carcinoma cell cycle progression and apoptosis via Notch-1 and p21WAF1/CIP1. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(8):2042–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mori M, Miyamoto T, Ohno S, Miyake Y, Sakaguchi T, Ohno E. Diagnostic utility of Notch-1 immunocytochemistry in endometrial cytology. Acta Cytol. 2012;56(2):166–70.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suzuki T, Aoki D, Susumu N, Udagawa Y, Nozawa S. Imbalanced expression of TAN-1 and human Notch4 in endometrial cancers. Int J Oncol. 2000;17:1131–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guo Q, Qian Z, Yan D, Li L, Huang L. LncRNA-MEG3 inhibits cell proliferation of endometrial carcinoma by repressing Notch signaling. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;82:589–94.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cobellis L, Caprio F, Trabucco E, et al. The pattern of expression of Notch protein members in the normal and pathological endometrium. J Anat. 2008;213:464–72.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mori M, Miyamoto T, Yakushiji H, et al. Effects of N-[N-(3, 5-difluorophenacetyl-l-alanyl)]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) on cell proliferation and apoptosis in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells. Hum Cell. 2012;25(1):9–15.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fearon AE, Gould CR, Grose RP. FGFR signalling in women’s cancers. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45(12):2832–42.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beenken A, Mohammadi M. The FGF family: biology, patho physiology and therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(3):235–53.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sangha RK, Li XF, Shams M, Ahmed A. Fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 is a critical component for endometrial remodeling: localization and expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and FGF-R1 in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle and decreased FGF-R1 expression in menorrhagia. Lab Invest. 1997;77(4):389–402.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gatius S, Velasco A, Azueta A, et al. FGFR2 alterations in endometrial carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(11):1500–10.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Byron S, Pollock P. FGFR2 as a molecular target in endometrial cancer. Future Oncol. 2009;5(1):1–6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liao R, Jung J, Tchaicha J, et al. Inhibitor-sensitive FGFR2 and FGFR3 mutations in lung squamous cell cancinoma. Can Res. 2013;73(16):5195–205.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Byron SA, Gartside MG, Wellens CL, et al. Inhibition of activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 in endometrial cancer cells induces cell death despite PTEN abrogation. Cancer Res. 2008;68(17):6902–7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Winterhoff B, Konecny GE. Targeting fibroblast growth factor pathways in endometrial cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2017;41(1):37–47.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakayama K, Satoh T, Igari A, et al. FGF induces oscillations of Hes1 expression and Ras/ERK activation. Curr Biol. 2008;18(8):332–4.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Byron SA, Chen H, Wortmann A, et al. The N550K/H mutations in FGFR2 confer differential resistance to PD173074, dovitinib, and ponatinib ATP-competitive inhibitors. Neoplasia. 2013;15(8):975–88.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rasband WS, ImageJ US. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2012.
  35. 35.
    Moreira NF, Luz VG, Moreira CC, et al. Self-reported weight and height are valid measures to determine weight status: results from the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS 2013). Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(5):e00063917.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fujimoto J, Hori M, Ichigo S, Tamaya T. Expressions of the fibroblast growth factor family (FGF-1, -2 and -4) mRNA in endometrial cancers. Tumour Biol. 1996;17(4):226–33.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Konecny GE, Kolarova T, O’Brien NA, et al. Activity of the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors dovitinib (TKI258) and NVP-BGJ398 in human endometrial cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(5):632–42.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Göke A, Göke R, Ofner A, Herbst A, Lankat -Buttgereit B. The FGFR inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 induces NSCLC cell death by activating caspase-dependent pathways as well as caspase-independent apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(11):5873–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu FS. Molecular carcinogenesis of endometrial cancer. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;46(1):26–32.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dong P, Kaneuchi M, Konno Y, Watari H, Sudo S, Sakuragi N. Emerging therapeutic biomarkers in endometrial cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:130362.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/130362.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wei Y, Zhang Z, Liao H, et al. Nuclear estrogen receptor-mediated Notch signaling and GPR30-mediated PI3K/AKT signaling in the regulation of endometrial cancer cell proliferation. Oncol Rep. 2012;27(2):504–10.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cenciarelli C, Marei HE, Zonfrillo M, et al. The interference of Notch1 target Hes1 affects cell growth, differentiation and invasiveness of glioblastoma stem cells through modulation of multiple oncogenic targets. Oncotarget. 2017;8(11):17873–86.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rasul S, Balasubramanian R, Filipović A, Slade MJ, Yagüe E, Coombes RC. Inhibition of gamma-secretase induces G2/M arrest and triggers apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(12):1879–88.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Qiu M, Bao W, Wang J, et al. FOXA1 promotes tumor cell proliferation through AR involving the Notch pathway in endometrial cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:78.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jang JH, Shin KH, Park JG. Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 genes associated with human gastric and colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2001;61(9):3541–3.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Davies H, Hunter C, Smith R, et al. Somatic mutations of the protein kinase gene family in human lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65(17):7591–5.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang Y, Becker D. Antisense targeting of basic fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 in human melanomas blocks intratumoral angiogenesis and tumor growth. Nat Med. 1997;3(8):887–93.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Terai H, Soejima K, Yasuda H, et al. Activation of the FGF2-FGFR1 autocrine pathway: a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC. Mol Cancer Res. 2013;11(7):759–67.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Weigelt B, Warne PH, Lambros MB, Reis-Filho JS, Downward J. PI3K pathway dependencies in endometrioid endometrial cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(13):3533–44.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):67–73.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sun M, Hillmann P, Hofmann BT, Hart JR, Vogt PK. Cancer-derived mutations in the regulatory subunit p85alpha of phosphoinositide 3-kinase function through the catalytic subunit p110alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(35):15547–52.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gupta S, Ramjaun AR, Haiko P, et al. Binding of ras to phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110alpha is required for ras-driven tumorigenesis in mice. Cell. 2007;129(5):957–68.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cheung LW, Hennessy BT, Li J, et al. High frequency of PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 mutations in endometrial cancer elucidates a novel mechanism for regulation of PTEN protein stability. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(2):170–85.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liao T, Wei WJ, Wen D, et al. Verteporfin inhibits papillary thyroid cancer cells proliferation and cell cycle through ERK1/2 signaling pathway. J Cancer. 2018;9(8):1329–36.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hou H, Ge C, Sun H, Li H, Li J, Tian H. Tunicamycin inhibits cell proliferation and migration in hepatocellular carcinoma through suppression of CD44s and the ERK1/2 pathway. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(4):1088–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Human Cell Society and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michihiro Mori
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Toshinori Mori
    • 3
    • 4
  • Aina Yamamoto
    • 4
  • Shoji Takagi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Masatsugu Ueda
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Medical Life Science, College of Life ScienceKurashiki University of Science and the ArtsOkayamaJapan
  2. 2.Kake Institute of CytopathologyOkayamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Clinical LaboratoryMihara Medical Associations HospitalHiroshimaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Chemical Technology, Graduate School of Science and Industrial TechnologyKurashiki University of Science and the ArtsOkayamaJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of Health SciencesKio UniversityNaraJapan
  6. 6.Graduate School of Health SciencesKio UniversityNaraJapan

Personalised recommendations