Advertisement

Sankhya B

pp 1–22 | Cite as

A Robust Sharpe Ratio

  • Mahesh K.CEmail author
  • Arnab Kumar Laha
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Sharpe ratio is one of the widely used measures in the financial literature to compare two or more investment strategies. Since it is a ratio of the excess expected return of a portfolio to its standard deviation of returns, it is not robust against the presence of outliers. In this paper we propose a modification of the Sharpe ratio which is based on robust measures of location and scale. We investigate the properties of this proposed ratio under six alternative return distributions. It is seen that the modified Sharpe ratio performs better than the original Sharpe ratio in the presence of outliers. A real life stock market return data set is analyzed and the comparative performances of the two ratios are studied. The results indicate that modified Sharpe ratio may be a better measure for comparing different investment strategies. When downside risk is the only concern of the investors a modification of the Sharpe ratio known as Sortino ratio is often used. It is shown that the Sortino ratio is not robust and we propose a modified version of the same which is robust.

Keywords and phrases

Cauchy distribution Mixture normal distribution Lognormal distribution Outliers Stock market returns. 

AMS (2000) subject classification

Primary 62F35 Secondary 91B28 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments which has led to substantial improvement of the article.

References

  1. Bao, Y. and Ullah, A. (2006). Moments of the estimated Sharpe ratio when the observations are not IID. Financ. Res. Lett.3, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhry, A. and Johnson, H.L. (2008). The efficacy of the Sortino ratio and other benchmarked performance measures under skewed return distributions. Aust. J. Manag.32, Special Issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cramer, H. (1946). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
  4. Falk, M. (1997). Asymptotic independence of median and MAD. Statist. Probab. Lett.34, 341–345.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hampel, F.R. (1974). The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.69, 383–393.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hampel, F.R., Ronchetti, E.M., Rousseeuw, P.J. and Stahel, W.A. (1986). Robust Statistics: the Approach Based on Influence Functions. Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Huber, P.J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann. Math. Stat.35, 73–101.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huber, P.J. (1965). A robust version of probability ratio test. Ann. Math. Stat.36, 1753–1758.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huber, P.J. (1968). Robust confidence limits. Z.Wahrsch. verw.Geb.10, 269–278.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huber, P.J. (1981). Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jobson, J.D. and Korkie, B.M. (1981). Performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe and Treynor measures. J. Financ.36, 889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight, J. and Satchell, S. (2005). A re-examination of Sharpe’s ratio for log-normal prices. Applied Mathematical Finance12, 1, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M. (2008). Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. J. Empir. Financ.15, 850–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lo, A.W. (2002). The statistics of Sharpe ratios. Financ. Anal. J.58, 4, 36–52.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marona, R.A., Martin, R.D. and Yohai, V.J. (2006). Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods. Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsaglia, G. (1965). Ratios of normal variables and ratios of sums of uniform variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.60, 193–204.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsagila, G. (2006). Ratios of normal variables. J. Stat. Softw. 16, 4.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, R.E. and Gehr, K.A. (1978). Sample size bias and sharpe’s performance measure: a note. J. Financ. Quant. Anal.13, 943–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nielsen, L.T. and Vassalou, M. (2004). Sharpe ratios and alphas in continuous time. J. Financ. Quant. Anal.39, 1, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Opdyke, J.D. (2007). Comparing Sharpe Ratios: So Where are the p-values?. J. Asset Manag.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinar, M.C. (2016). On robust mean-variance portfolios. Optimization65, 1039–1048.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perold, A.F. (2004). The capital asset pricing model. J. Econ. Perspect.8, 3, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rousseeuw, P.J. (1981). A new infinitesimal approach to robust estimation. Zeitschrift fuer Wahrscheinlichkeit und Verwandte Gebiete.56, 127–132.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roy, A.D. (1952). Safety first and the holdings of assets. Econometrika20, 3, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Serfling, R.J. (2002). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharpe, W.F. (1966). Mutual funds performance. Journal of Business (January), 119–138.Google Scholar
  27. Sortino, F.A. and Van der Meer, R. (1991). Downside risk. The Journal of Portfolio ManagementSummer, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Staudte, R.G. and Sheather, S.J. (1990). Robust Estimation and Tests. Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tukey, J.W. (1960). A Survey of Sampling from Contaminated Distributions. In: Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, (I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow and H. B. Mann, eds.) Stanford University Press, p. 448–485.Google Scholar
  30. Wilcox, R.R. (2012). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Elsevier, Amsterdam.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Statistical Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Management, Nirma UniversityAhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Management AhmedabadAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations