Sankhya B

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Point and Interval Estimation of Weibull Parameters Based on Joint Progressively Censored Data

  • Shuvashree Mondal
  • Debasis KunduEmail author


The analysis of progressively censored data has received considerable attention in the last few years. In this paper, we consider the joint progressive censoring scheme for two populations. It is assumed that the lifetime distribution of the items from the two populations follows Weibull distribution with the same shape but different scale parameters. Based on the joint progressive censoring scheme, first, we consider the maximum likelihood estimators of the unknown parameters whenever they exist. We provide the Bayesian inferences of the unknown parameters under a fairly general priors on the shape and scale parameters. The Bayes estimators and the associated credible intervals cannot be obtained in closed form, and we propose to use the importance sampling technique to compute the same. Further, we consider the problem when it is known a priori that the expected lifetime of one population is smaller than the other. We provide the order-restricted classical and Bayesian inferences of the unknown parameters. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to observe the performances of the different estimators and the associated confidence and credible intervals. One real data set has been analyzed for illustrative purpose.

Keywords and phrases

Joint progressive censoring scheme Weibull distribution Beta-gamma distribution Log-concave density function Posterior analysis 

AMS (2000) subject classification

Primary 62N01, 62N02 Secondary 62F10. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief Prof. D. Dey for providing several important suggestions which have helped to improve the manuscript significantly.


  1. Balakrishnan N. and Cramer E. (2014). The Art of Progressive Censoring: Applications to Reliability and Quality. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger J. O. and Sun D. (1993). Bayesian analysis of poly-Weibull model. Journal of the American Statistical Association88, 1412–1418.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen A. C. (1963). Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics5, 327–339.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen A. C. (1966). Life testing and early failure. Technometrics8, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Devroye L. (1984). A simple algorithm for generating random variables using log-concave density. Computing33, 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doostparast M., Ahmadi M. V. and Ahmadi J. (2013). Bayes estimation based on joint progressive type-II censored data under LINEX loss function. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation42, 1865–1886.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelman, A., Meng, X. L. and Stern, H. (1996) Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies, Statistica sinica, 733–760.Google Scholar
  8. Herd G. R. 1956 Estimation of the parameters of a population from a multi-censored sample, Ph.D. Thesis Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  9. Kundu D. (2008). Bayesian inference and life testing plans for the Weibull distribution in presence of progressive censoring. Technometrics50, 144–154.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kundu D. and Gupta R. (2006). Estimation of P[Y < X] for Weibull distributions. IEEE Transactions on Reliability55, 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kundu D. and Pradhan B. (2011). Bayesian analysis of progressively censored competing risks data. Sankhya Ser. B73, 276–296.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lemon G. H. (1975). Maximum likelihood estimation for the three parameter Weibull distribution based on censored samples. Technometrics17, 247–254.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mann N. R. (1971). Best linear invariant estimation for Weibull parameters under progressive censoring. Technometrics13, 521–533.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montanari G. C. and Cacciari M. (1988). Progressively-Censored aging tests on XLPE-Insulated cable models. IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation23, 365– 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ng H. K. T., Chan P. S. and Balakrishnan N. (2004). Optimal Progressive Censoring Plans for the Weibull Distribution. Technometrics46, 470–481.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng H. K. T. and Wang Z. (2009). Statistical estimation for the parameters of Weibull distribution based on progressively type-I interval censored sample. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation79, 145–159.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parsi S. and Bairamov I. (2009). Expected values of the number of failures for two populations under joint type-II progressive censoring. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis53, 3560–3570.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pena E. A. and Gupta A. K. (1990). Bayes estimation for the Marshall-Olkin exponential distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B.52, 379–389. vol. 15, 375–383.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasouli A. and Balakrishnan N. (2010). Exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under joint progressive type-II censoring. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods39, 2172–2191.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shafay A. R., Balakrishnan N. and Abdel-Aty Y. (2014). Bayesian inference based on a jointly type-II censored sample from two exponential populations. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation84, 2427–2440.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Su F. 2013 Exact likelihood inference for multiple exponential populations under joint censoring, Ph.D. Thesis McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.Google Scholar
  22. Viveros R. and Balakrishnan N. (1994). Interval estimation of parameters of life from progressively censored data. Technometrics36, 84–91.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang B. X., Yu K. and Jones M. C. (2010). Inference under progressive type-II right-censored sampling for certain lifetime distributions. Technometrics52, 453–460.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Statistical Institute 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsIndian Institute of Technology KanpurPinIndia

Personalised recommendations