Advertisement

Comparative analysis of metabolites in contrasting chickpea cultivars

  • Alokesh Ghosh
  • Abhishek Dadhich
  • Prakhar Bhardwaj
  • J. Nagendra Babu
  • Vinay KumarEmail author
Original Article
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a good source of nutrients for animals and human consumption. In the present study, we analyzed the anthocyanin and total phenolic contents in two contrasting (desi and kabuli) chickpea cultivars. The quantification of anthocyanins showed higher amount in desi as compared to kabuli chickpea. The total phenolic contents was estimated in desi and kabuli chickpea using two different solvents (50% Acetone and 70% Methanol extracts) for coverage of all potential phenolic compounds. In continuation, desi chickpea culitvars (himchana and ICC4958) were found to be significantly higher total phenolic contents (in both solvent extracts) as compared to kabuli cultivars (JGK-03 and L-552). Higher phenolic contents was found to be directly correlated to higher anthocyanin contents in desi as compared to kabuli chickpea. The volatile organic compounds were also analyzed using gas chromatography mass spectroscopy technique in both cultivars. The significant compositional differences in volatile organic composition (polar and non-polar) of desi and kabuli cultivars were also found to be noticed using two different solvent extractions (methanol and chloroform). The comparative analysis of volatile organic acids in methanolic and chloroform extracts of desi cultivars (himchana and ICC4958), kabuli cultivars (JGK-03 and L-552) and between desi and kabuli cultivars was also carried out for in-depth understanding of the differential patterns of low molecular weight metabolites. Six metabolites were found to be common in all four selected cultivars in chloroform extracted samples, while four were found to be common in all four selected cultivars in methanolic extracted samples. The remaining detected metabolites are uncommon among different cultivars and represented as cultivar specific signatory metabolites. In conclusion, the present investigation revealed higher anthocyanin and phenolic contents in desi cultivars as compared to kabuli cultivars and differential accumulation of volatile organic compounds in chickpea cultivars. The metabolite alterations among desi and chickpea cultivars could be the potential attribute for diversity, resilience and commercial usuages.

Keywords

Metabolites estimation Chickpea Desi and kabuli GC–MS Lipids Phenolics Anthocyanins 

Abbreviations

GC

Gas chromatography

DMSO

Dimethyl sulfoxide

MS

Mass spectroscopy

FW

Fresh weight

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors express deep gratitude to the Dr. Anita Babbar, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, JNKVV, Jabalpur (MP), India for providng JGK-03 and ICC4958 seed materials. The L-552 seed material was provided by Dr. Sarvjeet Singh and Dr. Gomti Grover from Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Pb), India. The himchana seed material was geneoursly gifted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra-CSK HPKV, Berthin (HP), India. Authors thank Mr. Ajit Paul Singh, STA for his help in analysis of samples by GC–MS technique. Authors also express thanks to editor and anonymous reviewers for their many insightful comments and suggestions.

Author’s contribution

VK conceived and designed present research. AG, AD and VK conducted experiments. AG, AD, PB, JNB and VK analyzed data. AD, PB and VK wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

“UGC-BSR start up grant” sanctioned to Dr. Vinay Kumar, sponsors this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This article contains unpublished materials and original. Authors confirmed that all authors have read and approved the manuscript and there is not ethical issue involved and declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13562_2019_530_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (520 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 519 kb)

References

  1. Abozed SS, El-Kalyoubi M, Abdelrashid A, Salama MF (2014) Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of various solvent extracts from whole wheat and bran. Annal Agric Sci 59:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal G, Jhanwar S, Priya P, Singh VK, Maneesha SS, Parida SL, Garg R, Tyagi AK, Jain M (2012) Comparative analysis of kabuli chickpea transcriptome with desi and wild chickpea provides a rich resource for development of functional markers. PLoS ONE 7:e52443CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed NU, Park JI, Jung HJ, Hur Y, Nou IS (2015) Anthocyanin biosynthesis for cold and freezing stress tolerance and desirable color in Brassica rapa. Funct Integr Genom 15:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aprea E, Biasioli F, Gasperi F (2015) Volatile compounds of raspberry fruit: from analytical methods to biological role and sensory impact. Molecules 20:2445–2474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhasker P, Nandwal AS, Kumar N, Chand G, Yadav SP, Devi S, Singh S (2017) High temperature significance of anthocyanins accumulation stress responses in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Int J Agric Innov Res 6:2319–2473Google Scholar
  6. Čertík M, Andráši P, Šajbidor J (1996) Effect of extraction methods on lipid yiled and fatty acid composition on lipid classes containing γ-linolenic acid extracted from fungi. J Am Oil Chem Soc 73:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coen O, Magnani E (2018) Seed caot thickness in the evolution of angiosperms. Cell Mol Life Sci 75:2509–2518CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dias DA, Hill CB, Jayasinghe NS, Atieno J, Sutton T, Roessner U (2015) Quantitative profiling of polar primary metabolites of two chickpea cultivars with contrasting responses to salinity. J Chromatogr B 1000:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiehn O (2016) Metabolomics by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: the combination of targeted and untargeted profiling. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 114:1–32Google Scholar
  10. Garg R, Singh VK, Rajkumar MS, Kumar V, Jain M (2017) Global transcriptome and co-expression network analyses reveal cultivar‐specific molecular signatures associated with seed development and seed size/weight determination in chickpea. Plant J 91:1088–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gautam AK, Gupta N, Narvekar DT, Bhadkariya R, Bhagyawant SS (2018) Characterization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) lectin for biological activity. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 24:389–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghribi AM, Maklouf I, Blecker C, Attia H, Besbes S (2015) Nutritional and compositional study of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) flours form tunisian cultivars. Adv Food Technol Nutr Sci Open J 2:567–572Google Scholar
  13. Gowda CLL, Rao BV, Chopra S (1987) Utility of desi × kabuli crosses in chickpea improvement. Int Chickpea Newslett 17:4–6Google Scholar
  14. Gül MK, Egesel CÖ, Turhan H (2008) The effect of planting time on fatty acids and tocopherols in chickpea. Eur Food Res Technol 226:517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta N, Gautam AK, Bhagyawant SS (2018) biochemical characterisation of lecithin from wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum L.) with potential inhibitory action against human cancer cells. J Food Biochem.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12712 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawtin GC, Singh KB (1979) Kabuli-desi introgression: problems and prospects. In: Green JM, Nene YL, Smithson JB (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on Chickpea improvement. 28 Feb–2 Mar 1979, Hyderabad, AP, India, pp 51–60Google Scholar
  17. Hirdyani H (2014) Nutritional composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and value added products. Indian J Community Health 26(Supp 2):102–106Google Scholar
  18. Hoch WA, Singsaas EL, McCown BH (2003) Resorption protection. Anthocyanin facilitate nutrient recovery in autumn by shielding leaves form potentially damaging light levels. Plant Physiol 133:1296–1305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hughes NM, Neufeld HS, Burkey KO (2005) Functional role of anthocyanins in high-light winter leaves of the evergreen herb Galax urceolata. New Phytol 168:575–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jukanti AK, Gaur PM, Gowda CL, Chibbar RN (2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr 108:S11–S26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan N, Ali S, Shahid MA, Kharabian-Masouleh A (2017) Advances in detection of stress tolerance in plants through metabolomics approaches. Plant Omics 10:153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar V, Gill T, Grover S, Ahuja PS, Yadav SK (2013) Influence of human lactoferrin expression on iron homeostasis, flavonoids, and antioxidants in transgenic tobacco. Mol Biotechnol 53:118–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar Y, Dholakia BB, Panigrahi P, Kadoo NY, Giri AP, Gupta VS (2015) Metabolic profiling of chickpea-fusarium interaction identifies differential modulation of disease resistance pathways. Phytochem 116:20–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar V, Suman U, Rubal, Yadav SK (2018) Flavonoid secondary metabolite: Biosynthesis and role in growth and development in plants. In: Kumar V, Singh SP, Yadav SK (eds) Recent Trends and Techniques in Plant Metabolic Engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macar TK, Macar O, Mart DI (2017) Variability in some biochemical and nutritional characteristics in desi and trukish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) types. Celal Bayar Univ J Sci 13:677–680Google Scholar
  26. Maheri-Sis N, Chamani M, Ali-Asghar S, Mirza-Aghazadeh A, Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A (2008) Nutritional evaluation of kabuli and desi type chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. Afr J Biotechnol 7:2946–2951Google Scholar
  27. Ngo TV, Scarlett CJ, Bowyer MC, Ngo PD, Vuong QV (2017) Impact of different extraction solvents on bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity from the root of Salacia chinensis L. J Food Qual 2017:9305047-1–9305047-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Purushothaman R, Upadhyaya HD, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Krishnamurthy L (2014) Kabuli and desi chickpeas differ in their requirement for reproductive duration. Field Crops Res 163:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rembold H, Wallner P, Singh AK (1989) Attractiveness of volatile chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seed components to Heliothis armigera larvae (Lep., Noctuidae). J App Entomol 107:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rubal, Dhawan A, Kumar V (2018) Flavonoid accumulation as adaptation response in plants during abiotic stresses. In: Ramakrishana A, Gill SS (eds) Metabolic adaptations in plants during abiotic stress. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santos T, Marinho C, Freitas M, Santos HM, Oppolzer D, Barros A, Carnide V, Igrejas G (2017) Unravelling the nutriproteomics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. Crop Past Sci 68:z1041–z1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scheuerbrandt G, Bloch K (1962) Unsaturated fatty acids in microorganisms. J Biol Chem 237:2064–2068Google Scholar
  33. Segev A, Badani H, Kapulnik Y, Shomer I, Oren-Shamir M, Galili S (2010) Determination of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity in colored chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Food Sci 75:S115–S119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Segev A, Badani H, Galili L, Hovav R, Kapulnik Y, Shomer I, Galili S (2011) Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by soaking and cooking conditions. Food Nutr Sci 2:724Google Scholar
  35. Sewak S, Iquebal MA, Singh NP, Solanki RK, Sarika (2012) Genetic diversity studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) germplasm. J Food Legume 25:31–36Google Scholar
  36. Srivastava RP, Srivastava GK (2004) Nutritional quality of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieities grown under drought condition. Indian J Agric Biochem 17:15–19Google Scholar
  37. Srivastava RP, Vasishtha H (2012) Saponin and lectins of Indian chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and lentils (Lens culinaris). Indian Agric Biochem 25:44–47Google Scholar
  38. Tikunov Y, Lommen A, Ric de Vos CH, Verhoeven HA, Bino RJ, Hall RD, Bovy AG (2005) A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-Scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiol 139:1125–1137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL, Baun M, Varshney RK, Udupa SM, Gowda CLL, Hoisington D, Singh S (2008) Genetic structure, diversity, and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Plant Biol 8:106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Maesen LJG (1987) Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpeain. In: Singh KB (ed) Saxena MC. C.A.B. International, London, pp 11–34Google Scholar
  41. Wallace TC, Murray R, Zelman KM (2016) The nutritional value and health benefits of chickpeas and hummus. Nutrients 8:766CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu BJ, Chang SKC (2007) A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activites of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. J Food Sci 72:S159–A166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ye XY, Ng TB (2002) Isolation of a new cyclophilin-like protein form chickpeas with mitogenic, antifungal and anti-HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activities. Life Sci 70:1129–1138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yin R, Messner B, Theresa F-K, Hoffmann T, Schwab W, Hajirezaei MR, Schäffner AR (2012) Feedback inhibition of the general phenylpropanoid and flavonol biosynthetic pathways upon a compromised flavonol-3-O-glycosylation. J Exp Bot 63:2465–2478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia

Personalised recommendations