Molecular genetic diversity analysis for heat tolerance of indigenous and exotic wheat genotypes
- 29 Downloads
Four hundred and ninety-six indigenous and exotic aestivum and durum wheat accessions were phenotyped for heat tolerance at three locations during 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 crop seasons under very late sown conditions (35–40 °C). Promising 47 heat tolerant accessions, including 15 of durum were identified. Phenotypic data were recorded for quantitative traits and genotypic using molecular markers in these 47 lines. Polymorphism of 73.7% and 71.5% was detected using 137 and 109 SSR markers in aestivum and durum accessions respectively. In Triticum aestivum 308 alleles and in T. durum 234 alleles were detected with a range of 2–6. The genetic diversity ranged from 0.099 to 0.733 with average 0.488. Genotypes were classified into four categories based on their tolerance to stress as determined from Heat susceptibility index for grain yield. Dendrograms constructed using phenological, physiological and grain traits as well as molecular data were different with respect to alignment of genotypes indicating that genotypes differed genetically as well as physiologically in heat tolerance. Moreover phylogenetic tree is better choice as compared to population structure. The wheat breeders can pyramid these diverse sources to improve heat tolerance.
KeywordsGenetic diversity SSR markers Cell membrane stability Chlorophyll fluorescence Wheat
Cell membrane stability
Heat susceptibility index
Financial assistance from USAID through CIMMYT, Mexico under ARCADIA—CIMMYT—USAID project Development of heat tolerant wheat for South Asia (Grant No. OAA-A-13-00001) is acknowledged. Financial assistance from Indian Council of Agricultural Research under project Development of high yielding heat tolerant wheat cultivars by utilizing molecular and physiological resources (Project no. 1007689) is acknowledged.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bhusal N (2016) Genetic and molecular marker analysis for heat tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell) Ph.D. thesis submitted to CCS Haryana Agricultural University, HisarGoogle Scholar
- Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331Google Scholar
- Dodig D, Quarrie S, Stanković S Milijić, Denčić S (2010) Characterizing wheat genetic resources for responses to drought stress. http://www.wg-crop.icidonline.org/38doc.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2017
- Garg D, Sareen S, Dalal S, Tiwari R, Singh R (2012) Heat shock protein based SNP marker for terminal heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust J Crop Sci 6(11):1516–1521Google Scholar
- Mason AS (2015) SSR Genotyping. In: Batley J (ed) Plant genotyping. Methods in molecular biology (methods and protocols), vol 1245. Humana Press, New York, pp 77–89Google Scholar
- Mondal S, Singh RP, Crossa J, Huerta-Espino J, Sharma I, Chatrath R, Singh GP, Sohu VS, Mavi GS, Sukuru VSP, Kalappanavar IK, Mishra VK, Hussain M, Gautam NR, Uddin J, Barma NCD, Hakim A, Joshi AK (2013) Earliness in wheat: a key to adaptation under terminal and continual high temperature stress in South Asia. Field Crop Res 151:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006) DARwin software CIRAD (French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development). http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin
- Prasad M, Varshney RK, Roy JK, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2000) The use of microsatellites for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100:584–592Google Scholar
- Sharma P, Sareen S, Saini M, Shefali (2016). Assessing genetic variation for heat stress tolerance in Indian bread wheat genotypes using morpho-physiological traits and molecular markers. Plant Genet Resour. Available on CJO2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479262116000241
- Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Graner A (2007) Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys. Crop Sci 173:638–649Google Scholar