Cumulative Risks of Multiple Criminal Justice Outcomes in New York City
- 343 Downloads
Previous research has provided estimates of the cumulative risk of felony conviction and imprisonment in the United States. These experiences are, however, also the rarest; most of what happens in the criminal justice system occurs at the level of the misdemeanor rather than the felony. This article addresses our limited understanding of the scope of subfelony justice by providing estimates of the cumulative risk of several lower-level arrest outcomes for one jurisdiction: New York City. Because of excess life table events contributed by nonresidents of New York City, estimates are likely upwardly biased relative to the true values. Nonetheless, they allow us to (1) assess the cumulative risk of misdemeanor conviction and jail sentences and (2) determine to what extent those who enter the world of subfelony justice are distinct from those with felony or imprisonment records.
KeywordsSubfelony justice Misdemeanor enforcement Cumulative risk Criminal justice system New York City
We thank Pil Chung, Christopher Muller, Jennifer Jennings, Michael Kurlaender, Sandra Mayson, Megan Stevenson, and Katie Beth White for comments. Kohler-Hausmann was supported by the Russel Sage Foundation and the Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund at Yale Law School.
- Bonczar, T. P., & Beck, A. J. (1997). Lifetime likelihood of going to state or federal prison (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report No. NCJ-160092). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
- Fagan, J., Geller, A., West, V., & Davies, G. (2010). Street stops and broken windows revisited: The demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. In S. K. Rice & M. D. White (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and policing: New and essential readings (pp. 309–348). New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Justice Center. (2018). New York. The National Inventory of Collateral Consequences of Conviction. Retrieved from https://niccc.csgjusticecenter.org/
- Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2014). Mass misdemeanors and managerial justice. Stanford Law Review, 66, 611–693.Google Scholar
- LaFountain, R., Schauffler, R., Strickland, S., & Holt, K. (2012). Examining the work of state courts: An analysis of 2010 state court caseloads. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
- Mauer, M., & Ghandnoosh, N. (2015). Fewer prisoners, less crime: A tale of three states (Policy brief). Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
- Natapoff, A. (2012). Misdemeanors. Southern California Law Review, 85, 1313–1376.Google Scholar
- Pettit, B. (2012). Invisible men: Mass incarceration and the myth of black progress. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Pfaff, J. F. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration and how to achieve real reform. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2017). IPUMS USA: Version 7.0 [Data set]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, M., & Mayson, S. (2018). The scale of misdemeanor justice. Boston University Law Review, 98, 101–146.Google Scholar