, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 1161–1171 | Cite as

Cumulative Risks of Multiple Criminal Justice Outcomes in New York City

  • Peter HepburnEmail author
  • Issa Kohler-Hausmann
  • Angela Zorro Medina


Previous research has provided estimates of the cumulative risk of felony conviction and imprisonment in the United States. These experiences are, however, also the rarest; most of what happens in the criminal justice system occurs at the level of the misdemeanor rather than the felony. This article addresses our limited understanding of the scope of subfelony justice by providing estimates of the cumulative risk of several lower-level arrest outcomes for one jurisdiction: New York City. Because of excess life table events contributed by nonresidents of New York City, estimates are likely upwardly biased relative to the true values. Nonetheless, they allow us to (1) assess the cumulative risk of misdemeanor conviction and jail sentences and (2) determine to what extent those who enter the world of subfelony justice are distinct from those with felony or imprisonment records.


Subfelony justice Misdemeanor enforcement Cumulative risk Criminal justice system New York City 



We thank Pil Chung, Christopher Muller, Jennifer Jennings, Michael Kurlaender, Sandra Mayson, Megan Stevenson, and Katie Beth White for comments. Kohler-Hausmann was supported by the Russel Sage Foundation and the Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund at Yale Law School.

Supplementary material

13524_2019_781_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (334 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 333 kb)


  1. Bonczar, T. P., & Beck, A. J. (1997). Lifetime likelihood of going to state or federal prison (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report No. NCJ-160092). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. Chung, P. H., & Hepburn, P. (2018). Mass imprisonment and the extended family. Sociological Science, 5, 335–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fagan, J., Geller, A., West, V., & Davies, G. (2010). Street stops and broken windows revisited: The demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. In S. K. Rice & M. D. White (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and policing: New and essential readings (pp. 309–348). New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelman, A., Fagan, J., & Kiss, A. (2007). An analysis of the New York City Police Department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobs, J. B. (2015). The eternal criminal record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Justice Center. (2018). New York. The National Inventory of Collateral Consequences of Conviction. Retrieved from
  7. Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2013). Misdemeanor justice: Control without conviction. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 351–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2014). Mass misdemeanors and managerial justice. Stanford Law Review, 66, 611–693.Google Scholar
  9. Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2018). Misdemeanorland: Criminal courts and social control in an age of broken windows policing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LaFountain, R., Schauffler, R., Strickland, S., & Holt, K. (2012). Examining the work of state courts: An analysis of 2010 state court caseloads. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
  11. Lageson, S. E. (2016). Found out and opting out: The consequences of online criminal records for families. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 665, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lageson, S. E., & Maruna, S. (2018). Digital degradation: Stigma management in the internet age. Punishment & Society, 20, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manza, J., & Uggen, C. (2006). Locked out: Felon disenfranchisement and American democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mauer, M., & Ghandnoosh, N. (2015). Fewer prisoners, less crime: A tale of three states (Policy brief). Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
  15. Muller, C., & Wildeman, C. (2016). Geographic variation in the cumulative risk of imprisonment and parental imprisonment in the United States. Demography, 53, 1499–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Natapoff, A. (2012). Misdemeanors. Southern California Law Review, 85, 1313–1376.Google Scholar
  17. Natapoff, A. (2015). Misdemeanors. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pettit, B. (2012). Invisible men: Mass incarceration and the myth of black progress. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfaff, J. F. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration and how to achieve real reform. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Phelps, M. S. (2017). Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society, 19, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2017). IPUMS USA: Version 7.0 [Data set]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  23. Shannon, S. K. S., Uggen, C., Schnittker, J., Thompson, M., Wakefield, S., & Massoglia, M. (2017). The growth, scope, and spatial distribution of people with felony records in the United States, 1948–2010. Demography, 54, 1795–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stevenson, M., & Mayson, S. (2018). The scale of misdemeanor justice. Boston University Law Review, 98, 101–146.Google Scholar
  25. Uggen, C., Vuolo, M., Lageson, S., Ruhland, E., & Whitham, H. K. (2014). The edge of stigma: An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment. Criminology, 52, 627–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Western, B., & Wildeman, C. (2009). The black family and mass incarceration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wildeman, C. (2009). Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography, 46, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Hepburn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Issa Kohler-Hausmann
    • 2
  • Angela Zorro Medina
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Law SchoolYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations