Repartnering Following Gray Divorce: The Roles of Resources and Constraints for Women and Men
The doubling of the gray divorce rate (i.e., divorce at age 50 or older) over the past few decades portends growth in later-life repartnering, yet little is known about the mechanisms undergirding decisions to repartner after gray divorce. Using data from the 1998–2014 Health and Retirement Study, we examined women’s and men’s likelihoods of forming a remarriage or cohabiting union following gray divorce by estimating competing risk multinomial logistic regression models using discrete-time event history data. About 22 % of women and 37 % of men repartnered within 10 years after gray divorce. Repartnering more often occurred through cohabitation than remarriage, particularly for men. Resources such as economic factors, health, and social ties were linked to repartnering, but constraints captured by the contours of the marital biography were also salient, underscoring the distinctive features of union formation in later life.
KeywordsCohabitation Health Marriage Remarriage Union transitions
An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, IL, April 2017. This research was supported by a grant to the first two authors from the National Institute on Aging (1R15AG047588). It also was supported in part by the Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, which has core funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD050959).
- Allison, P. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 61–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. L., & Wright, M. R. (2017). Marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in later life. Innovation in Aging, 1(2), igx015. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx015
- Hatch, R. (1995). Aging and cohabitation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
- Ofstedal, M. B., Weir, D. R., Chen, K.-T., & Wagner, J. (2011). Updates to HRS sample weights (HRS Report No. DR-013). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Survey Research Center. Retrieved from http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/dr-013.pdf
- Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.Google Scholar
- Raghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., van Hoewyk, J., & Solenberger, P. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27, 85–95.Google Scholar
- Sassler, S. (2010). Partnering across the life course: Sex, relationships, and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 557–575.Google Scholar
- Vespa, J. (2013). Relationship transitions among older cohabitors: The role of health, wealth, and family ties. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 933–949.Google Scholar