Demography

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 183–208 | Cite as

Potential (Mis)match? Marriage Markets Amidst Sociodemographic Change in India, 2005–2050

  • Ridhi Kashyap
  • Albert Esteve
  • Joan García-Román
Article

Abstract

We explore the impact of sociodemographic change on marriage patterns in India by examining the hypothetical consequences of applying three sets of marriage pairing propensities—contemporary patterns by age, contemporary patterns by age and education, and changing propensities that allow for greater educational homogamy and reduced educational asymmetries—to future population projections. Future population prospects for India indicate three trends that will impact marriage patterns: (1) female deficit in sex ratios at birth; (2) declining birth cohort size; (3) female educational expansion. Existing literature posits declining marriage rates for men arising from skewed sex ratios at birth (SRBs) in India’s population. In addition to skewed SRBs, India’s population will experience female educational expansion in the coming decades. Female educational expansion and its impact on marriage patterns must be jointly considered with demographic changes, given educational differences and asymmetries in union formation that exist in India, as across much of the world. We systematize contemporary pairing propensities using data from the 2005–2006 Indian National Family Health Survey and the 2004 Socio-Economic Survey and apply these and the third set of changing propensities to multistate population projections by educational attainment using an iterative longitudinal projection procedure. If today’s age patterns of marriage are viewed against age/sex population composition until 2050, men experience declining marriage prevalence. However, when education is included, women—particularly those with higher education—experience a more salient rise in nonmarriage. Significant changes in pairing patterns toward greater levels of educational homogamy and gender symmetry can counteract a marked rise in nonmarriage.

Keywords

Marriage Skewed sex ratios at birth Educational hypergamy Female educational expansion India 

References

  1. Akers, D. S. (1967). On measuring the marriage squeeze. Demography, 4, 907–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attané, I. (2006). The demographic impact of a female deficit in China, 2000–2050. Population and Development Review, 32, 755–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Ghatak, M., & Lafortune, J. (2013). Marry for what? Caste and mate selection in modern India. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 33–72.Google Scholar
  4. Banerji, M., Martin, S., & Desai, D. (2013). Are the young and the educated more likely to have “love” than arranged marriage? A study of autonomy in partner choice in India (India Human Development Survey Working Paper No. 8). Retrieved from http://ihds.umd.edu/ihds_papers/partnerchoice.pdf
  5. Bauer, R., Potančoková, M., Goujon, A., & Samir, K. C. (2012). Populations for 171 countries by age, sex, and level of education around 2010: Harmonized estimates of the baseline data for the Wittgenstein Centre Projections (IIASA Interim Report IR-12-016). Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  6. Bhat, P. M., & Halli, S. S. (1999). Demography of brideprice and dowry: Causes and consequences of the Indian marriage squeeze. Population Studies, 53, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabré, A. (1993). Volverán tórtolos y cigüeñas [Lovebirds and storks will return]. In L. Garrido & E. Gil Calvo (Eds.), Estrategias familiars (pp. 113–131). Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
  8. Cabré, A. (1994). Tensiones inminentes en los mercados matrimoniales [Imminent tensions in marriage markets.]. In J. Nadal (Ed.), El mundo que viene (pp. 37–62). Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
  9. Choo, E., & Siow, A. (2006). Estimating a marriage matching model with spillover effects. Demography, 43, 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desai, S., & Andrist, L. (2010). Gender scripts and age at marriage in India. Demography, 47, 667–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixon, R. B. (1971). Explaining cross-cultural variations in age at marriage and proportions never marrying. Population Studies, 25, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dommaraju, P. V. (2008). Demography, education and marriage age in India (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304686835
  13. Esteve, A., Cortina, C., & Cabré, A. (2009). Long term trends in marital age homogamy patterns: Spain, 1922–2006. Population, 64, 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esteve, A., García-Román, J., & Permanyer, I. (2012). The gender-gap reversal in education and its effect on union formation: The end of hypergamy? Population and Development Review, 38, 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraboni, R., & Billari, F. C. (2001). Measure and dynamics of marriage squeezes: From baby boom to baby bust in Italy (MPIDR Working Papers WP 2001-005). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Goodkind, D. (1997). The Vietnamese double marriage squeeze. International Migration Review, 31, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review, 35, 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Skewed sex ratios at birth and future marriage squeeze in China and India, 2005–2100. Demography, 49, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and Vienna Institute for Demography. (2010). IIASA/VID Population and Human Capital Population data set. Retrieved from http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/WorldPopulation/Research/ForecastsProjections/DemographyGlobalHumanCapital/EducationReconstructionProjections/education_reconstruction_and_projections.html
  20. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2007). India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06 (Vol. 1). Mumbai, India: IIPS.Google Scholar
  21. Jiang, Q., Attané, I., Li, S., & Feldman, M. W. (2007). Son preference and the marriage squeeze in China: An integrated analysis of the first marriage and the remarriage market. In I. Attané & C. Guilmoto (Eds.), Watering the neighbor’s garden: The growing demographic female deficit in Asia (pp. 347–364). Paris, France: CICRED.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, G. W. (2005). The “flight from marriage” in South-east and East Asia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36, 93–119.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, G. W. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and Development Review, 33(3), 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaur, R., & Palriwala, R. (2014). Marriage in South Asia: Continuities and transformations. In R. Kaur & R. Palriwala (Eds.), Marrying in South Asia: Shifting concepts, changing practices in a globalizing world (pp. 1–27). Delhi, India: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  25. KC, S., Barakat, B., Goujon, A., Skirbekk, V., Sanderson, W., & Lutz, W. (2010). Projection of populations by level of educational attainment, age, and sex for 120 countries for 2005–2050. Demographic Research, 22(article 15), 383–472. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.14
  26. Keyfitz, N., & Frauenthal, J. (1975). An improved life table method. Biometrics, 31, 889–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kulkarni, P. M. (2010). Tracking India’s sex ratio at birth: Evidence of a turnaround. In K. S. James, A. Pandey, D. W. Bansod, & L. Subaiya (Eds.), Population, gender and health in India: Methods, processes and policies (pp. 191–210). New Delhi, India: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Lutz, W. (2010). Education will be at the heart of 21st century demography. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 8, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lutz, W., Goujon, A., Samir, K. C., & Sanderson, W. (2007). Reconstruction of populations by age, sex and level of educational attainment for 120 countries for 1970–2000. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 5, 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathur, D. (2007). What’s love got to do with it?: Parental involvement and spouse choice in urban India. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1655998
  31. Minnesota Population Center (MPC). (2011). Integrated public use microdata series, international: Version 6.1 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  32. Qian, Z., & Preston, S. H. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review, 58, 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rallu, J. L. (2006). Female deficit and the marriage market in Korea. Demographic Research, 15(article 3), 51–60. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raymo, J. M., & Iwasawa, M. (2005). Marriage market mismatches in Japan: An alternative view of the relationship between women's education and marriage. American Sociological Review, 70, 801–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schoen, R. (1981). The harmonic mean as the basis of a realistic two-sex marriage model. Demography, 18, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoen, R. (1988). Modeling multigroup populations. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoen, R., & Baj, J. (1985). The impact of the marriage squeeze in five Western countries. Sociology and Social Research, 70, 8–19.Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharygin, E., Ebenstein, A., & Das Gupta, M. (2013). Implications of China’s future bride shortage for the geographical distribution and social protection needs of never-married men. Population Studies, 67, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smits, J. (2003). Social closure among the higher educated: Trends in educational homogamy in 55 countries. Social Science Research, 32, 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smits, J., Ultee, W., & Lammers, J. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63, 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Srinivasan, P., & Lee, G. R. (2004). The dowry system in Northern India: Women’s attitudes and social change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1108–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tucker, C., & Van Hook, J. (2013). Surplus Chinese men: Demographic determinants of the sex ratio at marriageable ages in China. Population and Development Review, 39, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tuljapurkar, S., Li, N., & Feldman, M. W. (1995). High sex ratios in China’s future. Science, 267, 874–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011). World population prospects: The 2010 revision, Volume I: Comprehensive tables. ST/ESA/SER.A/313. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/wpp/Documentation/pdf/WPP2010_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
  46. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  47. Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ridhi Kashyap
    • 1
    • 2
  • Albert Esteve
    • 3
  • Joan García-Román
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Nuffield CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchRostockGermany
  3. 3.Center for Demographic StudiesAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Minnesota Population CenterUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations