Advertisement

Asian Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 195–224 | Cite as

The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity on ethical decision-making in management in a non-Western and highly religious country

  • Samia Tariq
  • Nighat G. Ansari
  • Tariq Hameed AlviEmail author
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to explore the indirect effect of intrinsic religiosity and extrinsic religiosity on ethical intention through ethical judgment. A review of the literature shows the need for more research at the intersection of religiosity and ethics, especially in non-Western, highly religious contexts. This research, therefore, addresses the research question: Do intrinsic religiosity and extrinsic religiosity indirectly impact ethical intention through influencing the ethical judgment of management professionals? Data were gathered from members of the Management Association of Pakistan through a questionnaire. Pearson correlation results show the overall trend between the constructs of interest. Multiple regression results show that both intrinsic religiosity and extrinsic religiosity are significant positive predictors of ethical judgment. Ethical judgment was also found to be a significant, positive predictor of ethical intention. The main contribution of the study is evidence that ethical judgment acts as a mediator between religiosity (whether intrinsic or extrinsic) and ethical intention in a non-Western highly religious context. This research also found that intrinsic religiosity impacts ethical intention directly as well as indirectly through ethical judgment, but extrinsic religiosity influences ethical intention only through its effect on ethical judgment. We discuss our results along with practical and research implications, and limitations of this research are highlighted to guide future research.

Keywords

Religiosity Intrinsic religiosity Extrinsic religiosity Ethical decision-making Non-Western highly religious contexts Indirect effect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very thankful for the invaluable comments from anonymous reviewers of AJBE, AJBE Chief Editor, Dr. Allan K.K. Chan, and Associate Editors, Dr. Felix Tang and Dr. Maggie Y. Chu. We are thankful to the anonymous reviewers of AJBE for providing invaluable feedback, suggestions, and improvements; one of the reviewers provided extremely valuable comments for improvement of the manuscript.

Funding information

This study was self-funded by author Samia Tariq.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (2011). Theory of planned behavior. Handb Theor Soc Psychol Vol One, 1, 438.Google Scholar
  4. Allport, G. W. (1950). Individual and his religion: a psychological interpretation. Oxford, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anheier, H. K., & Isar, Y. R. (2007). Conflicts and tensions (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd..Google Scholar
  7. Barak-Corren, N., & Bazerman, M. (2017). Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(3), 280–296.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1161–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartels, R. (1967). A model for ethics in marketing. The Journal of marketing, 20–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296703100105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 557–571.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9576-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J., & Tuttle, M. (2013). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. In Citation classics from the journal of business ethics (pp. 97–117). Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, K. C., Fung, A., Fung, H.-G., & Yau, J. (2016). A citation analysis of business ethics research: a global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 557–573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2533-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, Y.-J., & Tang, T. L.-P. (2013). The bright and dark sides of religiosity among university students: do gender, college major, and income matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 531–553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1407-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, M. J., & Pullig, C. (2013). I’m number one! Does narcissism impair ethical judgment even for the highly religious? Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1239-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean, K. L., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2007). Empirical research in management, spirituality & religion during its founding years. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 4(1), 3–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14766080709518644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(89)90001-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernando, M., & Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2010). The relationship between spiritual well-being and ethical orientations in decision making: an empirical study with business executives in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 211–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0355-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernando, M., & Jackson, B. (2006). The influence of religion-based workplace spirituality on business leaders’ decision-making: an inter-faith study. Journal of Management & Organization, 12(1), 23–39.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200004144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fritzsche, D. J. (1991). A model of decision-making incorporating ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 841–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritzsche, D. J., & Becker, H. (1983). Ethical behavior of marketing managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(4), 291–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 348–354.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1386745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hackett, C., & Grim, B. J. (2012). The global religious landscape: a report on the size and distribution of the world’s major religious groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape.aspx.
  27. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. In T. D. Little (Ed.), Methodology in the social sciences. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: an experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451–457.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1979). Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 331–338.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.3.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ho, J. A. (2010). Ethical perception: are differences between ethnic groups situation dependent? Business Ethics: a European Review, 19(2), 154–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01583.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: a retrospective and revision, In Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  33. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: a revision and Three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146706290923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2008). The relationship between religiousness and corporate social responsibility orientation: are there differences between business managers and students? Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 165–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9321-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kashif, M., Zarkada, A., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). The moderating effect of religiosity on ethical behavioural intentions: an application of the extended theory of planned behaviour to Pakistani bank employees. Personnel Review, 46(2), 429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2015-0256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kidwell, J. M., Stevens, R. E., & Bethke, A. L. (1987). Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: myth or reality? Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 489–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurpis, L. V., Beqiri, M. S., & Helgeson, J. G. (2008). The effects of commitment to moral self-improvement and religiosity on ethics of business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 447–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9430-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lehnert, K., Park, Y., & Singh, N. (2015). Research Note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 195–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marta, J. K. M., Singhapakdi, A., Attia, A., & Vitell, S. J. (2004). Some important factors underlying ethical decisions of Middle-Eastern marketers. International Marketing Review, 21(1), 53–67.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330410522916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCullough, P. M., & Faught, S. (2005). Rational moralists and moral rationalists value-based management: model, criterion and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 195–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8317-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDaniel, S. W., & Burnett, J. J. (1990). Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(2), 101–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McNichols, C. W., & Zimmerer, T. W. (1985). Situational ethics: an empirical study of differentiators of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(3), 175–180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis: Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Mitchell, T. R. (1985). An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 192–205.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moghadam, A. (2004). A Global resurgence of religion. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  49. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oumlil, A. B., & Balloun, J. L. (2009). Ethical Decision-making differences between American and Moroccan managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 457–478.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9719-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parboteeah, K. P., Hoegl, M., & Cullen, J. B. (2008). Ethics and religion: an empirical test of a multidimensional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 387–398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9439-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peters, G.-J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69 https://www.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/view/ehp.v16.i2.p56.Google Scholar
  53. Pew Global Attitudes Project. (2007). World publics welcome global trade but not immigration: 47-nation Pew Global Attitudes Survey. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2007/10/Pew-Global-Attitudes-Report-October-4-2007-REVISED-UPDATED-5-27-14.pdf Google Scholar
  54. Phau, I., & Kea, G. (2007). Attitudes of university students toward business ethics: a cross-national investigation of Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9156-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piazza, J., & Landy, J. F. (2013). “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(6), 639–661. Retrieved from https://journal.sjdm.org/13/13822/jdm13822.html
  56. Rallapalli, K. C. (1995). Marketers’ norms: an empirical investigation of the influence of personal and situational factors on marketers’ deontological norms, ethical judgments and intentions. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/25074267
  57. Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & Al-Khatib, J. (2006). Does religion matter? A comparison study of the ethical beliefs of marketing students of religious and secular universities in Japan. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 69–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0023-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Razzaque, M. A., & Hwee, T. P. (2002). Ethics and purchasing dilemma: a Singaporean view. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 307–326.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013853021571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rest, J. (1994). Moral development in the professions: psychology and applied ethics. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  60. Singhapakdi, A., Marta, J. K., Rallapalli, K. C., & Rao, C. P. (2000a). Toward an understanding of religiousness and marketing ethics: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 305–319.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006342224035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singhapakdi, A., Salyachivin, S., Virakul, B., & Veerayangkur, V. (2000b). Some important factors underlying ethical decision making of managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 271–284.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006111004721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Lee, D.-J., Nisius, A. M., & Yu, G. B. (2013). The influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1334-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. The Pew Global Attitudes Project. (2008). Unfavorable views of Jews and Muslims on the increase in Europe (Vol. 17).Google Scholar
  64. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tse, A. C. B., & Au, A. K. M. (1997). Are New Zealand business students more unethical than non-business students? Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 445–450.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017957210848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: a modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7058-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-4603-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vitell, S. J., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2009). Religiosity and moral identity: the mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9980-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vitell, S. J., Keith, M., & Mathur, M. (2011). Antecedents to the justification of norm violating behavior among business practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 163–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0717-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wagner, S. C., & Sanders, G. L. (2001). Considerations in ethical decision-making and software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1), 161–167.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006415514200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walker, A. G., Smither, J. W., & DeBode, J. (2012). The effects of religiosity on ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 437–452.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1009-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilkes, R. E., Burnett, J. J., & Howell, R. D. (1986). On the meaning and measurement of religiosity in consumer research. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 14(1), 47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wimalasiri, J. S., Pavri, F., & Jalil, A. A. K. (1996). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1331–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of International Business and Economics (UIBE)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Administrative SciencesUniversity of the PunjabLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations