Advertisement

Enhancing the impact of conservation marketing using psychology: a research agenda

  • J. C. RyanEmail author
  • S. Mellish
  • B. R. Le Busque
  • C. A. Litchfield
Articles with Attitude

Abstract

Conservation marketing draws upon social marketing and psychology to address the human dimensions of biodiversity loss. Behavioural scientists with expertise in conservation psychology can contribute to the design of research projects in this field that utilize a variety of methodologies (quantitative and qualitative), formal application for approval of methodology and procedure through relevant human and animal research ethics committees, and implementation and evaluation of projects or campaigns that are based on psychological principles of persuasion, attitude, and behavior change with the aim of protecting biodiversity. Interdisciplinary projects utilizing best practice in conservation psychology, community-based social marketing, and conservation marketing are likely to lead to improved outcomes, such as reductions in human consumption patterns and other unsustainable behaviors and increases in community engagement. A closer relationship between conservation psychology and conservation marketing will lead to publications of research in high-impact peer-reviewed journals, offering practical recommendations for conservation practitioners, as well as reaching laypeople. Importantly, communicating successes and failures of different approaches, projects or campaigns will help conservation practitioners, conservation educators, tourism operators, community groups, policy-makers, and other stakeholders make informed decisions and design effective conservation marketing campaigns based on evidence.

Keywords

Conservation psychology Conservation marketing Social science Biodiversity loss Behavioral science Conservation education 

Notes

References

  1. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Action control. Springer, pp 11–39Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(4):665–683Google Scholar
  3. Alexander SM, Quinn MS (2011) Coyote (Canis latrans) interactions with humans and pets reported in the Canadian print media (1995–2010). Hum Dimens Wildl 16(5):345–359Google Scholar
  4. Bandura A, Walters RH (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice-hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya S, Wogan GO, Swartz B, Quental TB et al (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471(7336):51–57Google Scholar
  6. Baylis K, Honey-Rosés J, Börner J, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Ferraro PJ, Lapeyre R, Persson UM, Pfaff A, Wunder S (2016) Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conserv Lett 9(1):58–64Google Scholar
  7. Bazerman MH (2006) Climate change as a predictable surprise. Clim Chang 77(1–2):179–193Google Scholar
  8. Bennett NJ, Roth R, Klain SC, Chan KM, Clark DA, Cullman G et al (2017) Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conserv Biol 31(1):56–66Google Scholar
  9. Clayton S, Myers G (2015) Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Clayton S, Litchfield C, Geller ES (2013) Psychological science, conservation, and environmental sustainability. Front Ecol Environ 11(7):377–382Google Scholar
  11. Conde DA, Flesness N, Colchero F, Jones OR, Scheuerlein A (2011) An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331(6023):1390–1391Google Scholar
  12. Coppola DP (2005) “Gripped by fear” Public risk (mis) perception and the Washington, DC sniper. Disaster Prev Manag 14(1):32–54Google Scholar
  13. Duffett RG (2017) Influence of social media marketing communications on young consumers’ attitudes. Young Consum 18(1):19–39Google Scholar
  14. Flora JA, Maibach EW, Maccoby N (1989) The role of media across four levels of health promotion intervention. Annu Rev Public Health 10(1):181–201Google Scholar
  15. Game ET, Meijaard E, Sheil D, McDonald-Madden E (2014) Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions. Conserv Lett 7(3):271–277Google Scholar
  16. Gifford A Jr (2009) Cultural, cognition and human action. J Socio-Econ 38(1):13–24Google Scholar
  17. Gifford R, Nilsson A (2014) Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol 49(3):141–157Google Scholar
  18. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Evolution and cognition (paper)Google Scholar
  19. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82(4):581–629Google Scholar
  20. Happer C, Philo G (2016) New approaches to understanding the role of the news media in the formation of public attitudes and behaviours on climate change. Eur J Commun 31(2):136–151Google Scholar
  21. Inouye J (2014) Risk perception: theories, strategies, and next steps. Campbell Institute National Safety Council, ItascaGoogle Scholar
  22. Joffe H (2003) Risk: from perception to social representation. Br J Soc Psychol 42(1):55–73Google Scholar
  23. Karanth KU, Chellam R (2009) Carnivore conservation at the crossroads. Oryx 43(1):1–2Google Scholar
  24. Kitchen P, Kerr G, Schultz DE, McColl R, Pals H (2014) The elaboration likelihood model: review, critique and research agenda. Eur J Mark 48(11/12):2033–2050Google Scholar
  25. Kunzig R (2011) Population 7 billion. Natl Geogr 219(1):32–63Google Scholar
  26. Lee PC, Priston NE (2005) Human attitudes to primates: perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for primate conservation. Commensalism and Conflict: The Human-Primate Interface 4:1–23Google Scholar
  27. Litchfield CA (2013) Rhino poaching: apply conservation psychology. Science 340(6137):1168–1168Google Scholar
  28. Litchfield CA, Lowry R, Dorrian J (2018) Recycling 115,369 mobile phones for gorilla conservation over a six-year period (2009-2014) at Zoos Victoria: a case study of ‘points of influence’and mobile phone donations. PLoS One 13(12):e0206890Google Scholar
  29. Loboguerrero AM, Campbell BM, Cooper PJ, Hansen JW, Rosenstock T, Wollenberg E (2019) Food and earth systems: priorities for climate change adaptation and mitigation for agriculture and food systems. Sustainability 11(5):1372Google Scholar
  30. Locke H, Dearden P (2005) Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environ Conserv 32(1):1–10Google Scholar
  31. MacDonald E, Milfont T, Gavin M (2016) Applying the elaboration likelihood model to increase recall of conservation messages and elaboration by zoo visitors. J Sustain Tour 24(6):866–881Google Scholar
  32. MacKeracher T, Diedrich A, Simpfendorfer CA (2019) Sharks, rays and marine protected areas: a critical evaluation of current perspectives. Fish Fish 20(2):255–267Google Scholar
  33. Manejar AJA, Sandoy LMH, Subade RF (2019) Linking marine biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation: a case study in selected rural communities of Sagay Marine Reserve, Negros Occidental. Mar Policy 104:12–18Google Scholar
  34. Mascia MB, Mills M (2018) When conservation goes viral: the diffusion of innovative biodiversity conservation policies and practices. Conserv Lett 11(3):e12442Google Scholar
  35. McConnachie MM, Cowling RM (2013) On the accuracy of conservation managers’ beliefs and if they learn from evidence-based knowledge: a preliminary investigation. J Environ Manag 128:7–14Google Scholar
  36. McKenzie-Mohr D (2000) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. Am Psychol 55(5):531–537Google Scholar
  37. Myrick JG, Evans SD (2014) Do PSAs take a bite out of shark week? The effects of juxtaposing environmental messages with violent images of shark attacks. Sci Commun 36(5):544–569Google Scholar
  38. Neff C, Hueter R (2013) Science, policy, and the public discourse of shark “attack”: a proposal for reclassifying human–shark interactions. J Environ Stud Sci 3(1):65–73Google Scholar
  39. Nijman V, Morcatty T, Smith JH, Atoussi S, Shepherd CR, Siriwat P, Nekaris KAI, Bergin D (2019) Illegal wildlife trade – surveying open animal markets and online platforms to understand the poaching of wild cats. Biodiversity 20(1):58–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2019.1568915 Google Scholar
  40. Olmedo A, Sharif V, Milner‐Gulland EJ (2018) Evaluating the design of behavior change interventions: a case study of rhino horn in Vietnam. Conservation Letters, 11(1), e12365Google Scholar
  41. People in Need (2017) ‘Behaviour Change Toolkit’. Available at: https://www.behaviourchange.net/document/33-behaviour-change-toolkit. Accessed 19 June 2019
  42. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion. Springer, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  43. Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Betts MG, Ceballos G, Courchamp F et al (2019) Are we eating the world’s megafauna to extinction? Conserv Lett:e12627Google Scholar
  44. Rittichainuwat B, Nelson R, Rahmafitria F (2018) Applying the perceived probability of risk and bias toward optimism: implications for travel decisions in the face of natural disasters. Tour Manag 66:221–232Google Scholar
  45. Rogers EM (2010) Diffusion of innovations. Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
  46. Rumelhart DE (2017) Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Routledge, pp 33–58Google Scholar
  47. Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KA (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol Conserv 232:8–27Google Scholar
  48. Saunders CD (2003) The emerging field of conservation psychology. Hum Ecol Rev:137–149Google Scholar
  49. Schultz PW (2011) Conservation means behavior. Conserv Biol 25(6):1080–1083Google Scholar
  50. Schultz PW (2014) Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Eur Psychol 19:107–117Google Scholar
  51. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 24(2):311–322.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
  52. Smith L (2013) Visitors or visits? An examination of zoo visitor numbers using the case study of Australia. Zoo Biol 32(1):37–44Google Scholar
  53. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855Google Scholar
  54. Tribe A, Booth R (2003) Assessing the role of zoos in wildlife conservation. Hum Dimens Wildl 8(1):65–74Google Scholar
  55. Veríssimo D, Bianchessi A, Arrivillaga A, Cadiz FC, Mancao RK (2018) Does it work for biodiversity? Experiences and challenges in the evaluation of social marketing campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24(1):18–34Google Scholar
  56. WildAid (2017) Rhino Horn Demand. https://wildaid.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Rhino-Horn-Demand-in-Vietnam-2017.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2019
  57. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, de Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393(10170):447–492Google Scholar
  58. Youngsteadt E, López-Uribe MM, Sorenson CE (2019) Ecology in the sixth mass extinction: detecting and understanding rare biotic interactions. Ann Entomol Soc Am 112:119–121Google Scholar
  59. Zint M (2017) ‘My Environmental Education Evaluation Resource Assistant’. Available at: http://meera.snre.umich.edu/about-meera. Accessed 19 June 2019

Copyright information

© AESS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Ryan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. Mellish
    • 2
  • B. R. Le Busque
    • 2
  • C. A. Litchfield
    • 2
  1. 1.Health and BiosecurityCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Conservation Psychology and Applied Animal Behavior Research Group, School of Psychology, Social Work, and Social PolicyUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations