Advertisement

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 437–441 | Cite as

Engaging a global Facebook audience with conservation education

  • Kristen LatzkeEmail author
  • Laurie Marker
  • Heather Ravenscroft
Research Article

Abstract

Sharing information is a critical component of conservation science. Transferring this information from conservation scientists to the general public can be accelerated with the use of social media. Conservation practitioners and educators can utilize social media to display information, promote causes, and engage the public. Although social media has the potential to be a vessel for conservation education, there are few studies discussing the impact of social media on conservation education or on post timing for a global Facebook audience. To improve the success of these efforts, we sought to understand the effect of day of the week and time of day on Facebook post engagement. Data was collected from the Facebook page of the Cheetah Conservation Fund (CCF), a global leader in cheetah conservation rooted in education, research, and the mitigation of human-wildlife conflict. Friday was the most engaging day while the weekend (Saturday–Sunday) had the lowest engagement. The highest average engagement occurred between 9 AM EST and 10 AM EST and the lowest engagement was found between 5 PM EST and 6 PM EST. It is impossible to reach every person with every post, but scheduling posts or geotargeting specific geographical locations may increase engagement. This study is a starting point for global organizations to analyze their Facebook activity in order to conclude when the most engaging times occur in order to reach as many people as possible. Increasing engagement could increase the discussion of important issues in the field of conservation biology.

Keywords

Social media Environmental education Engagement Cheetah 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Ramana Callan, Kevin Matteson, and the many fellow graduate students for their advice and support.

Funding information

This project was conducted as a part of graduate work through Project Dragonfly at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio and was self-funded through the corresponding author.

References

  1. Carboni JL, Maxwell SP (2015) Effective social media engagement for nonprofits: what matters? J Public Nonprofit Aff 1(1):18–28.  https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.1.1.18-28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Vries L, Gensler S, Leeflang P (2012) Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. J Interact Mark 26(2):83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Di Minin E, Tenkanen H, Toivonen T (2015) Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Front Environ Sci 3.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063/full
  4. Edmondson B (2019) The best time to post on Facebook for maximum exposure. https://www.thebalancesmb.com/best-time-to-post-on-facebook-for-maximum-exposure-2531470. Accessed 15 March 2019
  5. Eisenberg H (2014) Humans process visual data better. http://www.t-sciences.com/news/humans-process-visual-data-better. Accessed 4 April 2019
  6. Facebook Business (2014) https://www.facebook.com/business/news/audience-insights. Accessed 7 April 2019
  7. Facebook Newsroom (n.d.) https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/. Accessed 31 October 2018
  8. Fortune (2018) Facebook’s traffic is down nearly 50% in 2 years. http://fortune.com/2018/08/09/facebook-traffic-down/. Accessed 7 April 2019
  9. Hootsuite (2018) The best time to post on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. https://blog.hootsuite.com/best-time-to-post-on-facebook-twitter-instagram/. Accessed 15 March 2019
  10. Kanuri VK, Chen Y, Sridhar S (2018) Scheduling content on social media: theory, evidence, and application. J Mark 82(6):89–108.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918805411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Medium (2017) This is why video is the most engaging type of content. https://medium.com/@zipstrr/this-is-why-video-is-the-most-engaging-type-of-content-e5ca46d5cef1. Accessed 4 April 2019
  12. Novacek M (2008) Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 11571.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802599105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Papworth SK, Nghiem TPL, Chimalakonda D, Posa MRC, Wijedasa LS, Bickford D, Carrasco LR (2015) Quantifying the role of online news in linking conservation research to Facebook and Twitter. Conserv Biol 29(3):825–833.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pew Research Center (2018) Social media factsheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/. Accessed 15 March 2019
  15. Thomas R, Johnson P, Fishman E (2018) Social media for global education: pearls and pitfalls of using Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. J Am Coll Radiol 15:1513–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Voorveld H, van Noort G, Muntinga D, Bronner F (2018) Engagement with social media and social media advertising: the differentiating role of platform type. J Advert 47(1):38–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. York A (2018) Best times to post on social media: 2018 industry research. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/best-times-to-post-on-social-media/. Accessed 15 March 2019
  18. Zhen F, Wang B, Wei Z (2015) The rise of the internet city in China: production and consumption of internet information. Urban Stud 52(13):2313–2329.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014547369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Miami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Cheetah Conservation FundOtjiwarongoNamibia

Personalised recommendations