Advertisement

Teaching environmental policy in an era of polarization and misrepresentation

  • Daniel J. Fiorino
Article

Abstract

The current national leadership in the United States poses challenges for anyone teaching in the environmental policy field. Although previous political administrations have been critical of environmental programs, the Trump administration poses new and different kinds of threats, among them a rejection of scientific analysis, selective use of policy data, a disregard for long-term threats like climate change, and a lack of policy and scientific integrity. Teachers of environmental policy should recognize these issues while building the capacities of students for using policy and scientific analysis critically and with integrity.

Keywords

Polarization Scientific integrity Transparency Education Energy Climate change 

References

  1. Eilperin J, Dennis B (2017) EPA dismisses half of key board’s scientific advisors; Interior Suspends More Than 200 Advisory Panels Washington Post, May 8. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/05/07/epa-dismisses-half-of-its-scientific-advisers-on-key-board-citing-clean-break-with-obama-administration/?utm_term=.5084ef48b706
  2. Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J Dev Econ 10:391–434Google Scholar
  3. Fiorino DJ (2006) The new environmental regulation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiorino DJ (2018) A good life on a finite earth: the political economy of green growth. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Foa RS, Mounk Y (2017) The signs of deconsolidation. J Democr 28:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hajnal Z, Lajevardi N, Nielson L (2017) Voter identification laws and the suppression of minority voters. J Polit 79:363–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leighley JE, Nagler J (2014) Who votes now? Demographics, issues, inequality, and turnout in the United States. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Milman, O (2016) Republican calls to scrap EPA met with skepticism by experts. The Guardian, February 26. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/feb/26/republican-candidates-donald-trump-eliminate-epa-law-experts
  9. Morgenstern RD, Pizer WA, Shih JS (2002) Jobs versus the environment: an industry-level perspective. J Environ Econ Manag 43:412–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Pollin R, Heintz J, Garrett-Peltier H (2009) The economic benefits of investing in clean energy. Center for American Progress; Political Economy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruckelshaus WD (1998) Stepping stones. The environmental forum 15:30–36Google Scholar
  13. Shapiro I, Irons J (2011) Regulation, employment, and the economy: fears of job loss are overblown. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Environmental PolicyAmerican UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations