The optimization of in-situ tar reduction and syngas production on a 60-kW three-staged biomass gasification system: theoretical and practical approach
- 7 Downloads
In order to develop more efficient biomass thermochemical conversion technology, a 60-kW three-staged biomass gasification system was constructed, and pinewood was used as material to investigate the effect of key influential factors on gasifier operation. Results show that the tar yield in pyrolysis stage was around 43,023 mg/Nm3, which was mainly consisted of primary tar compounds, such as acids, furans, and phenols. Sum of phenols compounds account for about 50.1% of total tar compounds. With the increase of excess air coefficient, the temperature of char-bed was improved, which benefited the reduction reactions in char bed. At ER = 0.35, the operation of the gasifier achieved an optimization value: gasification efficiency, carbon conversion rate, and tar yield were 76.77%, 81.91%, and 99 mg/Nm3 respectively. Subsequently, a 3D CFD (computational fluid dynamics) model of the throat section was built. Six kinds of air injection styles were designed and simulated. Results show that tangential air blow with reasonable angle (θ = 30° in this work) improves the flow field in the furnace and eliminate flow stagnation zone near the wall, which benefits the tar cracking in the throat section.
KeywordsBiomass Tar Gasification Excess air coefficient CFD
This work was supported by Science Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology (YKJ201813) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51706094).
- 4.Vreugdenhil B, Zwart R, Neeft JPA (2009) Tar formation in pyrolysis and gasification. ECN. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264090579_Tar_formation_in_pyrolysis_and_gasification
- 6.Zwart R, van der Heijden S, Emmen R, Dall Bentzen J, Ahrenfeldt J, Stoholm P, Krogh J (2010) Tar removal from low-temperature gasifiers. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/4974583/Tar%20removal%20from.pdf
- 7.Fjellerup J, Ahrenfeldt J, Henriksen U, Gøbel B (2005) Formation, decomposition and cracking of biomass tars in gasification. Technical University of Denmark. Department of Mechanical Engineering. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/3220398/pyrotar2.pdf
- 8.Beaty P Nexterra-gasification of bark–a pragmatic development roadmap for gasification. In: TAPPI 2007 International Conference on Renewable Energy, May, 2007. pp 10–11Google Scholar
- 9.Neubert M, Reil S, Wolff M, Pöcher D, Stork H, Ultsch C, Meiler M, Messer J, Kinzler L, Dillig M (2017) Experimental comparison of solid phase adsorption (SPA), activated carbon test tubes and tar protocol (DIN CEN/TS 15439) for tar analysis of biomass derived syngas. Biomass Bioenergy 105:443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Simell P, Ståhlberg P, Kurkela E, Albrecht J, Deutsch S, Sjöström K (2000) Provisional protocol for the sampling and anlaysis of tar and particulates in the gas from large-scale biomass gasifiers. Version 1998. Biomass Bioenergy 18(1):19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0961-9534(99)00064-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Jess A (1995) Reaktionskinetische Untersuchungen zur thermischen Zersetzung von Modellkohlenwasserstoffen. Erdol Erdgas Kohle 111(11):479–484Google Scholar
- 26.RPL WPJ (1988) Global reaction schemes for hydrocarbon combustion. Combustion and Flame 73(233–249). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(88)90021