Advertisement

Characterisation of the non-oil Jatropha biomass material for use as a source of solid fuel

  • Elias KethobileEmail author
  • Clever Ketlogetswe
  • Jerekias Gandure
Original Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Jatropha curcas L. plant (Jatropha) is cultivated in many countries for biodiesel production. This is to provide for high energy demand and mitigate global warming from the combustion processes of fossil fuels. The production of Jatropha oil for biodiesel production in Botswana following the recent government decision to promote biofuels is likely to generate large volumes of non-oil biomass. The residual non-oil biomass material can be used in place of firewood in low-income communities. This is perceived to be one of the effective ways of utilising non-oil biomass from the plant. However, for the non-oil biomass material to be used effectively in place of firewood, its properties related to fuel value need to be investigated. The objective of this study was therefore to characterise the Jatropha non-oil biomass from Botswana material for effective use as solid fuel source. The characterisation results showed that Jatropha seed cake has relatively high calorific value of 19.28 MJ/kg, high bulk density of 0.75 MJ/kg, high fixed carbon content of 24.28 MJ/kg and low ash content of 5.04 MJ/kg, which are good properties for solid fuel source. The Jatropha seed cake also has more carbon content to the value of 46.15% when compared with the stem’s carbon content of 43.68% and the fruit husk carbon content of 36.05%. The thermal gravimetric analysis showed that the thermal degradation of the Jatropha seed cake is slow when compared to the other Jatropha biomass materials under investigation. It can, therefore, be concluded that, the Jatropha seed cake can be a good source of solid fuel when compared with the Jatropha stem and the Jatropha fruit husk.

Keywords

Jatropha plant Thermogravimetric analysis Biomass Characterisation Elements Solid fuel 

Notes

Funding information

This research was funded by the Ministry of Mineral Resources, Green Technology, and Energy Security – MMGE, Botswana Government through a project called ‘Information-based Optimization of Jatropha Biomass Energy Production in the Frost and Drought-prone Regions of Botswana’. It was also supported by the Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food Security, Government of Botswana.

References

  1. 1.
    Ishimoto Y, Yabuta S, Kgokong S, Motsepe M, Tominaga J, Teramoto S, Konaka T, Mmopelwag G, Kawamitsu Y, Akashi K, Ueno M (2018) Environmental evaluation with greenhouse gas emissions and absorption based on life cycle assessment for a Jatropha cultivation system in frost and drought-prone regions of Botswana. Biomass Bioenergy 110:33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.026 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Özyuğuran A, Yaman S (2017) Prediction of calorific value of biomass from proximate analysis. Energy Procedia 107:130–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.149 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kavalek M, Havrland B, Ivanova T, Hutla P, Skope P (2013) Utilization of Jatropha curcas L. seed cake for production of solid biofuels. In 12th International scientific conference engineering for rural development. Latvia university of agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia 23:536–540Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishimoto Y, Kgokong S, Yabuta S, Tuminaga J, Coetzee T, Konaka TF, Mazereku C, Kawamitsu Y, Akashi K (2017) Flowering pattern of biodiesel plant Jatropha in frost- and drought-prone regions of Botswana. Int J Green Energy 14:908–815.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2017.1339041 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mmopelwa G, Kgathi DL, Kashe K, Chanda R (2017) Economic sustainability of Jatropha cultivation for biodiesel production. J Fundam Renew Energy Appl 7(6).  https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-4541.1000244
  6. 6.
    Pambudi NA, Torii S, Syamsiro M, Saptoadi H, Gandidi IM (2012) Emission factor of single pellet cake seed Jatropha curcas in a fix bed reactor. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 34:179–183.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782012000200009 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vyas D, Singh R (2007) Feasibility study of Jatropha seed husk as an open core gasifier feedstock. Renew Energy 32:512–517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.06.006 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang LQ, Fang Z, Guo F, Yang L-b (2012) Production of 2,3-butanediol from acid hydrolysates of Jatropha hulls with Klebsiella oxytoca. Bioresour Technol 107:405–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.083 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Achten W, Vercho L, Franken Y, Mathjis E, Singh VP, Aerts R, Muys B (2008) Jatropha bio-diesel production and use. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1063–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.03.003 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smeets E, Johnson FX, Ballard-Tremeer G (2012) Keynote introduction: traditional and improved use of biomass for energy in Africa. In: Janssen R, Rutz D (eds) Bioenergy for sustainable development in Africa. Heidelberg, London and New York, Dordrecht, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Madanayake B, Gan S, Eastwick C, Ng H (2017) Biomass as an energy source in coal co-firing and its feasibility enhancement via pre-treatment techniques. Fuel Process Tehnol 159:207–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.01.029 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demirbas A (2017). Higher heating values of lignin types from wood and non-wood lignocellulosic biomasses. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 39:592:598. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2016.1248798
  13. 13.
    Sedai P, Kalita D, Deka D (2016) Assessment of the fuel wood of India: a case study based on fuel characteristics of some indigenous species of Arunachal Pradesh. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 38:891–897.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2013.834399 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loo SV, Koppejan J (2007) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, London.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773041
  15. 15.
    Maiti S, Bapat P, Das P, Ghosh P (2014) Feasibility study of Jatropha shell gasification for captive power generation in biodiesel production process from whole dry fruits. Fuel 121:126–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.04 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murata K, Liu T, Inaba M, Takahara I (2012) Catalytic fast pyrolysis of Jatropha wastes. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 94:75–82Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adinurani PG, Hendroko RS, Nindita A, Wahono SK, Maizirwan M, Sasmito A, Nugroho YA, Liwang T (2015) Characterization of Jatropha curcas Linn. Capsule husk as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Energy Procedia 65:264–273Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kongkasawan J, Nam H, Capareda S (2016) Jatropha waste meal as an alternative energy source via pressurized pyrolysis: a study on temperature effects. Energy 113:631–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.030 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manurung R, Wever DAZ, Wildschut J, Venderbosch RH, Hidayat H, van Dam JEG, Leijenhorst EJ, Broekhuis AA, Heeres HJ (2009) Valorisation of Jatropha curcas L. plant parts: nut shell conversion to fast pyrolysis oil. Food Bioprod Process 87:187–196Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patel B, Gami B (2012) Biomass characterization and its use as solid fuel for combustion. Iranica J Energy Environ 3:123–128.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijee.2012.03.02.007 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Obafemi O, Stephen A, Ajayi O, Mashinini P, Nkosinathi M (2018) Experimental investigation of thermal properties of lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Mater Sci Eng 413.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/413/1/012054
  22. 22.
    ASTM E1757–01 (2015). ASTM standard practice for preparation of biomass for compositional analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.  https://doi.org/10.1520/E1757-01R15
  23. 23.
    AOCS (2004). AOCS approved procedure am 5–04 rapid determination of oil/fat utilizing high temperature solvent extraction, 5th edition ed., Champaign, AOCS PressGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Soest, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in cattle. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ASTM E1755–01 (2015) Standard test method for ash in biomass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA  https://doi.org/10.1520/E1755-01R15
  26. 26.
    Singh YD, Mahanta P, Bora U (2017) Comprehensive characterization of lignocellulosic biomass through proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis for bioenergy production. Renew Energy 103:490–500Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ayeni A, Adeeyo OA, Oresegun OM, Oladimeji TE (2015) Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass. Am J Eng Res 4:14–19Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qin J, Yang Y, Jiang J, Yi Z, Xiao L, Ai X, Chen Z (2012) Comparison of lignocellulose composition in four major species of Miscanthus. Afr J Biotechnol 11:2529–12537Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASTM E1756-01(2001). Standard test method for determination of total solids in biomass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.  https://doi.org/10.1520/E1756-08R15
  30. 30.
    ASTM E872–82 (2013). Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis of particulate wood fuels. American Society for testing and materials (ASTM) standard methods, West Conshohocken, PA  https://doi.org/10.1520/E0872-82R13
  31. 31.
    ASTM E870–82 (2013) Standard test methods for analysis of wood fuels. American Society for testing and materials (ASTM) standard methods, West Conshohocken, PA.  https://doi.org/10.1520/E0870-82R13
  32. 32.
    Pari L, Suardi A, Longo L, Carnevale M, Gallucci F (2018) Jatropha curcas, L. pruning residues for energy: characteristics of an untapped by-product. Energies 11:1622.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071622 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seyedsadr S, Al Afif R, Pfeifer C (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues: a case study of the farm residues-based biogas plants. Carbon Resources Conversion 1:81–85Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ASTM E873–82 (2013). Standard test method for bulk density of densified particulate biomass fuels. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.  https://doi.org/10.1520/E0873-82R13, 2013
  35. 35.
    Lunguleasa A (2014) Hygroscopicity of chip wood versus solid wood. In International Conference of Scientific paper, AFASES, Brasov, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Plattner SH, Reale R, Visco G, Papa MG, Sammartino MP (2012) Proposal of new analytical procedure for the measurement of water absorption by stone. Preliminary study for an alternative to the Italian technical normative NORMAL 07-81. Chem Cent J 6:62.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-62 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shi SQ, Gardher DJ, Wang JZ (2000) Estimating maximum water absorption of wood fibre/polymer fluff composites. Wood and Fibre science 32:269–277Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Acar S, Ayanoglu A (2012) Determination of higher heating values (HHVs) of biomass fuels. Energy Educ Sci Technol A 28:749-758Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Erol M, Haykiri-Acma M, Küçükbayrak S (2010) Calorific value estimation of biomass from their proximate analyses data. Renew Energy 35:170–173Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wahid FRAA, Sale S, Samad NAFA (2017) Estimation of higher heating value of torrefied palm oil wastes from proximate analysis. Energy Procedia 138:307–312Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    ASTM E711–87 (2004). Standard test method for gross calorific value for refuse-derived fuel by the bomb calorimeter. American Society for testing and materials (ASTM) standard methods, West Conshohocken, PA  https://doi.org/10.1520/E0872-82R13
  42. 42.
    Shinde VB, Singarvelu M (2014) Thermo gravimetric analysis of biomass stalks for briquetting. J Environ Res Dev 9:151–160Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wróblewski R, Ceran B (2016) Thermogravimetric analysis in the study of solid fuels. E3S Web of Conferences 10.  https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20161000109
  44. 44.
    ISO/IEC:17025 (2005) Laboratory Accreditation Program- PJLA [Online]Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/39883.html. [Accessed 07 November 2018]
  45. 45.
    Brand MA, de Souza BR, Buss R, Waltrick D, Jacinto RC (2018) Thermogravimetric analysis for characterization of the pellets produced with different forest and agricultural residues. Ciência Rural 14:11.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20180271 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yi Q, Qi F, Cheng G, Zhang Y, Xiao B, Hu Z, Liu S, Cai H, Xu S (2013) Thermogravimetric analysis of combustion of biomass. J Therm Anal Calorim 1112:1475–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-012-2744-1 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    IBM (2016) SPSS: version24. Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp, Armonk, N.Y., USAGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Karaj S, Müller J (2009) Optimization of mechanical extraction of Jatropha curcas seeds. Landtechnik 64:164–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.009 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Beerens P, van Eijc J (2010) Oil pressing and purification. In: de Jongh J (ed) The Jatropha hand book from cultivation to application. FACT, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp 39–58Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Telmo C, Lousada J (2011) Heating values of wood pellets from different species. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2634–2639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.043 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nguyen NQ, Cloutier A, Achim A, Stevanovic T (2016) Fuel properties of sugar maple and yellow birch wood in relation to tree vigor. BioResources 11:3275–3288Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cabral Moulin J, Coimbra Nobre JR, Paz Castro J, Trugilho PF, Chaves Arantes MD (2017) Effect of extractives and carbonisation temperature on energy characteristics of wood waste in Amazon rainforest. CERNE 23:209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723022216 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Polleto M (2016) Effect of extractive content on the thermal stability of two wood species from Brazil. Maderas Ciencia y tecnología 18:435–442.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2016005000039 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Scheller H, Ulvskov P (2010) Hemicelluloses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:263–289.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevarplant-042809-112315
  55. 55.
    Pauly M, Gille S, Liu L, Mansoori N, da Souza A, Schultink A, Xiong G (2013). Hemicellulose biosynthesis. Planta, 238: 627–642, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1921-1
  56. 56.
    Nhuchhen DR, Basu P, Achriya B (2014) A comprehensive review on biomass torrefaction. International Journal of Renewable Energy and Biofuel 2014:1–56.  https://doi.org/10.5171/2014.506376 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    dos Santos RS, Macedo A, Pantoja L, dos Santos AS (2014) Bioethanol from Jatropha seed cakes produced by acid hydrolysis followed by fermentation with baker’s yeast. Int J Appl Sci Technol 4:111–117Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kim SW, Park DK, Kim SD (2013) Pyrolytic characteristics of Jatropha seed shell cake in thermo-balance and fluidized bed reactors. Korean J Chem Eng 30:1162–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0015-x Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Liang Y, Siddaramu T, Yesuf J, Sarkany N (2010) Fermentable sugar release from Jatropha seed cakes following lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 101:6417–6424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.038 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lourenço A, Rencoret J, Chemetova C, Jorge Gominho J, Gutiérrez A, del Río JJ, Pereira H (2016) Lignin composition and structure differs between xylem, phloem and Phellem in Quercus suber L. Frontiers of Plants 7:1612.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01612 Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Santiago R, Barrosrios J, Malvar R (2013) Impact of cell wall composition on maize resistance to pests and diseases. Int J Mol Sci 14:6960–6980.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14046960 Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stelte W, Holm KL, Sanadi A, Barsber S, Ahrenfeldt J, Henriksen UB (2011) Fuel pellets from biomass: the importance of the pelletizing pressure and its dependency on the processing conditions. Fuel 90:3285–3290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.011 Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yamamura M, Akashi K, Yokota A, Hattori T, Shibata D et al (2012) Characterization of Jatropha curcas lignins. Plant Biotechnol 29:179–183.  https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.12.0515b Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shuhairia NM, Mohamed S, Ismail ZS (2015) Lignocellulosic-based Jatropha seed pre-treatment using ultrasonic reactive extraction for liquid biofuel production. Chem Eng Trans 45:1573–1578.  https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1545263 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gottipati R, Mishra S (2011) A kinetic study on pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of oil cakes: effect of cellulose and lignin content. J Fuel Chem Technol 39:265–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(11)60 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Singh R, Vyas D, Srivastava M (2008) SPRERI experience on holistic approach to utilize all parts of Jatropha curcas fruit for energy. Renew Energy 33:1868–1873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.1 Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gunaseelan V (2009) Biomass estimates, characteristics, biochemical methane potential, kinetics and energy flow from Jatropha curcas on dry lands. Biomass Bioenergy 33:589–596Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Khalil HPSA, Aprilia NAS, Bhat AH, Jawaid M, Paridah MT, Rudi DA (2013) Jatropha biomass as a renewable materials for bio composites and its applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:667–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.036 Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gudeta TD (2016) Chemical composition, bio-diesel potential and uses of Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae). American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 4:35–48.  https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20160402.15 Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vaithanomsat P, Apiwatanapiwat W (2009) Feasibility study on vanillin production from Jatropha curcas stem using steam explosion as a pretreatment. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 3:258–261Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sricharoenchaikul V, Atong D (2009) Thermal decomposition study on Jatropha curcas L. waste using TGA and fixed bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 85:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.030 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ngangyo-Heya R, Pournavab F, Carrillo-Parra A (2016) Calorific value and chemical composition of five semi-arid Mexican tree species. Forests 7:8.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f7030058 Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Khazraji AC, Robert S (2013). Interaction effects between cellulose and water in nanocrystalline and amorphous regions: a novel approach using molecular modeling. J Nanomater 2013: 10pp  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/409676, 1, 10Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Balasundram V, Alias N, Ibrahim N, Kasmani MR, Isha R, Hamid MKA, Habulla H (2018) Thermal characterization of Malaysian biomass via thermogravimetric analysis. Journal of Energy and Safety Technology 1:31–38 https://jest.utm.my/index.php/jest Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S (2011) Comparison of the combustion behaviours of agricultural wastes under dry air and oxygen. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 163.  https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp11057251
  76. 76.
    P. Kaewpengkrow P, Atong D, Sricharoenchaikul V (2014). Effect of Pd, Ru, Ni and ceramic supports on selective deoxygenation and hydrogenation of fast pyrolysis Jatropha residue vapours. Renew Energy 65: 92–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.026
  77. 77.
    Pereira BLC, Oliveira AC, Carvalho AM, Carneiro ACL, Santos LC, Vital BR (2012). Quality of wood and charcoal from eucalyptus clones for ironmaster use. International Journal of Forestry Research 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/523025
  78. 78.
    Castro AFNM, Castro RVO et al (2015) Correlations between age, wood quality and charcoal quality of Eucalyptus clonesi. evista Árvore, Viçosa-M 40:551–560.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000300019 Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jourabchi S, Gan S, Ng HK (2014) Pyrolysis of Jatropha curcas pressed cake for bio- oil production in a fixed-bed system. Energy Convers Manag 78:518–526Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Demirbas T, Demirbas C (2009) Fuel properties of wood species. Energy Sources, Part A, 31:1464–1472.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030802093153
  81. 81.
    Sher F, Pans MA, Afilaka DT, Sun C, Liu H (2017) Experimental investigation of woody and non-woody biomass combustion in a bubbling fluidised bed combustor focusing on gaseous emissions and temperature profiles. Energy 141:2069–2080Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zambon I, Colosimo F, Monarca D, Cecchini M, Gallucci F, Proto A, Lord R, Colantoni A (2016) An innovative agro-forestry supply chain for residual biomass: physicochemical characterisation of biochar from olive and hazelnut pellets. Energies 9(7):526.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en9070526
  83. 83.
    Contran N, Chessa L, Lubino M, Bellavite D, Roggero P, Enne G (2013) State-of-the-art of the Jatropha curcas productive chain: from sowing to biodiesel and by-products. Ind Crop Prod 42:202–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.037 Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Navarro-Pineda FS, Baz-Rodríguez SA, Handler RJ, Sacramento-Rivero JC (2016) Advances on the processing of Jatropha curcas towards a whole-crop biorefinery. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:247–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.009 Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Achten W, Maes W, Aerts R, Verchot L, Trabucco A, Mathijs E, Singh V, Muys B (2010) Jatropha: from global hype to local opportunity. J Arid Environ 74:64–165Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    FAO (2015). Wood fuels: hand book: food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Panwar NL (2010) Performance evaluation of developed domestic cook stove with Jatropha shell. Waste Biomass Valor 1:309–314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-010-9040-8 Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Moniruzzaman M, Yaakob Z, Katun R (2016) Biotechnology for Jatropha improvement: a worthy exploration. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1262–1277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.074 Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ghaly A, Mansaray KG (1999) Comparative study on the thermal degradation of rice husks in various atmospheres. Energy Sources 21:867–881Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Deng J, Wang G, Kuang J, Zhang U, Luo Y (2009) Pre-treatment of agricultural residues for co-gasification via torrefaction. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 86:331–337Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bergman PCA, Boersma AR, Zwart RWH, Kiel JHA (2005). Development of torrefaction for biomass co-firing in existing coal-fired power stations. ECN report, ECN-C- 05-013, 200Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tumuluru J, Sokhansanj S, Hess JS, Wright CT, Boardman R (2011) A review on biomass torrefaction process and product properties for energy applications. Ind Biotechnol 7:384–401.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2011.7.384 Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Jingura RM, Musademba D, Matengaifa R (2010) An evaluation of utility of Jatropha curcas L. as a source of multiple energy. International Journal of Engineering. Sci Technol 2:115–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and TechnologyUniversity of BotswanaGaboroneBotswana
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural ResearchMinistry of Agricultural Development and Food SecurityGaboroneBotswana

Personalised recommendations