Advertisement

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 681–688 | Cite as

Char properties and pollutant adsorption capability of oil palm shell using hydrothermal process

  • Ismail Budiman
  • Dede HermawanEmail author
  • Fauzi Febrianto
  • Gustan Pari
  • Subyakto
Original Article
  • 143 Downloads

Abstract

Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) for lignocellulosic biomass has many advantages in terms of environmentally friendly, non-toxic, and low energy use. The products produced from HTC process can be used for various materials such as chemicals, adsorbents, energy, and agriculture fertilizer. In this study, HTC process has been done by using the oil palm shell (OPS). The purposes of this study were to evaluate the characteristics of the hydrochar, as well as to determine the effect of temperature and processing time on hydrochar properties resulting from the HTC process. The process was carried out using a temperature of 200 °C, 225 °C, and 250 °C, with a processing time of 4, 6, and 8 h. The ratio of biomass to water was 15:100 based on weight. The characterization that performed on the hydrochar and its raw OPS were elemental analysis, proximate analysis, Brunauer Emmett and Teller (BET), fourier transform infrared (FTIR), pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (Pyr–GC–MS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The determination of iodine number test, methylene blue number test, and some pollutants adsorption tests were also performed to characterize the product. The results showed that the surface area, fixed carbon, and carbon content of hydrochars were increased as compared with the raw OPS. The structure of hydrochar also differs with raw OPS structure based on XRD analysis. The hydrochar that produced by the temperature of 225 °C for 8 h selected as the best properties based on the determination of iodine, some gaseous pollutant adsorption, and surface area of materials.

Keywords

Hydrothermal carbonization Oil palm shell Hydrochars Temperature Processing time 

Notes

Author contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work and discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Funding information

This research is financially supported by The Postgraduate Scholarship Program of Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia.

References

  1. 1.
    Jamari SS, Howse JR (2012) The effect of the hydrothermal carbonization process on palm oil empty fruit bunch. Biomass Bioenergy 47:82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiao LP, Shi ZJ, Xu F, Sun RC (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 118:619–623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici MM, Fuhner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich KH (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes, and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2(1):71–106.  https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parshetti GK, Hoekman SK, Balasubramanian R (2013) Chemical, structural and combustion characteristics of carbonaceous products obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of palm empty fruit bunches. Bioresour Technol 135:683–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain A, Jayaraman S, Balasubramanian R, Srinivasan MP (2014) Hydrothermal pre-treatment for mesoporous carbon synthesis: enhancement of chemical activation. Journal of Material Chemistry A 2(2):520–528.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta12648j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain A, Balasubramanian R, Srinivasan MP (2016) Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: a review. Chem Eng J 283:789–805.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nizamuddin S, Jayakumar NS, Sahu JN, Ganesan P, Bhutto AW, Mubarak NM (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of oil palm shell. Korean J Chem Eng 32(9):1789–1797.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0376-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daud WHAW, Ali WSW (2004) Comparison on pore development of activated carbon produced from palm oil shell and coconut shell. Bioresour Technol 93:63–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (2002) TAPPI T 222 om-02. Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. TAPPI Press, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (1997) TAPPI T 17 wd-97. Cellulose in wood. TAPPI Press, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (1997) TAPPI T 204 cm-97. Solvent extractives of wood and pulp. TAPPI Press, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Browning BL (1967) Methods of wood chemistry. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Standardization Agency of Indonesia (1995) SNI 06-3730-1995. Technical activated charcoal. BSN, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (1994) ASTM D 4607-94. Standard test method for determination of iodine number of activated carbon (Reapproved 2006). ASTM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raposo F, Rubia MADL, Borja R (2009) Methylene blue number as useful indicator to evaluate the adsorptive capacity of granular activated carbon in batch mode: influence of adsorbate/adsorbent mass ratio and particle size. J Hazard Mater 165:291–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sumtong P, Chollacoop N, Eiad-ua A (2017) Effect of temperature and times by hydrothermal carbonization process from sawdust and bagasse for carbon material supporter. J Appl Sci 16:93–97.  https://doi.org/10.14416/j.appsci.2017.10.S14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu X, Pellechia PJ, Flora JRV, Berge ND (2013) Influence of reaction time and temperature on product formation and characteristics associated with the hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 138:180–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Demirbas A (2003) Relationship between heating value and lignin, fixed carbon, and volatile material contents of shells from biomass production. Energy Sources 25:629–635.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310390212336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Funke A, Ziegler F (2010) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining 4:160–177.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saetea P, Tippayawong N (2013) Characterization of adsorbent from hydrothermally carbonized and steam activated sewage sludge. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013 Vol.III, WCE 2013, July 3-5, 2013, London, UK. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/40a8/b4f244c2b7d9fc434d57fe4d200633fb88fb.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2018
  21. 21.
    Hameed BH, Ahmad AL, Latiff KNA (2007) Adsorption of basic dye (methylene blue) onto activated carbon prepared from rattan sawdust. Dyes Pigments 75:143–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.05.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karagoz S, Bhaskar T, Muto A, Sakata Y, Uddin MA (2004) Low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of biomass: effect of reaction parameters on products and boiling point distribution. Energy Fuel 18:234–241.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef030133g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yan Y, Xu J, Li T, Ren Z (1999) Liquefaction of sawdust for liquid fuel. Fuel Process Technology 60:135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00026-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boonamnuayvitaya V, Sae-ung S, Tanthapanichakoon W (2005) Preparation of activated carbon from coffee residue for the adsorption of formaldehyde. Sep Purif Technol 42:159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2004.07.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shin SK, Song JH (2011) Modeling and simulations of the removal of formaldehyde using silver-nano-particles attached to granular activated carbon. Journal on Hazardous Materials 194:385–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gao Y, Chen HP, Wang J, Shi T, Yang HP, Wang XH (2011) Characterization of products from hydrothermal liquefaction and carbonation of biomass model compounds and real biomass. J Fuel Chem Technol 39(12):893–900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-5813(12)60001-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu C, Huang X, Kong L (2017) Efficient low temperature hydrothermal carbonization of Chinese reed for biochar with high energy density. Energies 10(12):2094.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng A, Jiang L, Zhao Z, Chang S, Huang Z, Zhao K, He F, Li H (2016) Effect of hydrothermal treatment on chemical structure and pyrolysis behavior of eucalyptus wood. Energy Fuel 30(4):3057–3065.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b03005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ismail Budiman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dede Hermawan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fauzi Febrianto
    • 1
  • Gustan Pari
    • 3
  • Subyakto
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest Products Department, Faculty of ForestryBogor Agricultural UniversityBogorIndonesia
  2. 2.Research Center for Biomaterials LIPIBogorIndonesia
  3. 3.Forest Products Research and Development CenterBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations