Advertisement

Influence of biochar application on growth of Oryza sativa and its associated soil microbial ecology

  • G. Swagathnath
  • S. Rangabhashiyam
  • S. Murugan
  • P. BalasubramanianEmail author
Original Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, biochar was produced from three biomass feedstocks such as fruits of Cassia fistula and Caesalpinia sp. and barks of Eucalyptus globulus. The samples of the obtained biochar were characterized for pH, physiochemical properties, surface morphology, and surface functional groups. The obtained biochar samples were further studied with/without the combination of urea for their plant growth enhancement properties including the germination studies and effect on shoot and root growth of rice plants. Biochar produced from C. fistula fruits at 1.5% concentration increased the plant shoot height 18% higher than the control plants. Eucalyptus sp. barks’ biochar application at 0.5% concentration also increased the plant shoot height 12% longer than the control. However, the biochar produced from Caesalpinia sp. did not increase the shoot length. Yet, a generalized increase in root length was observed with the application of biochar. The combined application of nitrogen fertilizer (urea) and biochar together reverted the effect of biochar on the shoot length increase. Phospholipid-derived fatty acid (PLFA) characterization of soil revealed that soil biota shifts when soil was supplemented with the biochar. The bacterial community increased and a loss of fungal community was observed with the application of biochar.

Keywords

Biochar Agro residues PLFA Gasifier Biomass feedstocks Soil ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India (File No. ECR/2017/003397) is greatly acknowledged. The authors thank the National Institute of Technology Rourkela for providing the necessary research facilities. The authors acknowledge SAIF, IIT Madras for the use of ICP-OES in measuring CEC property which is presented in the paper. The authors greatly acknowledge the Ministry of Human Resources Development of Government of India for supporting the master’s programme of the first author.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Balasubramanian P & Karthickumar P (2017) Biofertilizers and biopesticides: a holistic approach for sustainable agriculture. In: Sustainable utilization of natural resources. pp 255–284.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315153292
  2. 2.
    Savci S (2012) An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. Int J Environ Sci Dev 3(1):73MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matovic D (2011) Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: global and Canadian perspective. Energy 36(4):2011–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11(2):403–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glaser B (2000) Persistence of soil organic matter in archaeological soils (terra preta) of the Brazilian amazon region. pp. 190–194 (No. Reserva Biblioteca/631.417 S964s). En: Sustainable management of soil organic matter. CAB International, OxonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang J, Lü F, Zhang H, Shao L, Chen D, He P (2015) Multiscale visualization of the structural and characteristic changes of sewage sludge biochar oriented towards potential agronomic and environmental implication. Sci Rep 5:9406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee XJ, Lee LY, Gan S, Thangalazhy-Gopakumar S, Ng HK (2017) Biochar potential evaluation of palm oil wastes through slow pyrolysis: thermochemical characterization and pyrolytic kinetic studies. Bioresour Technol 236:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulz H, Dunst G, Glaser B (2013) Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility. Agron Sustain Dev 33(4):817–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerzabek MH, Pichlmayer F, Kirchmann H, Haberhauer G (1997) The response of soil organic matter to manure amendments in a long-term experiment at Ultuna, Sweden. Eur J Soil Sci 48(2):273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 41(2):210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35(4):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eykelbosh AJ, Johnson MS, de Queiroz ES, Dalmagro HJ, Couto EG (2014) Biochar from sugarcane filtercake reduces soil CO2 emissions relative to raw residue and improves water retention and nutrient availability in a highly-weathered tropical soil. PLoS One 9(6):e98523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen V, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Petersen CT, Mikkelsen TN, Muller-Stover D (2016) Effects of gasification biochar on plant-available water capacity and plant growth in two contrasting soil types. Soil Tillage Res 161(1–9):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Behrendt U, Abd_Allah EF, Berg G (2016) Biochar treatment resulted in a combined effect on soybean growth promotion and a shift in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Front Microbiol 7:209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rangabhashiyam S, Balasubramanian P (2019) The potential of lignocellulosic biomass precursors for biochar production: performance, mechanism and wastewater application—a review. Ind Crop Prod 128:405–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Czimczik CI, Preston CM, Schmidt MW, Werner RA, Schulze ED (2002) Effects of charring on mass, organic carbon, and stable carbon isotope composition of wood. Org Geochem 33(11):1207–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baath E (2011) Use and misuse of PLFA measurements in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43(8):1621–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buyer JS, Sasser M (2012) High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Appl Soil Ecol 61:127–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swagathnath G, Rangabhashiyam S, Parthsarathi K, Murugan S, Balasubramanian P (2019) Modeling biochar yield and syngas production during the pyrolysis of agro-residues. In: Green buildings and sustainable engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohammadi A, Cowie AL, Cacho O, Kristiansen P, Mai TLA, Joseph S (2017) Biochar addition in rice farming systems: economic and energy benefits. Energy 140:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brewer CE, Unger R, Schmidt-Rohr K, Brown RC (2011) Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties. Bioenergy Res 4(4):312–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hilioti Z, Michailof CM, Valasiadis D, Iliopoulou EF, Koidou V, Lappas AA (2017) Characterization of castor plant-derived biochars and their effects as soil amendments on seedlings. Biomass Bioenergy 105:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xin Y, Cao H, Yuan Q, Wang D (2017) Two-step gasification of cattle manure for hydrogen-rich gas production: effect of biochar preparation temperature and gasification temperature. Waste Manag 68:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li H, Dong X, da Silva EB, de Oliveira LM, Chen Y, Ma LQ (2017) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3488–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weber K, Quicker P (2018) Properties of biochar. Fuel 217:240–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Solaiman ZM, Murphy DV, Abbott LK (2012) Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings. Plant Soil 353(1–2):273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vaughn SF, Dinelli FD, Tisserat B, Joshee N, Vaughan MM, Peterson SC (2015) Creeping bentgrass growth in sand-based root zones with or without biochar. Sci Hortic 197:592–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158(3–4):436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fertil Soils 48(3):271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337(1–2):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. Biochar Environ Manag Sci Technol 1:67–84Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prasad M, Tzortzakis N, McDaniel N (2017) Chemical characterization of biochar and assessment of the nutrient dynamics by means of preliminary plant growth tests. J Environ Manag 216:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Agegnehu G, Srivastava AK, Bird MI (2017) The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: a review. Appl Soil Ecol 119:156–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ding Y, Liu YX, Wu WX, Shi DZ, Yang M, Zhong ZK (2010) Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water Air Soil Pollut 213(1–4):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graber ER, Elad Y (2013) Biochar impact on plant resistance to disease. Biochar Soil Biota 278Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jin H (2010) Characterization of microbial life colonizing biochar and biochar-amended soilsGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough TJ, Sherlock RR, Condron LM (2012) Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable. Plant Soil 350(1–2):57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111(1–2):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Res 45(8):629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sun H, Lu H, Chu L, Shao H, Shi W (2017) Biochar applied with appropriate rates can reduce N leaching, keep N retention and not increase NH3 volatilization in a coastal saline soil. Sci Total Environ 575:820–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    He T, Liu D, Yuan J, Luo J, Lindsey S, Bolan N, Ding W (2018) Effects of application of inhibitors and biochar to fertilizer on gaseous nitrogen emissions from an intensively managed wheat field. Sci Total Environ 628:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ameloot N, De Neve S, Jegajeevagan K, Yildiz G, Buchan D, Funkuin YN, Sleutel S (2013) Short-term CO2 and N2O emissions and microbial properties of biochar amended sandy loam soils. Soil Biol Biochem 57:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lin Y, Ding W, Liu D, He T, Yoo G, Yuan J, Fan J (2017) Wheat straw-derived biochar amendment stimulated N2O emissions from rice paddy soils by regulating the amoA genes of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 113:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Anders E, Watzinger A, Rempt F, Kitzler B, Wimmer B, Zehetner F, Stahr K, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Soja G (2013) Biochar affects the structure rather than the total biomass of microbial communities in temperate soils. Agric Food Sci 22(4):404–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Watzinger A, Feichtmair S, Kitzler B, Zehetner F, Kloss S, Wimmer B et al (2014) Soil microbial communities responded to biochar application in temperate soils and slowly metabolized 13C-labelled biochar as revealed by 13C PLFA analyses: results from a short-term incubation and pot experiment. Eur J Soil Sci 65(1):40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gomez JD, Denef K, Stewart CE, Zheng J, Cotrufo MF (2014) Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65(1):28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kim JS, Sparovek G, Longo RM, De Melo WJ, Crowley D (2007) Bacterial diversity of terra preta and pristine forest soil from the Western Amazon. Soil Biol Biochem 39(2):684–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural & Environmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Biotechnology & Medical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology RourkelaOdishaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and BiotechnologySASTRA UniversityTamilnaduIndia
  3. 3.Thermal Engineering Division, Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology RourkelaOdishaIndia

Personalised recommendations