Advertisement

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 659–668 | Cite as

Ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment to intensify enzymatic saccharification of Crotalaria juncea using a statistical method

  • Manasa P
  • Paramjeet Saroj
  • Narasimhulu Korrapati
Original Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Sunn hemp as a non-woody fiber crop was selected to determine the effect of ultrasound-assisted alkali pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis. We hypothesized that ultrasound-assisted alkali pretreatment (US-NaOH) was more efficient than alkali pretreatment alone; maximum fermentable sugars were released in US-NaOH-pretreated biomass by enzymatic hydrolysis. In this study, sunn hemp was pretreated with NaOH and US-NaOH at 121 °C. A higher cellulose content of 67% was obtained in US-NaOH-pretreated biomass (1% NaOH, 10-min sonication, 121 °C) as compared with that of the alkali-pretreated biomass. After ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment, the crystallinity index of cellulose and the solubilization of pentose and lignin increased from 39 to 53%, leading to a significant increase in enzyme accessibility to cellulose to release reducing sugars. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the biomass underwent erosion after ultrasound pretreatment. Response surface methodology was chosen to study the individual effects of variables on enzymatic hydrolysis and their inter-dependence. The quantity of reducing sugars released was optimized using a response surface methodology, and the experimental results with optimized process variables gave 5.17 mg/mL glucose and 2.08 mg/mL xylose.

Keywords

Sunn hemp Ultrasound Alkaline Hydrolysis Crystallinity index Response surface methodology 

Abbreviation

US-NaOH

Ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment

NaOH

Sodium hydroxide

XRD

X-ray diffraction

SEM

Scanning electron microscope

NDF

Neutral detergent fiber

ADF

Acid detergent fiber

ADL

Acid detergent lignin

HPLC

High-performance liquid chromatography

DNS

3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid

CrI

Crystallinity index

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, Telangana, India.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin DB (2011) Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29(6):675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Villa-Vélez HA, Váquiro HA, Telis-Romero J (2015) The effect of power-ultrasound on the pretreatment of acidified aqueous solutions of banana flower-stalk: structural, chemical and statistical analysis. Ind Crop Prod 66:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rehman MSU, Kim I, Chisti Y, Han JI (2013) Use of ultrasound in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Educ Sci Technol A: Energy Sci Res 30(2):1391–1410Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yunus R, Salleh SF, Abdullah N, Biak DRA (2010) Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment on low temperature acid hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch. Bioresour Technol 101(24):9792–9796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Subhedar PB, Ray P, Gogate PR (2018) Intensification of delignification and subsequent hydrolysis for the fermentable sugar production from lignocellulosic biomass using ultrasonic irradiation. Ultrason Sonochem 40:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K (2012) Ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for fermentable sugar production: optimization through response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 112:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakashima K, Ebi Y, Kubo M, Shibasaki-Kitakawa N, Yonemoto T (2016) Pretreatment combining ultrasound and sodium percarbonate under mild conditions for efficient degradation of corn stover. Ultrason Sonochem 29:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh S, Bharadwaja S, Yadav PK, Moholkar VS, Goyal A (2014) Mechanistic investigation in ultrasound-assisted (alkaline) delignification of Parthenium hysterophorus biomass. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(37):14241–14252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dinh Vu N, Thi Tran H, Bui ND, Duc Vu C, Viet Nguyen H (2017) Lignin and cellulose extraction from Vietnam’s rice straw using ultrasound-assisted alkaline treatment method. International Journal of Polymer Science 2017:8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1063695
  10. 10.
    de Oliveira Vargas T, Diniz ER, Pacheco ALV, Santos RHS, Urquiaga S (2017) Green manure-15N absorbed by broccoli and zucchini in sequential cropping. Sci Hortic 214:209–213Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Online article by United States Department of Agriculture, AgResearch magazine (2012). https://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/2012/jan/crop
  12. 12.
    Natural Resources Conservation Service (1999) Sunn hemp: a cover crop for southern and tropical farming systems. Soil Qual. Instit Tech. Note 10 [Online]. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/files/10d3.pdf. (accessed 23 June 2004; verified 4 Oct. 2004). USDA NRCS, Soil Quality Inst., Auburn, AL
  13. 13.
    Cantrell KB, Bauer PJ, Ro KS (2010) Utilization of summer legumes as bioenergy feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 34(12):1961–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamireddy SR, Li J, Abbina S, Berti M, Tucker M, Ji Y (2013) Converting forage sorghum and sunn hemp into biofuels through dilute acid pretreatment. Ind Crop Prod 49:598–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalyani D, Lee K-M, Kim T-S, Li J, Dhiman SS, Kang YC, Lee J-K (2013) Microbial consortia for saccharification of woody biomass and ethanol fermentation. Fuel 107:815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sindhu R, Kuttiraja M, Preeti VE, Vani S, Sukumaran RK, Binod P (2013) A novel surfactant-assisted ultrasound pretreatment of sugarcane tops for improved enzymatic release of sugars. Bioresour Technol 135:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goering HK (1970) Forage fiber analysis. Apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. Agric handbook 379:20Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Segal L, Creely J, Martin A Jr, Conrad C (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ninomiya K, Kamide K, Takahashi K, Shimizu N (2012) Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of kenaf powder after ultrasonic pretreatment in ionic liquids at room temperature. Bioresour Technol 103(1):259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Lima CJ, Coelho LF, Contiero J (2010) The use of response surface methodology in optimization of lactic acid production: focus on medium supplementation, temperature and pH control. Food Technol Biotechnol 48(2):175–181Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asghar U, Irfan M, Iram M, Huma Z, Nelofer R, Nadeem M, Syed Q (2015) Effect of alkaline pretreatment on delignification of wheat straw. Nat Prod Res 29(2):125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhang J (2014) Effect of alkali treatment on the quality of hemp fiber. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 9(2):19–24Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pakarinen A, Zhang J, Brock T, Maijala P, Viikari L (2012) Enzymatic accessibility of fiber hemp is enhanced by enzymatic or chemical removal of pectin. Bioresour Technol 107:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Y, Fu E, Liang J (2008) Effect of ultrasonic waves on the saccharification processes of lignocellulose. Chem Eng Technol 31(10):1510–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu S, Huang W, Huang W, Wang K, Chen Q, Wu Y (2015) Coproduction of xylose, lignosulfonate and ethanol from wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 185:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A (2016) Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass—an overview. Bioresour Technol 199:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao XB, Wang L, Liu DH (2008) Peracetic acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for enzymatic hydrolysis: a continued work. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83(6):950–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Subhedar PB, Gogate PR (2014) Alkaline and ultrasound assisted alkaline pretreatment for intensification of delignification process from sustainable raw-material. Ultrason Sonochem 21(1):216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen D, Guo Y, Huang R, Lu Q, Huang J (2010) Pretreatment by ultra-high pressure explosion with homogenizer facilitates cellulase digestion of sugarcane bagasses. Bioresour Technol 101(14):5592–5600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eblaghi M, Niakousari M, Sarshar M, Mesbahi GR (2016) Combining ultrasound with mild alkaline solutions as an effective pretreatment to boost the release of sugar trapped in sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. J Food Process Eng 39(3):273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang S, Li F, Zhang P, Jin S, Tao X, Tang X, Ye J, Nabi M, Wang H (2017) Ultrasound assisted alkaline pretreatment to enhance enzymatic saccharification of grass clipping. Energy Convers Manag 149:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li F, Zhang P, Zhang G, Tang X, Wang S, Jin S (2017) Enhancement of corn stover hydrolysis with rumen fluid pretreatment at different solid contents: effect, structural changes and enzymes participation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zakaria B, Nassar H, Amr SA, El-Gendy NS (2015) Applying factorial design and response surface methodology to enhance microbial denitrogenation by Tween 80 and yeast extract. Pet Sci Technol 33(8):880–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Preetha B, Viruthagiri T (2007) Application of response surface methodology for the biosorption of copper using Rhizopus arrhizus. J Hazard Mater 143(1):506–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manasa P
    • 1
  • Paramjeet Saroj
    • 1
  • Narasimhulu Korrapati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyNational Institute of Technology WarangalWarangalIndia

Personalised recommendations