Advertisement

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 99–116 | Cite as

Impact of adhering soil and other extraneous impurities on the combustion and emission behavior of forest residue wood chips in an automatically stoked small-scale boiler

  • Thomas ZengEmail author
  • Daniel Kuptz
  • Kathrin Schreiber
  • Claudia Schön
  • Fabian Schulmeyer
  • Volker Zelinski
  • Annett Pollex
  • Herbert Borchert
  • Achim Loewen
  • Hans Hartmann
  • Volker Lenz
  • Michael Nelles
Original Article

Abstract

Within six case studies, different drying and sieving process steps were employed for the removal of adhering soil and other extraneous impurities from wood chips. Consequently, it was systematically investigated to which extent this strategy can be used to jointly mitigate the risk of bottom ash slagging and high pollutant emission levels during combustion in an automatically stoked small-scale boiler. Throughout all combustion tests, slag and emission formation were recorded. Formation of agglomerates in the bottom ash was not observed in the fuel bed. However, fuel processing resulted in an increase of the ash shrinking–softening range up to 230 K indicating a lower slagging risk in the bottom ash. An asymptotic trend for the ash melting temperatures was observed as a function of the molar (Si + P + K)/(Ca + Mg) ratio. It was also found that potassium is less efficiently retained in the bottom ash with lower Si content in the fuel. Lower moisture contents in the wood chips typically resulted in lower CO emissions and higher boiler efficiencies for the investigated range of moisture content. The sieving of the unprocessed wood chips reduced NOx emission levels up to 28%. However, fuel processing did not necessarily reduce the level of particulate matter emissions.

Keywords

Wood chip Combustion Emission Sieving Drying Ash agglomeration 

Abbreviations

ar

As received

db

Dry basis

DAI

Detrital/authigenic index

DT

Ash deformation temperature (°C)

E

Processed wood chips (i.e., end product)

ENplus

ENplus is an international acknowledged wood pellet certification scheme which was established in 2011. ENplus introduced quality classes and stronger requirements to those set by the European and international product standards for solid biofuels.

FT

Ash flow temperature (°C)

HPLC

High pressure liquid chromatography

HT

Ash hemisphere temperature (°C)

R

Unprocessed wood chips (i.e., raw material)

SD

Standard deviation

SST

Ash shrinkage starting temperature (°C)

STP

Standard temperature and pressure (i.e., 293.15 K and 1013 mbar, respectively)

TPM

Total particulate matter [mg/m3]

vol%

Volume percent

wt%

Weight percent

Nomenclature

ηboiler

Boiler efficiency (%)

cp

Specific heat capacity for water (kJ/(kg K))

Hu

Net calorific value on as received basis (MJ/kg ar)

Hu,d.b.

Net calorific value on dry basis (MJ/kg db)

Qfuel

Energy input of the fuel during the combustion test (kW)

QHC

Heat transferred to the water heating circuit during the combustion test (kW)

mfuel

Consumed fuel mass (kg/s)

mwater

Water mass flow (kg/s)

Pel

Auxiliary energy consumed during the test (kW)

Tin

Water return temperature (K)

Tout

Water outlet temperature (K)

uy,max

Maximum measurement uncertainty.

Trt

Water return temperature from the heat circuit into the boiler (K)

Mfuel

Average moisture content of the fuel determined out of three analyses per combustion test (wt%)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work presented here was funded under grant agreement numbers 22031814, 22035714, 22035814, and 22005815 of the Agency for Renewable Resources (Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V., FNR) in the name of the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) on the basis of a resolution of the German Federal Parliament. Funds have also been received from the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support programme. Special thanks go to our colleagues from the Bundesverband Bioenergie e. V. (German Federal Association of Bioenergy, BBE). The contribution of the industrial partners is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

13399_2018_368_MOESM1_ESM.docx (60 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Thrän D, Dotzauer M, Lenz V et al (2015) Flexible bioenergy supply for balancing fluctuating renewables in the heat and power sector—a review of technologies and concepts. Energy Sustain Soc 5(1):35.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-015-0062-8 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (2016) Klimaschutzplan 2050: Klimaschutzpolitische Grundsätze und Ziele der Bundesregierung, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thrän D, Lenz V, Liebetrau J et al. (2016) Stellungnahme zum Klimaschutzaktionsplan im Entwurf von 09/2016: Ausschöpfung der Möglichkeiten der THG-Reduktion durch emissionsarme, effiziente Bioenergiebereitstellung, Leipzig, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brosowski A, Thrän D, Mantau U et al (2016) A review of biomass potential and current utilisation—status quo for 93 biogenic wastes and residues in Germany. Biomass Bioenergy 95(Supplement C):257–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.10.017 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spinelli R, Nati C, Pari L et al (2012) Production and quality of biomass fuels from mechanized collection and processing of vineyard pruning residues. Appl Energy 89(1):374–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.049 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spinelli R, Lombardini C, Pari L et al (2014) An alternative to field burning of pruning residues in mountain vineyards. Ecol Eng 70:212–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.05.023 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pari L, Civitarese V, Giudice A et al (2013) Influence of chipping device and storage method on the quality of SRC poplar biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 51:169–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.019 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hofmann N, Mendel T, Schulmeyer F et al (2017) Drying effects and dry matter losses during seasonal storage of spruce wood chips under practical conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 111:196–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.03.022 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuptz D, Hartmann H (2015) The effect of raw material and machine setting on chipping performance and fuel quality—a German case study. Int J For Eng 26(1):60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2015.1021529 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietz E., Kuptz D., Blum U. et al. (2016) New indexes for the contamination of wood chips with mineral soil. In: ETA-Florence Renewable Energies (ed) Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, pp 630–633Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG, Song Y-C et al (2017) Ash contents and ash-forming elements of biomass and their significance for solid biofuel combustion. Fuel 208:377–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.036 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK et al (2010) An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel 89(5):913–933.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chandrasekaran SR, Hopke PK, Rector L et al (2012) Chemical composition of wood chips and wood pellets. Energy Fuel 26(8):4932–4937.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300884k Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duca D, Riva G, Foppa Pedretti E et al (2014) Wood pellet quality with respect to EN 14961-2 standard and certifications. Fuel 135:9–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.042 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Werkelin J, Skrifvars B-J, Zevenhoven M et al (2010) Chemical forms of ash-forming elements in woody biomass fuels. Fuel 89(2):481–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.005 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pollex A, Zeng T, JHA K et al (2018) Content of potassium and other aerosol forming elements in commercially available wood pellet batches. Fuel 232:384–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.001 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng T, Weller N, Pollex A et al (2016) Blended biomass pellets as fuel for small scale combustion appliances: Influence on gaseous and total particulate matter emissions and applicability of fuel indices. Fuel 184:689–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.047 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sommersacher P, Brunner T, Obernberger I (2012) Fuel indexes: a novel method for the evaluation of relevant combustion properties of new biomass fuels. Energy Fuel 26(1):380–390.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201282y Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knudsen JN, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K (2004) Transformation and release to the gas phase of Cl, K, and S during combustion of annual biomass. Energy Fuel 18(5):1385–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049944q Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frandsen FJ, van Lith SC, Korbee R et al (2007) Quantification of the release of inorganic elements from biofuels. Fuel Process Technol 88(11–12):1118–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.06.012 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Lith SC, Jensen PA, Frandsen FJ et al. (2008) Release to the gas phase of inorganic elements during wood combustion. Part 2: influence of fuel composition. Energy Fuels 22(3): 1598–1609. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060613i
  22. 22.
    Glarborg P (2003) Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Prog Energy Combust Sci 29(2):89–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(02)00031-X Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huelsmann T, Mack R, Kaltschmitt M et al (2018) Influence of kaolinite on the PM emissions from small-scale combustion. Biomass Convers Biorefinery.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0316-8
  24. 24.
    Boström D, Skoglund N, Grimm A et al (2012) Ash transformation chemistry during combustion of biomass. Energy Fuel 26(1):85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201205b Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Näzelius I-L, Boström D, Rebbling A et al (2017) Fuel indices for estimation of slagging of phosphorus-poor biomass in fixed bed combustion. Energy Fuel 31(1):904–915.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02563 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Vassileva CG (2013) An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion: part I. Phase-mineral transformations of organic and inorganic matter. Fuel 112:391–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.043 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Vassileva CG (2014) An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion: Part II. Ash fusion and ash formation mechanisms of biomass types. Fuel 117:152–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.024 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zeng T, Pollex A, Weller N et al (2018) Blended biomass pellets as fuel for small scale combustion appliances: effect of blending on slag formation in the bottom ash and pre-evaluation options. Fuel 212:108–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.036 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Serrano C, Portero H, Monedero E (2013) Pine chips combustion in a 50kW domestic biomass boiler. Fuel 111:564–573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.068 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bignal KL, Langridge S, Zhou JL (2008) Release of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter from biomass combustion in a wood-fired boiler under varying boiler conditions. Atmos Environ 42(39):8863–8871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.013 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chandrasekaran SR, Laing JR, Holsen TM et al (2011) Emission characterization and efficiency measurements of high-efficiency wood boilers. Energy Fuel 25(11):5015–5021.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2012563 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leskinen J, Tissari J, Uski O et al (2014) Fine particle emissions in three different combustion conditions of a wood chip-fired appliance—particulate physico-chemical properties and induced cell death. Atmos Environ 86:129–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.012 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Quintero-Marquez A, Bernard C, Zoulalian A et al (2014) Improving the operation of an automatic wood chip boiler by optimizing co emissions. Energy Fuel 28(3):2152–2159.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402021c Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Torvela T, Uski O, Karhunen T et al (2014) Reference particles for toxicological studies of wood combustion: formation, characteristics, and toxicity compared to those of real wood combustion particulate. Mass Chem Res Toxicol 27(9):1516–1527.  https://doi.org/10.1021/tx500142f Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buchmayr M, Gruber J, Hargassner M et al (2016) Spatially resolved chemical species concentrations above the fuel bed of a small grate-fired wood-chip boiler. Biomass Bioenergy 95:146–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.10.004 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Orasche J, Seidel T, Hartmann H et al. (2012) Comparison of emissions from wood combustion. Part 1: emission factors and characteristics from different small-scale residential heating appliances considering particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-related toxicological potential of particle-bound organic species. Energy Fuels: 6695–6704. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301295k
  37. 37.
    Schön C, Kuptz D, Mack R et al (2017) Influence of wood chip quality on emission behaviour in small-scale wood chip boilers. Biomass Conv Bioref 145(2):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0249-7 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Olave RJ, EGA F, Johnston CR et al (2017) Particulate and gaseous emissions from different wood fuels during combustion in a small-scale biomass heating system. Atmos Environ 157:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.003 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen W-S, Shen Y-H, Hsieh T-Y et al (2011) Fate and distribution of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in a woodchip-fuelled boiler. Aerosol Air Qual Res 11(3):282–289.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.11.0098 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sippula O, Hokkinen J, Puustinen H et al (2009) Particle emissions from small wood-fired district heating units. Energy Fuel 23(6):2974–2982.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900098v Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Morán JC, Míguez JL, Porteiro J et al (2015) Low-quality fuels for small-scale combustion boilers: an experimental study. Energy Fuel 29(5):3064–3081.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5019252 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Buchmayr M, Gruber J, Hargassner M et al (2016) A computationally inexpensive CFD approach for small-scale biomass burners equipped with enhanced air staging. Energy Convers Manag 115:32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.038 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang Y, Ryu C, Khor A et al (2005) Effect of fuel properties on biomass combustion. Part II. Modelling approach—identification of the controlling factors. Fuel 84(16):2116–2130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.023 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang X, Chen Q, Bradford R et al (2010) Experimental investigation and mathematical modelling of wood combustion in a moving grate boiler. Fuel Process Technol 91(11):1491–1499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.05.026 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Patronelli S, Antonelli M, Tognotti L et al (2018) Combustion of wood-chips in a small-scale fixed-bed boiler: validation of the numerical model through in-flame measurements. Fuel 221:128–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.083 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yang Y, Ryu C, Khor A et al (2005) Fuel size effect on pinewood combustion in a packed bed. Fuel 84(16):2026–2038.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.022 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thunman H, Leckner B (2005) Influence of size and density of fuel on combustion in a packed bed. Proc Combust Inst 30(2):2939–2946.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.07.010 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rackl M, Günthner WA (2016) Experimental investigation on the influence of different grades of wood chips on screw feeding performance. Biomass Bioenergy 88:106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.011 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kortelainen A, Joutsensaari J, Hao L et al (2015) Real-time chemical composition analysis of particulate emissions from woodchip combustion. Energy Fuel 29(2):1143–1150.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5019548 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lanzerstorfer C (2017) Grate-fired biomass combustion plants using forest residues as fuel: enrichment factors for components in the fly ash. Waste Biomass Valor 8(1):235–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9565-6 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Retschitzegger S, Gruber T, Brunner T et al (2016) Short term online corrosion measurements in biomass fired boilers. Part 2: investigation of the corrosion behavior of three selected superheater steels for two biomass fuels. Fuel Process Technol 142:59–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.021 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Retschitzegger S, Gruber T, Brunner T et al (2015) Short term online corrosion measurements in biomass fired boilers. Part 1: application of a newly developed mass loss probe. Fuel Process Technol 137:148–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.03.026 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thy P, Jenkins BM, Lesher CE (1999) High-temperature melting behavior of urban wood fuel ash. Energy Fuel 13(4):839–850.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef980249q Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lindström E, Öhman M, Backman R et al (2008) Influence of sand contamination on slag formation during combustion of wood derived fuels. Energy Fuel 22(4):2216–2220.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700772q Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gilbe C, Öhman M, Lindström E et al (2008) Slagging characteristics during residential combustion of biomass pellets. Energy Fuel 22(5):3536–3543.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800087x Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lindström E, Larsson SH, Boström D et al (2010) Slagging characteristics during combustion of woody biomass pellets made from a range of different forestry assortments. Energy Fuel 24(6):3456–3461.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901571c Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Näzelius I-L, Fagerström J, Boman C et al (2015) Slagging in fixed-bed combustion of phosphorus-poor biomass: critical ash-forming processes and compositions. Energy Fuel 29(2):894–908.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502531m Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Oyedeji O, Fasina O (2017) Impact of drying-grinding sequence on loblolly pine chips preprocessing effectiveness. Ind Crop Prod 96:8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.028 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Oveisi E, Sokhansanj S, Lau A et al (2018) In-depot upgrading the quality of fuel chips for a commercial gasification plant. Biomass Bioenergy 108:138–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.036 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schmidt G, Trouvé G, Leyssens G et al (2018) Wood washing: influence on gaseous and particulate emissions during wood combustion in a domestic pellet stove. Fuel Process Technol 174:104–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.02.020 Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kuptz D, Schreiber K, Schulmeier F et al. Evaluation of combined screening and drying steps for the improvement of the fuel quality of forest residue wood chips—results from six case studies. Biomass Conv. Bioref.: submittedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2017) DIN EN ISO 18135: Solid Biofuels - SamplingGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    European Pellet Council (2015) ENplus quality certification scheme for wood pellets: part 3: pellet quality requirements, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2002) DIN EN 13284–1: stationary source emissions—determination of low range mass concentration of dust—part 1: Manual gravimetric methodGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Carlon E, Verma VK, Schwarz M et al (2015) Experimental validation of a thermodynamic boiler model under steady state and dynamic conditions. Appl Energy 138:505–516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.031 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2014) DIN EN 14789: Stationary source emissions—determination of volume concentration of oxygen—standard reference method: ParamagnetismGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2006) DIN EN 15058: Stationary source emissions—determination of the mass concentration of carbon monoxide (CO)—reference method: non-dispersive infrared spectrometryGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2006) DIN EN 14792: Stationary source emissions—determination of mass concentration of nitrogen oxides (NOx)—reference method: chemiluminescenceGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zeng T, Sonntag J von, Weller N et al. (2017) CO, NOx , PCDD/F, and total particulate matter emissions from two small scale combustion appliances using agricultural biomass type test fuels. Energy Fuels 31(7): 7540–7551. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00513
  70. 70.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2014) DIN EN ISO 17225-1: solid biofuels—fuel specifications and classes—part 1: general requirementsGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2015) DIN EN ISO 18134-2: solid biofuels—determination of moisture content—oven dry method—part 2: total moisture—simplified methodGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2003) DIN EN 12457-4: characterization of waste—leaching; compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludge—part 4: one stage batch test at a liquid to solid ratio of 10 l/kg for materials with particle size below 10 mm (without or with limited size reduction)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Öhman M, Boman C, Hedman H et al (2004) Slagging tendencies of wood pellet ash during combustion in residential pellet burners. Biomass Bioenergy 27(6):585–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.016 Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Grøn C, Bjerre Hansen J, Magnusson B, Nordbotten A, Krysell M, Andersen KJ, Lund U (2007) Uncertainty from sampling—a NORDTEST handbook for sampling planners on sampling quality assurance and uncertainty estimation (NT TR 604), Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sippula O, Lamberg H, Leskinen J et al (2017) Emissions and ash behavior in a 500 kW pellet boiler operated with various blends of woody biomass and peat. Fuel 202:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.009 Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zevenhoven M, Yrjas P, Skrifvars B-J et al (2012) Characterization of ash-forming matter in various solid fuels by selective leaching and its implications for fluidized-bed combustion. Energy Fuel 26(10):6366–6386.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300621j Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Dietz E, Kuptz D, Blum U et al. (2016) Qualität von Holzhackschnitzeln in Bayern: Gehalte ausgewählter Elemente, Heizwert und Aschegehalt. Berichte aus dem TFZ, Straubing, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Werkelin J, Skrifvars B-J, Hupa M (2005) Ash-forming elements in four Scandinavian wood species. Part 1: Summer harvest. Biomass Bioenergy 29(6):451–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.06.005 Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Dayton DC, Jenkins BM, Turn SQ et al (1999) Release of inorganic constituents from leached biomass during thermal conversion. Energy Fuel 13(4):860–870.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef980256e Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Houshfar E, Løvås T, Skreiberg Ø (2012) Experimental investigation on NOx reduction by primary measures in biomass combustion: straw, peat, sewage sludge, forest residues and wood pellets. Energies 5(12):270–290.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en5020270 Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Rademacher P (2005) Nährelementgehalte in den Kompartimenten wichtiger Wirtschaftsbaumarten und deren Bedeutung für die Reststoffverwertung. Holz Roh Werkst 63(4):285–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0565-z Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wopienka E, Carvalho L, Öhman M et al. (2011) Evaluation of ash melting behaviour of solid biomass based on fuel analyses. In: ETA-Florence Renewable Energies (ed) Proceedings of the 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, pp 1283–1286Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bryers RW (1996) Fireside slagging, fouling, and high-temperature corrosion of heat-transfer surface due to impurities in steam-raising fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 22(1):29–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(95)00012-7 Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Fang X, Jia L (2012) Experimental study on ash fusion characteristics of biomass. Bioresour Technol 104(Supplement C):769–774.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.055 Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Link S, Yrjas P, Hupa L (2018) Ash melting behaviour of wheat straw blends with wood and reed. Renew Energy 124:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.050 Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sasi T, Mighani M, Örs E et al (2018) Prediction of ash fusion behavior from coal ash composition for entrained-flow gasification. Fuel Process Technol 176:64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.03.018 Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Reinmöller M, Klinger M, Schreiner M et al (2015) Relationship between ash fusion temperatures of ashes from hard coal, brown coal, and biomass and mineral phases under different atmospheres: a combined FactSage™ computational and network theoretical approach. Fuel 151:118–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.036 Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Carvalho L, Wopienka E, Pointner C et al (2013) Performance of a pellet boiler fired with agricultural fuels. Appl Energy 104:286–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.058 Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Díaz-Ramírez M, Sebastián F, Royo J et al (2014) Influencing factors on NOx emission level during grate conversion of three pelletized energy crops. Appl Energy 115:360–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.011 Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Anca-Couce A, Sommersacher P, Evic N et al (2018) Experiments and modelling of NOx precursors release (NH3 and HCN) in fixed-bed biomass combustion conditions. Fuel 222:529–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.003 Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Nussbaumer T (1997) Primary and secondary measures for the reduction of nitric oxide emissions from biomass combustion. In: Bridgwater AV, Boocock DGB (eds) Developments in thermochemical biomass conversion: Volume 1 / Volume 2. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 1447–1461Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Zhou H, Jensen AD, Glarborg P et al (2006) Formation and reduction of nitric oxide in fixed-bed combustion of straw. Fuel 85(5):705–716.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.038 Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Johansen JM, Aho M, Paakkinen K et al (2013) Release of K, Cl, and S during combustion and co-combustion with wood of high-chlorine biomass in bench and pilot scale fuel beds. Proc Combust Inst 34(2):2363–2372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.025 Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sommersacher P, Kienzl N, Brunner T et al (2016) Simultaneous online determination of S, Cl, K, Na, Zn, and Pb release from a single particle during biomass combustion. Part 2: results from test runs with spruce and straw pellets. Energy Fuel 30(4):3428–3440.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02766 Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Schmidl C, Luisser M, Padouvas E et al (2011) Particulate and gaseous emissions from manually and automatically fired small scale combustion systems. Atmos Environ 45(39):7443–7454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.006 Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nielsen IE, Eriksson AC, Lindgren R et al (2017) Time-resolved analysis of particle emissions from residential biomass combustion – Emissions of refractory black carbon, PAHs and organic tracers. Atmos Environ 165:179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.033 Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lamberg H, Sippula O, Tissari J et al (2011) Effects of air staging and load on fine-particle and gaseous emissions from a small-scale pellet boiler. Energy Fuel 25(11):4952–4960.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2010578 Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (2012) DIN EN 303-5: heating boilers—part 5: heating boilers for solid fuels, manually and automatically stoked, nominal heat output of up to 500 kW—terminology, requirements, testing and markingGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kaltschmitt M, Hartmann H, Hofbauer H (2016) Energie aus Biomasse: Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Zeng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Kuptz
    • 2
  • Kathrin Schreiber
    • 3
  • Claudia Schön
    • 2
  • Fabian Schulmeyer
    • 3
  • Volker Zelinski
    • 4
  • Annett Pollex
    • 1
  • Herbert Borchert
    • 3
  • Achim Loewen
    • 4
  • Hans Hartmann
    • 2
  • Volker Lenz
    • 1
  • Michael Nelles
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.DBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum Gemeinnützige GmbH (DBFZ)LeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Technologie- und Förderzentrum im Kompetenzzentrum für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (TFZ), Solid Biofuels DepartmentStraubingGermany
  3. 3.Bavarian State Institute of Forestry (LWF)FreisingGermany
  4. 4.Faculty of Resource ManagementUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts (HAWK)GöttingenGermany
  5. 5.Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Waste ManagementUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations