Students from grade 2 to grade 10 solving a Fermi problem: analysis of emerging models
- 3 Downloads
One hundred four students aged 8 to 16 worked on one Fermi problem involving estimating the number of people that can fit in their school playground. We present a qualitative analysis of the different mathematical models developed by the students. The analysis of the students’ written productions is based on the identification of the model of elements distribution and the strategy used. The results show how the students adapt their solutions in order to tackle the problem from their available knowledge. Indeed, younger students have important difficulties to deal with two-dimensional mathematical contents, but they overcome them by simplifying the problem. Finally, we also discuss the possibilities of using the proposed problem as part of a sequence to promote mathematical modelling in each educational stage, in basis of the potentialities identified in our analysis.
KeywordsFermi problems Mathematical modelling Modelling sequences
This research is supported by the projects EDU2017-84377-R and EDU2017-82427-R (Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Spain) and also 2017 SGR 497 (AGAUR, Generalitat de Catalunya).
- ACARA. (2016). Australian curriculum: mathematics aims. Retrieved July 2018. https://australiancurriculum.edu.au.
- Albarracín, L., & Gorgorió, N. (2019). Using large number estimation problems in primary education classrooms to introduce mathematical modelling. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(2), 33–45.Google Scholar
- Ärlebäck, J. B. (2009). On the use of realistic Fermi problems for introducing mathematical modelling in school. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(3), 331–364.Google Scholar
- Blomhøj, M. (2009). Different perspectives in research on the teaching and learning mathematical modelling. In M. Blomhøj & S. Carreira (Eds.), Mathematical applications and modelling in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Proceedings from Topic Study Group 21 at the 11 thInternational Congress on Mathematical Education in Monterrey, México (pp. 1–17). Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.Google Scholar
- Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58.Google Scholar
- Borromeo Ferri, R., & Blum, W. (2013). Barriers and motivations of primary teachers implementing modelling in mathematical lessons. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1000–1010). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
- CCSI. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved July 2018. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf.
- Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 1–28). Erlbaum: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
- Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). A modeling perspective on teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 125-140). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591–645). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H. M., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2003). Model development sequence. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 35-58). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McLean, J. A., & Doerr, H. M. (2016). A bootstrapping approach to elicit students’ informal inferential reasoning through model development sequences. In C. R. Hirsch & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Annual Perspectives in Mathematics Education 2016: Mathematical Modeling and Modeling Mathematics (pp. 163–173). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Ng, K. E. D. (2013). Teacher readiness in mathematical modelling: are there differences between pre-service and experienced teachers? In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. Brown (Eds.), Connecting to practice: teaching practice and the practice of applied mathematicians (pp. 339–348). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Peter-Koop, A. (2004). Fermi problems in primary mathematics classrooms: pupils’ interactive modelling processes. In S. Ruwisch & A. Peter-Koop (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010 (pp. 454–461). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Real Decreto 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y del Bachillerato. Boletín Oficial del Estado, Madrid, Spain, December 26th, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2015/01/03/pdfs/BOE-A-2015-37.pdf.
- Zawojewski, J. S., Lesh, R. A., & English, L. D. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on the role of small group learning activities. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 337–358). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar