Advertisement

Teaching interrelated concepts of fraction for understanding and teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge

  • Seyum GetenetEmail author
  • Rosemary Callingham
Original Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Fractions are perceived as one of the most difficult areas in school mathematics to learn and teach. The most frequently mentioned factors contributing to the complexity are fractions having five interrelated constructs (part-whole, ratio, operator, quotient and measure) and teachers’ pedagogical approaches to address these constructs. The present study used the five interrelated constructs of fraction and the Knowledge Quartet Framework to investigate a teacher’s teaching of fraction in a New Zealand Year 7 classroom. Video recordings and transcribed audio-recordings were analysed through the lenses of the five integrated constructs of fraction and the Knowledge Quartet Framework. The findings showed that students often initiated uses of fractions as quotient and as operator, drawing on part-whole understanding when solving fraction problems. The study showed that the teacher’s focus in connecting the constructs and procedures of the lesson as well as shaping the classroom discussion when the lesson unfolded supported students’ learning of the fraction constructs.

Keywords

Teaching fractions Pedagogy and content knowledge Knowledge Quartet Mathematics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The involvement and contributions of Professor Kim Beswick, Associate Professor Helen Chick, and Professor Tom Nicholson are acknowledged, as is the support of Professor Roberta Hunter.

Funding information

This project was funded by the Australian Research Council Grant No. DP130103144.

References

  1. Abell, S. K., Rogers, M. A. P., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: a model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron, B., & Engle, R. A. (2007). Analyzing data derived from video records. In S. J. Derry (Ed.), Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel (pp. 24–43). Chicago: Data Research Development Center Retrieved from http://drdc.uchicago.edu/what/video-research-guidelines.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017.
  4. Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T., & Silver, E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Behr, M. J., Khoury, H. A., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1997). Conceptual units analysis of preservice elementary school teachers' strategies on a rational-number-as-operator task. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 48–69.Google Scholar
  6. Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110386798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2006). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293–316.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9036-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chick, H., Baker, M., Pham, T. & Cheng, H. (2006). Aspects of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for decimals. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague.Google Scholar
  9. Cortina, J. L., & Visnovska, J. (2016). Reciprocal relations of relative size in the instructional context of fractions as measures. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitanyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 179–186). Szeged, Hungary: PME.Google Scholar
  10. Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2011). Extending children’s mathe-matics: fractions and decimals. Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.Google Scholar
  11. Getenet, S. & Callingham, R. (2017). Teaching fractions for understanding: addressing interrelated concepts. In A. Downton, S. Livy & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: we are still learning! (Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) pp. 277–284. Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
  12. Gupta, D., & Wilkerson, T. L. (2015). Teaching and learning of fractions in elementary grades: let the dialogue begin! Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1/2), 27–44.Google Scholar
  13. Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.  https://doi.org/10.1086/428763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: an exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. M. R. (2018). Opening the space for all students to engage in mathematical practices within collaborative inquiry and argumentation. In R. Hunter, M. Civil, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, N. Planas, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Mathematical discourse that breaks barriers and creates space for marginalized learners (pp. 1–22). Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop ERIC/SMEAC (pp. 101–144). Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  18. Liston, M. (2015). The use of video analysis and the knowledge quartet in mathematics teacher education programmes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.941423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/National-Standards/Mathematics-standards/The-standards/End-of-year-7. Accessed Jan 2017
  20. Mitchell, A., & Horne, M. (2009). There are more than part-whole strategies at work in understanding non-equal-parts fraction-area-models. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 371–378). Wellington: MERGA.Google Scholar
  21. Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: a new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naiser, E. A., Wright, W. E., & Capraro, R. M. (2003). Teaching fractions: strategies used for teaching fractions to middle grades students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18(3), 193–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540409595034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, J., Güçler, B., & McCrory, R. (2013). Teaching prospective teachers about fractions: historical and pedagogical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petrou, M., & Goulding, M. (2011). Conceptualising teachers’ mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 9–25). Dordrecht: Springer Netherland.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2014). Helping children learn mathematics (Australian edition). Australia, Milton: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Rowland, T. (2013). The knowledge quartet: the genesis and application of a framework for analysing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Sisyphus-Journal of Education, 1(3), 15–43.Google Scholar
  27. Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and using the ‘Knowledge Quartet’: a framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107–124.Google Scholar
  28. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P. & Thwaites, A. (2003). The knowledge quartet. In J. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for research into Learning Mathematics, 23(3), 97–103.Google Scholar
  29. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: the knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowland, T., Turner, F., Thwaites, A., & Huckstep, P. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: reflecting on practice with the Knowledge Quartet. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt, W., Houang, R., Cogan, L., Blömeke, S., Tatto, M., Hsieh, F., & Paine, L. (2008). Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: its structure and how it varies across six countries. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 735–747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0115-y.Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siemon, D., Virgona, J., & Corneille, K. (2001). The middle years numeracy research project: 5–9 final report. Melbourne: RMIT University.Google Scholar
  34. Siemon, D., Beswick, K., Brady, K., Clark, J., Faragher, R., & Warren, E. (2015). Teaching mathematics: foundations to middle years (2nd ed.). Australia, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Strother, S., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., & Appleton, S. (2016). Five key ideas to teach fractions and decimals with understanding. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(2), 132–137.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, P. (2014). Constructivism in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 96–100.Google Scholar
  37. Tobias, J. M. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers’ development of fraction language for defining the whole. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 85–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9212-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner, F. (2012). Using the Knowledge Quartet to develop mathematics content knowledge: the role of reflection on professional development. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 253–271.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.734972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner, F., & Rowland, T. (2011). The Knowledge Quartet as an organising framework for developing and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 195–212). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weston, T. L. (2013). Using the Knowledge Quartet to quantify mathematical knowledge in teaching: the development of a protocol for initial teacher education. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weston, T. L., Kleve, B., & Rowland, T. (2013). Developing an online coding manual for the Knowledge Quartet: an international project. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 32(3), 179–184.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations