Advertisement

Pre-service teacher attitudes towards discussing terrorism in English as an Additional Language (EAL) classrooms: citizenship, democratic practices, and the discussion of controversial issues

  • Kirk Weeden
  • David BrightEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper reports on interviews exploring pre-service English as an Additional Language (EAL) teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of controversial issues in EAL classrooms. The paper examines how teachers perceive the role of the teacher in fostering EAL students’ democratic understandings, skills, and dispositions, and whether these perceptions lead teachers to consider including controversial topics such as terrorism for discussion in EAL. Pre-service teachers report that they perceive the discussion of controversial topics to be beneficial in both breaking down stereotypes and misrepresentations and in developing students’ knowledge and skills as active citizens, in agreement with a body of international research that recommends the discussion of controversial issues as a fundamental democratic practice. However, analysis suggests that despite this positive attitude towards the discussion of controversial topics, many pre-service teachers often defer the decision to include such topics to external authorities over concerns related to negative professional consequences and sensitivity to student well-being.

Keywords

Citizenship Controversy Discussion Democracy English as an Additional Language (EAL) Terrorism 

Notes

References

  1. Allard, A. C., Mayer, D., & Moss, J. (2014). Authentically assessing graduate teaching: Outside and beyond neo-liberal constructs. The Australian Educational Researcher.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0140-x.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. W. (2014). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auerbach, E. (1995). The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues of power in pedagogical choices. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education (pp. 9–33). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bickmore, K. (2005). Teacher development for conflict participation: Facilitating learning for ‘difficult citizenship’ education. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(2), 2–16. Retrieved from http://www.citized.info.
  5. Birmingham, S., & Keenan, M. (2016). New initiatives in schools to safeguard our youth [Press release]. Retrieved from https://ministers.education.gov.au/birmingham/new-initiatives-schools-safeguard-our-youth.
  6. Bryan, H. (2017). Developing the political citizen: How teachers are navigating the statutory demands of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 205 and the Prevent Duty. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917717841.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z.Google Scholar
  8. Coppock, V. (2014). ‘Can you spot a terrorist in your classroom?’ Problematising the recruitment of schools to the ‘War on Terror’ in the United Kingdom. Global Studies of Childhood.  https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2014.4.2.115.Google Scholar
  9. Coppock, V., & McGovern, M. (2014). ‘Dangerous minds’? Deconstructing counter-terrorism discourse, radicalisation and the ‘psychological vulnerability’ of Muslim children and young people in Britain. Children and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12060.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, L. (2016). Security, extremism and education: Safeguarding or surveillance? British Journal of Educational Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1107022.Google Scholar
  11. Dearden, R. F. (1981). Controversial issues and the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027810130105.Google Scholar
  12. Duckworth, C. (2014). 9/11 and collective memory in US classrooms: Teaching about terror. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gee, J. (1994). Orality and literacy: From the savage mind to ways with words”. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice (pp. 168–192). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  14. Gerulek, D. (2012). Education, extremism and terrorism: What should be taught in citizenship education and why. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Hand, M. (2008). What should we teach as controversial?. A defense of the epistemic criterion: Educational Theory.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00285.x.Google Scholar
  16. Hess, D. E. (2004). Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education. Political Science & Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004196.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hess, D. E., & Gatti, L. (2010). Putting politics where it belongs: In the classroom. New Directions for Higher Education.  https://doi.org/10.1002/he.408.Google Scholar
  19. Heybach, J. (2014). An inquiry into the myth of neutrality: Curriculum and pedagogy in an age of terrorism. In A. Costigan & L. Grey (Eds.), Demythologizing educational reforms (pp. 87–103). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Ho, L., Alviar-Martin, T., & Leviste, E. (2014). “There is space and there are limits”: The challenges to teaching controversial topics in an illiberal democracy. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1–28.Google Scholar
  21. Humphrey, S. (2010). Enacting rhetoric in the civic domain. English in Australia, 45(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  22. Humphrey, S. (2016). Academic literacies in the middle years: A framework for enhancing teacher knowledge and student achievement. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahne, J., Crow, D., & Lee, N.-J. (2013). Different pedagogy, different politics: High school learning opportunities and youth political engagement. Political Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00936.x.Google Scholar
  24. Keddie, A., Wilkinson, J., Howie, L., & Walsh, L. (2018). ‘…we don’t bring religion into school’: Issues of religious inclusion and social cohesion. Australian Educational Researcher., 46(1), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0289-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179–200.Google Scholar
  27. Mayes, E. (2018). Student voice in an age of ‘security’? Critical Studies in Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1455721.Google Scholar
  28. Mayssoun, S., & Tannock, S. (2016). The de-radicalisation of terror, youth and the assault on learning. Race and Class.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396815621236.Google Scholar
  29. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Education Goals for Young Australians. Carlton South, Vic: MCEETYA.Google Scholar
  30. Misco, T., & Patterson, N. (2007). A study of pre-service teachers’ conceptualizations of academic freedom and controversial issues. Theory & Research in Social Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2007.10473349.Google Scholar
  31. Morgan, B., & Fleming, D. (2009). Critical citizenship practices in ESP and ESL programs: Canadian and global perspectives. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice (pp. 264–288). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  32. O’Donnell, A. (2016). Securitisation, counterterrorism and the silencing of dissent: The educational implications of prevent. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1121201.Google Scholar
  33. O’Donnell, A. (2018). Contagious ideas: Vulnerability, epistemic injustice and counter-terrorism in education. Education Philosophy and Theory.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1217187.Google Scholar
  34. Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Parker, C. A. (2011). Conflict-dialogue pedagogies as learning opportunities for ethno-cultural minority immigrant students. Citizenship Education Research Network, 1(1), 43–56. Retrieved from https://education.ok.ubc.ca/__shared/assets/2011CERNpeerCollecitons42738.pdf.
  36. Pegrum, M. (2004). Selling English: Advertising and the discourses of ELT. English Today, 1, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078404001026.Google Scholar
  37. Pennycook, A. (1995). English in the world/The world in English. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Seddon, T. (2015). Re-making education in contexts of uncertainty: Governing, learning and contextual understanding. Australian Educational Researcher.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0191-2.Google Scholar
  40. Starkey, H. (2007). Language education, identities and citizenship: Developing cosmopolitan perspectives. Language and Intercultural Communication.  https://doi.org/10.2167/laic197.0.Google Scholar
  41. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237.Google Scholar
  42. Yamashita, H. (2006). Global citizenship education and war: The needs of teachers and learners. Education Review.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500352531.Google Scholar
  43. Youniss, J. (2011). Civic education: What schools can do to encourage civic identity and action. Applied Developmental Science, 1, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2011.560814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations