Pre-service teacher attitudes towards discussing terrorism in English as an Additional Language (EAL) classrooms: citizenship, democratic practices, and the discussion of controversial issues
This paper reports on interviews exploring pre-service English as an Additional Language (EAL) teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of controversial issues in EAL classrooms. The paper examines how teachers perceive the role of the teacher in fostering EAL students’ democratic understandings, skills, and dispositions, and whether these perceptions lead teachers to consider including controversial topics such as terrorism for discussion in EAL. Pre-service teachers report that they perceive the discussion of controversial topics to be beneficial in both breaking down stereotypes and misrepresentations and in developing students’ knowledge and skills as active citizens, in agreement with a body of international research that recommends the discussion of controversial issues as a fundamental democratic practice. However, analysis suggests that despite this positive attitude towards the discussion of controversial topics, many pre-service teachers often defer the decision to include such topics to external authorities over concerns related to negative professional consequences and sensitivity to student well-being.
KeywordsCitizenship Controversy Discussion Democracy English as an Additional Language (EAL) Terrorism
- ACARA. (n.d.). Rationale. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/english/rationale/.
- Auerbach, E. (1995). The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues of power in pedagogical choices. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education (pp. 9–33). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bickmore, K. (2005). Teacher development for conflict participation: Facilitating learning for ‘difficult citizenship’ education. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(2), 2–16. Retrieved from http://www.citized.info.
- Birmingham, S., & Keenan, M. (2016). New initiatives in schools to safeguard our youth [Press release]. Retrieved from https://ministers.education.gov.au/birmingham/new-initiatives-schools-safeguard-our-youth.
- Gee, J. (1994). Orality and literacy: From the savage mind to ways with words”. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice (pp. 168–192). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Gerulek, D. (2012). Education, extremism and terrorism: What should be taught in citizenship education and why. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Heybach, J. (2014). An inquiry into the myth of neutrality: Curriculum and pedagogy in an age of terrorism. In A. Costigan & L. Grey (Eds.), Demythologizing educational reforms (pp. 87–103). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ho, L., Alviar-Martin, T., & Leviste, E. (2014). “There is space and there are limits”: The challenges to teaching controversial topics in an illiberal democracy. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1–28.Google Scholar
- Humphrey, S. (2010). Enacting rhetoric in the civic domain. English in Australia, 45(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
- Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179–200.Google Scholar
- Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Education Goals for Young Australians. Carlton South, Vic: MCEETYA.Google Scholar
- Morgan, B., & Fleming, D. (2009). Critical citizenship practices in ESP and ESL programs: Canadian and global perspectives. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice (pp. 264–288). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Parker, C. A. (2011). Conflict-dialogue pedagogies as learning opportunities for ethno-cultural minority immigrant students. Citizenship Education Research Network, 1(1), 43–56. Retrieved from https://education.ok.ubc.ca/__shared/assets/2011CERNpeerCollecitons42738.pdf.
- Pennycook, A. (1995). English in the world/The world in English. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar