Advertisement

Understanding school engagement in and with research

  • Shani Prendergast
  • Mark RickinsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

There are increasing calls within Australia and internationally for schools to be research-engaged, for teaching to be research-rich and for researchers to engage with end-users. Such aspirations raise important questions about whether and how Australian schools are engaging in and with research. This paper reports on an empirical study, Catholic Education Melbourne’s Understanding School Engagement in Research project, which sought to better understand research engagement amongst 67 Catholic schools in Melbourne. Drawing on the findings of this project, coupled with a subsequent analysis of wider international literature, this paper shows how schools are selective about their research involvement; are discerning about what the research is on and how it is conducted; access research in indirect and informal ways; value research more than they use it; and need much more than research access. The paper concludes by synthesising these five themes into a conceptual framework for understanding and improving school research engagement, and outlining the implications for research organisations, schools and jurisdictions.

Keywords

Schools Research engagement Research use Education Evidence use 

References

  1. Anwaruddin, S. M. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with educational research: Toward a conceptual framework for locally-based interpretive communities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(40), 1–22.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, AITSL. (2014). Australian professional standard for principals and the leadership profiles. Melbourne: AITSL.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Research Council, ARC. (2016). Engagement and impact assessment consultation paper. Canberra: ARC.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Research Council, ARC. (2017). Making a difference. Canberra: ARC.Google Scholar
  5. Befort, C., Lynch, R., James, R. L., Carroll, S. L., Nolleen, N., & Davis, A. (2008). Perceived barriers and benefits to research participation among school administrators. Journal of School Health, 78(11), 581–586.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, M., Cordingley, P., Isham, C., & Davis, R. (2010). Report of professional practitioner use of research review: Practitioner engagement in and/or with research. Coventry: CUREE, GTCE, LSIS & NTRP.Google Scholar
  7. Biddle, B. J., & Saha, L., (2002/2005). The untested accusation: Principals, research knowledge, and policy making in schools. Wesipon: Ablex Publishing & Lanham.Google Scholar
  8. Biddle, B. J., & Saha, L. J. (2006). How principals use research. Educational Leadership, March, 72–75.Google Scholar
  9. Bielick, S. (2017). Surveys and questionnaires. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith Smith & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 640–658). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  10. Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  11. Boaz, A., Davies, H., Fraser, A., & Nutley, S. (Forthcoming, 2019). What works now? Evidence-informed policy and practice revisited. Bristol: The Policy PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429.Google Scholar
  13. British Educational Research Association (BERA) & Royal Society for the Encouragement of the Arts, Manufacturing and Commerce (RSA). (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. London: BERA/RSA.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, C. (Ed.). (2015). Leading the use of research and evidence in schools. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, C., Daly, A., & Liou, Y. (2016). Improving trust, improving schools: Findings from a social network analysis of 43 primary schools in England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(1), 69–91.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, C., & Zhang, D. (2016). How can school leaders establish evidence-informed schools: An analysis of the effectiveness of potential school policy levers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 382–401.Google Scholar
  17. Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with research texts: Beyond instrumental, conceptual or strategic use. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 478–492.Google Scholar
  18. Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners? The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–24.Google Scholar
  19. Coburn, C., & Penuel, W. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.Google Scholar
  20. Commonwealth of Australia. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, A. (2013). Research-brokering organizations in education across Canada: A response to evidence-based policy-making and practice initiatives. In S. P. Young (Ed.), Evidence-based policy-making in Canada: A multidisciplinary look at how evidence and knowledge shape Canadian public policy (pp. 67–92). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 234–252.Google Scholar
  23. Cordingley, P., Wilson, J, Seddon, K., & Thomas, F. (2002). Encouraging discerning research involvement by schools and developing CPD co-ordinators: The contribution of the National Teacher Research Panel. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Conference, Devon.Google Scholar
  24. Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abramai, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Ramde, J., & Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: A review of empirical research. Evidence & Policy, 8(3), 285–309.Google Scholar
  25. Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121.Google Scholar
  26. Department of Education and Training, DET Victoria. (2015). The education state: School improvement initiatives. Melbourne: DET.Google Scholar
  27. Dimmock, C. (2016). Conceptualising the research-practice-professional development nexus: Mobilising schools as ‘research-engaged’ professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 36–53.Google Scholar
  28. Figgis, J., Zubrick, A., Butorac, A., & Alderson, A. (2000). Backtracking practice and policies to research. In Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, The Impact of Educational Research. Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  29. Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. (Eds.). (2014). Using research evidence in education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Hammersley, M. (2004). Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 133–149). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects (teacher training agency annual lectures 1996). London: Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  33. Hedges, H. (2010). Blurring the boundaries: Connecting research, practice and professional learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(3), 299–314.Google Scholar
  34. Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 363–391.Google Scholar
  35. Huberman, M. (1993). Linking the practitioner and research communities for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  36. Huberman, M., & Levinson, N. (1984). An empirical model for exchanging educational knowledge between universities and schools. International Review of Education, 30(4), 385–404.Google Scholar
  37. Ion, G., & Iucu, R. (2014). Professionals’ perceptions about the use of research in educational practice. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 334–347.Google Scholar
  38. Judkins, M., Stacey, O., McCrone, T., & Inniss, M. (2014). Teachers’ use of research evidence: A case study of United Learning schools. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  39. Kawulich, B. (2017). Coding and analyzing qualitative data. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith Smith & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 769–790). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  40. Landrum, T. J., Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., & Fitzgerald, S. (2002). Teacher perceptions of the trustworthiness, usability and accessibility of information from different sources. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 42–48.Google Scholar
  41. Levin, B. (2004). Making research count more. Education Policy Archives, 12(56), 1–20.Google Scholar
  42. Levin, B., Cooper, A., Arjomand, S., & Thompson, K. (2011). Can simple interventions increase research use in secondary schools? Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 126, 1–29.Google Scholar
  43. Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 113–131.Google Scholar
  44. Lingard, B. (2015). Think Tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 43, 15–33.Google Scholar
  45. Lysenko, L. V., Abramai, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice: Predictors of use. Canadian Journal of Education, 37(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  46. Nelson, I. A., London, R. A., & Strobel, K. R. (2015). Reinventing the role of the university researcher. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
  47. Nelson, J., & O’Beirne, C. (2014). Using evidence in the classroom: What works and why?. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  48. NSW Government. (2017). School excellence framework. Sydney: NSW Government.Google Scholar
  49. Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  50. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, OECD. (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  51. Penuel, W. R., Briggs, D. C., Davidson, K. L, Herlihy, C., Sherer, D., Hill, H. C., Farrell, C. C., & Allen, A. (2016). Findings from a national survey of research use among school and district leaders (Technical Report No. 1). Boulder, CO: National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.Google Scholar
  52. Prendergast, S. (2017). Understanding school engagement in research (USER) project. Melbourne: Catholic Education Melbourne.Google Scholar
  53. Proctor, R. (2015). Teachers and school research practices: The gaps between the values and practices of teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 464–477.Google Scholar
  54. Productivity Commission. (2016). National Education Evidence Base, Report no. 80. Canberra: Productivity CommissionGoogle Scholar
  55. Reid, A. (2016). The use and abuse of research in the public domain. Australian Educational Researcher, 43, 75–91.Google Scholar
  56. Rickinson, M. (2005). Practitioners’ use of research. London: National Educational Research Forum.Google Scholar
  57. Rickinson, M., de Bruin, K., Walsh, L., & Hall, M. (2017). What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy? Educational Research, 59(2), 173–189.Google Scholar
  58. Scott, S., & McNeish, D. (2013). School leadership evidence review: Using research evidence to support school improvement. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  59. Sharples, J. (2013). Evidence for the frontline. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence.Google Scholar
  60. Shore, S., White, S., Nuttall, J., Mills, M., Down, B., Woods, A. & Bussey, K. (2017). A Research-rich teaching profession: Insights from the field. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Canberra.Google Scholar
  61. St. Clair, R., Chen, C., & Taylor, L. (2003). How adult literacy practitioners use research. Occasional Research Paper 2. College Station: Texas Centre for Adult Literacy and Learning.Google Scholar
  62. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  63. Teh, L., Hogan, D., & Dimmock, C. (2013). Knowledge mobilization and utilisation in the Singapore education system: The nexus between researchers, policy makers and practitioners. In B. Levin, J. Qi, H. Edelstein, & J. Sohn (Eds.), The impact of research in education: An international perspective (pp. 41–63). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  64. Todman, J., Crombie, I., & Keighren, J. (1990). Protracted intrusive research in schools: Why us? Educational Studies, 16(2), 141–149.Google Scholar
  65. Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Building the infrastructure to improve the use and usefulness of research in education. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education (pp. 163–175). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316.Google Scholar
  67. White, S. (2016). Teacher education research and education policymakers: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(2), 252–264.Google Scholar
  68. Williams, D., & Coles, L. (2007). Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49(2), 185–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic Education MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Monash University Faculty of EducationMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations