Experimental Investigations of End Bearing Anchors Under Uplift Load Using Transparent Soil and Numerical Simulation

  • Chen ChenEmail author
  • Yuan-you XiaEmail author
  • Chun-qing Li
  • Qing Ni
Research Article - Civil Engineering


This paper presents a series of small-scale physical model tests, using transparent soil and particle image velocimetry technique. The soil displacements, anchor load and displacement responses were measured directly from the tests. Based on the results, the anchor’s ultimate uplift load, impact area within the surrounding soil and failure mechanism of the anchor system were studied. Furthermore, numerical investigation was also carried out to study the effect of shoulder sizes on the ultimate uplift bearing capacity. It was observed that the fracture surface formed at the shoulder was convex and bullet-shaped. The analysis of results showed that the ultimate uplift bearing capacity of end bearing anchors was affected by enlargement diameter (D), shaft diameter (d) and enlargement segment length (L), especially with the enlargement shoulder dimension (D − d). The model tests and numerical simulation results were compared with equations from the British and Chinese standards. When (D − d)/L ≥ 0.2, Chinese standard was more suitable, and when (D − d)/L < 0.2, British standard performed better. Finally, the effect of varying shoulder sizes and enlargement lengths were discussed, and some suggestions for better design of end bearing anchor were proposed to improve the anchorage efficiency.


Soil anchors Model tests Transparent soil Displacements Ultimate uplift bearing capacity 



Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with No: 51374163 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to the University of Warwick and the university staff for their skilful assistance.


  1. 1.
    Chen, C.; Ting, R.; Cheris, C.: Calculation of the effect of Poisson’s ratio in laboratory push and pull testing of resin-encapsulated bolts. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 64, 175–180 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim, H.J.; Mission, J.L.; Park, T.W.; Dinoy, P.R.: Analysis of negative skin-friction on single piles by one-dimensional consolidation model test. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 16, 1445–1461 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qi, C.G.; Liu, G.B.; Wang, Y.; Deng, Y.B.: Theoretical study on setup of expanded-base pile considering cavity contraction. J. Central South Univ. 22, 4355–4365 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhorthakur, N.; Dey, A.K.: Experimental investigation on load carrying capacity of micropiles in soft clay. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43, 1969–1981 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ma, S.; Nemcik, J.; Aziz, N.: An analytical model of fully grouted rock bolts subjected to tensile load. Constr. Build. Mater. 49, 519–526 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozhan, H.O.; Guler, E.: Critical tendon bond length for prestressed ground anchors in pullout performance tests conducted in sand. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 16, 1329–1340 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qian, Z.Z.; Lu, X.L.; Sheng, M.Q.: Experimental investigation of the tensile capacity for anchor groups with different spacing between cast-in-place headed anchors of high strength and deep embedment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 44, 4745–4755 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharnouby, M.M.; Naggar, M.H.: Numerical investigation of the response of expansion anchors used to attach helical pile connectors to concrete foundations. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 37(6), 866–877 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tho, K.K.; Chen, Z.; Leung, C.F.; Chow, Y.W.: Pullout behaviour of plate anchor in clay with linearly increasing strength. Can. Geotech. J. 51, 92–102 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kong, G.Q.; Yang, Q.; Liu, H.L.; Luan, M.T.: Simplified calculation method and 3D numerical analysis for pile groups under uplift load. China Ocean Eng. 23(4), 709–718 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kong, G.Q.; Yang, Q.; Zheng, P.Y.; Luan, M.T.: Evaluation of group effect of pile groups under dragload embedded in clay. J. Central South Univ. Technol. 16(3), 503–512 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Su, W.; Richard, J.: Uplift testing of model anchors. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 114, 961–983 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milligan, G.W.E.; Tei, K.: The pull-out resistance of model soil nails. Soils Found. 38(2), 179–190 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iskander, M.G.; Liu, J.; Sadek, S.: Transparent amorphous silica to model clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128(3), 262–273 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, J.; Iskander, M.G.; Sadek, S.: Consolidation and permeability of transparent amorphous silica. Geotech. Test. J. 26(4), 390–401 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, X.; Sun, Y.; Yin, F.; Liu, H.; Xiang, J.: Constitutive modeling for transparent granular soils. Int. J. Geomech. (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    White, D.J.; Take, W.A.; Bolton, M.D.: Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photo grammetry. Géotechnique 53(7), 619–631 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ronald, J.A.: Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 261–304 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christian, W.: The fully digital evaluation of photographic PIV recordings. Appl. Sci. Res. 56, 79–102 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    White, D.J.; Take, W.A.: Particle Image Velocimetry Software for Use in Geotechnical Testing. Engineering Department Technical Report D-SOILS-TR322, Cambridge University, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan, B.X.; Xu, K.; Wang, Y.X.; Chen, R.; Luo, Q.: Investigation of deflection of a laterally loaded pile and soil deformation using the PIV technique. Int. J. Geomech. (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang, H.; Dabiri, D.; Gharib, M.: On errors of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 1427 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ni, Q.; Hird, C.C.; Guymer, I.: Physical modelling of pile penetration in clay using transparent soil and particle image velocimetry. Géotechnique 60(2), 121–132 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cao, Z.H.; Liu, H.L.; Kong, G.Q.; Zhou, H.: Physical modelling of pipe piles under oblique pullout loads using transparent soil and particle image velocimetry. J. Central South Univ. 22(11), 4329–4336 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qi, C.G.; Zheng, J.H.; Zuo, D.J.; Chen, G.: Measurement on soil deformation caused by expanded-base pile in transparent soil using particle image velocimetry (PIV). J. Mt. Sci. 14(8), 1655–1665 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qi, C.G.; Iskander, M.; Omidvar, M.: Soil deformation during casing jacking and extraction of expanded- shoe piles using model tests. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 35, 809–826 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Motamedinia, H.; Hataf, N.; Habibagahi, G.: A study on failure surface of helical anchors in sand by PIV/DIC technique. Int. J. Civ. Eng. (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xia, Y.Y.; Chen, C.; Ni, Q.: Comparative modelling of pull-out process of four different anchorages by using transparent soil. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 39(3), 399–407 (2017). (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xia, Y.Y.; Chen, C.; Ni, Q.: Research on continuous ball shape anchorages pulling-out mechanism by using transparent soil. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 39(5), 804–812 (2017). (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yin, J.H.; Zhou, W.H.: Influence of grouting pressure and overburden stress on the interface resistance of a soil nail. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135, 1198–1208 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Song, Z.H.; Hu, Y.X.; Randolph, M.F.: Numerical simulation of vertical pullout of plate anchors in clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134, 866–875 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mickovsii, S.B.; Bengough, A.G.; Bransby, M.F.; Davies, M.C.R.; Sonnenberg, R.: Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58, 1471–1481 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hover, E.D.; Ni, Q.; Guymer, I.: Investigation of centreline strain path during tube penetration using transparent soil and particle image velocimetry. Géotech. Lett. 3(2), 37–41 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pradhan, B.; Tham, L.G.; Yue, Z.Q.; Junaideen, S.M.; Lee, C.F.: Soil-nail pullout interaction in loose fill materials. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 6(4), 238–247 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    CECS (China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization): Code for Design and Construction of Soil Anchors, vol. 22, p. 90. Central Research Institute of Building and Construction, Beijing (1990)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    BSI (British Standards Institution): British Standard Code of Practice for Grouted Anchors. BS 8081. UDC 624.137.6, London (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    CEN (European Committee for Standardization): Geotechnical Design, Part 1. Eurocode 7, Brussels (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang, S.; Yin, S.; Wu, Z.J.: Strain-softening analysis of a spherical cavity. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 36(2), 182–202 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang, G.; Wang, L.P.: Stability analysis of strain-softening slope reinforced with stabilizing piles. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136(11), 1578–1582 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    FLAC 3D Manual: Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions, Version 5.01. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minnesota (2014)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hamdia, K.M.; Marino, M.; Zhuang, X.Y.; Wriggers, P.; Rabczuk, T.: Sensitivity analysis for the mechanics of tendons and ligaments: investigation on the effects of collagen structural properties via a multiscale modeling approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. (2019). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of EngineeringRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations