Advertisement

Investigating the Impacts of Graphical Route Information Panel Layouts on Drivers’ Comprehension and Response Time

  • Nora ReinolsmannEmail author
  • Wael Alhajyaseen
  • Tom Brijs
  • Veerle Ross
  • Chantal Timmermans
  • Ali Pirdavani
  • Qinaat Hussain
  • Kris Brijs
Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Graphical route information panels (GRIPs) are an alternative to conventional text-based variable message signs to address different traveler information needs. Since drivers are traveling at higher speeds on the motorways, they have to quickly comprehend and correctly respond to the graphical information displayed on a GRIP. Design elements like the shape of the route map, the meaning of colors indicating congestion and the font sizes of main and minor destinations along the route can influence the comprehension times of drivers. In this study, GRIPs with two purposes (congestion information and event destination information) were presented to 49 Belgian drivers in a computer-based task. All GRIPs were presented on an abstract and naturalistic motorway network shape. Half of the GRIPs were presented with congestion-related colors (red-only or red–orange), and the other half were presented with additional destinations being displayed in different or same font sizes to facilitate drivers visual search on the GRIP. Firstly, travel information statements were presented to the participant, followed by a displayed GRIP layout. Afterward, the participant had to indicate as fast as possible whether the subsequently shown GRIP confirmed the same travel statement. The subjects’ response accuracy and response times were recorded to assess drivers’ quick comprehension of the graphical content. The results of a repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that for GRIP displaying congestion, the red-color element (and not the map shape) significantly reduced drivers response times. A survey among participants also revealed a preference for two-color congestion information, if shown on an abstract map shape. An abstract map shape in combination with different font sizes for major and minor destinations improved drivers’ comprehension and response times to the GRIP, whereas different destination font sizes displayed on a naturalistic map had the contrary effect. The results highlight the importance of graphical design elements with respect to the information purpose.

Keywords

Traveler information systems Graphical route information panel Response time Response accuracy Panel layout Intelligent transportation systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication was made possible by an NPRP Award (NPRP 9-360-2-150) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank Pieter Verslype for collecting the data.

References

  1. 1.
    Shalloe, S.; Sharples, S.C.; Burnett, G.; Crundall, D.; Meekums, R.; Morris, D.: Developing a graphical route information panel (GRIP) for use on the UK motorway network. The first steps. Transp. Res. Part F 27, 133–149 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albert Gan, P.D.; Dibakar Saha, M.S.; Kirolos Haleem, P.D.; Priyanka Alluri, P.D.; Dennis McCarthy, P.D.: Best practices in the use of hybrid static–dynamic signs. Final report (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aitken, R.J.; Conway, A.; Walton, C.M.: “Implementing graphic route information panels (GRIPs) in the United States. ITE J. Inst. Transp. Eng. 82(3), 42–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rijkswaterstaat.: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu: Richtlijn Informatievoorziening op (berm) DRIPs, pp. 1–69 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gan, H.; Sun, L.; Chen, J.: Advanced traveler information system for metropolitan expressways in Shanghai. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1944, 35–40 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boddington, K.; Ralston, K.; Weeratunga, K.: Kwinana Freeway all lane running sign comprehension study, p. 13p (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gan, H.; Chen, S.: Why do drivers change routes? Impact of graphical route information panels. ITE J. Inst. Transp. Eng. 83(8), 38–43 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richards, A.; Mcdonald, M.; Fisher, G.; Brackstone, M.: Investigation of driver comprehension of traffic information on graphical congestion display panels using a driving simulator. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 4(4), 417–435 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lai, C.J.: Drivers’ comprehension of traffic information on graphical route information panels. Accid. Anal. Prev. 45, 565–571 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, C.; Waters, D.; Cabrera, C.C.; Wang, J.; Collyer, C.E.: Enhancing the messages displayed on dynamic message signs. System 1997, 111–118 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharples, S.; Shalloe, S.; Burnett, G.; Crundall, D.: Journey decision making: the influence on drivers of dynamic information presented on variable message signs. Cogn. Technol. Work 18(2), 303–317 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schönfeld, M.; Reischl, G.; Tsavachidis, A.: Dynamic driver information goes graphical: a new quality in urban traffic information. In: World Congress Intelligent Transport Systems Proceedings: From Vision To Reality (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ullman, B.; Ullman, G.; Dudek, C.; Ramirez, E.: Legibility distances of smaller letters in changeable message signs with light-emitting diodes. Transp. Res. Rec. 1918(1), 56–62 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Driver, J.; Monsell, S.: Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance, vol. XVIII. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Theeuwes, J.: Visual selection: usually fast and automatic; seldom slow and volitional. J. Cogn. 1(1), 1–15 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erke, A.; Sagberg, F.; Hagman, R.: Effects of route guidance variable message signs (VMS) on driver behaviour. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10(6), 447–457 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cummings, M.: Electronic signs strategies and their benefits. In: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, pp. 141–144 (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davidsson, F.; Taylor, N.: ITS modelling in Sweden using CONTRAM (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arbaiza, A.; Lucas-Alba, A.: Variable message signs harmonisation principles of VMS messages design supporting guideline, pp. 1–60 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ullman, G.L.; Brydia, R.; Nelson, A.; Higgins, L.; Baker, R.; Geiselbrecht, T.: Graphical route information panel signs for southbound I-35 and SH 130 travel through Austin, vol. 7, no. 19 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun, L.; Lu, J.; Yao, L.; Rong, J.: Simulation analysis on driving behavior during traffic sign recognition. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 4(3), 353–360 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ullman, B.R.; Trout, N.D.; Dudek, C.L.: Use of graphics and symbols on dynamic message signs: technical report,” vol. 7, no. 2 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klauer, S.G.; Dingus, T.A.; Neale, V.L.; Sudweeks, J.D.; Ramsey, D.J.: The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. NHTSA, DOT HS 810 594, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arentze, T.A.; Dellaert, B.G.C.; Timmermans, H.J.P.: Modeling and measuring individuals’ mental representations of complex spatio-temporal decision problems. Environ. Behav. 40(6), 843–869 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Montesinos, M.; Ortelli, N.; Kazagli, E.; Bellocchi, L.; Geroliminis, N.: Modeling simplicity in drivers route choice behavior. In: STRC (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, J.; Cao, Y.: Assessing message display formats of portable variable message signs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1937, 113–119 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Transportation Sciences, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB)UHasseltDiepenbeekBelgium
  2. 2.Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering TechnologyUHasseltDiepenbeekBelgium

Personalised recommendations