Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 44, Issue 10, pp 8675–8689 | Cite as

Impact of Midblock Pedestrian Crossing on Speed Characteristics and Capacity of Urban Arterials

Civil Engineering: Transportation Engineering
  • Hareshkumar Dahyabhai Golakiya
  • Manish Patkar
  • Ashish DhamaniyaEmail author
Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Pedestrian crossing at midblock sections of urban roads at undesignated places is a normal phenomenon in developing countries. These locations are undesignated places, i.e., not marked with any zebra crossing, pedestrians’ signals or grade-separated facility. Still the Pedestrians cross the road to access their desired place in order to save time which negatively affects traffic movement. The present study attempted to quantify the reduction in capacity of 6-lane and 4-lane divided urban arterial roads due to such crossing maneuver by pedestrians. Capacity of base section, i.e., section does not have pedestrian cross-flow or any other factors influencing traffic flow, is determined from field data. These capacity values are compared with the capacity of section under the influence of pedestrian crossing. Data were collected on twenty-two different locations of 4-lane and 6-lane urban arterials in five different metropolitan cities. The speed–volume data are extracted from field data in order to find out the capacity of base sections and friction sections. The mathematical equation has been developed showing the relationship among pedestrian cross-flow and capacity drop. It has been found that there is no impact on capacity when pedestrian cross-flow is limited to 200 pph (pedestrians/hour). However, the capacity reduces by 32% when pedestrian cross-flow is raised to 1550 pph. Further, the safe pedestrian crossing facilities are recommended based on pedestrian and vehicular volume analysis.

Keywords

Pedestrian crossing Midblock Mixed traffic Capacity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    HCM: Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bang, K.L.; Carlsson, A.: Palgunadi: Development of Speed-Flow Relationships for Indonesian Rural Roads Using Empirical Data and Simulation, vol. 1484, pp. 24–32. Transp. Res. Rec. Transp. Res. Board Natl. Acad., Washington, DC (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bak, R.; Kiec, M.: Influence of midblock pedestrian crossings on urban street capacity. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2316, 76–83 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2316-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bang, K.L.: Impact of side friction on speed-flow relationships for rural and urban highways. SWEROAD, Indones, p. 27 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arronson, K.; Bang, K.L.: Factors influencing speed profiles on urban streets. In: 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, Ill: Compendium of Papers CD-ROM (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duncan, N.C.; Christie, A.W.; Marlow, M.: Traffic speed in towns: further analysis of the urban congestion surveys. Traffic Eng. Control. 21, 576–579 (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Black, J.A.; Westerman, H.L.; Blinkhorn, L.; McKittrick, J.: Land use along arterial roads: friction and impact. Environ. Plan. Manag. Ser. 140, 1–140 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishaque, M.M.; Noland, R.B.; Pedestrian modeling in urban road networks: issues, limitations and opportunities offered by micro-simulation. In: 9th Annual Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, vol. 9, pp. 1–9 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dallmeyer, J.; Lattner, A.D.; Timm, I.J.: Pedestrian simulation for urban traffic scenarios. In: Proceedings of the Summer Computer Simulation Conference, pp. 414–421 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhamaniya, A.; Chandra, S.: Influence of operating speed on capacity of urban arterial midblock sections. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 15, 1053–1062 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0206-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadrayi, A.; Saffarzadeh, M.; Boroujerdian, A.M.: Assessment of pedestrian refuge islands on vehicle speed changes and pedestrian safety: case study in Tehran. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 1, 1–9 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0244-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erkan, İ.; Hastemoglu, H.: Analyzing level of service through anthropometric scale and its contribution to transportation engineering. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 14, 585–593 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0028-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biswas, S.; Chandra, S.; Ghosh, I.: Estimation of vehicular speed and passenger car equivalent under mixed traffic condition using artificial neural network. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42, 4099–4110 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2597-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao, N.Y.; Sano, K.: Estimating capacity and motorcycle equivalent units on urban roads in Hanoi, Vietnam. J. Transp. Eng. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 138, 776–785 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000382 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choudhury, C.F.; Rajiwade, S.S.; Rapolu, S.R.; Benakiva, M.E.: Evaluating the impact of interventions on network capacity. In: Transportation Research Board, 96th Annual Meeting, pp. 1–22 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modi, V.; Washburn, S.S.; Mcleod, D.S.; Manager, P.; Modi, V.; Washburn, S.S.: Capacity estimation for Florida freeways. In: Transportation Research Board, 96th Annual Meeting (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sohrabi, S.; Ermagun, A.; Ovaici, R.: Finding optimum capacity of freeways considering stochastic capacity concept. In: Transportation Research Board, 96th Annual Meeting, pp. 1–13 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kadali, B.R.; Vedagiri, P.: Pedestrian crossing treatment warrants for midblock crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2581, 145–153 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2581-17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jain, U.; Singh, M.; Rishiraj, R.V.; Vijay, R.; Rastogi, R.: Revision of PV \(^{2}\) based pedestrian crossing warrants in India using clustering techniques. Transp. Lett. 7867, 1–9 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1415122 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prabhu, T.D.; Sarkar, P.K.: Pedestrian warrants for developing countries by simulation approach. Proc. Comput. Sci. 83, 665–669 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Indian Roads Congress: Guidelines for capacity of urban roads in plain areas. IRC Code of Practice, Vol. 106, New Delhi, India (1990)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Indo-HCM: Indian Highway Capacity Manual (Indo-HCM). CSRI-Central Road Res. Institute, New Delhi (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    MoRTH: Road Accidents In India—2017. Minist. Road Transp. Highw. (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Website of Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/
  25. 25.
    Mean, Gruntster, and Fahr: Avidemux 2.6 Video editing software.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chandra, S.; Kumar, U.: Effect of lane width on capacity under mixed traffic conditions in India. J. Transp. Eng. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 129, 155–160 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ben-Edigbe, J.E.; Ferguson, N.S.: Extent of capacity loss resulting from pavement distress. Transportation 158, 27–32 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.2005.158.1.27 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chandra, S.; Prasad, N.V.: Capacity of Multilane Urban Roads Under Mixed Traffic Conditions, pp. 97–103. Res. Bull. Traffic Eng. Indian Road Congr., New Delhi (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greenshields, B.D.: A study of traffic capacity. http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=120649 (1935)
  30. 30.
    IRC:103.: Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Biswas, S.; Singh, B.; Saha, A.: Assessment of level-of-service on urban arterials: a case study in Kolkata metropolis. Int. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 6, 303–3112 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2016.6(3).06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boora, A.; Ghosh, I.; Chandra, S.: A novel approach for assessing the LOS for two-lane intercity highways under heterogeneous traffic conditions. J. Adv. Transp. 50, 2041–2059 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mohanty, M.; Dey, P.P.: Quantification of LOS at uncontrolled median openings using area occupancy through cluster analysis. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3509-3 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hareshkumar Dahyabhai Golakiya
    • 1
  • Manish Patkar
    • 1
  • Ashish Dhamaniya
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology SuratSuratIndia

Personalised recommendations