Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 4971–4992 | Cite as

Positive-Phase Blast Effects on Base-Isolated Structures

  • Muhammed Zain KangdaEmail author
  • Sachin Bakre
Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The last few decades have shown a dramatic increase in the number of man-made disaster activities resulting in extensive life loss and structural failures. The explosive devices used in these heinous acts result in blast wave loading. Therefore, the present structural engineers require comprehensive expertise to analyze and design blast-resistant structures. The present study aims to develop blast load time history based on the previous research works and demonstrates the effectiveness of base isolation technique such as lead rubber bearings in mitigating the structural responses under the effect of blast loading. Two base-isolated building models systems are analyzed to examine the role of structural control strategies subjected to blast loading. Various isolation parameters are also incorporated in the present investigation in improving the structural performance subjected to this extreme dynamic loading. The study concludes that base isolation is an efficient technique in reducing structural output parameters such as peak storey displacement, storey drift and root mean square absolute acceleration values due to post-blast effects. Energy-based equations are also examined in the study to evaluate the hysteretic energy dissipated by the system subjected to blast loading.

Keywords

Base isolation Energy dissipation Isolation parameters Blast loading 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Karlos, V.; Solomos, G.: Calculation of blast loads for application to structural components. JRC Technical Reports, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Italy (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FEMA 428: Primer to design safe school projects in case of terrorist attacks. Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IS 4991: Criteria for blast resistant design of structures for explosions above ground. BIS, New Delhi (1968)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dharaneepathy, M.V.; Keshava Rao, M.N.; Santhakumar, A.R.: Critical distance for blast resistant design. Comput. Struct. 54(4), 587–595 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lam, N.; Mendis, P.; Ngo, T.: Response spectrum solutions for blast loading. EJSE 4(5), 28–44 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ngo, T.; Mendis, P.; Gupta, A.; Ramsay, J.: Blast loading and blast effects on structures—an overview. EJSE 7, 76–91 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bajic, Z.; Bogdanov, J.; Jeremic, R.: Blast effects evaluation using TNT equivalent. Sci. Tech. Rev. 3(4), 50–53 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goel, M.D.; Matsagar, V.A.; Gupta, A.K.; Marburg, S.: An abridged review of blast wave parameters. Def. Sci. J. 62(5), 300–306 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kinney, G.F.; Grahm, K.J.: Explosive Shocks in Air. Springer, Berlin (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayes, Jr. J.R.; Woodson, S.C.; Pekelnicky, R.G.; Poland, C.D.; Corley, W.G.; Sozen, M.; Mahoney, M.; Hanson, R.D.: Earthquake resistance and blast resistance: a structural comparison. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, pp. 1–6 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koccaz, Z.; Sutcu, F.; Torunbalci, N.: Architectural and Structural Design for Blast Resistant Buildings. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, 12–17 Oct (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jayasooriya, R.; Thambiratnam, D.; Perera, N.; Kosse, V.: Response and damage evaluation of reinforced concrete frames subjected to blast loading. In: 34th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, Hotel Park Royal, Singapore, 16–18 Aug (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, Y.N.; Whittaker, A.S.: Response of conventional and base isolated nuclear power plants to blast loading. In: 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 20), Espoo, pp. 9–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goel, M.D.; Matsagar, V.A.: Blast resistant design of structures. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 19(2), 04014007 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burrell, R.; Aoude, H.; Saatcioglu, M.: Response of SFRC columns under blast loads. J. Struct. Eng. 141(9), 04014209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rigby, S.E.; Tyas, A.; Bennett, T.; Clarke, S.D.; Fay, S.D.: The negative phase of the blast load. Int. J. Prot. Struct. 5(1), 1–19 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, R.; Phillips, B.M.: Performance and protection of base—isolated structures under blast loading. J. Eng. Mech. 142(1), 04015063 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kangda, M.Z.; Bakre, S.: The effect of LRB parameters on structural responses for blast and seismic loads. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43(4), 1761–1776 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baker, W.E.: Explosions in Air. University of Texas Press, Austin and London (1973)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jangid, R.S.: Optimum lead–rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions. Eng. Struct. 29, 2503–2513 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uang, C.M.; Bertero, V.V.: Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19(1), 77–90 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramallo, J.C.; Johnson, E.A.; Spencer Jr., B.F.: “Smart” base isolation systems. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 128(10), 1088–1099 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelly, J.M.; Leitmann, G.; Soldatos, A.G.: Robust control of base-isolated structures under earthquake excitation. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 53(2), 159–180 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Mechanics DepartmentVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations