Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 4095–4109 | Cite as

Seismic Behavior of Hybrid Post-Tensioned Cast in Place Concrete Shear Walls

  • Anis Shatnawi
  • Sara G. Abdallah
  • Bashar TarawnehEmail author
Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

A hybrid concrete shear wall system is created by combining the conventional reinforced concrete construction with post-tensioning technology. Such hybrid shear wall with continuous mild steel combined with post-tensioned (PT) steel provides superior restoring, energy dissipation, and ductile behavior over larger lateral displacements. Hence, both mild steel and high-strength post-tensioning steel contribute to the flexural strength. This leads to a reduction in the total area of steel when compared to the conventional reinforced concrete shear wall. When using a hybrid system, the lateral load response varies based on the ratio of post-tensioning steel to the mild steel reinforcement. In this research, the seismic behavior of hybrid unbonded PT concrete shear walls is investigated. Finite element analysis using ABAQUS for multi-hybrid shear walls of different ratios of post-tensioning steel area to mild steel area is performed. Results show that the large nonlinear displacements in PT shear wall may be reduced by using more mild steel reinforcement in the hybrid unbonded PT system. The post-tensioning steel provides a restoring force that eliminates the permanent deformation after cyclic load and reduces the displacement peaks during a cycle. However, PT walls incorporating only post-tensioning bars do not provide a sufficient amount of energy dissipation to limit seismic displacement adequately. By increasing the mild steel reinforcement area concerning the post-tensioning steel area, seismic energy can be dissipated by the yielding of mild steel.

Keywords

Seismic Shear wall Hybrid Post-tension 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fintel, M.: Performance of buildings with shear walls in earthquakes of the last thirty years. PCI J. 40(3), 62–71 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, B.J.; Kurama, Y.C.; McGinnis, M.J.: Behavior of precast concrete shear walls for seismic regions: comparison of hybrid and emulative specimens. J. Struct. Eng. 139(11), 1917–1927 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu, Z.; Guo, Z.: Experimental study on emulative hybrid precast concrete shear walls. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21(1), 329–338 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurama, Y.: Seismic Analysis, Behavior, and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensions Precast Concrete Walls. Dissertation, Lehigh University, Pennsylvania (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bora, C.; Oliva, M.; Nakaki, S.D.; Becker, R.: Development of precast concrete shear wall system requiring special code acceptance. PCI J. 52(1), 2–15 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurama, Y.: Hybrid post-tensioned precast concrete walls for use in seismic regions. PCI J. 47(5), 36–59 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panian, L.; Steyer, M.; Tipping, S.: Post-tensioned concrete walls for seismic resistance. PTI J. Post Tens. Inst. 5(1), 7–16 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, B.; Mcginnis, M.; Kurama, Y. :3rd fib International Congress, Full-Field Lateral Response Investigation of Hybrid Precast Concrete Shear Walls (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurama, Y.: Seismic design of partially post tensioned precast concrete walls. PCI J. 50(4), 100–125 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chavan, R.; Kannan, M.: Analysis and design of vertical post-tensioned precast shear wall. IJRITCC 5(4), 50–54 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurama, Y.; Pessiki, S.; Sause, R.; Lu, L.W.: Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. PCI J. 44(3), 72–89 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aaleti, S.; Sritharan, S.: A simplified analysis method for characterizing unbonded post-tensioned precast wall systems. Eng. Struct. 31(12), 2966–2975 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erkmen, B.; Schultz, A.E.: Self-centering behavior of unbonded, post-tensioned precast concrete shear walls. J. Earthq. Eng. 13(7), 1047–1064 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henry, R.S.; Brooke, N.J.; Sritharan, S.; Ingham, J.M.: Defining concrete compressive strain in unbonded post-tensioned walls. ACI Struct. J. 109(1), 101–111 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassanli, R.; ElGawady, M.A.; Mills, J.E.: Force-displacement behavior of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls. Eng. Struct. 106, 495–505 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henry, R.S.; Sritharan, S.; Ingham, J.M.: Unbonded tendon stresses in post-tensioned concrete walls at nominal flexural strength. ACI Struct. J. 109(2), 171 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henry, R.S.; Sritharan, S.; Ingham, J.M.: Finite element analysis of the PreWEC self-centering concrete wall system. Eng. Struct. 115, 28–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Concrete Institute: ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318–14. Farmington Hills, MI (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    American Society of Civil Engineers: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/ SEI 7-16 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    ABAQUS Analysis User Manual, Version 6.8 . Dassault Systems Simulia Corp. Providence, Rhode Island, USA (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anis Shatnawi
    • 1
  • Sara G. Abdallah
    • 1
  • Bashar Tarawneh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentThe University of JordanAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations