Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 6305–6313 | Cite as

A Model for Estimating the Saturation Exponent Based on NMR in Tight Sandy Conglomerate Reservoirs

  • Yan Kuang
  • Liqiang Sima
  • Zeyu Zhang
  • Zhenlin Wang
  • Meng Chen
Research Article - Petroleum Engineering
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

The electrical resistivity of a porous medium, which is used for water or oil saturation evaluation through combination with Archie’s law, strongly depends on the wettability and geometry of the pore system. In tight sandy conglomerate reservoirs, the pore-throat structure is so complicated that Archie’s equation is non-applicable. Analysis shows that the saturation exponent n is a function of the water saturation \((S_\mathrm{w})\), microstructure, and wettability. Here, a novel method based on nuclear magnetic resonance is proposed to determine the saturation exponent (n) under water- or oil-wet conditions. The Schlumberger Doll Research model is also introduced to estimate and analyze the fluid distribution in an irregular pore space. To validate the model, 21 water-wet core samples from the tight conglomerate reservoir in the Junggar Basin, Northwestern China, were selected to measure the electrical resistivity at varying water saturation levels. The absolute errors between the predicted and measured saturation exponents range from −0.153 to 0.131, and the absolute errors for the water saturation between the predicted and measured values vary from −0.032 to 0.023. These results indicate that the proposed model could be applied to accurately predict the water saturation in tight sandy conglomerate reservoirs.

Keywords

Tight sandy conglomerate Nuclear magnetic resonance SDR model Saturation exponent Water-wet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Archie, G.E.: The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. AIME 146, 54–61 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alkafeef, S.F.; Alajmi, A.F.: The electrical conductivity and surface conduction of consolidated rock cores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 309, 253–261 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tabbagh, A.; Cosenza, P.: Effect of microstructure on the electrical conductivity of clay-rich systems. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A B C 32, 154–160 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar, M.; Senden, T.J.; Sheppard, A.P.; Arns, C.H.; Knackstedt, M.A.: Probing the Archie’s exponent under variable saturation conditions. Petrophysics 52, 124–134 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clavier, C.; Coates, G.; Dumanoir, J.: Theory and experimental basis for the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands. SPE (1977)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiao, L.; Zou, C.C.; Mao, Z.Q.; Shi, Y.J.; Liu, X.P.; Jin, Y.; Guo, H.P.; Hu, X.X.: Estimation of water saturation from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and conventional logs in low permeability sandstone reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 108, 40–51 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haro, C.F.: Permeability modeling. Setting Archie and Carman–Kozeny Right. In: SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haro, C.F.: The equations archie forgot: anisotropy of the rocks. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 13, 823–836 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knight, R.; Endres, A.: An introduction to rock physics principles for near-surface geophysics. SEG Investig. Geophys. 13, 31–70 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yue, W.Z.; Tao, G.: A new non-Archie model for pore structure: numerical experiments using digital rock models. Geophys. J. Int. 195, 282–291 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmus, J.C.: Summary of the effects of various pore geometries and their wettability on measured and in-situ values of cementation and saturation exponents. Log Anal. 28, 152–164 (1987)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berg, C.R.: Effective-medium resistivity models for calculation water saturation in shaly sands. Log Anal. 37, 16–28 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montaron, B.: Connectivity theory—a new approach to modeling non-Archie rocks. Petrophysics 50, 102–115 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suman, R.J.; Knight, R.J.: Effects of pore structure and wettability on the electrical resistivity of partially saturated rocks-a network study. Geophysics 62, 1151–1162 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Man, H.N.; Jing, X.D.: Network modelling of mixed-wettability on electrical resistivity, capillary pressure and wettability indices. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 33, 101–122 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simandoux, P.: Dielectric measurements on porous media, application to the measurement of water saturations, study of the behavior of argillaceous formations (translated by L. Moinard, in the SPWLA Shaly sand reprint volume, 1982). Revue de l’Institut Francais du Petrole, pp. 193–215 (1963)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poupon, A.; Leveaux, J.: Evaluation of water saturation in shaly formations. In: Transactions, SPWLA 12th Annual Logging Symposium, paper O (1971)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waxman, M.H.; Thomas, E.C.: Electrical conductivities in shaly sands-I. The relation between hydrocarbon saturation and resistivity index; II. The temperature coefficient of electrical conductivity. SPE J. 12, 213–225 (1974)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clavier, C.; Coates, G.; Dumanoir, J.: Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands. SPE J. 24, 153–168 (1984)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Juhasz, I.: Normalized Qv—the key to shaly sand evaluation using the Waxman–Smits equation in the absence of core data. In: Transactions, SPWLA 22nd Annual Logging Symposium, 23–26 June, paper Z (1981)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anderson, W.G.: Wettability literature survey. Part 3: The effects of wettability on the electrical properties of porous media. J. Pet. Technol. 39, 1371–1378 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walsh, J.B.; Brace, W.F.: The effect of pressure on porosity and the transport properties of rock. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 89, 9425–9432 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jorand, R.; Fehr, A.; Koch, A.; Clauser, C.: Study of the variation of thermal conductivity with water saturation using nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 116, 4684–4698 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seevers, D.O.: A nuclear magnetic method for determining the permeability of sandstones. In: Transactions, SPWLA 6, paper L (1966)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kenyon, W.E.: Nuclear magnetic resonance as a petro physical measurement. Nucl. Geophys. 6, 153–171 (1992)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    LaTorraca, G.A.; Dunn, K.J.; Brown, R.J.S.: Predicting permeability from nuclear magnetic resonance and electrical properties measurement. In: Society of Core Analysts Conference, SCA-9312, Sept 1993 (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kubica, P.: Statistical test of permeability estimates based on NMR measurements. In: Transactions, SPWLA 36, paper VVV (1995)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Straley, C.; Rossini, D.; Vinegar, H.J.; Tutunjian, P.; Morriss, C.E.: Core analysis by low-field NMR. Log Anal. 38, 84–93 (1997)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alghamdi, T.M.; Arns, C.H.: Predicting relative permeability from NMR relaxation-diffusion responses utilizing high resolution micro X-ray-CT images. SPE (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Amott E.; Aime M.: Observations relating to the wettability of porous rock. SPE, pp. 156–162 (1959)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schmitt, M.; Fernandes, C.P.; Neto, J.A.B.D.C.; Wolf, F.G.; Santos, V.S.S.D.: Characterization of pore systems in seal rocks using nitrogen gas adsorption combined with mercury injection capillary pressure techniques. Mar. Pet. Geol. 39, 138–149 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geoscience and TechnologySouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Research Institute of Exploration and DevelopmentXinjiang Oilfield Company, CNPCKaramayPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations