A comparison of trapping efficacy of 11 rodent traps in agriculture
- 16 Downloads
A trapping study was conducted to compare the efficacy of 11 different small mammal traps—seven live-traps and four lethal-traps—in capturing pest rodents in agricultural fields and orchards. The 9-year study was carried out in various regions in Israel, and comprised of 648 trap-sets, totalling over 32,000 trap-nights. Mice comprised the great majority (over 85%) of captures, with Tristram’s jirds in the second place (about 8%). Among the traps, the Victor Mouse snap-trap displayed the greatest capturing rate (10.05%), followed by the Sherman live-trap (8.88%) and the Ugglan live-trap (6.28%). Pairwise comparisons were performed only between the four most abundant traps—Victor Mouse, Box, Victor Rat, and Sherman. For mice, the most attractive trap was the Victor Mouse, second in attractiveness was the Sherman, third was the Box live-trap, and the least of the four was the Victor Rat snap-trap. For the larger jirds, the attractiveness hierarchy was reversed, with Victor Mouse being the least attractive. These results shed light on rodent traps and rodent trappability in various agricultural environments and with regard to target species. A careful choice of trap types should be exercised to best address mission goals.
KeywordsAgricultural pests Snap-traps Live-traps Rodents Small mammals Trapping efficacy
We thank Prof. Yossi Leshem for help in coordinating the surveys; Shauli Aviel, Kobi Meyrom, Yinnon Shaham, Ya’ankale Klein, Guy Rotem, and Itai Shimshon for field assistance; Prof. Yoram Yom-Tov, Prof. Ran Nathan, Prof. Iddo Kan, Dr. Shmuel Moran, and Eitan Aram for advice on trap types and setting methods. The research was supported by The Israel Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and by the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel.
- Martell AM (1979) Relative efficiencies of Museum Special, Victor, and Holdfast traps for sampling small mammal populations. Can Field Nat 93:313–315Google Scholar
- Weihong JI, Veitch CR, Craig JL (1999) An evaluation of the efficiency of rodent trapping methods: the effect of trap arrangement, cover type, and bait. New Zeal J Ecol 23:45–51Google Scholar
- Ylönen H, Jacob J, Kotler BP (2003) Trappability of rodents in single-capture and multiple capture traps in arid and open environment: why don’t Ugglan traps work? Ann Zool Fenn 40:537–541Google Scholar