Advertisement

Temporal coexistence in a carnivore assemblage from central Mexico: temporal-domain dependence

  • Yuriana Gómez-OrtizEmail author
  • Octavio Monroy-Vilchis
  • Ivan Castro-Arellano
Original Paper

Abstract

Species coexistence at a given locality generally implies segregation along one of the three resource dimensions of the ecological niche: spatial, trophic or temporal. Temporal activity patterns of species are ecologically important as they expose how species exploit their environments. Using camera traps, we evaluated the temporal activity patterns and temporal overlap for a mammalian carnivore assemblage from Sierra Nanchititla Natural Park, central Mexico. We characterized and compared temporal activity patterns and temporal overlap between species pairs using circular statistics. Temporal overlap was analyzed using three temporal domains (full diel, diurnal, and nocturnal), and null models were used to contrast the empirical assemblage-wide temporal overlap in relation to randomly generated distributions. We found that pair-wise temporal overlap comparisons among species were quite heterogeneous and dependent on the temporal domain used for the analyses. Two major inferences can be derived from pair-wise analyses and the null model: (a) most of the carnivore assemblage show a nocturnal activity pattern in common and (b) most of the pair-wise comparisons indicate temporal segregation among species. The highest temporal overlap at the assemblage-wide level was found when only the nocturnal domain was evaluated and we found coincident temporal activities at the full domain level, independent of the temporal resolution used. Overall, our results suggest that carnivores with distinct trophic and habitat use like the margay (Leopardus wiedii) and gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) had temporal overlapping activity patterns to full diel and nocturnal domains, and species with similar trophic and habitat use always presented temporal segregation (gray fox and white-nosed coati, Nasua narica). Finally, species with predator-prey relationships (white-nosed coati and cougar, Puma concolor) showed segregation during the day but overlap at night. Our results indicate that species temporal activity patterns likely change in relation to different interspecific interactions such as predation and competition to allow species coexistence within this carnivore assemblage.

Keywords

Temporal activity pattern Carnivore Overlap Null model Temporal segregation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all students that helped as volunteer field assistants and to the rangers of Sierra Nanchititla Biological Station and CEPANAF for their support in field. We also thank to Dr. Joseph Veech for reviewing the English grammar of the first version of our draft. The comments from one anonymous reviewer and the detailed help of the editor enhanced the clarity of the final version of this manuscript.

Funding information

This work was supported by CONACYT (project #105254 and the scholarship #255868 for graduate studies of Gómez-Ortiz Y.) and PROMEP (project #103.5/10/0942).

References

  1. Bennie JJ, Duffy JP, Inger R, Gaston KJ (2014) Biogeography of time partitioning in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:13727–13732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carothers JH, Jaksic FM (1984) Time as a niche difference: the role of interference competition. Oikos 42:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castro-Arellano I, Lacher TE (2009) Temporal niche segregation in two rodent assemblages of subtropical Mexico. J Trop Ecol 25:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castro-Arellano I, Lacher TE, Willig MR, Rangel TF (2010) Assessment of assemblage-wide temporal niche segregation using null models. Methods Ecol Evol 1:311–318Google Scholar
  5. Davies TJ, Meiri S, Barraclough TG, Gittleman JL (2007) Species co-existence and character divergence across carnivores. Ecol Lett 10:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis ML, Kelly MJ, Stauffer DF (2011) Carnivore co-existence and habitat use in the mountain pine ridge Forest reserve, Belize. Anim Conserv 14:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Almeida AT, Silveira L, Diniz-Filho JAF (2004) Niche separation between the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), the crab-eating fox (Dusicyon thous) and the hoary fox (Dusicyon vetulus) in Central Brazil. J Zool (London) 262:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Bitetti MS, Di Blanco YE, Pereira JA, Paviolo A, Jiménez I (2009) Time partitioning favors the coexistence of sympatric crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) and pampas foxes (Lycalopex gymnocercus). J Mammal 90:479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Bitetti MS, De Angelo CD, Di Blanco YE, Paviolo A (2010) Niche partitioning and species coexistence in a Neotropical felid assemblage. Acta Oecol 36:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora. Am Nat 167:524–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farías V, Fuller TK, Sauvajot RM (2012) Activity and distribution of gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Southern California. Southwest Nat 57:176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feisinger P, Spears EE, Poole RW (1981) A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gómez H, Wallace RB, Ayala G, Tejada R (2005) Dry season activity periods of some Amazonian mammals. Stud Neotropical Fauna Environ 40:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gómez-Ortiz Y, Monroy-Vilchis O (2013) Feeding ecology of puma Puma concolor in Mexican montane forests with comments about jaguar Panthera onca. Wildl Biol 19:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez-Ortiz Y, Monroy-Vilchis O, Fajardo V, Mendoza GD, Urios V (2011) Is food quality important for carnivores? The case of Puma concolor. Anim Biol 61:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gómez-Ortiz Y, Monroy-Vilchis O, Mendoza GD (2015) Feeding interactions in an assemblage of terrestrial carnivores in Central Mexico. Zool Stud 54:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. González G, Sánchez V, Íñiguez L, Santana E, Fuller T (1992) Activity patterns of coyote (Canis latrans), grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and opossum (Didelphis virginiana) in Serra of Manantlán, Jalisco. An Inst Biol Univ Nac Auton Mex Ser Zool 63:293–299Google Scholar
  18. Gotelli NJ, Hart EM, Ellison AM (2015) EcoSimR: null model analysis for ecological data. Zenodo.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16636
  19. Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Silver SC, Ostro LET, Doncaster CP (2009) Spatial and temporal interactions of sympatric jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) in a Neotropical forest. J Mammal 90:612–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayward MW, Slotow R (2009) Temporal partitioning of activity in large African carnivores: tests of multiple hypotheses. S Afr J Wildl Res 39:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hulbert SH, Lombardi CM (2003) Design and analysis: uncertain intent, uncertain result. Ecology 84:810–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter J, Caro T (2008) Interspecific competition and predation in American carnivore families. Ethol Ecol Evol 20:295–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T (2003) Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:153–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Linnell JCD, Strand O (2000) Interference interactions, co-existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores. Divers Distrib 6:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lira-Torres I, Briones-Salas M (2012) Relative abundance and activity patterns of mammals at Chimalapa’s forest, Oaxaca, Mexico. Acta Zool Mex 28:566–585Google Scholar
  26. Loreau M (1989) On testing temporal niche differentiation in carabid beetles. Oecologia 81:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucherini M, Reppucci J, Walker RS, Villalba M, Wurstten A, Gallardo G, Iriarte A, Villalobos R, Perovic P (2009) Activity pattern segregation of carnivores in the high Andes. J Mammal 90:1404–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Monroy-Vilchis O, Zarco-González M, Rodríguez-Soto C, Suárez P, Urios V (2008) Uso tradicional de vertebrados silvestres en la Sierra Nanchititla, México. Interciencia 33:308–313Google Scholar
  29. Monroy-Vilchis O, Gómez Y, Janczur M, Urios V (2009) Food niche of Puma concolor in Central Mexico. Wildl Biol 15:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monroy-Vilchis O, Zarco-González M, Rodríguez-Soto C, Soria-Díaz L, Urios V (2011) Mammals’ camera-trapping in Sierra Nanchititla, Mexico: relative abundance and activity patterns. Rev Biol Trop 59:373–383Google Scholar
  31. Morgan E (2004) Ecological significance of biological clocks. Biol Rhythm Res 35:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Núñez R, Miller B, Lindzey F (2000) Food habits of jaguars and pumas in Jalisco, Mexico. J Zool 52:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira-Santos LG, Graipel ME, Tortato MA, Zucco CA, Cáceres NC, Goulart FV (2012) Abundance changes and activity flexibility of the oncilla, Leopardus tigrinus (Carnivora: Felidae), appear to reflect avoidance of conflict. Zoologia 29:115–120Google Scholar
  34. Oliveira-Santos LGR, Zucco CA, Agostinelli C (2013) Using conditional circular kernel density functions to test hypotheses on animal circadian activity. Anim Behav 85:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson BR, Bondrup-Nielsen S, Messier F (1999) Activity patterns and daily movements of the eastern coyote, Canis latrans, in Nova Scotia. Can Field Nat 113:251–257Google Scholar
  36. Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramesh T, Kalle R, Sankar K, Qureshi Q (2012) Dietary partitioning in sympatric large carnivores in a tropical forest of Western Ghats, India. Mamm Study 37:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramesh T, Kalle R, Sankar K, Qureshi Q (2015) Role of body size in activity budgets of mammals in the Western Ghats of India. J Trop Ecol 31:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roback PJ, Askins RA (2005) Judicious use of multiple hypothesis tests. Conserv Biol 19:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roemer GW, Gompper ME, Valkenburgh BV (2009) The ecological role of the mammalian mesocarnivores. BioScience 59:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scognamillo D, Maxit I, Sunquist M, Polisar J (2003) Coexistence of jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) in a mosaic landscape in the Venezuelan llanos. J Zool (London) 259:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soria-Díaz L, Monroy-Vilchis O, Rodríguez-Soto C, Zarco-González MM, Urios V (2010) Variation of abundance and density of Puma concolor in zones of high and low concentration of camera traps in central Mexico. Anim Biol 60:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suselbeek L, Emsens WJ, Hirsch BT, Kays R, Rowcliffe JM, Zamora-Gutierrez V, Jansen PA (2014) Food acquisition and predator avoidance in Neotropical rodent. Anim Behav 88:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taber A, Novaro A, Neris N, Colman F (1997) The food habits of sympatric jaguar and puma in the Paraguayan Chaco. Biotropica 29:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nuñez P, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Orihuela G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Adler GH, Lambert TD, Balbas L (2001) Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294:1923–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tokeshi M (1986) Resource utilization, overlap and temporal community dynamics: a null model analysis of an epiphytic chironomid community. J Anim Ecol 55:491–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valenzuela D, Ceballos G (2000) Habitat selection, home range, and activity of the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica) in a Mexican tropical dry forest. J Mammal 81:810–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vanderhoff EN, Hodge A, Arbogast BS, Nilsson J, Knowles WT (2011) Abundance and activity patterns of the margay (Leopardus wiedii) at a mid-elevation site in the eastern Andes of Ecuador. Mastozool Neotrop 18:271–279Google Scholar
  51. Winemiller KO, Pianka ER (1990) Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes. Ecol Monogr 60:27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zar JH (1999) Bioestatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 662pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigación en Recursos Bióticos, Instituto Literario 100Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoTolucaMexico
  2. 2.División de Desarrollo SustentableUniversidad Intercultural del Estado de MéxicoSan Felipe del ProgresoMexico
  3. 3.Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas Aplicadas, Instituto Literario 100Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoTolucaMexico
  4. 4.Department of BiologyTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations