Spatial positioning of individuals in a group of feral horses: a case study using drone technology
Spatial positioning of individuals in animal groups has been studied from numerous perspectives. However, although many studies have focused on spatial position in flocks of birds and schools of fish, relatively few studies have been conducted in mammals with high accuracy. Because some mammal species form societies, we wondered how social relationships among mammals within a group influence each individual’s spatial position. To address this issue, we used drones to obtain accurate positioning of individuals in a feral horse group on the Serra D’ Arga mountain in Portugal. The results of our study revealed the following characteristics: (1) the male in between social and spatial relationships indicated that they are independent from each other. The present study is the first to reveal the characteristics of spatial positioning in a mammalian group using drone technology. The harem group was located in the periphery; (2) as in other species, individuals had areas of repulsion and attraction, and (3) nearest neighbors were located more toward the sides than to the back or front. We also measured the social relationships between individuals in terms of grooming frequency. Social network analyses of the correlation between social and spatial relationships indicated that they are independent from each other. The present study is the first to reveal the characteristics of spatial positioning in a mammalian group using drone technology.
KeywordsDrone Horse Nearest neighbor Repulsion and attraction Spatial position Social relationship
Special thanks are due to Viana do Castelo city for supporting our project. We are also grateful to Agostinho Costinha, the director of Descubra Minho, Lourenço Almada of Associação O Caminho do Garrano. We also thank the villagers in Montaria for their support during our stay, Tetsuro Matsuzawa for the generous guidance throughout the study, and Dora Biro and Valéria Romano for helpful comments on an earlier version of our manuscript.
The study was financially supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS core-to-core CCSN and JSPS-LGP-U04 to Tetsuro Matsuzawa, KAKENHI Nos. 15H01619 and 15H05309 to Shinya Yamamoto) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan (MEXT No.16H06283 to Tetsuro Matsuzawa). We thank Lilly Gray and Adam Phillips, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
- Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12(6):1–42Google Scholar
- Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Lecomte V, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Pnas 105:1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711437105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barak Y, Yom-Tov Y (1989) The advantage of group hunting in Kuhl’s bat Pipistrellus kuhlii (Microchiroptera). J Zool London 219:670–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02608.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC 2002 Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysisGoogle Scholar
- Czaja JA, Bielert C (1975) Female rhesus sexual behavior and distance to a male partner: relation to stage of the menstrual cycle. Arch Sex Behav 4(6):583–597Google Scholar
- Fortin M-J, Dale MRT, Hoef J (2002) Spatial analysis in ecology. Encycl Environmetrics 4:2051–2058Google Scholar
- Furuichi T (1983) Interindividual distance and influence of dominance on feeding in a natural Japanese macaque troop. Primates 24(4):445–455Google Scholar
- Goolsby J, Jung J, Landivar J, Mccutcheon W, Lacewell R, Duhaime R, ... Schwartz A (2016) Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for detection of cattle in the Cattle Fever Tick Permanent QuarantineZone. Subtropical Agriculture and Environments 67:24–27Google Scholar
- Heitor F, do Mar Oom M, Vicente L (2006) Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses: Part I. Correlates of social dominance and contexts of aggression. Behav Process 73(2):170–177Google Scholar
- Herskin J, Steffensen JF (1998) Energy savings in sea bass swimming in a school : measurements of tail beat frequency and oxygen consumption at di ff erent swimming speeds. J Fish Biol 53:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00986.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jung S (2017) Strategic cattle roundup using multiple quadrotor UAVsGoogle Scholar
- Katz Y, Tunstrøm K, Ioannou CC, Huepe C, Couzin ID (2011) Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(46):18720–18725Google Scholar
- Lukeman R, Li Y, Edelstein-keshet L (2010) Inferring individual rules from collective behavior. Pnas 107:12576–12580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001763107/-/DCSupplemental.www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1001763107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rees L (1993) The horse’s mind. Ebury, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Ringhofer M, Inoue S, Mendonça RS, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T, Hirata S, Yamamoto S (2017) Comparison of the social systems of primates and feral horses: data from a newly established horse research site on Serra D’Arga, northern Portugal. Primates 58:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-017-0614-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rubenstein DI (1994) The ecology of female social behavior in horses, zebras, and asses. In: Animal societies: individuals, interactions, and organization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 13–28Google Scholar
- Tokuyama N, Furuichi T (2017) Leadership of old females in collective departures in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71(3):55Google Scholar
- Torney CJ, Dobson AP, Borner F, Lloyd-Jones DJ, Moyer D, Maliti HT, Mwita M, Fredrick H, Borner M, Hopcraft JGC (2016) Assessing rotation-invariant feature classification for automated wildebeest population counts. PLoS One 11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wanng GH (1983) Horse behaviour: the behavioral traits and adaptations of domesric and wild horses, including ponies. Noyes Publications, New Jersey, pp 175–215Google Scholar