Advertisement

Effects of temperature during successive generations on life-history traits in a seed beetle Callosobruchus chinensis (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera)

  • Kenji Terada
  • Kentarou Matsumura
  • Takahisa MiyatakeEmail author
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Temperature is an important environmental factor for life-history traits in poikilothermic animals. Many of experiments on evolution have been conducted using Drosophila species, and effects on life-history traits vary depending on the study. On the other hand, few studies have been conducted on the effects of temperature on life-history traits in the other insect species. In the present study, we reared adzuki bean beetles under two different temperatures, high and low, for 2 years (20 generations), and compared life-history traits including body size of females, fecundity, egg size, rate of egg hatching, emergence rate, development time, and wing length. No differences in responses were found in these traits between selection strains, except the rate of egg hatching. That is, the rates of egg hatching in high-temperature (32 °C) selection strains were significantly higher than those in low-temperature (24 °C) selection strains. We discuss the cause of change in egg hatchability during successive generations under different temperature treatments from the following viewpoints including evolutionary adaptation to high temperature and the experimental protocol.

Keywords

Temperature Experimental evolution Hatching rate Seed beetle Callosobruchus chinensis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Shin-ichi Yanagi, Dr. Takuro Oikawa, and Mr. Kazuma Kuroda for helpful advices. This work was mainly supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Grants, KAKENHI 17H05976, and 18H02510 to T.M.

References

  1. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size-a biological law for ectotherms? Adv Ecol Res 25:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo RBR, French V, Partridge L (1996) Thermal evolution of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50:2338–2345.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03621.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedford NL, Hoekstra H (2015) Peromyscus mice as a model for studying natural variation. eLife 4:e06813.  https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.06813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett A, Dao FKM, Lenski RE (1990) Rapid evolution in response to high temperature selection. Nature 346:79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger D, Stångberg J, Grieshop K, Martinossi-Allibert I, Arnqvist G (2017) Temperature effects on life-history trade-offs, germline maintenance and mutation rate under simulated climate warming. Proc R Soc B 284:20171721.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle WA, Sandercock BK, Martin K (2016) Patterns and drivers of intraspecific variation in avian life history along elevational gradients: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev 91:469–482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavicchi S, Guerra V, Natali V, Pezzoli C, Giorgi G (1989) Temperature-related divergence in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Correlation between fitness and body dimensions. J Evol Biol 2:235–251.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1989.2040235.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavicchi S, Guerra D, LaTorre V, Huey RB (1995) Chromosomal analysis of heat-shock tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster evolving at different temperatures in the laboratory. Evolution 49:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilchrist GW, Huey RB, Partridge L (1997) Thermal sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster: evolutionary responses of adults and eggs to laboratory natural selection at different temperatures. Physiol Zool 70:403–414.  https://doi.org/10.1086/515853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmann AA, Parsons PA (1991) Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Huey RB, Bennett AF (1987) Phylogenetic studies of coadaptation: preferred temperatures versus optimal performance temperatures of lizards. Evolution 41:1098–1115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05879.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huey RB, Kingsolver LG (1993) Evolution of resistance to high temperature in ectotherms. Am Nat 142:S21–S41.  https://doi.org/10.1086/285521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huey RB, Stevenson RD (1979) Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: a discussion of approaches. Amer Zool 19:357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/19.1.357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huey RB, Partridge L, Fowler K (1991) Thermal sensitivity of Drosophila malanogaster responds rapidly to laboratory natural selection. Evolution 45:751–756.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04343.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecol Evol 15:56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James A, Partridge L (1995) Thermal evolution of rate of development in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 8:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James AC, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L (1997) Genetic and environmental responses to temperature of Drosophila melanogaster from a latitudinal cline. Genetics 146:881–890Google Scholar
  18. Maharjan R, Ahn J, Park C, Yoon Y, Jang Y, Kang H, Bae S (2017) Effects of temperature on development of the adzuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on two leguminous seed. J Stored Prod Res 72:90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neat F, Fowler K, Frencg V, Partridge L (1995) Thermal evolution at low temperature reduces the nutritional requirement for growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc B 260:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–639.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons SMA, Joern A (2014) Life history traits associated with body size covary along a latitudinal gradient in a generalist grasshopper. Oecologia 174:379–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2785-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Partridge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V (1994) Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48:1269–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05311.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Partridge L, Barrie B, Barton NH, Fowler K, French V (1995) Rapid laboratory evolution of adult life-history traits in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 49:538–544.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02285.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roitberg ES, Eplanova GV, Kotenko TI, Amat F, Carretero MA, Kuranova VN, Bulakhova NA, Zinenko OI, Yakovlev VA (2015) Geographic variation of life-history traits in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: testing Darwin’s fecundity-advantage hypothesis. J Evol Biol 28:613–629.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SAS Institute Inc. (2015) JMP® 12.2.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Service PM, Hutchinson MD, MacKinley MD, Rose MR (1985) Resistance to environmental stress in Drosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence. Physiol Zool 58:380–389.  https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.58.4.30156013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stillwell RC, Fox CW (2005) Complex patterns of phenotypic plasticity: interactive effect of temperature during rearing and oviposition. Ecology 86:924–934.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stillwell RC, Moya-Laraňo J, Fox CW (2008) Selection does not favor larger body size at lower temperature in a seed-feeding beetle. Evolution 62:2534–2544.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00467.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tseng M, Kaur KM, Pari SS, Sarai K, Chan D, Yao CH, Porto P, Toor A, Toor HS, Fograscher K (2018) Decreases in beetle body size linked to climate change and warning temperatures. J Anim Ecol 87:647–659.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yanagi S, Miyatake T (2002) Effects of maternal age on reproductive traits and fitness components of the offspring in the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Physiol Entomol 27:261–266.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00294.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yanagi S, Miyatake T (2003) Costs of mating and egg production in female Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol 49:823–827.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00119-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Applied Entomology and Zoology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental and Life ScienceOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations