Advertisement

Distribution and population structure of two phylogroups of the parasitoid Encarsia smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in tea fields infested with the invasive camellia spiny whitefly Aleurocanthus camelliae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan

  • Kaori Yara
  • Ryuji Uesugi
  • Takeshi Shimoda
  • Yasushi Sato
Original Research Paper
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

A recent study revealed that two phylogenetic groups of the parasitoid Encarsia smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) can attack the camellia spiny whitefly Aleurocanthus camelliae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), an invasive pest of Japanese tea fields. Type I was introduced in 1925 from China to Japanese citrus orchards to control the citrus spiny whitefly A. spiniferus, but it has also recently appeared in several tea fields. Type II, presumably introduced accidentally, was also found in many tea fields. However, little is known about distribution and their relative importance as a biocontrol agent in tea fields. To investigate these aspects, we developed specific PCR for the two groups using a variation in their nuclear ribosomal DNA’s ITS region. We then surveyed their distribution in 23 tea fields in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, from 2013 to 2015 using this specific PCR. We found that both types were distributed, sometimes coexisting, in many tea fields during 2013–2015, although the population structure of these types varied with the field, year and season. These results suggest that A. camelliae can be controlled unintentionally by accidentally introduced exotic natural enemies (Type II) and/or Type I species originally introduced to control other invasive pests such as A. spiniferus.

Keywords

Aleurocanthus camelliae Encarsia smithi Parasitoid wasp Phylogenetic group Specific PCR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor-in-chief and the two anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful comments.

References

  1. Bellows TS (2001) Restoring population balance through natural enemy introductions. Biol Control 21:199–205.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2001.0936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brust RA, Ballard JWO, Driver F, Hartley DM, Galway NJ, Curran J (1998) Molecular systematics and hybrid crossing identify a third taxon, Aedes (Halaedes) wardangensis sp.n., of the Aedes (Halaedes) australis species group (Diptera: Culicidae). Can J Zool 76:1236–1246.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z98-051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cock MJW, Murphy ST, Kairo MTK, Thompson E, Murphy RJ, Francis AW (2016) Trends in the classical biological control of insect pests by insects: an update of the BIOCAT database. Biocontrol 61:349–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9726-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hajek AE, Hurley BP, Kenis M, Garnas JR, Bush SJ, Wingfield MJ, van Lenteren JC, Cock MJW (2016) Exotic biological control agents: a solution or contribution to arthropod invasions? Biol Invasions 18:953–969.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1075-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kawamura M (1976) Ecological studies of Prospaltella smithi SILVESTRI. Bull Kochi Fruit Exp Sta Jpn 1:11–22 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  6. Kenis M, Hurley BP, Hajek AE, Cock MJW (2017) Classical biological control of insect pests of trees: facts and figures. Biol Invasions 19:3401–3417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1414-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuwana I (1934) Notes on a newly imported parasite of the spiny white fly attacking citrus in Japan. In: Proceeding of the fifth Pacific Science Congress organized by the Pacific Science Association and the National Research Council of Canada, Victoria and Vancouver, 1–14 June 1933, Toronto, University of Toronto, pp. 3521–3525Google Scholar
  8. Nguyen RU, Sailer RI (1987) Facultative hyperparasitism and sex determination of Encarsia smithi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:713–719.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/80.6.713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ohgushi R (1969) Ecology of citrus pests. Rural Culture Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  10. Ozawa A, Uchiyama T, Kosugi Y, Haga H (2015) Distribution of the parasitoid Encarsia smithi (Silvestri) on the tea spiny whitefly Aleurocanthus camelliae Kanmiya & Kasai in tea fields in Shizuoka prefecture, Japan. Tea Res J 119:1–6 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  11. Schmidt S, Driver F, De Barro P (2006) The phylogenetic characteristics of three different 28S rRNA gene regions in Encarsia (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Org Divers Evol 6:127–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2005.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Uesugi R, Sato Y, Han BY, Huang ZD, Yara K, Furuhashi K (2016a) Molecular evidence for multiple phylogenetic groups within two species of invasive spiny whiteflies and their parasitoid wasp. Bull Entomol Res 106:328–340.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485315001030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Uesugi R, Yara K, Sato Y (2016b) Changes in population density of Aleurocanthus camelliae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and parasitism rate of Encarsia smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) during the early invasion stages. Appl Entomol Zool 51:581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-016-0434-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van den Berg MA, Greenland J (1997) Classical biological control of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Hem.: Aleyrodidae), on citrus in southern Africa. Entomophaga 42:459–465.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Driesche RG, Carruthers RI, Center T et al (2010) Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems. Biol Control 54:S2–S33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. van Lenteren JC (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. Biocontrol 57:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9395-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yamashita K, Kasai A, Suzuki Y, Yoshiyasu Y (2016) Population dynamics of the camellia spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus camelliae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), in tea fields during the early phase of invasion into Kyoto, Japan. Appl Entomol Zool 51:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-015-0380-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yara K, Sasawaki T, Kunimi Y (2007) Displacement of Torymus beneficus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) by T. sinensis, an indigenous and introduced parasitoid of the chestnut gall wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), in Japanese chestnut fields: possible involvement in hybridization. Biol Control 42:148–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yara K, Sasawaki T, Kunimi Y (2010) Hybridization between introduced Torymus sinensis (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) and indigenous T. beneficus (late-spring strain), parasitoids of the Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Biol Control 54:14–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yara K, Shimoda T, Sato Y (2017) Rearing method for the two strains of Encarsia smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) using citrus seedlings infested with Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 61:131–134.  https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.2017.131 (in Japanese with English summary) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Applied Entomology and Zoology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaori Yara
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ryuji Uesugi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Takeshi Shimoda
    • 2
  • Yasushi Sato
    • 1
  1. 1.Kanaya Tea Research Station, Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NAROShimadaJapan
  2. 2.Central Region Agricultural Research Center, NAROTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NAROTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Tohoku Agricultural Research Center, NAROMoriokaJapan

Personalised recommendations