Advertisement

Development of multiplex PCR to detect slow rust resistance genes Lr34 and Lr46 in wheat

  • Roksana Skowrońska
  • Michał KwiatekEmail author
  • Agnieszka Tomkowiak
  • Jerzy Nawracała
Open Access
Plant Genetics • Short Communication
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

Leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina belongs to one of the most dangerous fungal diseases of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and is the cause of large yield losses every year. Here we report a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, which was developed for detection of two important wheat slow rust resistance genes Lr34 and Lr46, using two molecular markers: csLV34 and Xwmc44, respectively. The presence of genes was analyzed in one winter wheat variety TX89D6435 and five spring wheat varieties: Pavon F76, Parula ‘S’, Rayon 89, Kern, Mochis 88. Both Lr34 and Lr46 genes were identified in variety TX89D6435, gene Lr34 was also identified in Parula ‘S’ and Kern varieties, and gene L46 occurs in Pavon F76 and Mochis 88 variety. None of the resistance genes tested was detected in the Rayon 89 variety. The use of the multiplex PCR method allowed to shorten the analysis time, reduce costs of analyses, and reduce the workload.

Keywords

Leaf rust Lr34 Lr46 Multiplex PCR Wheat 

Introduction

Leaf rust caused by the pathogen Puccinia triticina Erikss. & Henn. is one of the most destructive diseases of wheat (Kolmer et al. 2005). There are many fungicides that help control these fungal disease, but their use is expensive and can have a negative impact on the environment. The most efficient, economical, and environmentally sound method to mitigate the losses caused by pathogens is breeding for genetic resistance (Muthe et al. 2016). To date, more than 70 leaf rust resistance (Lr) genes have been cataloged (McIntosh et al. 2013), but many of these genes are race-specific and they have lose their effectiveness when new races of the pathogen are appearing (McCallum et al. 2007). Currently, breeding programs focus on producing cultivars with adult plant resistance (APR), also known as slow rusting or race non-specific genes. Slow rusting genes are a group of leaf rust resistance genes that give durable resistance only in adult plant (Bošković et al. 2008). APR is characterized by less and slower pathogen growth and reproduction despite a high infection type (Tiwari et al. 2009). An important advantage of genes is their pleiotropic effect on many pathogens, for example Blumeria graminis causing powdery mildew (Lillemo et al. 2008). Among all, the leaf rust resistance genes in wheat only four genes are known as slow rusting: Lr34 (Singh 1992), Lr46 (Singh et al. 1998), Lr67 (Dyck and Samborski 1979), and Lr68 (Herrera-Foessel et al. 2012).

The leaf rust resistance gene Lr34 (earlier LrT2) is the best known and most effective of slow rusting genes. The gene Lr34 was first described in the wheat line PI58548 and located on short arm of wheat chromosome 7D (Dyck 1987). Lagudah et al. (2006) developed PCR-based marker csLV34 that has been used extensively to identify the presence of Lr34 gene. The disadvantage is that the marker is not diagnostic in some genetic backgrounds, like Canadian wheat germplasm (Lagudah et al. 2009). Leaf tip necrosis (LTN) is one of the morphological markers associated with leaf rust resistance gene Lr34 and is also expressed in the absence of the pathogen (Lagudah et al. 2006). The Lr46 gene was first described in wheat cultivar Pavon F76 and was localized on chromosome 1BL (Singh et al. 1998). Lr46 shows a resistance phenotype in adult plants similar to Lr34, but the effects of Lr46 are not as pronounced as Lr34 (Martinez et al. 2001). Lillemo et al. (2008) have shown that Lr46 has an additive effect on leaf rust resistance of Lr34. The gene Lr46 was mapped distal to Xwmc44 and proximal to Xgwm259 (Suenaga et al. 2003).

Material and methods

The aim of this study was to develop a multiplex PCR method for simultaneous identification of two most effective slow rust resistance genes: Lr34 and Lr46. Plant material consisted of six wheat cultivars Triticum aestivum L. derived from the National Small Grains Collection, the Agriculture Research Station in Aberdeen, USA: TX89D6435, Pavon F76, Parula ‘S’, Rayon 89, Kern and Mochis 88 (Table 1).
Table 1

Presence of genes Lr34 and L46 in tested wheat varieties

No.

Cultivar

Origin

Plant ID

Presence of Lr34

Presence of Lr46

1.

TX89D6435

US, Texas

PI 584759

+

+

2.

Pavon F76

Mexico

PI 520003

+

3.

Parula ‘S’

Mexico

PI 520340

+

4.

Rayon 89

Mexico

PI 591784

5.

Kern

US

PI 672001

+

6.

Mochis 88

Mexico

PI 591791

+

The DNA was extracted from leaf tissue using the GeneMATRIX Plant & Fungi DNA Purification Kit (EURx Ltd., Poland). DNA quality and concentration was checked using the DeNovix spectrophotometer. In order to identify the Lr34 and Lr46 genes, two molecular markers were used: csLv34 and Xwmc44. The STS marker csLV34 maps 0.4 cM from Lr34 and the sequence of primers (Merck) is as follows: csLV34F 5′- GTT GGT TAA GAC TGG TGA TGG -3′; csLV34R 5′- TGC TTG CTA TTG CTG AAT AGT -3′ (Lagudah et al. 2006). According to the literature, the size of the amplified product is a 150 bp (base pairs) band, indicative of the presence of the gene and a 229 bp band in susceptible genotypes. Locus of SSR marker Xwmc44 is located 0.4 cm from QTL for Lr46. A product of the microsatellite marker is 242 bp band for the presence of Lr46 gene, and the sequence of marker primers is as follows: WMC44F 5′- GGT CTT CTG GGC TTT GAT CCT G -3′, WMC44R 5′- GTT GCT AGG GAC CCG TAG TGG -3′ (Suenaga et al. 2003). The 25 μL mix composition of multiplex PCR volume consisted of the following: 12.5 μL 2× PCR TaqNovaHs PCR Master Mix (Blirt), which included 2× concentrated PCR reaction buffer, 4 mM MgCl2; 1.6 mM dNTPs mix (0.4 mM of each dNTP); 0.8 μL csLv34 forward primer; 0.8 μL csLv34 reverse primer; 1.2 μL Xwmc44 forward primer; 1.2 μL Xwmc44 reverse primer (the concentration for each primer was 100 μM); 2 μL DNA template (50 ng/μL) and 6.5 μL PCR grade water. PCR profile was modified with reference to standard protocol. The following annealing temperatures were tested: 55 °C, optimal for the csLv34 primer (Lagudah et al. 2006), 61 °C recommended for the Xwmc44 marker (Suenaga et al. 2003), and several intermediate variants. The final PCR reaction consisted of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles (denaturation, 94 °C for 45 s; primer annealing, 60 °C for 30 s; elongation, 72 °C for 1 min), followed by the final extension for 7 min at 72 °C and final step at 4 °C. The reaction was carried out using the Labcycler thermal cyclers (SensoQuest GmbH). The products of amplification were prepared by adding 0.5 Midori Green Direct (NIPPON Genetics EUROPE) to each tube and were separated using 2% agarose (SIGMA) gel in 1× TBE buffer (BioShop) at 100 V for two and a half hours. A Molecular Imager Gel Doc™ XR UV system was used with the Biorad Bio Image™ Software to visualize the PCR products.

Results and discussion

Molecular markers can be successfully used in the identification of leaf rust resistance genes in wheat resistance breeding programs (Vida et al. 2009). The results showed that the amplification of csLv34 marker was observed in TX89D6435, Parula ‘S’, and Kern varieties, but the size of the resulting Lr34 gene linked product was approximately 145 bp, which is smaller than reported by Lagudah et al. (2006). Differences in the size of products may result from the size of the DNA ladder used. Lagudah et al. (2006) used a 100 bp ladder molecular size markers. In our experiment we have used more precise, 50 bp DNA ladder, which showed that the csLv34 marker product is smaller than 150 bp. Considering other varieties (Pavon F76, Rayon 89, and Kern’) the PCR reaction with csLv34 marker showed a 229 bp product, indicating the lack of the Lr34 gene. The analyses with the Xwmc44 marker linked to the Lr46 gene resulted in the identification of a 242 bp specific product in TX89D6435, Pavon F76, and Mochis 88 varieties. The accumulation of both Lr34 and Lr46 resistance genes was demonstrated by the multiplex PCR in TX89D6435 variety, so this variety can be a good source of non-race specific resistance to leaf rust (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Electrophoresis showing the presence of markers: csLv34 (for the Lr34) and Xwmc44 (for the Lr46) in the wheat varieties. M, GeneRuler 50 bp DNA ladder (NIPPON Genetics EUROPE GmbH); 1, TX89D6435; 2, Pavon F76; 3, Parula ‘S’; 4, Rayon 89; 5, Kern; 6, Mochis 88

The literature gives many examples of successful use of the multiplex PCR method to identify race-specific resistance genes. Leśniowska-Nowak et al. (2013) developed a multiplex PCR method to identify two resistance genes for leaf rust Lr9 and Lr19. Other major resistance genes for P. triticina Lr29 and Lr37 were identified with one PCR reaction by Sumikova and Hanzalova (2010). Gogół et al. (2015) made a successful attempt to use the multiplex PCR method to simultaneously identify genes of resistance to two different diseases: Lr21 (leaf rust) and Pm4b (powdery mildew). Tomkowiak et al. (2019) identified the Pm2, Pm3a, Pm4b, and Pm6 genes and developed multiplex PCR reaction conditions for simultaneous identification of Pm2 and Pm4b genes.

Slow rusting genes Lr34 and Lr46 are very important for breeding because they provide durable resistance over a long period of time in different environments, and they are effective against many pathogens (Imbaby et al. 2014). The development of the multiplex PCR method allows to significantly shorten the time of analysis of these two important genes. The study demonstrated that the developed multiplex PCR conditions are effective diagnostic tool for the simultaneous identification of Lr34 and L46 genes using the csLv34 and Xwmc44 markers, respectively. The developed multiplex PCR conditions can be used in breeding programs for marker-assisted selection.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Harrold Bockelman at the USDA/ARS Small Grains Laboratory, Aberdeen (ID, USA), for providing the seeds samples.

Authors contribution statement

RS made the experiments and analyses, wrote the first draft, and incorporated all inputs from co-authors. MK initiated the project. MK, AT, and JN revised the draft and made suggestions for improving the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Bošković J, Bošković M, Prijić Ž (2008) Accumulations of genes for durable resistance to wheat leaf rust pathogen. J Agric Sci 53(3):163–172.  https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS0803163B Google Scholar
  2. Dyck PL (1987) The association of a gene for leaf rust resistance with the chromosome 7D suppressor of stem rust resistance in common wheat. Genome. 29(3):467–469.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g87-081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dyck PL, Samborski DJ (1979) Adult-plant leaf rust resistance in PI 250413, an introduction of common wheat. Can J Plant Sci 59(2):329–332.  https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps79-053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gogół A, Leśniowska-Nowak J, Nowak M, Okoń S, Kowalczyk K (2015) Development of multiplex PCR for Lr21 and Pm4b resistance genes detection in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ann UMCS Sectio E LXX(3):21–30Google Scholar
  5. Herrera-Foessel SA, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Rosewarne GM, Periyannan SK, Viccars L, Calvo-Salazar V, Lan C, Lagudah ES (2012) Lr68: a new gene conferring slow rusting resistance to leaf rust in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 124(8):1475–1486.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1802-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Imbaby IA, Mahmoud MA, Hassan MEM, Abdel-aziz ARM (2014) Identification of leaf rust resistance genes in selected Egyptian wheat cultivars by molecular markers. Sci World J 7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/574285
  7. Kolmer JA, Long DL, Hughes ME (2005) Physiologic specialization of Puccinia triticina on wheat in the United States in 2003. Plant Dis 89(11):1201–1206.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-1201 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagudah ES, McFadden H, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Bariana HS, Spielmeyer W (2006) Molecular genetic characterization of the Lr34/Yr18 slow rusting resistance gene region in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 114(1):21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0406-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lagudah ES, Krattinger SG, Herrera-Foessel S, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Spielmeyer W, Brown-Guedira G, Selter LL, Keller B (2009) Gene-specific markers for the wheat gene Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 which confers resistance to multiple fungal pathogens. Theor Appl Genet 119(5):889–898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1097-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Leśniowska-Nowak J, Gradzielewska A, Majek M (2013) Identification of the gene resistant to leaf rust in selected European wheat cultivars and multiplex PCR development. Ann UMCS Sect E 68(3):20–28Google Scholar
  11. Lillemo M, Asalf B, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Chen XM, He ZH, Bjørnstad Å (2008) The adult plant rust resistance loci Lr34/Yr18 and Lr46/Yr29 are important determinants of partial resistance to powdery mildew in bread wheat line Saar. Theor Appl Genet 116(8):1155–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0743-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Martinez F, Niks RE, Singh RP, Rubiales D (2001) Characterization of Lr46, a gene conferring partial resistance to wheat leaf rust. Hereditas. 135(23):111–114.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001.00111.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McCallum BD, Fetch T, Chong J (2007) Cereal rust control in Canada. Aust J Agric Res 58:639–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(12)60032-4Get CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McIntosh RA, Yamazaki Y, Dubcovsky J, Rogers WJ, Morris C, Appels R, Xia XC (2013) Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat: 12th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, 8–13 September 2013, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  15. Muthe ST, Kulwal PL, Gadekar DA, Jadhav AS (2016) Molecular marker based detection of leaf rust resistance gene Lr34 in Indian bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australas Plant Pathol 45(4):369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0423-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh RP (1992) Expression of wheat leaf rust resistance gene Lr34 in seedlings and adult plants. Plant Dis 76:489–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh RP, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Huerta-Espino J (1998) Lr46: a gene conferring slow-rusting resistance to leaf rust in wheat. Phytopathology. 88(9):890–894.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.9.890 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Suenaga K, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, William HM (2003) Microsatellite markers for genes Lr34/Yr18 and other quantitative trait loci for leaf rust and stripe rust resistance in bread wheat. Phytopathology. 93(7):881–890.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.7.881 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sumikova T, Hanzalova A (2010) Multiplex PCR assay to detect rust resistance genes Lr26 and Lr37 in wheat. Czech J Genet Plant 46(2):85–89.  https://doi.org/10.17221/32/2010-CJGPB CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tiwari R, Saharan MS, Chatrath R, Siwach P, Mishra B (2009) STS marker based tracking of slow rusting Lr34 gene in Indian wheat genotypes. Indian J Biotechnol 8:207–213Google Scholar
  21. Tomkowiak A, Skowrońska R, Weigt D, Kwiatek M, Nawracała J, Kowalczewski PŁ, Pluta M (2019) Identification of powdery mildew Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici resistance genes in selected wheat varieties and development of multiplex PCR. Open Chem 17:157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vida G, Gál M, Uhrin A, Veisz O, Syed NH, Flavell AJ, Wang Z, Bedo Z (2009) Molecular markers for the identification of resistance genes and marker-assisted selection in breeding wheat for leaf rust resistance. Euphytica 170:67–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9945-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy and BioengineeringPoznań University of Life SciencesPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations