Advertisement

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 63–76 | Cite as

Detection of a curved bridge deck vibration using robotic total stations for structural health monitoring

  • Renaude Carneiro dos Santos
  • Ana Paula C. LaroccaEmail author
  • João Olympio de Araújo Neto
  • Augusto César Barros Barbosa
  • José Venâncio Marra Oliveira
Original Paper
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

This article proposes a contribution to the inspection procedures of curved reinforced concrete road bridges through a short-term monitoring plan using topographic techniques during an ambient vibration test (AVT) under normal traffic conditions. The proposed monitoring method was used to determine the 3D displacements in the observed points, which enabled the evaluation of vibrations of two points on the bridge deck in the vertical (Z), horizontal (Y)—perpendicular to track direction—and longitudinal (X) directions of the track. The application consisted of measurements performed under normal traffic conditions with two RTSs with a nominal sampling rate of 10 Hz. The targets were two prisms located on opposite edges of the runway and perpendicular to the traffic direction. A tri-dimensional view of the residuals from the measured coordinates and Morlet continuous wavelet transform (CWT) are used to establish the time and frequency-domain of the bridge vibrations and analyze the behavior and movement of the midspan in an AVT. This study confirms the feasibility of using high sampling rate RTSs for monitoring dynamic responses of small concrete bridges without interrupting traffic on highways.

Keywords

Ambient vibration test Dynamic response Short-span bridge Robotic total station Wavelet transform Structural health monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors express their gratitude to CNPq–PQ2, FAPESP, CAPES #001, ANTT.

References

  1. 1.
    Nowak AS, Tharmabala T (1998) Bridge Reliability evaluation using load tests. J Struct Eng 114(10):2268–2279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melchers RE, Beck AT (2018) Structural reliability analysis and prediction, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ciddor PE (1996) Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared. Appl Opt 35(9):1566–1573.  https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.001566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frangopol DM, Strauss A, Kim A (2008) Bridge reliability assessment based on monitoring. J Bridge Eng 13(3):258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seo J, Hu J, Lee J (2015) Summary review of structural health monitoring applications for highway bridge. J Perform Construct Facil.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000824 (04015072) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li H, Ou JP (2016) The state of the art in structural health monitoring of cable-stayed bridges. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(1):43–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DNIT (2004) Manual de inspeção de pontes rodoviárias - IPR/DNIT. 2ª. Edição, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rüeger JM (1996) Electronic distance measurement—an introduction, 4th edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salawu OS (1997) Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct 19(9):718–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cosser E, Roberts GW, Meng X, Dodson AH (2003) Measuring the dynamic deformation of bridges using a total station. In: Proceeding of the 11th FIG symposium on deformation measurements, Santorini, Greece, pp 25–28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lekidis V, Tsakiri M, Makra K, Karakostas C, Klimis N, Sous I (2005) Evaluation of dynamic response and local soil effects of the Evripos cable-stayed bridge using multi-sensor monitoring systems. Eng Geol 79:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bayoud Fadi A (2006) Leica’s Pinpoint EDM Technology with Modified Signal Processing and Novel Optomechanical Features. In Proceedings of the XXIII FIG meeting, Munich, German, 8–13 October 2006, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Psimoulis PA, Stiros SC (2007) Measurement of deflections and of oscillation frequencies of engineering structures using Robotic Theodolites (RTS). Eng Struct 29:3312–3324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chrzanowski A, Szostak-Chrzanowski A (2009) Deformation monitoring surveys: old problems and new solutions. Canadian Centre for Geodetic Engineering, University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasperski J, Delacourt C, Allemand P, Potherat P, Jaud M, Varrel E (2010) Application of a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) to the study of the Séchilienne Landslide (Isère, France). Remote Sens 2(12):2785–2802.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs122785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stiros SC, Psimoulis PA (2012) Response of a historical short-span railway bridge to passing trains: 3-D deflections and dominant frequencies derived from Robotic Total Station (RTS) measurements. Eng Struct 45:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frukacz M, Presl R, Wieser A (2016) Pushing the sensitivity limits of TPS-based continuous deformation monitoring of an Alpine Valley. In: Proc Joint international symposium on deformation monitoring (JISDM), Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu J, Zhu P, Xu B, Meng X (2017) Experimental assessment of high sampling-rate robotic total station for monitoring bridge dynamic responses. Measurement 104:60–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lienhart W (2017) Geotechnical monitoring using total stations and laser scanners: critical aspects and solutions. J Civ Struct Health Monit.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0228-5 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Artese S, Perrelli M (2018) Monitoring a landslide with high accuracy by total station: a DTM-based model to correct for the atmospheric effects. Geosciences 8:46.  https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Colombo AB (2016) Applications of structural health monitoring and field-testing techniques to probabilistic based life-cycle evaluation of reinforced concrete bridges. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Estruturas) – Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2016, p 129Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestre (ANTT) (2015). Desenvolvimento e aplicação de técnicas de “Structural Health Monitoring” para avaliação estrutural de pontes rodoviária, Projeto 4 SGP/AFD_04 Rev.0Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zolghadri N, Halling M, Barr P, Petroff S (2016) Field verification of simplified bridge weigh-in-motion techniques. J Bridge Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000930 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ha WS, Liu HJ, Wu J, Yuan YG, Chen AR (2017) Dynamic analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridges under wind and traffic using aerodynamic coefficients considering aerodynamic interference. Wind Struct 24(5):405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sabamehr A, Lim C, Bagchi A (2018) System identification and model updating of highway bridges using ambient vibration tests. J Civ Struct Health Monit.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0304-5 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang DH, Yi TH, Li HN, Zhang YF (2018) Monitoring-based analysis of the static and dynamic characteristic of wind actions for long-span cable-stayed bridge. J Civ Struct Health Monit 8:5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0257-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Andrade RGM (2012) Monitoramento de curta duração de uma ponte curva em concreto armado: um estudo de caso. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Estruturas) – Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012, p 144Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andrade RGM, Trautwein LM, Bittencourt TN (2013) Comparison and calibration of numerical models from monitoring data of a reinforced concrete highway bridge. IBRACON 6(1):121–138 (São Paulo) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    American Society of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1962) The AASHTO road test, Report 4, highway research board, special report 61D. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Society of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1993) Guide specifications for horizontally curved highway bridges, AASHTO report. National Academy of Science, National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2003) Guide specifications for horizontally curved steel girder highway bridges, AASHTO report. National Academy of Science, National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Senthilvasan J, Thambiratnam DP, Brameld GH (2002) Dynamic response of a curved bridge under moving truck load. Eng Struct 24(10):1283–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    He XH, Sheng XW, Scanlon A, Linzell DG, Yu XD (2012) Skewed concrete box girder bridge static and dynamic testing and analysis. Eng Struct 39:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng Q, Yang YB, Dimitrakopoulos EG (2016) Dynamic response of high speed vehicles and sustaining curved bridges under conditions of resonance. Eng Struct 114(2016):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wodzinowski R, Sennah K, Afefy HM (2018) Free vibration analysis of horizontally curved composite concrete-steel I-girder bridges. J Constr Steel Res 140(2018):47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bakker J, Frangopol DM, Tsompanakis Y (2018) Life-cycle of engineering systems: emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure. Struct Infrastruct Eng 14(7):831–832.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1439974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin H (2007) MATLAB recipes for earth sciences, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Daubechies I, Mallat S, Willsky A (1992) Introduction to the special issue on wavelet transforms and multiresolution signal analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38(2):528–531Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Büssow R (2007) An algorithm for the continuous Morlet wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(8):2970–2979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.06.001 (0888-3270) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lin CW, Yang YB (2005) Use of a passing vehicle to scan the fundamental bridge frequencies: an experimental verification. Eng Struct 27(13):1865–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Palazzo, D R, Friedmann, RMP, Nadal, CA, Santos Filho, ML, Veiga, LAK, Faggion, PL (2006) Dynamic monitoring of structures using a robotic total station. In: Proceedings of XXIII FIG congress, Munich, Germany, October 8–13, 2006Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Owen J, Eccles B, Choo B, Woodings M (2001) The application of auto–regressive time series modelling for the time–frequency analysis of civil engineering structures. Eng Struct 23(5):521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Neild S, Mcfadden P, Williams M (2003) A review of time- frequency methods for structural vibration analysis. Eng Struct 25(6):713–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ogaja C, Wang J, Rizos C (2003) Detection of wind-induced response by wavelet transformed GPS solutions. J Surv Eng 129(3):99–104.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Doukaa E, Hadjileontiadisb L (2005) Time–frequency analysis of the free vibration response of a beam with a breathing crack. NDT&E Int 38(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Al-Badour F, Sunar M, Cheded L (2011) Vibration analysis of rotating machinery using time-frequency analysis and wavelet techniques. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(6):2083–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhao M, Zhang J, Yi C (2011) Time–frequency characteristics of blasting vibration signals measured in milliseconds. Min Sci Technol 21(3):349–352Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Larocca APC, Araújo Neto JO, Trabanco JLA, Santos MC (2016) First steps using two GPS Satellites for monitoring the dynamic behavior of a small concrete highway bridge. J Surv Eng Asce 142:4016008.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    MATLAB, release 12 [Computer software] (2015) Natick. MA, MathworksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Transportation Engineering, São Carlos School of EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Federal Sul de Minas Gerais (IFSULDEMINAS)Pouso AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Centro de Ciências e Tecnologia (UECE-CCT)Universidade Estadual do CearáFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations