Movement of giant lipid vesicles induced by millimeter wave radiation change when they contain magnetic nanoparticles
- 113 Downloads
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are used in a rapidly expanding number of research and practical applications in biotechnology and biomedicine. Recent developments in iron oxide nanoparticle design and understanding of nanoparticle membrane interactions have led to applications in magnetically triggered, liposome delivery vehicles with controlled structure. Here we study the effect of external physical stimuli—such as millimeter wave radiation—on the induced movement of giant lipid vesicles in suspension containing or not containing iron oxide maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles (MNPs). To increase our understanding of this phenomenon, we used a new microscope image-based analysis to reveal millimeter wave (MMW)-induced effects on the movement of the vesicles. We found that in the lipid vesicles not containing MNPs, an exposure to MMW induced collective reorientation of vesicle motion occurring at the onset of MMW switch “on.” Instead, no marked changes in the movements of lipid vesicles containing MNPs were observed at the onset of first MMW switch on, but, importantly, by examining the course followed; once the vesicles are already irradiated, a directional motion of vesicles was induced. The latter vesicles were characterized by a planar motion, absence of gravitational effects, and having trajectories spanning a range of deflection angles narrower than vesicles not containing MNPs. An explanation for this observed delayed response could be attributed to the possible interaction of MNPs with components of lipid membrane that, influencing, e.g., phospholipids density and membrane stiffening, ultimately leads to change vesicle movement.
KeywordsGiant unilamellar vesicles Magnetoliposomes Millimeter waves Vesicle motion Image-based automatic analysis Optical microscopy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Tabatabaei SN, Duchemin S, Girouard H, Martel S. Towards MR-navigable nanorobotic carriers for drug delivery into the brain. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2012;14:727–32.Google Scholar
- 13.Salac D. Vesicles in magnetic fields. Soft Condensed Matter. 2016; arXiv:1608.05587v1.Google Scholar
- 15.Bulbake U, Doppalapudi S, Kommineni N, Khan W. Liposomal formulations in clinical use: an updated review. Pharmaceutics. 2017;9(2) https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics9020012.
- 22.Partyla T, Hacker H, Edinger H, Leutzow B, Lange J, Usichenko T. Remote effects of electromagnetic millimeter waves on experimentally induced cold pain: a double-blinded crossover investigation in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(3):980–5. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Vecchia P, Matthes R, Ziegelberger G, Lin J, Saunders R, Swerdlow A. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection; 2009.Google Scholar
- 37.Hough PVC. Method and means for recognizing complex pattern. US Patent No3069654. 1962.Google Scholar
- 44.Chukova YP. Doubts about nonthermal effects of MM radiation have no scientific foundations. J Phys Conf Ser. 2011;329(1) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/329/1/012032.
- 45.Beneduci A, Bernstein E. Review on the mechanisms of interaction between millimeter waves and biological systems. Bioelectrochem Res Dev. 2008:35–80.Google Scholar
- 53.Keblinski P, Cahill DG, Bodapati A, Sullivan CR, Taton TA. Limits of localized heating by electromagnetically excited nanoparticles. J Appl Phys. 2006;100(5) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2335783.
- 54.Khizhnyak EP, Ziskin MC. Temperature oscillations in liquid media caused by continuous (nonmodulated) millimeter wavelength electromagnetic irradiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17(3):223–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:3<223::AID-BEM8>3.0.CO;2-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 KHz to 300 GHz. 1992.Google Scholar
- 58.Fannin P, Relihan T, Charles S. Experimental and theoretical profiles of the frequency-dependent complex susceptibility of systems containing nanometer-sized magnetic particles. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys. 1997;55(21):14423–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar