Advertisement

Islet autoantibodies in disease prediction and pathogenesis

  • Xiaofan Jia
  • Yong Gu
  • Hilary High
  • Liping YuEmail author
Review Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is now predictable by measuring specific islet autoantibodies (IAbs). Almost all children who developed multiple IAbs will progress to T1D with time, while individuals with single IAb have a very low risk although it is an important earlier biomarker. The poor prediction of single IAb has been found to be associated with IAb affinity. Majority of single IAb generated in current standard IAb radio-binding assay (RBA) are of low affinity, which have been demonstrated low risk in T1D development. New generation of nonradioactive IAb assay with electrochemiluminescence (ECL) technology has been shown to discriminate high-affinity from low-affinity IAbs and greatly improve sensitivity and disease specificity. With a high-affinity IAb assay, like ECL assay, single IAb will be expected to be a reliable biomarker for T1D early prediction. Although appearance of IAbs is most reliable biomarkers for T1D, there are no direct evidences that IAbs contribute to β-cell damage. With recent studies on ZnT8, a merging protein on β-cell surface membrane associated with insulin secretion, a subclass of ZnT8 autoantibodies directed to extra-cellular epitopes of ZnT8 on β-cell surface has recently been identified in T1D patients and these cell surface autoantibodies have been found to appear very early, before other IAbs. These findings lead us to a hypothesis that the immunogenic epitopes on β-cell surface might be early targets for autoimmune disease and IAbs to cell surface epitopes might be involved in β-cell destruction, which will change the paradigm of IAbs in T1D pathogenesis.

Keywords

Autoantibodies Type 1 diabetes ECL assay Prediction Pathogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by JDRF Grants 2-SRA-2015-51-Q-R, 2-SRA-2018-533-S-B, 1-SRA-2016-208-S-B, NIH grants DK32083 and DK32493. LY has full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author contributions

XJ researched data and wrote the manuscript. YG researched data. HH researched data and edited the manuscript. LY designed the study, researched data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Xiaofan Jia, Author Yong Gu, Author Hilary High, and Author Liping Yu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any experimental studies with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Stone RA. Secular trends in incidence of childhood IDDM in 10 countries: Diabetes Epidemiology Research International Group. Diabetes. 1990;39(7):858–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harjutsalo V, Sjoberg L, Tuomilehto J. Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study. Lancet. 2008;371(9626):1777–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vehik K, Hamman RF, Lezotte D, et al. Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in 0–17-year-old Colorado youth. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):503–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorsuch AN, Spencer KM, Lister J, et al. Evidence for a long prediabetic period in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1981;2(8260–61):1363–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baekkeskov S, Landin M, Kristensen JK, et al. Antibodies to a 64,000 Mr human islet cell antigen precede the clinical onset of insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1987;79(3):926–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kulmala P, Savola K, Petersen JS, et al. Prediction of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in siblings of children with diabetes. A population-based study. The Childhood Diabetes in Finland Study Group. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(2):327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krischer JP, Liu X, Vehik K, et al. Predicting islet cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: an 8-year TEDDY Study progress report. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(6):1051–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norris JM, Lee HS, Frederiksen B, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and risk of islet autoimmunity. Diabetes. 2018;67(1):146–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Insel RA, Dunne JL, Atkinson MA, et al. Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(10):1964–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ziegler AG, Rewers M, Simell O, et al. Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steck AK, Vehik K, Bonifacio E, et al. Predictors of progression from the appearance of islet autoantibodies to early childhood diabetes: the environmental determinants of diabetes in the young (TEDDY). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(5):808–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu LRM, Gianani R, Kawasaki E, Zhang Y, Verge C, et al. Anti-islet autoantibodies develop sequentially rather than simultaneously. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(81):4264–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu L, Miao D, Scrimgeour L, et al. Distinguishing persistent insulin autoantibodies with differential risk: nonradioactive bivalent proinsulin/insulin autoantibody assay. Diabetes. 2012;61(1):179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miao D, Guyer KM, Dong F, et al. GAD65 autoantibodies detected by electrochemiluminescence assay identify high risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2013;62(12):4174–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miao D, Steck AK, Zhang L, et al. Electrochemiluminescence assays for insulin and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies improve prediction of type 1 diabetes risk. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(2):119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steck AK, Fouts A, Miao D, et al. ECL-IAA and ECL-GADA Can identify high-risk single autoantibody-positive relatives in the TrialNet pathway to prevention study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(7):410–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sosenko JM, Yu L, Skyler JS, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. The use of Electrochemiluminescence assays to predict glycemic and autoantibody progression to type 1 diabetes in individuals with single autoantibodies. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017; 19:183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arvan P, Pietropaolo M, Ostrov D, et al. Islet autoantigens: structure, function, localization, and regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(8):a007658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christgau S, Aanstoot HJ, Schierbeck H, et al. Membrane anchoring of the autoantigen GAD65 to microvesicles in pancreatic beta-cells by palmitoylation in the NH2-terminal domain. J Cell Biol. 1992;118(2):309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang Q, Merriman C, Zhang H, et al. Coupling of insulin secretion and display of a granule-resident zinc transporter ZnT8 on the surface of pancreatic beta cells. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(10):4034–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Merriman C, Huang Q, Gu W, et al. A subclass of serum anti-ZnT8 antibodies directed to the surface of live pancreatic beta-cells. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(2):579–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu L, Liu Y, Miao D, et al. Triple chimeric islet autoantigen IA2-ZnT8WR to facilitate islet autoantibody determination. J Immunol Methods. 2010;353(1–2):20–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wenzlau JM, Hutton JC. Novel diabetes autoantibodies and prediction of type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(5):608–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wenzlau JM, Liu Y, Yu L, et al. A common nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism in the SLC30A8 gene determines ZnT8 autoantibody specificity in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2008;57(10):2693–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lernmark A, Freedman ZR, Hofmann C, et al. Islet-cell-surface antibodies in juvenile diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1978;299(8):375–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van De Winkel M, Smets G, Gepts W, et al. Islet cell surface antibodies from insulin-dependent diabetics bind specifically to pancreatic B cells. J Clin Invest. 1982;70(1):41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dobersen MJ, Scharff JE. Preferential lysis of pancreatic B-cells by islet cell surface antibodies. Diabetes. 1982;31(5 Pt 1):459–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peterson C, Campbell IL, Harrison LC. Lack of specificity of islet cell surface antibodies (ICSA) in IDDM. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1992;17(1):33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vives M, Somoza N, Soldevila G, et al. Reevaluation of autoantibodies to islet cell membrane in IDDM: Failure to detect islet cell surface antibodies using human islet cells as substrate. Diabetes. 1992;41(12):1624–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Diabetes Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barbara Davis Center for DiabetesUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Department of EndocrinologyBeijing Hospital, National Center of GerontologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations