Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcomes of pregnancies complicated with and treated for gestational diabetes mellitus: consequences of screening under the IADPSG criteria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Diabetology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

We diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus according to the criteria of the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), treated gestational diabetes mothers in order to achieve normal glycemic levels, and evaluated clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

One hundred sixty pregnant women had oral glucose tolerance tests and were classified using the IADPSG criteria. Women with gestational diabetes received nutritional counseling, and insulin treatment was started if glycemic control, targeting below 100 mg/dl as fasting plasma glucose and below 120 mg/dl as 2-h postprandial plasma glucose, was not achieved with diet therapy.

Results

Out of 160 pregnancies, 31 women were diagnosed as having gestational diabetes. Insulin treatment was necessary for 14 women. Newborns from mothers with gestational diabetes were heavier than babies from normoglycemic mothers (3,194 ± 274 vs. 3,042 ± 388 g, p = 0.025). The rate of overall cesarean sections in gestational diabetes mothers was higher than the one in normoglycemic mothers (35.4 vs. 17.8 %, p = 0.031), although rates of primary cesarean sections were not different in the two groups. Neonatal hypoglycemia was more frequent in babies from gestational diabetes mothers (4 out of 25) than in newborns from normoglycemic mothers (3 out of 108) (p = 0.023).

Conclusions

The IADPSG criteria are more suitable for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus than the previous criteria. But even after making a diagnosis of gestational diabetes under the IADPSG criteria and extensive treatment, perinatal adverse events were not completely avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown FM, Goldfine AB. Diabetes and pregnancy. In: Kahn CR, Weir GC, King GL, Jacobson AM, Moses AC, Smith RJ, editors. Joslin’s diabetes mellitus. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 1035–47.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl. 1):S62–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS, Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2477–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Rouse DJ, Thorp JM Jr, Sciscione A, Catalano P, Harper M, Saade G, Lain KY, Sorokin Y, Peaceman AM, Tolosa JE, Anderson GB, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. A multicenter randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1339–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morikawa M, Yamada T, Yamada T, Akaishi R, Nishida R, Cho K, Minakami H. Change in the number of patients after the adoption of IADPSG criteria for hyperglycemia during pregnancy in Japanese Women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;90:339–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Sullivan EP, Avlos G, O’Reilly M, Dennedy MC, Gaffney G, Dunne F, Atlantic DIP collaborators. Atlantic diabetes in pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria. Diabetologia. 2011;54:1670–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seltzer HS, Allen EW, Herron AL Jr, Brennan MT. Insulin secretion in response to glycemic stimulus: relation of delayed initial release to carbohydrate intolerance in mild diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1967;46:323–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, Barbour LA. Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1660–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Catalano PM. Obesity, insulin resistance and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction. 2010;140:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank T. Fukuda and Y. Nakamura for administrative assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terumasa Okada.

About this article

Cite this article

Okada, T., Iwashina, M., Kasatani, T. et al. Clinical outcomes of pregnancies complicated with and treated for gestational diabetes mellitus: consequences of screening under the IADPSG criteria. Diabetol Int 4, 186–189 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-013-0114-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-013-0114-2

Keywords

Navigation