Advertisement

Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Advanced Cancer Near End of Life

  • Hirokazu NakayamaEmail author
  • Masahiro Suzuki
  • Toshiaki Kato
  • Hirotoshi Echizen
Short Communication
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Background and Objective

The effect of cancer cachexia on the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin remains unclear. We investigated whether the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin and the risk of kidney injury are altered with the development of cancer cachexia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using therapeutic drug monitoring data obtained from 86 cancer patients who received vancomycin intravenously for infection. The patients were classified into four groups according to the stage of cachexia defined by international consensus—non-cachexia (n = 26), pre-cachexia (n = 10), cachexia (n = 21) and refractory cachexia (n = 29). Vancomycin pharmacokinetics were analyzed by a traditional one-compartment model and Bayesian method using plasma concentrations measured in these patients. Renal function and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the non-cachexia patients (n = 26) and total cancer cachexia patients (n = 60).

Result

No significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed between the non-cachexia and the total cancer cachexia patients. In contrast, systemic clearance of vancomycin was significantly lower in the total cancer cachexia patients compared with the non-cachexia patients when analyzed by the traditional one-compartment model [median (range)—49.7 (9.8‒98.7) vs 70.2 (12.5‒211.8) mL/min, p < 0.01] and by the Bayesian method [45.6 (12.5–84.7) vs 63.3 (12.2–102.5) mL/min, p < 0.05]. None of the non-cachexia patients developed kidney injury, whereas 15% (9 of 60 patients) of the total cancer cachexia patients developed kidney injuries (p = 0.052).

Conclusions

The present study revealed that cancer patients with cachexia may have reduced vancomycin clearance compared with those without cachexia. Cancer cachexia may be a risk factor of vancomycin-associated kidney injury, independent of renal function.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

The protocol of the present study was approved by Ethics Committee of NTT Medical Center Tokyo prior to the study (the approval number: 17‒227).

Informed consent

The IRB waived the requirement of written informed consent from patients, because the present study had a retrospective design and the data used were obtained from routine medical care including TDM. Nevertheless, the study was conducted with full consideration of protecting patients’ personal information according to the guidelines on privacy policy.

References

  1. 1.
    Mirhosseini M, Oneschuk D, Hunter B, Hanson J, Quan H, Amigo P. The role of antibiotics in the management of infection-related symptoms in advanced cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2006;22:69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:489–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachmann J, Heiligensetzer M, Krakowski-Roosen H, Büchler MW, Friess H, Martignoni ME. Cachexia worsens prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0505-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruera E. ABC of palliative care. Anorexia, cachexia, and nutrition. BMJ. 1997;315:1219–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirst HA, Thompson DG, Nicas TI. Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1303–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moellering RC Jr. Vancomycin: a 50-year reassessment. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levine DP. Vancomycin: a history. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R Jr, Craig W, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.  https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp080434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buelga DS, de Mar Fernandez de Gatta M, Herrera EV, Dominguez-Gil A, García MJ. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in patients with hematological malignancies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4934–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Kofide H, Zaghloul I, Al-Naim L. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in adult cancer patients. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2010;16:245–50.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155209355847.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Omote S, Yano Y, Hashida T, Masuda S, Yano I, Katsura T, Inui K. A retrospective analysis of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in Japanese cancer and non-cancer patients based on routine trough monitoring data. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mizuno T, Mizokami F, Fukami K, Ito K, Shibasaki M, Nagamatsu T, Furuta K. The influence of severe hypoalbuminemia on the half-life of vancomycin in elderly patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1323–8.  https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S52259.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hidayat LK, Hsu DI, Quist R, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lodise TP, Patel N, Lomaestro BM, Rodvold KA, Drusano GL. Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration-time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:507–14.  https://doi.org/10.1086/600884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, May 28, 2009. Available from: https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2017.
  16. 16.
    Sawchuk RJ, Zaske DE. Pharmacokinetics of dosing regimens which utilize multiple intravenous infusions: gentamicin in burn patients. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1976;4:183–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamamoto M, Kuzuya T, Baba H, Yamada K, Nabeshima T. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in patients with gram-positive infections and the influence of infectious disease type. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:473–83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.01016.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakayama H, Suzuki M, Usuki K, Kato T. Amikacin pharmacokinetics in terminal stage of hematological malignancy. Ther Drug Monit. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Masman AD, Tibboel D, Baar FP, van Dijk M, Mathot RA, van Gelder T. Prevalence and implications of abnormal laboratory results in patients in the terminal phase of life. J Palliat Med. 2016;19:822–9.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cvan Trobec K, Kerec Kos M, Trontelj J, Grabnar I, Tschirner A, Palus S, Anker SD, Springer J, Lainscak M. Influence of cancer cachexia on drug liver metabolism and renal elimination in rats. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6:45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Franken LG, Masman AD, de Winter BC, Koch BC, Baar FP, Tibboel D, van Gelder T, Mathot RA. Pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in terminally ill adult patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:697–709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0345-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kullar R, Davis SL, Levine DP, Rybak MJ. Impact of vancomycin exposure on outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: support for consensus guidelines suggested targets. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:975–81.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rybak MJ. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marsot A, Boulamery A, Bruguerolle B, Simon N. Vancomycin: a review of population pharmacokinetic analyses. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.2165/11596390-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lanke S, Yu T, Rower JE, Balch AH, Korgenski EK, Sherwin CM. AUC-guided vancomycin dosing in adolescent patients with suspected sepsis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.782.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou Y, Gao F, Chen C, Ma L, Yang T, Liu X, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhao X, Que C, Li S, Lv J, Cui Y, Yang L. Development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vancomycin and its application in Chinese geriatric patients with pulmonary infections. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019;44:361–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-018-0534-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pryka RD, Rodvold KA, Garrison M, Rotschafer JC. Individualizing vancomycin dosage regimens: one- versus two-compartment Bayesian models. Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11:450–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PharmacyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Palliative CareNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of PharmacotherapyMeiji Pharmaceutical UniversityKiyoseJapan

Personalised recommendations