Advertisement

Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 3–18 | Cite as

A review of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Australia and New Zealand

  • R. Billones-BaaijensEmail author
  • S. Savocchia
Review

Abstract

Botryosphaeria dieback caused by species of Botryosphaeriaceae is an economically significant disease of grapevine worldwide including in Australia and New Zealand. Symptoms such as dieback of the shoots and cordons, cankers, stunted shoots, bunch rot and bud necrosis are observed, eventually leading to yield loss and reduced grapevine longevity. The disease was first recognised as an important issue in vineyards in Australia and New Zealand in the early 2000s and since then, considerable research has been conducted for better understanding of the causal organisms and their management. However, there is also a need to better understand the role of nursery planting material as a potential source of infection in new or replanted vineyards. This review reports on the current knowledge of Botryosphaeriaceae in grapevines in Australia and New Zealand including their identification, distribution across various wine grape growing regions, symptomatology, pathogenicity, epidemiology and management strategies. Future strategies to increase our knowledge and to better manage these economically important pathogens are discussed.

Keywords

Botryosphaeria dieback Grapevines Vitis vinifera Nurseries Management strategies 

References

  1. Abou-Mansour E, Débieux JL, Ramírez-Suero M, Bénard-Gellon M, Magnin-Robert M, Spagnolo A, Chong J, Farine S, Bertsch C, L’Haridon F (2015) Phytotoxic metabolites from Neofusicoccum parvum, a pathogen of Botryosphaeria dieback of grapevine. Phytochemistry 115:207–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaniz S, García-Jiménez J, Abad-Campos P, Armengol J (2010) Susceptibility of grapevine rootstocks to Cylindrocarpon liriodendri and C. macrodidymum. Sci Hortic 125:305–308Google Scholar
  3. Alfonzo A, Conigliaro G, Torta L, Burruano S, Moschetti G (2009) Antagonism antagonism of Bacillus subtilis strain AG1 against vine wood fungal pathogens. Phytopathol Mediterr 48:155–158Google Scholar
  4. Alves A, Crous PW, Correia A, Phillips AJL (2008) Morphological and moecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal Divers 28:1–13Google Scholar
  5. Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2009) Rainwater dispersal of Botryosphaeria conidia from infected grapevines. New Zealand Plant Protection 62:228–233Google Scholar
  6. Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2011) Identification, potential inoculum sources and pathogenicity of botryosphaeriaceous species associated with grapevine dieback disease in New Zealand. Eur J Plant Pathol 131:467–482Google Scholar
  7. Amponsah NT, Jones E, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2012a) Evaluation of fungicides for the management of Botryosphaeria dieback diseases of grapevines. Pest Manag Sci 68:676–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2012b) Susceptibility of grapevine tissues to Neofusicoccum luteum conidial infection. Plant Pathol 61:719–729Google Scholar
  9. Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2014) Factors affecting Neofusicoccum luteum infection and disease progression in grapevines. Australas Plant Pathol 43:547–556Google Scholar
  10. Andolfi A, Mugnai L, Luque J, Surico G, Cimmino A, Evidente A (2011) Phytotoxins produced by fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases. Toxins 3:1569–1605PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Angulo-Romero J, Mediavilla-Molina A, Domínguez-Vilches E (1999) Conidia of Alternaria in the atmosphere of the city of Coroba, Spain in relation to meteorological paramaters. Int J Biometeorol 43:45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Aroca A, Gramaje D, Armengol J, García-Jiménez J, Raposo R (2010) Evaluation of the grapevine nursery propagation process as a source of Phaeoacremonium spp. and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and occurrence of trunk disease pathogens in rootstock mother vines in Spain. Eur J Plant Pathol 126:165–174Google Scholar
  13. Aylor DE (1998) The aerobiology of apple scab. Plant Dis 82:838–849Google Scholar
  14. Ayres M, Billones-Baaijens R, Savocchia S, Scott E, Sosnowski M (2016) Susceptibility of pruning wounds to grapevine trunk disease pathogens. Wine Vitic J 31:48–50Google Scholar
  15. Ayres M, Billones-Baaijens R, Savocchia S, Scott E, Sosnowski M (2017) Critical timing for application of pruning wound protectants for control of grapevine trunk diseases. Wine Vitic J 32:38–41Google Scholar
  16. Baskarathevan J, Jaspers MV, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ (2012a) Incidence and distribution of botryosphaeriaceous species in New Zealand vineyards. Eur J Plant Pathol 132:549–560Google Scholar
  17. Baskarathevan J, Jaspers MV, Jones EE, Cruickshank RH, Ridgway HJ (2012b) Genetic and pathogenic diversity of Neofusicoccum parvum in New Zealand vineyards. Fungal Biol 116:276–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baskarathevan J, Jaspers MV, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ (2013) Development of isolate-specific markers for Neofusicoccum parvum and N. luteum and their use to study rainwater splash dispersal in the vineyard. Plant Pathol 62:501–509Google Scholar
  19. Billones RG, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE, Jaspers MV (2010) First report of Neofusicoccum macroclavatum as a canker pathogen of grapevine in New Zealand. Plant Dis 94:1504Google Scholar
  20. Billones-Baaijens R (2011) Botryosphaeria infections in New Zealand Grapevine nurseries: Sources of inoculum and infection pathways. Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln University, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  21. Billones-Baaijens R, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE, Cruickshank RH, Jaspers MV (2013a) Prevalence and distribution of Botryosphaeriaceae species in New Zealand grapevine nurseries. Eur J Plant Pathol 135:175–185Google Scholar
  22. Billones-Baaijens R, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE, Jaspers MV (2013b) Inoculum sources of Botryosphaeriaceae species in New Zealand grapevine nurseries. Eur J Plant Pathol 135:159–174Google Scholar
  23. Billones-Baaijens R, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2013c) Virulence affected by assay parameters during grapevine pathogenicity studies with Botryosphaeriaceae nursery isolates. Plant Pathol 62:1214–1225Google Scholar
  24. Billones-Baaijens R, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2014) Susceptibility of common rootstock and scion grapevine varieties to Botryosphaeriaceae species. Australas Plant Pathol 43:25–31Google Scholar
  25. Billones-Baaijens R, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE, Jaspers MV (2015a) Spatial distribution of Neofusicoccum species within a rootstock mothervine indicates potential infection pathways. Eur Plant Pathol J 141:267–279Google Scholar
  26. Billones-Baaijens R, Jaspers M, Allard A, Hong Y, Ridgway H, Jones E (2015b) Management of Botryosphaeriaceae species infection in grapevine propagation materials. Phytopathol Mediterr 54:355–367Google Scholar
  27. Billones-Baaijens R, Ayers M, Savocchia S, Sosnowski M (2017) Monitoring inoculum dispersal by grapevine trunk disease pathogens using spore traps. Wine Vitic J 32:46–50Google Scholar
  28. Billones-Baaijens R, Úrbez-Torres JR, Liu M, Ayres M, Sosnowski M, Savocchia S (2018) Molecular methods to detect and quantify Botryosphaeriaceae inocula associated with grapevine dieback in Australia. Plant Dis.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-17-1854-RE
  29. Bleach C, Jones E, Ridgway H, Jaspers M (2013) Hot water treatment to reduce incidence of black foot pathogens in young grapevines grown in cool climates. Phytopathol Mediterr 52:347–358Google Scholar
  30. Bonfiglioli R, McGregor S (2006) The Botryosphaeria conundrum – a New Zealand perspective. Aust New Zealand Grapegrower Winemaker 512:49–53Google Scholar
  31. Burgess TI, Barber PA, Hardy SJ,GE (2005) Botryosphaeria spp. associated with eucalypts in Western Australia, including the description of Fusicoccum macroclavatum sp. nov. Australas Plant Pathol 34:557–567Google Scholar
  32. Carter MV (1994) Eutypa Dieback. P. 32–34. In: Compendium of Grape Disease. R. C. Pearson and A. C. Goheen eds. APS press, St PaulsGoogle Scholar
  33. Castillo-Pando M, Somers A, Green CD, Priest M, Sriskanthades M (2001) Fungi associated with dieback of Semillon grapevines in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales. Australas Plant Pathol 30:59–63Google Scholar
  34. Correia KC, Câmara MPS, Barbosa MAG, Sales RJ, Agustí-Brisach C, Gramaje D, León M, García-Jiménez J, Abad-Campos P, Armengol J, Michereff SJ (2013) Fungal trunk pathogens associated with table grape decline in northeastern Brazil. Phytopathol Mediterr 52:380–387Google Scholar
  35. Costadone L, Gubler WD (2016) Biological control of grape canker pathogens. In: Compant S, Mathieu F (eds) Biocontrol of major grapevine diseases: leading research. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 150–159Google Scholar
  36. Creaser ML, Wicks TJ (2004) Short-term effects of remedial surgery to restore productivity to Eutypa lata infected vines. Phytopathol Mediterr 43:105–107Google Scholar
  37. Edwards J, Pascoe IG (2004) Occurrence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum associated with petri disease and esca in Australian grapevines. Australas Plant Pathol 33:273–279Google Scholar
  38. Elena G, Luque J (2016) Pruning debris of grapevine as a potential inoculum source of Diplodia seriata, causal agent of Botryosphaeria dieback. Eur J Plant Pathol 144:803–810Google Scholar
  39. Elena G, Di Bella V, Armengol J, Luque J (2015) Viability of Botryosphaeriaceae species pathogenic to grapevine after hot water treatment. Phytopathol Mediterr 54:325–334Google Scholar
  40. Elena G, Garcia-Figueres F, Reigada S, Luque J (2015) Intraspecific variation in isolates occurring on grapevines in Spain. Plant Pathology 64:680-689Google Scholar
  41. Eskalen A, Gubler WD, Khan A (2001) Rootstock susceptibility to Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium spp. Phytopathol Mediterr 40:S433–S438Google Scholar
  42. Evidente A, Punzo B, Andolfi A, Cimmino A, Melck D, Luque J (2010) Lipophilic phytotoxins produced by Neofusicoccum parvum, a grapevine canker agent. Phytopathol Mediterr 49:74–79Google Scholar
  43. Fourie PH, Halleen F (2004a) Occurrence of grapevine trunk disease pathogens in rootstock mother plants in South Africa. Australas Plant Pathol 33:313–315Google Scholar
  44. Fourie PH, Halleen F (2004b) Proactive control of petri disease of grapevine through treatment of propagation material. Plant Dis 88:1241–1245Google Scholar
  45. Giménez-Jaime A, Aroca A, Raposo R, García-Jiménez J, Armengol J (2006) Occurrence of fungal pathogens associated with grapevine nurseries and the decline of young vines in Spain. J Phytopathol 154:598–602Google Scholar
  46. Graham A (2007) Hot water treatment of grapevine rootstock cuttings grown in cool climate. Phytopathol Mediterr 46:124Google Scholar
  47. Gramaje D, Armengol J (2011) Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: potential inoculum sources, detection, identification and management strategies. Plant Dis 95:1040–1055PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gramaje D, Armengol J, Salazar D, López-Cortés I, García-Jiménez J (2009) Effect of hot-water treatments above 50C on grapevine viability and survival of petri disease pathogens. Crop Prot 28:280–285Google Scholar
  49. Gramaje D, Úrbez-Torres JR, Sosnowski MR (2018) Managing grapevine trunk diseases with respect to etiology and epidemiology: current strategies and future prospects. Plant Dis 102:12–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Halleen F, Fourie PH (2016) An integrated strategy for the proactive management of grapevine trunk disease pathogen infections in grapevine nurseries. S Afr J Enol Vitic 37:104–114Google Scholar
  51. Halleen F, Fourie PH, Crous PW (2007) Control of black foot disease in grapevine nurseries. Plant Pathol 56:637–645Google Scholar
  52. Highet A, Wicks T (1998) The incidence of Eutypa dieback in south Australian vineyards. Annual technical issue. Aust Grape Grower Winemaker 414:135–136Google Scholar
  53. Jaspers MV, Bleach CM, Harvey IC (2007) Susceptibility of grapevine rootstocks to Cylindrocarpon disease. Phytopathol Mediterr 46:114Google Scholar
  54. Kuntzmann P, Villaume S, Bertsch C (2009) Conidia dispersal of Diplodia species in a French vineyard. Phytopathol Mediterr 48:150–154Google Scholar
  55. Larignon P, Dubos B (2001) The villainy of black dead arm. Wines Vines 82:86–89Google Scholar
  56. Larignon P, Fulchic R, Cere L, Dubos B (2001) Observation on black dead arm in French vineyards. Phytopathol Mediterr 40:S336–S342Google Scholar
  57. Leavitt GM (1990) The occurrence, distribution, effects and control of Botryodiplodia theobromae on Vitis vinifera in California, Arizona and northern Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  58. Lecomte P, Darrieutort G, Liminana JM, Comont G, Muruamendiaraz A, Legorburu FJ, Choueiri E, Jreijiri F, Amil RE, Fermaud M (2012) New insights into esca of grapevine: the development of foliar symptoms and their association with xylem discoloration. Plant Dis 96:924–934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Luque J, Elena G, Garcia-Figueres F, Reyes J, Barrios J, Legorburu FJ (2014) Natural infections of pruning wounds by fungal trunk pathogens in mature grapevines in Catalonia (Northeast Spain). Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 20:134-143Google Scholar
  60. Marchi G (2001) Susceptibility to esca of various grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivars grafted on different rootstocks in a vineyard in the province of Siena (Italy). Phytopathol Mediterr 40:27–36Google Scholar
  61. Martos S, Andolfi A, Luque J, Mugnai L, Surico G, Evidente A (2008) Production of phytotoxic metabolites by five species of Botryosphaeriaceae causing decline on grapevines, with special interest in the species Neofusicoccum luteum and N. parvum. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:451–461Google Scholar
  62. Mounier E, Boulisset F, Cortes F, Cadiou M, Dubournet P, Pajot E (2016) Esquive® WP limits development of grapevine trunk diseases and safeguards the production potential of vineyards. In: Compant S, Mathieu F (eds) Biocontrol of major grapevine diseases: leading research. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 150–159Google Scholar
  63. New Zealand Winegrowers (2017a) New Zealand Wine Growers Vineyard Spray Schedule 2017/2018Google Scholar
  64. New Zealand Winegrowers (2017b) Annu Rep 2017 https://www.nzwine.com/en/news-media/statistics-reports/new-zealand-winegrowers-annual-report/ (accessed 01/03/2018)
  65. New Zealand Winegrowers (2017c) Grafted Grapevine Standard 3.1, https://www.nzwine.com/en/sustainability/biosecurity/grafted-grape-standard/ (accessed 28/02/2018)
  66. Niem J, Billones-Baaijens R, Savocchia S (2017) Exploring endophytic bacteria as potential biocontrol agents against grapevine trunk disease pathogens. Phytopathol Mediterr 56:564Google Scholar
  67. Pascoe I, Cottral E (2000) Developments in grapevine trunk diseases research in Australia. Phytopathol Mediterr 39:68–75Google Scholar
  68. Pennycook SR, Samuels GJ (1985) Botryosphaeria and Fusicoccum species associated with ripe fruit rot of Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit) in New Zealand. Mycotaxon 24:445–458Google Scholar
  69. Phillips AJL (2002) Botryosphaeria species associated with diseases of grapevines in Portugal. Phytopathol Mediterr 41:3–18Google Scholar
  70. Pitt WM, Huang R, Steel CC, Savocchia S (2010) Identification, distribution and current taxonomy of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with grapevine decline in New South Wales and South Australia. Aust J Grape Wine Res 16:258–271Google Scholar
  71. Pitt W, Sosnowski MR, Huang R, Qiu Y, Steel CC, Savocchia S (2012) Evaluation of fungicides for the management of Botryosphaeria canker of grapevines. Plant Dis 96:1303–1308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Pitt WM, Huang R, Steel CC, Savocchia S (2013a) Pathogenicity and epidemiology of Botryosphaeriaceae species isolated from grapevines in Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 42:573–582Google Scholar
  73. Pitt WM, Úrbez-Torres JR, Trouillas FP (2013b) Dothiorella vidmadera, a novel species from grapevines in Australia and notes on Spencermartinsia. Fungal Divers 61:209–219Google Scholar
  74. Qiu Y, Steel CC, Ash GJ, Savocchia S (2011) Survey of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with grapevine decline in the Hunter Valley and Mudgee grape growing regions of New South Wales. Australas Plant Pathol 40:1–11Google Scholar
  75. Qiu Y, Steel CC, Ash GJ, Savocchia S (2015) Hierarchical genetic variation of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with decline and dieback of grapevine in South-Eastern Australia. Aust J Grape Wine Res 21:458–467Google Scholar
  76. Qiu Y, Steel CC, Ash GJ, Savocchia S (2016) Effects of temperature and water stress on the virulence of Botryosphaeriaceae spp. causing dieback of grapevines and their predicted distribution using CLIMEX in Australia. Acta Hortic 1115:171–181Google Scholar
  77. Reis P, Magnin-Robert M, Nascimento T, Spagnolo A, Abou-Mansour E, Fioretti C, Clément C, Rego C, Fontaine F (2016) Reproducing Botryosphaeria dieback foliar symptoms in simple model system. Plant Dis 100:1071–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Reveglia P, Savocchia S, Billones-Baaijens R, Masi M, Evidente A (2018a) Spencertoxin and spencer acid, new phytotoxic derivatives of diacrylic acid and dipyridinbutan-1, 4-diol produced by Spencermartinsia viticola, a causal agent of grapevine Botryosphaeria dieback in Australia. Arab J Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.01.014
  79. Reveglia P, Savocchia S, Billones-Baaijens R, Cimmino A, Evidente A (2018b) Isolation of phytotoxic phenols and characterization of a new 5-Hydroxymethyl-2-isopropoxyphenol from Dothiorella vidmadera, a causal agent of grapevine trunk disease. J Agric Food Chem 66:1760–1764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ridgway HJ, Amponsah NT, Brown DS, Baskarathevan J, Jones EE, Jaspers MV (2011) Detection of botryosphaeriaceous species in environmental samples using a multi-species primer pair. Plant Pathol 60:1118–1127Google Scholar
  81. Rolshausen PE, Greve LC, Labavitch JM, Mahoney NE, Molyneux RJ, Gubler WD (2008) Pathogenesis of Eutypa lata in grapevine: identification of virulence factors and biochemical characterization of cordon dieback. Phytopathology 98:222–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Savocchia S, Laurent EN, Stodart BJ, Steel C (2005) Botryosphaeria canker and sensitivity to fungicides in vitro. Proc 43rd annual Congr south African Society for Plant Pathology, 23–26 January 2005, Hartenbos, South Africa, p. 88Google Scholar
  83. Savocchia S, Steel CC, Stodart BJ, Somers A (2007) Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species isolated from declining grapevines in sub-tropical regions of eastern Australia. Vitis 46:27–32Google Scholar
  84. Savocchia S, Billones-Baaijens R, Ayres MR, Sosnowski MR (2017) Remedial surgery for the management of Botryosphaeria dieback. Phytopathol Mediterr 56:582–583Google Scholar
  85. Scholefield P, Morison J (2010) Assessment of economic cost of Endemic Pests & Diseases on the Australian Grape & Wine Industry. Final report to the Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation, GWRDC project GWR 08/04. https://www.wineaustralia.com/getmedia/3ca22df5-54be-4c82-a711-bcf8d00ed698/GWR-08-04 (Accessed 11/3/2018)
  86. Serra S, Mannoni MA, Ligios V (2008) Studies on the susceptibility of pruning wounds to infection by fungi involved in grapevine wood diseases in Italy. Phytopathol Mediterr 47:234–246Google Scholar
  87. Shafi A, Jaspers MV, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE (2015) Splash dispersal of Botryosphaeriaceae species in Marlborough vineyards. New Zealand Plant Protection 68:448Google Scholar
  88. Shafi A, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV, Jones EE (2017) Conidial production of Botryosphaeriaceae species from grapevine shoot lesions in Marlborough vineyards. New Zealand Plant Protection 70:295–300Google Scholar
  89. Siebert JB (2001) Eutypa: the economic toll on vineyards. Wines and Vines April, 50–56Google Scholar
  90. Slippers B, Wingfield MJ (2007) Botryosphaeriaceae as endophytes and latent pathogens of woody plants: diversity, ecology and impact. Fungal Biol Rev 21:90–106Google Scholar
  91. Sosnowski MR, Wicks TJ, Scott ES (2011) Control of Eutypa dieback in grapevines using remedial surgery. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:S277–S284Google Scholar
  92. Sosnowski M, Ayres M, and Savocchia S (2013) Queensland grapevine trunk disease survey and workshops. http://qwia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Qld-survey_workshop-report-Nov-2013_final.pdf
  93. Sosnowski M, Ayres M, Scott E (2016a) The influence of water deficit on grapevine trunk disease. Wine Vitic J 31:46–50Google Scholar
  94. Sosnowski M, Ayres M, McCarthy M, Wicks T, Scott E (2016b) Investigating potential for resistance to grapevine trunk diseases. Wine Vitic J 31:41–45Google Scholar
  95. Spagnolo A, Marchi G, Peduto F, Phillips AJL, Surico G (2011) Detection of Botryosphaeriaceae species within grapevine woody tissues by nested PCR, with particular emphasis on the Neofusicoccum parvum/N. ribis complex. Eur J Plant Pathol 129:485–500Google Scholar
  96. Standards Australia (2013). Grapevine propagation material. SAI Global Limited, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  97. Tan YP, Shivas RG, Marney TS, Edwards J, Dearnaley J, Jami F, Burgess T (2018) Australian cultures of Botryosphaeriaceae held in Queensland and Victoria plant pathology herbaria revisited. Australas Plant Pathol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-018-0559-7
  98. Taylor A, St. J Hardy GE, Wood P, Burgess T (2005) Identification and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species associated with grapevine decline in Western Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 34:187–195Google Scholar
  99. The Australian Wine Research Institute Ltd (2017). Agrochemicals registered for use in Australian viticulture. Accessed 28/02/2018 https://www.awri.com.au/wp-content/uploads/agrochemical_booklet.pdf
  100. Úrbez-Torres JR (2011) The status of Botryosphaeriaceae species infecting grapevines. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:S5–S45Google Scholar
  101. Úrbez-Torres JR, Gubler WD (2009) Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species isolated from grapevine cankers in California. Plant Dis 93:584–592Google Scholar
  102. Úrbez-Torres JR, Gubler WD (2011) Susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Neofusicoccum parvum. Plant Pathol 60:261–270Google Scholar
  103. Úrbez-Torres JR, Leavitt GM, Voegel TM, Gubler WD (2006) Identification and distribution of Botryosphaeria spp. associated with grapevine cankers in California. Plant Dis 90:1490–1503Google Scholar
  104. Úrbez-Torres JR, Battany M, Bettiga LJ, Gispert C, McGourty G, Roncoroni J, Smith RJ, Verdegaal P, Gubler WD (2010) Botryosphaeriaceae species spore-trapping studies in California vineyards. Plant Dis 94:717–724Google Scholar
  105. Valencia D, Torres C, Camps R, López E, Celis-Diez J, Beosain X (2015) Dissemination of Botryosphaeriaceae conidia in vineyards in the semiarid Mediterranean climate of the Valparaíso region of Chile. Phytopathol Mediterr 54:394–402Google Scholar
  106. van Niekerk JM, Calitz FJ, Halleen F, Fourie PH (2010) Temporal spore dispersal patterns of grapevine trunk pathogens in South Africa. Eur J Plant Pathol 127:375–390Google Scholar
  107. van Niekerk JM, Halleen F, Fourie PH (2011) Temporal susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to trunk pathogen infection in south African grapevines. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:S139–S150Google Scholar
  108. Waite H, May P (2005) The effects of hot water treatment, hydration and order of nursery operations on cuttings of Vitis vinifera cultivars. Phytopathol Mediterr 44:144–152Google Scholar
  109. Waite H, May P, Bossinger G (2013a) Variations in phytosanitary and other management practices in Australian grapevine nurseries. Phytopathol Mediterr 52:369–379Google Scholar
  110. Waite H, Gramaje D, Whitelaw-Weckert M, Torley P, Hardie WJ (2013b) Soaking grapevine cuttings in water: a potetial source of cross contamination by microorganisms. Phytopathol Mediterr 52:359–368Google Scholar
  111. Whitelaw-Weckert MA, Sergeeva V, Priest MJ (2006) Botryosphaeria stevensii infection of pinot noir grapevines by soil-root transmission. Australas Plant Pathol 35:369–371Google Scholar
  112. Whitelaw-Weckert MA, Rahman L, Appleby LM, Hall A, Clark AC, Waite H, Hardie WJ (2013) Co-infection by Botryosphaeriaceae and Ilyonectria spp. fungi during propagation causes decline of young grafted grapevines. Plant Pathol 62:1226–1237Google Scholar
  113. Wicaksono WA, Jones EE, Monk J, Ridgway HJ (2016) The bacterial signature of Leptospermum scoparium (Mânuka) reveals core and accessory communities with bioactive properties. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163717
  114. Wicaksono W, Jones E, Monk J, Ridgway H (2017) Biological control of the Botryosphaeriaceae in grapevines using endophytes from Leptospermum scoparium. Phytopathol Mediterr 56:581Google Scholar
  115. Wine Australia (2013) Winegrowing Futures (Theme 2): Vine health and environment (protecting yield). Final Report to the Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation, GWRDC Project NWG 06/01. https://www.wineaustralia.com/research/search/completed-projects/nwg-06-01-%e2%80%93-theme-2 (accessed 16/03/2018)
  116. Wunderlich N, Ash GJ, Steel CC, Raman H, Savocchia S (2011a) Association of Botryosphaeriaceae grapevine trunk disease fungi with the reproductive structures of Vitis vinifera. Vitis 50:89–96Google Scholar
  117. Wunderlich N, Ash GJ, Steel CC, Raman H, Cowling A, Savocchia S (2011b) Refining the biological factors affecting virulence of Botryosphaeriaceae on grapevines. Ann Appl Biol 159:467–477Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Faculty of ScienceCharles Sturt UniversityWagga WaggaAustralia

Personalised recommendations